Literature DB >> 35044590

Development of a Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Whole-Body Disposition of MMAE Containing Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Mice.

Hsuan-Ping Chang1, Zhe Li1, Dhaval K Shah2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantitate and mathematically characterize the whole-body pharmacokinetics (PK) of different ADC analytes following administration of an MMAE-conjugated ADC in tumor-bearing mice.
METHODS: The PK of different ADC analytes (total antibody, total drug, unconjugated drug) was measured following administration of an MMAE-conjugated ADC in tumor-bearing mice. The PK of ADC analytes was compared with the whole-body PK of the antibody and drug obtained following administration of these molecules alone. An ADC PBPK model was developed by linking antibody PBPK model with small-molecule PBPK model, where the drug was assumed to deconjugate in DAR-dependent manner.
RESULTS: Comparison of antibody biodistribution coefficient (ABC) values for total antibody suggests that conjugation of drug did not significantly affect the PK of antibody. Comparison of tissue:plasma AUC ratio (T/P) for the conjugated drug and total antibody suggests that in certain tissues (e.g., spleen) ADC may demonstrate higher deconjugation. It was observed that the tissue distribution profile of the drug can be altered following its conjugation to antibody. For example, MMAE distribution to the liver was found to increase while its distribution to the heart was found to decrease upon conjugation to antibody. MMAE exposure in the tumor was found to increase by ~20-fold following administration as conjugate (i.e., ADC). The PBPK model was able to a priori predict the PK of all three ADC analytes in plasma, tissues, and tumor reasonably well.
CONCLUSIONS: The ADC PBPK model developed here serves as a platform for translational and clinical investigations of MMAE containing ADCs.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC); monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE); pharmacokinetics; physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model; tissue distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35044590     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-021-03162-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  58 in total

Review 1.  Current Approaches for Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion Characterization of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: An Industry White Paper.

Authors:  Eugenia Kraynov; Amrita V Kamath; Markus Walles; Edit Tarcsa; Antoine Deslandes; Ramaswamy A Iyer; Amita Datta-Mannan; Priya Sriraman; Michaela Bairlein; Johnny J Yang; Matthew Barfield; Guangqing Xiao; Enrique Escandon; Weirong Wang; Dan A Rock; Nagendra V Chemuturi; David J Moore
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 2.  Application of Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation for Antibody-Drug Conjugate Development.

Authors:  Aman P Singh; Young G Shin; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Key bioanalytical measurements for antibody-drug conjugate development: PK/PD modelers' perspective.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Frank Barletta; Alison Betts; Steven Hansel
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Bioanalysis of antibody-drug conjugates: American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Antibody-Drug Conjugate Working Group position paper.

Authors:  Boris Gorovits; Stephen C Alley; Sanela Bilic; Brian Booth; Surinder Kaur; Phillip Oldfield; Shobha Purushothama; Chetana Rao; Stacy Shord; Patricia Siguenza
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  A priori prediction of tumor payload concentrations: preclinical case study with an auristatin-based anti-5T4 antibody-drug conjugate.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Lindsay E King; Xiaogang Han; Jo-Ann Wentland; Yanhua Zhang; Judy Lucas; Nahor Haddish-Berhane; Alison Betts; Mauricio Leal
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 6.  Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer.

Authors:  Cindy H Chau; Patricia S Steeg; William D Figg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  An integrated approach to identify normal tissue expression of targets for antibody-drug conjugates: case study of TENB2.

Authors:  C Andrew Boswell; Eduardo E Mundo; Ron Firestein; Crystal Zhang; Weiguang Mao; Herman Gill; Cynthia Young; Nina Ljumanovic; Shannon Stainton; Sheila Ulufatu; Aimee Fourie; Katherine R Kozak; Reina Fuji; Paul Polakis; Leslie A Khawli; Kedan Lin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Bioanalytical assay strategies for the development of antibody-drug conjugate biotherapeutics.

Authors:  Surinder Kaur; Keyang Xu; Ola M Saad; Randall C Dere; Montserrat Carrasco-Triguero
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Phase I biodistribution and pharmacokinetic study of Lewis Y-targeting immunoconjugate CMD-193 in patients with advanced epithelial cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca A Herbertson; Niall C Tebbutt; Fook-Thean Lee; David J MacFarlane; Bridget Chappell; Noel Micallef; Sze-Ting Lee; Timothy Saunder; Wendie Hopkins; Fiona E Smyth; David K Wyld; John Bellen; Daryl S Sonnichsen; Martin W Brechbiel; Carmel Murone; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Preclinical Characterization of the Distribution, Catabolism, and Elimination of a Polatuzumab Vedotin-Piiq (POLIVY®) Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Sprague Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Victor Yip; M Violet Lee; Ola M Saad; Shuguang Ma; S Cyrus Khojasteh; Ben-Quan Shen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.