Literature DB >> 35043358

U-net Models Based on Computed Tomography Perfusion Predict Tissue Outcome in Patients with Different Reperfusion Patterns.

Yaode He1, Zhongyu Luo1, Ying Zhou1, Rui Xue1, Jiaping Li1, Haitao Hu1, Shenqiang Yan1, Zhicai Chen1, Jianan Wang1, Min Lou2.   

Abstract

Evaluation of cerebral perfusion is important for treatment selection in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). To assess ischemic core and tissue at risk more accurately, we developed a deep learning model named U-net using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) images. A total of 110 acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment with major reperfusion (≥ 80%) or minimal reperfusion (≤ 20%) were included. Using baseline CTP, we developed two U-net models: one model in major reperfusion group to identify infarct core; the other in minimal reperfusion group to identify tissue at risk. The performance of fixed-thresholding methods was compared with that of U-net models. In the major reperfusion group, the model estimated infarct core with a Dice score coefficient (DSC) of 0.61 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92, while fixed-thresholding methods had a DSC of 0.52. In the minimal reperfusion group, the model estimated tissue at risk with a DSC of 0.67 and an AUC of 0.93, while fixed-thresholding methods had a DSC of 0.51. In both groups, excellent volumetric consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.951 in major reperfusion and 0.746 in minimal reperfusion) was achieved between the estimated lesion and the actual lesion volume. Thus, in patients with anterior LVO, the CTP-based U-net models were able to identify infarct core and tissue at risk on baseline CTP superior to fixed-thresholding methods, providing individualized prediction of final lesion in patients with different reperfusion patterns.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute ischemic stroke; Computed tomographic perfusion; Deep learning; Endovascular therapy; Reperfusion patterns

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35043358     DOI: 10.1007/s12975-022-00986-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Stroke Res        ISSN: 1868-4483            Impact factor:   6.800


  26 in total

1.  Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core.

Authors:  Bruce C V Campbell; Søren Christensen; Christopher R Levi; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Mark W Parsons
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Gregory W Albers; Michael P Marks; Stephanie Kemp; Soren Christensen; Jenny P Tsai; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Ryan A McTaggart; Michel T Torbey; May Kim-Tenser; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Amrou Sarraj; Scott E Kasner; Sameer A Ansari; Sharon D Yeatts; Scott Hamilton; Michael Mlynash; Jeremy J Heit; Greg Zaharchuk; Sun Kim; Janice Carrozzella; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Roland Bammer; Philip W Lavori; Joseph P Broderick; Maarten G Lansberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.

Authors:  Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Fully automated stroke tissue estimation using random forest classifiers (FASTER).

Authors:  Richard McKinley; Levin Häni; Jan Gralla; M El-Koussy; S Bauer; M Arnold; U Fischer; S Jung; Kaspar Mattmann; Mauricio Reyes; Roland Wiest
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials.

Authors:  Mayank Goyal; Bijoy K Menon; Wim H van Zwam; Diederik W J Dippel; Peter J Mitchell; Andrew M Demchuk; Antoni Dávalos; Charles B L M Majoie; Aad van der Lugt; Maria A de Miquel; Geoffrey A Donnan; Yvo B W E M Roos; Alain Bonafe; Reza Jahan; Hans-Christoph Diener; Lucie A van den Berg; Elad I Levy; Olvert A Berkhemer; Vitor M Pereira; Jeremy Rempel; Mònica Millán; Stephen M Davis; Daniel Roy; John Thornton; Luis San Román; Marc Ribó; Debbie Beumer; Bruce Stouch; Scott Brown; Bruce C V Campbell; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Jeffrey L Saver; Michael D Hill; Tudor G Jovin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Indications for the Performance of Intracranial Endovascular Neurointerventional Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Clifford J Eskey; Philip M Meyers; Thanh N Nguyen; Sameer A Ansari; Mahesh Jayaraman; Cameron G McDougall; J Kevin DeMarco; William A Gray; David C Hess; Randall T Higashida; Dilip K Pandey; Constantino Peña; Hermann C Schumacher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Predicting tissue outcome from acute stroke magnetic resonance imaging: improving model performance by optimal sampling of training data.

Authors:  Kristjana Yr Jonsdottir; Leif Østergaard; Kim Mouridsen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Comparison of Perfusion CT Software to Predict the Final Infarct Volume After Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Friederike Austein; Christian Riedel; Tina Kerby; Johannes Meyne; Andreas Binder; Thomas Lindner; Monika Huhndorf; Fritz Wodarg; Olav Jansen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Aad van der Lugt; Bijoy K Menon; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W Dippel; Bruce C Campbell; Raul G Nogueira; Andrew M Demchuk; Alejandro Tomasello; Pere Cardona; Thomas G Devlin; Donald F Frei; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Olvert A Berkhemer; Tudor G Jovin; Adnan H Siddiqui; Wim H van Zwam; Stephen M Davis; Carlos Castaño; Biggya L Sapkota; Puck S Fransen; Carlos Molina; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Ángel Chamorro; Hester Lingsma; Frank L Silver; Geoffrey A Donnan; Ashfaq Shuaib; Scott Brown; Bruce Stouch; Peter J Mitchell; Antoni Davalos; Yvo B W E M Roos; Michael D Hill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Optimal Tmax threshold for predicting penumbral tissue in acute stroke.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Olivot; Michael Mlynash; Vincent N Thijs; Stephanie Kemp; Maarten G Lansberg; Lawrence Wechsler; Roland Bammer; Michael P Marks; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  1 in total

1.  Performance of Machine Learning for Tissue Outcome Prediction in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinrui Wang; Yiming Fan; Nan Zhang; Jing Li; Yang Duan; Benqiang Yang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.