| Literature DB >> 35044743 |
M Rippa1, D Sagnelli1, A Vestri1, V Marchesano1, B Munari2, D Carnicelli2, E Varrone2, M Brigotti1,2, R Tozzoli3, M Montalbano3, S Morabito1,3, J Zhou4, J Zyss1,5, L Petti1.
Abstract
The interest in the development of nanoscale plasmonic technologies has dramatically increased in recent years. The photonic properties of plasmonic nanopatterns can be controlled and tuned via their size, shape, or the arrangement of their constituents. In this work, we propose a 2D hybrid metallic polymeric nanostructure based on the octupolar framework with enhanced sensing property. We analyze its plasmonic features both numerically and experimentally, demonstrating the higher values of their relevant figures of merit: we estimated a surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) enhancement factor of 9 × 107 and a SPR bulk sensitivity of 430 nm/RIU. In addition, our nanostructure exhibits a dual resonance in the visible and near-infrared region, enabling our system toward multispectral plasmonic analysis. Finally, we illustrate our design engineering strategy as enabled by electron beam lithography by the outstanding performance of a SERS-based biosensor that targets the Shiga toxin 2a, a clinically relevant bacterial toxin. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a SERS fingerprint of this toxin has been evidenced.Entities:
Keywords: SERS; Shiga toxins; bacterial infections; nanobiosensors; octupolar nanostructure; plasmonic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35044743 PMCID: PMC8815041 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c21553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ISSN: 1944-8244 Impact factor: 9.229
Figure 1Octupolar nanostructure designed and studied: (A) scheme of the octupolar cell unit (top view) and (B) scheme of the hybrid multilayer (side view) with the link of the complex Ab + Stx2a represented.
Figure 2Analysis of the octupolar nanopattern taken into account. FDTD numerical simulations: (A) distribution of the EM x-component and (B) distribution of the Poynting vector intensity. Morphological analysis: (C) SEM image and (D) AFM image.
Figure 3Spectroscopic characterization of the hybrid nanostructure based on octupolar geometry: (A) average extinction spectra (red curve), (B) SPR peak vs refractive indices of different medium, linear fit (red line), and (C) SERS spectrum achieved for a SAM of 4-MbA molecule (red line) and the Raman spectra of 4-MbA in the bulk (blue curve), further magnified in the inset.
Figure 4SERS measurements on the Shiga toxin. Spectra of Stx2a adsorbed on the octupolar nanostructure (154 nM). The scale bar represents 2000 a.u. The spectra were smoothed using an Origin-pro 2020 using the Savitzky-Golay algorithm with seven points of window.
Tentative Assignation to the Bands of Stx2a Spectra and Shared Peaks between the Toxin Alone and the Ab + Stx2a Complex
| wavenumber cm–1 | assignation Stx2a | shared with Ab + Stx2a |
|---|---|---|
| protein S–S[ | ||
| 552 | Trp | |
| Nd | 579 | |
| ring
breathing[ | 613 | |
| Tyr ring deformation[ | ||
| ring
breathing[ | 656 | |
| C–S cysteine[ | ||
| met C–S stretching[ | ||
| Trp ring breathing[ | ||
| nd | ||
| Tyr | ||
| 856 | ring Tyr[ | |
| PBS or Trp[ | ||
| CC stretching[ | ||
| amide III[ | ||
| in-plane ring CH
def. Phe[ | ||
| Trp or Glu[ | ||
| stretching (CN)
protein[ | 1115 | |
| Phe,[ | ||
| amide III alpha
helix[ | ||
| amide III alpha
helix[ | ||
| wagging (CH2,CH3)[ | 1358 | |
| 1392 | aromatic amino
acids COO– stretching[ | |
| Trp[ | ||
| bending C=C in Phe and Tyr[ | 1616 | |
| amide I,[ | 1655 |
Figure 5SERS measurements of the Shiga toxin performed with the immunosensor. (A) Comparison between the spectra of the toxin captured by the antibody (Ab + Stx2a) achieved with three different antibody (Ab) concentrations: 5, 10, and 25 μg/mL, the scale bar represents 2000 a.u. (B) Comparison between the spectra of the Ab + Stx2a complex and the antibody alone. Two spectral bands (460–590 and 1616–1660 cm–1) highlighted in yellow correlated with the interaction between the antibody and toxin. (C) Calibration curve achieved by plotting the 1554 cm–1 peak intensity vs the toxin concentrations.