Literature DB >> 35042646

Understanding COVID-19 vaccination willingness among youth: A survey study in the Netherlands.

Saskia Euser1, Floor M Kroese2, Mare Derks3, Marijn de Bruin4.   

Abstract

Vaccination of youth could be key to preventing future outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2. Given the limited direct health benefit for young people, it is important to understand how youth themselves perceive obtaining a vaccination. This survey study in a representative sample of Dutch youth aged 12-18 showed that 73% were willing to get vaccinated against COVID-19. In regression analyses, vaccination willingness was strongly related to age, perceived personal (protect own health) and societal benefits (to get rid of restrictive policies), and their peers' and parents' vaccination uptake. Negative associations with vaccination willingness were perceived side-effects and potential unknown long term consequences. On-going and transparent communication with up-to-date information about safety and risks, delivered by independent and trusted experts (as perceived by the recipients) seems important for addressing questions and concerns. Local information sessions for youth and parents where a vaccination can be obtained without appointment could have merit in addition to mass media communication.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Vaccination beliefs; Vaccination intention; Youth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35042646      PMCID: PMC8730787          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


Background

On June 30, the Dutch health council advised to vaccinate healthy youth against COVID-19 with the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine, which was reason for the Dutch government to start vaccinating healthy Dutch youth (12–18 years old). In the week prior to the Dutch health council advice, we conducted a study on vaccination willingness amongst 12–18 year old Dutch youth, which we report on in this short communication. In addition, we examined demographic factors, personal beliefs and social norms that could be related to vaccination willingness in this age group. Understanding vaccination willingness and perceptions is key to informing policies and communication to support vaccination uptake.

Material and methods

The Corona Behavioural Unit at the Dutch Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) designed the study, using two youth panels from a Dutch survey company. These were designed to be demographically representative for the Dutch youth. A brief questionnaire was sent by e-mail directly to 16-and-17-year-old panel members and to the parents of 12–15-year-olds. Parents were requested to let their children independently fill out the questionnaire. The questionnaire could be completed between June 22 and June 27, 2021. The questionnaire includes questions on their vaccination willingness, vaccination willingness among parents and peers, and on specific reasons in favor or against vaccination. In addition, children responded to several vaccination beliefs on a 5-point scale (completely agree-completely disagree; see below). As introduction, children were informed that vaccination is voluntary and they were informed about safety, efficacy and potential side effects of the vaccine. A total of 1468 children participated in the study (5478 were invited: response rate 27%), of which three children were excluded from analyses because of unreliable response patterns (i.e., identical responses to all questions). Characteristics of the final sample are shown in Table 1 . Participants were informed about the aims and procedure of the study in the invitation e-mail for the study, and provided informed consent by starting the questionnaire.
Table 1

Sample characteristics (n = 1465).

Age (M=14.8; SD = 1.7)
60% 12–15 years old
40% 16–17 years old
Gender
48% boys
52% girls
1% different/unknown
Educational level
19% low
24% middle
57% high
Minority background
96% Dutch as main language at home
Previous COVID-19 infection
21% yes
Sample characteristics (n = 1465).

Results

Vaccination intention among 12–18-year-old youth

The majority of the participants (73%) indicated they would probably (27%) or certainly (46%) get vaccinated if they would be offered a vaccine. Seven percent was hesitant and 20% indicated they would not get vaccinated (9% certainly not, 10% probably not). Vaccination intention was comparable when data were weighted on age, gender and educational level to match the Dutch population (72% probably or certainly willing). Vaccination intention was higher amongst older youth (80% for 16–17-year-olds vs. 68% for 12–15-year-olds) and amongst youth with a higher educational level (78% high educational level vs. 64% for low educational level). No differences were found between boys and girls.

Explaining vaccination intention

Based on the literature and our previous research in adults (16 years and older), which includes questionnaire studies and qualitative interviews [1], [2], we assessed a number of vaccination beliefs. We were interested in beliefs about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines and social influence from parents and peers. First, it is likely that the vaccination intention of youth is dependent upon the vaccination behavior or intention of their parents [3]. Indeed, nearly all parents (93%) from youth who expressed willingness to vaccinate were (willing to get) vaccinated themselves, compared to only 39% of parents from youth who were (probably) not willing to vaccinate. In light of these findings, it should be noted that in the Netherlands, children over 16 can make their own choices about vaccination, whereas children between 12 and 16 years old decide together with their parents. The descriptives for other vaccination beliefs are shown in Fig. 1 , separately for youth willing, hesitant, and not willing to vaccinate. Specific reasons why youth were or were not willing to vaccinate are given in Table 2 . The most frequently-mentioned reasons to vaccinate were to protect themselves (81%) and to protect others (79%) against COVID-19, and the most frequently-mentioned reason for not getting vaccinated was fear of unknown long-term side effects (73%).
Fig. 1

Descriptives of vaccination beliefs, separately for youth who are willing, hesitant or not willing to get the vaccine.

Table 2

Reasons contributing to vaccination intention, separately for youth who are willing to get vaccinated or do not know whether they want to get vaccinated (positive intention) and youth who are not willing to get vaccinated or do not know (negative intention).

Reasons contributing to..
...positive vaccination intentionWilling (n = 1071)Hesitant (n = 107)
I want to protect myself81%41%
I want to protect others79%40%
I want to help ending the corona crisis67%42%
I want to go on vacation abroad without testing for corona52%44%
I want to go to an event without testing for corona42%33%
I no longer want to keep distance from others40%25%
My parents want me to get vaccinated23%11%
I want to do what is best according to the government13%7%
Other2%8%
...negative vaccination intentionNot willing (n = 287)Hesitant (n = 107)
I am afraid of unknown long-term effects of the vaccine73%56%
I do not know enough about the vaccine yet38%45%
I am afraid of side effects38%41%
I do not think I will get sick of the coronavirus38%24%
I think the vaccines are not safe33%10%
All vulnerable people have already been vaccinated30%15%
My parents do not want me to get vaccinated17%3%
I think the vaccines are not effective15%6%
I am afraid of needles14%17%
I do not think I will get infected with the coronavirus13%8%
Other10%7%
Descriptives of vaccination beliefs, separately for youth who are willing, hesitant or not willing to get the vaccine. Reasons contributing to vaccination intention, separately for youth who are willing to get vaccinated or do not know whether they want to get vaccinated (positive intention) and youth who are not willing to get vaccinated or do not know (negative intention). In order to statistically examine the beliefs most important for a positive vaccination intention, we conducted two logistic regression analyses with the following binary outcomes: 1) not willing (0) versus willing (1), and 2) hesitant (0) versus willing (1). The first regression analysis (see Table 3 ), showed that 16–17-year-olds were more often willing to get vaccinated compared to 12–15-year-olds. Also, youth with a higher educational level were more often willing to get vaccinated. Youth more willing to get vaccinated, more often believed that the vaccine protects their health, that the vaccines are safe, and that vaccinating helps ending the corona crisis. They were less often afraid of side effects. Youth more willing to get vaccinated more often thought their friends would get a vaccine and that their parents would expect them to get a vaccine. Comparable associations were found when comparing youth who are hesitant to get vaccinated and youth who are more willing to get a vaccine. The only difference was that youth who are willing (compared with hesitant), more often believed that the vaccine protects the health of others in their environment, and more often thought it is important to follow guidelines from the government.
Table 3

Determinants of vaccination intention for youth who are probably or certainly not willing compared to youth probably or certainly willing to vaccinate (Model 1) and for youth who are hesitant compared to youth who are probably or certainly willing to vaccinate (Model 2).

Willing vs not willing
Willing vs hesitant
Model 1a
Model 1b
Model 2a
Model 2b
OR95% CIOR95% CIOR95% CIOR95% CI
Demographic characteristics
Age (16–17 yr)2.03***1.51 ∼ 2.731.550.96–2.531.390.89–2.171.210.73–1.99
Gender (boys)1.100.84–1.440.840.54–1.321.210.80–1.821.010.63–1.60
Educational level
Low vs higha0.730.51–1.030.720.40–1.290.38***0.23–0.620.54*0.31–0.92
Middle vs higha0.62**0.45–0.840.57*0.34–0.960.690.41–1.150.960.54–1.72
Dutch main language at home1.370.69–2.720.580.17–1.950.870.26–2.900.630.17–2.33
Previous infection0.790.57–1.081.080.63–1.851.130.66–1.941.320.73–2.39
Vaccination beliefs
The vaccine protects youth1.45*1.08–1.940.740.51–1.09
The vaccine protects others1.300.97–1.751.45*1.02–2.06
Afraid of side effects0.54***0.44–0.670.43***0.35–0.53
Belief vaccine is safe1.80***1.36–2.381.45*1.06–1.98
Vaccinating youth helps ending the crisis1.74***1.34–2.260.950.70–1.30
Important to follow advice from the government1.320.99–1.761.49*1.06–2.09
Social factors
My friends would get the vaccine1.33*1.05–1.680.820.62–1.07
My parents expect me to vaccinate2.05***1.65–2.561.46**1.16–1.84
My friends expect me to vaccinate1.040.83–1.321.110.88–1.40

Note. OR = Odds Ratio (OR > 1 indicates a higher odd for probably or certainly willing to get vaccinated).

Higher educational level is reference category, indicating that OR < 1 indicates a higher odd for high educational level.

p < .05.

p < .01.

p < .001.

Determinants of vaccination intention for youth who are probably or certainly not willing compared to youth probably or certainly willing to vaccinate (Model 1) and for youth who are hesitant compared to youth who are probably or certainly willing to vaccinate (Model 2). Note. OR = Odds Ratio (OR > 1 indicates a higher odd for probably or certainly willing to get vaccinated). Higher educational level is reference category, indicating that OR < 1 indicates a higher odd for high educational level. p < .05. p < .01. p < .001.

Conclusion and discussion

Seven out of ten respondents in a demographically representative sample of Dutch youth (aged 12–18 years) indicated to be probably or certainly willing to get vaccinated. Vaccination intentions were higher amongst older youth and amongst youth with a higher educational level. The main reasons for wanting to get vaccinated were to protect one’s own health and to protect others’ health, and ending the crisis. Main reasons for not wanting to get vaccinated were concerns about side-effects and unknown long-term consequences. These motivations are very similar to what has been found in adults and in a US adolescent sample [1], [4]. Moreover, vaccination intentions from peers, but in particular perceptions about what parents expect their children to do, were associated with respondents willingness to obtain the vaccine – a finding that has also been reported for other vaccination programs [5].

Policy implications

The current results suggest many youth are willing to vaccinate against COVID-19 to protect their own health, those of others, and as a way out of the crisis. Concerns about vaccine safety underline the need for providing objective, reliable, tailored and up-to-date information for parents and youth about the risks and benefits of vaccination [6], [7], [8]. Such vaccination campaigns should target and be co-created with youth and their parents [9], information should be delivered by a trusted expert (e.g., their general practitioner, cf. [10], [8], [11]), and people should have the opportunity to ask questions and share their concerns [1], [12], [13]. Studies about vaccine hesitancy among adults suggest that advice or recommendation from health professionals are positively associated with vaccine uptake [14]. Finally, on a more general note, we stress that intentions are not always translated into behavior. Therefore, reminders [15] and ensuring easy access (e.g., local walk-in vaccination units) could be important complements to local and national communication campaigns [14], [16]. With the new school year starting, an effective strategy could thus be to organize information sessions nearby schools where parents and youth can obtain information, ask questions to local are professionals, and immediately vaccinate without appointment - in addition to mass media approaches.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Factors associated with the uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  May P S Yeung; Frank L Y Lam; Richard Coker
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.341

Review 2.  Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: a theory-informed, systematic review.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Karah I Fazekas
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Caregiver willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19: Cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Ran D Goldman; Tyler D Yan; Michelle Seiler; Cristina Parra Cotanda; Julie C Brown; Eileen J Klein; Julia Hoeffe; Renana Gelernter; Jeanine E Hall; Adrienne L Davis; Mark A Griffiths; Ahmed Mater; Sergio Manzano; Gianluca Gualco; Naoki Shimizu; Thomas L Hurt; Sara Ahmed; Matt Hansen; David Sheridan; Samina Ali; Graham C Thompson; Nathalie Gaucher; Georg Staubli
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  Key Guidelines in Developing a Pre-Emptive COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake Promotion Strategy.

Authors:  Jeff French; Sameer Deshpande; William Evans; Rafael Obregon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Addressing Parental Vaccine Hesitancy and Other Barriers to Childhood/Adolescent Vaccination Uptake During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Authors:  Olufunto A Olusanya; Robert A Bednarczyk; Robert L Davis; Arash Shaban-Nejad
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  National Study of Youth Opinions on Vaccination for COVID-19 in the U.S.

Authors:  Eric J Brandt; Julia Rosenberg; Marika E Waselewski; Xochitl Amaro; Jacob Wasag; Tammy Chang
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 7.  Evidence-Based Strategies for Clinical Organizations to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Xuan Zhu; Aaron L Leppin; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Melanie D Swift; Joan M Griffin; Jennifer L St Sauver; Abinash Virk; Robert M Jacobson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates.

Authors:  Julie C Jacobson Vann; Robert M Jacobson; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Josephine K Asafu-Adjei; Peter G Szilagyi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-18

9.  Meningococcal W135 Disease Vaccination Intent, the Netherlands, 2018-2019.

Authors:  Marion de Vries; Liesbeth Claassen; Margreet J M Te Wierik; Feray Coban; Albert Wong; Danielle R M Timmermans; Aura Timen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  6 in total

1.  An Online Experiment of NHS Information Framing on Mothers' Vaccination Intention of Children against COVID-19.

Authors:  Audrey L Van Hoecke; Jet G Sanders
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine behaviour intentions among the youth in Kenya: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Joachim O Osur; Rehema Chengo; Evelyne Muinga; Jackline Kemboi; Myriam Sidibe; Maggie Rarieya
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  The Effect of Message Framing on COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions among the Younger Age Population Groups: Results from an Experimental Study in the Italian Context.

Authors:  Sara Betta; Greta Castellini; Marta Acampora; Serena Barello
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 4.  Myocarditis or Pericarditis Following the COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Minglong Li; Xingxing Wang; Junjie Feng; Ziqi Feng; Wenwen Li; Bailiu Ya
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-15

5.  Effectiveness of Social Video Platforms in Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination Among Youth: A Content-Specific Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Topic Videos on Bilibili.

Authors:  Hao Gao; Hao Yin; Li Peng; Han Wang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-09-01

6.  Career Aspiration Fulfillment and COVID-19 Vaccination Intention among Nigerian Youth: An Instrumental Variable Approach.

Authors:  Abayomi Samuel Oyekale
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.