Literature DB >> 35043651

Effects of mechanical ventilation versus apnea on bi-ventricular pressure-volume loop recording.

M Dam Lyhne1, C Schmidt Mortensen, J Valentin Hansen, S Juel Dragsbaek, J E Nielsen-Kudsk, A Andersen.   

Abstract

Respiration changes intrathoracic pressure and lung volumes in a cyclic manner, which affect cardiac function. Invasive ventricular pressure-volume (PV) loops can be recorded during ongoing mechanical ventilation or in transient apnea. No consensus exists considering ventilatory mode during PV loop recording. The objective of this study was to investigate the magnitude of any systematic difference of bi-ventricular PV loop variables recorded during mechanical ventilation versus apnea. PV loops were recorded simultaneously from the right ventricle and left ventricle in a closed chest porcine model during mechanical ventilation and in transient apnea (n=72). Variables were compared by regression analyses. Mechanical ventilation versus apnea affected regression coefficients for important PV variables including right ventricular stroke volume (1.22, 95% CI [1.08-1.36], p=0.003), right ventricular ejection fraction (0.90, 95% CI [0.81-1.00], p=0.043) and right ventricular arterial elastance (0.61, 95%CI [0.55-0.68], p<0.0001). Right ventricular pressures and volumes were parallelly shifted with Y-intercepts different from 0. Few left ventricular variables were affected, mainly first derivatives of pressure (dP/dt(max): 0.96, 95% CI [0.92-0.99], p=0.016, and dP/dt(min): 0.92, 95% CI [0.86-0.99], p=0.026), which might be due to decreased heart rate in apnea (Y-intercept -6.88, 95% CI [-12.22; -1.54], p=0.012). We conclude, that right ventricular stroke volume, ejection fraction and arterial elastance were mostly affected by apnea compared to mechanical ventilation. The results motivate future standardization of respiratory modality when measuring PV relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35043651      PMCID: PMC8997677          DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.934787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Res        ISSN: 0862-8408            Impact factor:   1.881


  30 in total

Review 1.  Right ventricular function and positive pressure ventilation in clinical practice: from hemodynamic subsets to respirator settings.

Authors:  François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  RV filling modulates LV function by direct ventricular interaction during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Jamie R Mitchell; William A Whitelaw; Rozsa Sas; Eldon R Smith; John V Tyberg; Israel Belenkie
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  The hemodynamic consequences of mechanical ventilation: an evolving story.

Authors:  M R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Early Development of Right Ventricular Ischemic Lesions in a Novel Large Animal Model of Acute Right Heart Failure in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  David Boulate; Jennifer Arthur Ataam; Andrew J Connolly; Genevieve Giraldeau; Myriam Amsallem; Benoit Decante; Lilia Lamrani; Elie Fadel; Peter Dorfmuller; Frederic Perros; Francois Haddad; Olaf Mercier
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Right ventricular adaptation in the critical phase after acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Mads Dam Lyhne; Jacob Gammelgaard Schultz; Anders Kramer; Christian Schmidt Mortensen; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Asger Andersen
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2020-05-21

Review 6.  Guidelines for the measurement of vascular function and structure in isolated arteries and veins.

Authors:  Camilla F Wenceslau; Cameron G McCarthy; Scott Earley; Sarah K England; Jessica A Filosa; Styliani Goulopoulou; David D Gutterman; Brant E Isakson; Nancy L Kanagy; Luis A Martinez-Lemus; Swapnil K Sonkusare; Pratish Thakore; Aaron J Trask; Stephanie W Watts; R Clinton Webb
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.125

Review 7.  Clinical review: Positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output.

Authors:  Thomas Luecke; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Increased stiffness is the major early abnormality in a pig model of severe aortic stenosis and predisposes to congestive heart failure in the absence of systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Kiyotake Ishikawa; Jaume Aguero; Jae Gyun Oh; Nadjib Hammoudi; Lauren A Fish; Lauren Leonardson; Belén Picatoste; Carlos G Santos-Gallego; Kenneth M Fish; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Guidelines for measuring cardiac physiology in mice.

Authors:  Merry L Lindsey; Zamaneh Kassiri; Jitka A I Virag; Lisandra E de Castro Brás; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Ventriculo-arterial coupling detects occult RV dysfunction in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary vascular disease.

Authors:  Richard G Axell; Simon J Messer; Paul A White; Colm McCabe; Andrew Priest; Thaleia Statopoulou; Maja Drozdzynska; Jamie Viscasillas; Elizabeth C Hinchy; James Hampton-Till; Hatim I Alibhai; Nicholas Morrell; Joanna Pepke-Zaba; Stephen R Large; Stephen P Hoole
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.