Sean D Young1,2, William G Cumberland3, Parvati Singh2, Thomas Coates3. 1. Departments of Emergency Medicine; and. 2. Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; and. 3. Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effectiveness of using a peer-led online community to increase HIV self-testing among Latinx and African American men who have sex with men (MSM). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Throughout 6 waves, between February 18, 2017, and January 8, 2021, 900 HIV negative and/or serostatus unknown Los Angeles-based MSM (68.9% Latinx, 16.0% African American, and 7.4% White) participated in an online 12-week HIV prevention randomized controlled trial. A total of 79 trained role models (peer leaders) were randomly assigned to participants within clusters to build trust and deliver HIV testing information on Facebook groups. Participants in control groups were assigned to groups without peer leaders. Participants were not required to respond to peer leaders or to remain group members. Participants completed self-report assessments at baseline and 12-week follow-up and could receive a free HIV self-testing kit during the study period. RESULTS: Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants were significantly more likely to accept the offer for the HIV self-testing kit (intervention 130 of 450, 29%; control 102 of 450, 22.7%; odds ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.95, P = 0.03), report having taken an HIV self-test within the past 3 months (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 2.13, P = 0.04), and report drinking fewer glasses of alcohol in an average week (P = 0.01). Effects seemed concentrated within later study waves. Study retention was greater than 93%. CONCLUSIONS: A peer-led online community seems to be an effective method of increasing HIV self-testing among MSM of color. We discuss the implications of the wave effects on public health research and policy.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effectiveness of using a peer-led online community to increase HIV self-testing among Latinx and African American men who have sex with men (MSM). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Throughout 6 waves, between February 18, 2017, and January 8, 2021, 900 HIV negative and/or serostatus unknown Los Angeles-based MSM (68.9% Latinx, 16.0% African American, and 7.4% White) participated in an online 12-week HIV prevention randomized controlled trial. A total of 79 trained role models (peer leaders) were randomly assigned to participants within clusters to build trust and deliver HIV testing information on Facebook groups. Participants in control groups were assigned to groups without peer leaders. Participants were not required to respond to peer leaders or to remain group members. Participants completed self-report assessments at baseline and 12-week follow-up and could receive a free HIV self-testing kit during the study period. RESULTS: Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants were significantly more likely to accept the offer for the HIV self-testing kit (intervention 130 of 450, 29%; control 102 of 450, 22.7%; odds ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.95, P = 0.03), report having taken an HIV self-test within the past 3 months (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 2.13, P = 0.04), and report drinking fewer glasses of alcohol in an average week (P = 0.01). Effects seemed concentrated within later study waves. Study retention was greater than 93%. CONCLUSIONS: A peer-led online community seems to be an effective method of increasing HIV self-testing among MSM of color. We discuss the implications of the wave effects on public health research and policy.
Authors: Andre Maiorana; Susan Kegeles; Percy Fernandez; Ximena Salazar; Carlos Cáceres; Clara Sandoval; Ana María Rosasco; Thomas Coates Journal: Eval Program Plann Date: 2006-12-04
Authors: J A Kelly; D A Murphy; K J Sikkema; T L McAuliffe; R A Roffman; L J Solomon; R A Winett; S C Kalichman Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Patrick S Sullivan; Anna Satcher Johnson; Elizabeth S Pembleton; Rob Stephenson; Amy C Justice; Keri N Althoff; Heather Bradley; Amanda D Castel; Alexandra M Oster; Eli S Rosenberg; Kenneth H Mayer; Chris Beyrer Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sean D Young; Ian Holloway; Devan Jaganath; Eric Rice; Drew Westmoreland; Thomas Coates Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Weiming Tang; Chongyi Wei; Bolin Cao; Dan Wu; Katherine T Li; Haidong Lu; Wei Ma; Dianmin Kang; Haochu Li; Meizhen Liao; Katie R Mollan; Michael G Hudgens; Chuncheng Liu; Wenting Huang; Aifeng Liu; Ye Zhang; M Kumi Smith; Kate M Mitchell; Jason J Ong; Hongyun Fu; Peter Vickerman; Ligang Yang; Cheng Wang; Heping Zheng; Bin Yang; Joseph D Tucker Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 11.069