| Literature DB >> 35044468 |
Ningjing Chen1, Daniel Yee Tak Fong1, Janet Yuen Ha Wong1.
Abstract
Importance: It is hard for policy makers and health professionals to develop musculoskeletal rehabilitation strategies because secular trends for musculoskeletal rehabilitation by region and country remain unknown. Objective: To evaluate the secular trends in global musculoskeletal rehabilitation needs by sex, age, region, country, and health condition. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included data from 191 countries and territories from the World Health Organization Rehabilitation Need Estimator between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2019. Data analyses were performed from February to May 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence and years lived with disability (YLDs) of musculoskeletal disorders in need of rehabilitation, overall and by sex, age, region, country, and health condition. Trends in rehabilitation needs were evaluated by the estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) in age-standardized rates. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the associations between EAPCs and the age-standardized rates in 1990. The associations between the age-standardized rates and universal health coverage (UHC) effective coverage index were assessed by fitting a restricted cubic spline in a linear model.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35044468 PMCID: PMC8771302 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA Netw Open ISSN: 2574-3805
Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Needs in 2019 and Trends Between 1990 and 2019 by World Health Organization Region
| Region | Prevalence | YLDs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. (95% UI) | ASRs per 100 000 persons (95% UI) | EAPC (95% CI) | No. (95% UI) | ASRs per 100 000 persons (95% UI) | EAPC (95% CI) | |
| World Bank high-income countries | 440 888 942 (421 545 909 to 461 006 107) | 27 454.1 (26 198.7 to 28 814.1) | −0.31 (−0.33 to −0.28) | 39 796 477 (28 491 329 to 53 575 691) | 2404.6 (1722.5 to 3196.5) | −0.28 (−0.36 to −0.19) |
| Western Pacific | 426 725 952 (400 919 594 to 454 208 920) | 17 699.4 (16 670.3 to 18 824.2) | −0.06 (−0.09 to −0.03) | 37 626 387 (26 820 254 to 51 100 520) | 1557.8 (1113.6 to 2097.2) | −0.27 (−0.38 to −0.17) |
| Southeast Asia | 369 339 406 (351 639 924 to 388 490 686) | 19 107.5 (18 245.8 to 20 036.0) | −0.22 (−0.25 to −0.19) | 32 638 938 (23 537 446 to 42 986 130) | 1699.8 (1229.8 to 2238.2) | −0.41 (−0.50 to −0.31) |
| Europe | 302 298 953 (289 346 326 to 316 450 308) | 26 924.9 (25 727.8 to 28 206.2) | −0.47 (−0.50 to −0.45) | 25 137 083 (18 097 385 to 33 543 852) | 2203.7 (1580.1 to 2932.5) | −0.57 (−0.65 to −0.48) |
| Eastern Mediterranean | 118 709 853 (111 157 257 to 127 159 399) | 20 164.3 (18 985.9 to 21 498.0) | 0.02 (−0.01 to 0.05) | 10 533 856 (7 593 119 to 13 687 920) | 1801.6 (1301.4 to 2346.5) | −0.11 (−0.21 to −0.01) |
| The Americas | 226 449 897 (215 059 745 to 238 113 512) | 21 558.6 (20 464.8 to 22 666.9) | −0.14 (−0.16 to −0.11) | 18 176 795 (13 055 388 to 24 196 147) | 1728.5 (1242.8 to 2298.1) | −0.18 (−0.28 to −0.08) |
| Africa | 129 105 085 (121 518 605 to 137 027 944) | 17 474.3 (16 530.4 to 18 491.2) | −0.07 (−0.10 to −0.04) | 11 260 629 (8 105 431 to 14 865 745) | 1548.5 (1118.3 to 2050.3) | −0.09 (−0.19 to 0.02) |
Abbreviations: ASRs, age-standardized rates; EAPC, estimated annual percentage change; UI, uncertainty interval; YLDs, years lived with disability.
Figure 1. Prevalence Estimates for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Needs Worldwide
Areas shaded gray did not have available data.
Figure 2. Proportion of Prevalent Cases and Years Lived With Disability Counts of Musculoskeletal Disorders
A, Given that an individual may have more than 1 health condition, the total proportion is larger than 100%.
Figure 3. Correlations Between Estimated Annual Percentage Change and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Needs Age-Standardized Rates
The sizes of circles represent increases in the corresponding prevalent cases or YLD counts of musculoskeletal disorders in need of rehabilitation. The ρ indices and P values were derived from Pearson correlation analysis. The line and shaded area represent ρ and its 95%CI.
Figure 4. Associations Between Age-Standardized Rates and Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Effective Coverage Index in 2019
The associations were adjusted for health spending per capita, measured in 2017, and parity adjusted for 2019 purchasing power. Each point represents the observed value for each location, and the line indicates expected values. Location codes are presented in eTable 4 in the Supplement. YLD indicates years lived with disability.