| Literature DB >> 35042709 |
Mitch M Matoga1,2, Mina C Hosseinipour3,4, Sara Jewett5, Charles Chasela2,6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is one of the key interventions for HIV prevention. However, its uptake among men in Malawi is low. Implementation science strategies for demand creation of VMMC increase uptake. We designed an implementation science demand-creation intervention to increase the uptake of VMMC among men with sexually transmitted infections (STIs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a pragmatic pre-interventional and post-interventional quasi-experimental study combined with a prospective observational design to determine the uptake, acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of a multifaceted intervention for scale up of uptake of VMMC among men with STIs at Bwaila STI clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi. The intervention includes transport reimbursement (R), intensified health education (I) and short messaging service (SMS)/telephonic tracing (Te) (RITe). The intervention will be implemented in phases: pre-implementation and implementation. Pre-implementation phase will be used for collecting baseline data, while the RITe intervention will be rolled-out in the implementation phase. The RITe intervention will be implemented in a sequential and incremental manner called implementation blocks: block 1: intensified health education; block 2: intensified health education and SMS/telephonic tracing; and block 3: intensified health education, SMS/telephonic tracing and transport reimbursement. The target sample size is 80 uncircumcised men for each intervention block, including the pre-implementation sample, making a total of 320 men (280 total, 70 per block will be surveyed). The primary outcome is uptake of VMMC during the implementation period. Mixed methods assessments will be conducted to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the RITe intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Malawi's National Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 19/10/2412), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Institutional Review Board (approval number: 19-2559) and University of the Witwatersrand's Health Research Ethics Committee (approval number: M200328). Results will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at relevant scientific conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04677374. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: HIV & AIDS; epidemiology; public health; sexual medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35042709 PMCID: PMC8768936 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Overview of study phases, stages and intervention roll-out.
Figure 2Conceptual framework for increasing uptake of VMMC. STI, sexually transmitted infection; VMMC, voluntary medical male circumcision.
Description of procedures and assessments by objective
| Assessment | Description | Participants | Sample size |
| Objective 1: to compare uptake within 30 days and time to uptake of VMMC between the RITe intervention and the standard of care | |||
| Uptake of VMMC | The number of uncircumcised men who will undergo VMMC within 30 days from the date offered | Men aged ≥18 years | 320 men (80 in each implementation block) |
| Time to uptake of VMMC | The number of days from the date offered to date received circumcision | Men aged ≥18 years | 320 men (80 in each implementation block) |
| Objective 2: to assess factors associated with uptake of VMMC | |||
| Factors associated with uptake of VMMC | Demographic, sexual, HIV and clinical factors affecting uptake of VMMC | Men aged ≥18 years | 320 men (80 in each implementation block) |
| Objective 3: to assess the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the RITe intervention | |||
| Acceptability | Assessment will be through AIM Likert scale survey, IDIs and FGDs | Men aged ≥18 years (surveys and FGDs) | 70 men for the surveys. 6–10 men for the FGDs |
| Appropriateness | Assessment will be through IAM Likert scale survey, IDIs and FGDs | Men aged ≥18 years (surveys and FGDs) | 70 men for the surveys. 6–10 men for the FGDs |
| Feasibility | Assessment will be through FIM Likert scale survey, IDIs and FGDs | Men aged ≥18 years (surveys and FGDs) | 70 men for the surveys. 6–10 men for the FGDs |
AIM, acceptability of intervention measure; FGDs, focus group discussions; FIM, feasibility of intervention measure; HCWs, healthcare workers; IAM, intervention appropriateness measure; IDIs, in-depth interviews; RITe, transport reimbursement (R), intensified health education (I) and SMS/telephonic tracing (Te); STI, sexually transmitted infection; VMMC, voluntary medical male circumcision.