Literature DB >> 35042220

The Skin and Nose Microbiome and Its Association with Filaggrin Gene Mutations in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis.

Minke M F van Mierlo1, Luba M Pardo1, Karin B Fieten2,3,4, Tim J van den Broek5, Frank H J Schuren5, Michel van Geel6,7, Suzanne G M A Pasmans1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interactions between the skin barrier, immune system, and microbiome underlie the development of atopic dermatitis (AD).
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the skin and nasal microbiome in relation to filaggrin gene (FLG) mutations.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study including 77 children with difficult-to-treat AD. The entire encoding region of FLG was screened for mutations using single molecule molecular inversion probes and next-generation sequencing. Bacterial swabs from the anterior nares, lesional and nonlesional skin were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. For skin samples, additional qPCR was performed for Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.
RESULTS: The prevalence of patients with a mutation in FLG was 40%, including 10 different mutations. Analyzing bacterial swabs from all three niches showed a significant effect for both niche and FLG mutation status on the overall microbiome composition. Using a subset analysis to test the effect of FLG mutation status per niche separately did not show a significant association to the microbiome. Shannon diversity and S. aureus abundance were significantly affected by the niche, but not by the presence of an FLG mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest only a minor role for FLG mutation status on the overall microbiome, which is rather caused by differences in the present genera than by microbe richness and evenness.
© 2022 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eczema; Filaggrin; Microbiome; Skin barrier; Staphylococcus aureus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35042220      PMCID: PMC9501786          DOI: 10.1159/000520978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatology        ISSN: 1018-8665            Impact factor:   5.197


Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder primarily present in children [1]. This condition is characterized by a dry, itchy skin with eczematous skin lesions that show an age-related distribution [2]. The pathogenesis of AD is complex, including alterations in the skin microbiome, epidermal barrier dysfunction, and immunological changes [1, 3]. The skin microbiome in AD is characterized by a low bacterial diversity, with a high abundance of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis and low abundance of the genera Propionibacterium, Streptococcus, Acinetobacter, Corynebacterium, and Prevotella [4]. The skin microbiome is in constant interaction with the skin barrier and immune system, leading to inflammation characteristic of AD [5, 6, 7]. Previous studies showed that skin barrier impairment, characterized by mutations in the filaggrin gene (FLG), causes modified fibronectin binding, higher skin pH, and an increased serine protease activity, which can lead to altered colonization patterns [8, 9]. Interestingly, skin colonization with S. aureus leads to the secretion of virulence factors, increasing inflammation and further damage of the skin barrier [8, 10]. Furthermore, activated T helper type 2 (Th2) cells in AD can downregulate the filaggrin expression in the stratum corneum (SC) [11, 12]. Mutations in FLG are the strongest genetic risk factors for AD susceptibility [11, 13]. In West-European populations, 2282del4, R2447*, R501*, and S3247* are the most common mutations with a prevalence of around 40% in AD patients [11, 14]. However, up to 113 different mutations have been described in the literature [15], which are present depending on ethnic background [16, 17]. Due to the complexity of FLG, with the third exon encoding between 10 and 12 nearly identical repeats, screening for mutations in this gene has been challenging. Classical Sanger sequencing is frequently used, but this method is too cumbersome to screen the whole encoding gene for mutations [18]. A recent method, using single molecule molecular inversion probes (smMIPs) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) permits comprehensive sequencing of the entire gene [15, 19]. Instead of screening for population-specific mutations only, this technique enables to analyze the entire gene and detect population-specific mutations as well as specific mutations not previously published. Previous studies investigating whether S. aureus colonization is more common in patients with a mutation in FLG compared to wild-type patients, show conflicting results [10, 20, 21, 22, 23]. Publications on the relation between mutations in FLG and the composition of the entire microbiome in AD are scarce. It was recently shown that the microbiome on nonlesional skin in adult AD patients was associated with FLG mutation status [7]. This study included a smaller number of AD patients and only screened for the most common mutations in FLG, which might have led to an underrepresentation of FLG mutation carriers. In addition, no other studies are available to validate these results. The aim of this study was to profile the entire mutational background of FLG using a new smMIP sequencing technique in children with difficult-to-treat AD. Second, we describe the microbiome in this population and investigate differences in the microbiome from nose, lesional and nonlesional skin in AD children with and without a mutation in FLG.

Material and Methods

Study Design

This study was performed as part of the DAVOS-trial, a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the long-term effectiveness of treatment in alpine climate to treatment in moderate maritime climate in children with difficult-to-treat AD (ISRCTN88136485). The detailed study protocol and primary outcomes have been published previously [24, 25]. Study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands (reference 09-192/K). All patients and, if needed, their parents/guardians provided written informed consent. This present study involves secondary outcomes of this trial and included data before the start of the intervention period.

Participants

This study included Dutch children between 8 and 18 years old, with difficult-to-treat AD. Difficult-to-treat AD was determined before the start of the study and defined as use of at least a class 3 topical corticosteroid and not being able to step down, current use of systemic immunosuppressive treatment, repeated treatment with potent topical corticosteroids or systemic immunosuppressive treatment, a history of use of systemic treatment, a significant impact of AD on the child's or the family's quality of life, or seemingly unresponsive to conventional therapy according to current guidelines [25]. Demographic data was extracted from questionnaires and the electronic patient files. Due to the severity of the disease in this patient group, concurrent medication was continued. Disease severity was determined using the Self-Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index (SA-EASI, range 0–96), and microbiome as well as blood samples were collected. Study assessments were performed in the Netherlands.

Microbial Samples

Microbial samples were collected from the anterior nares, lesional and nonlesional skin. Samples taken from the lesional skin were preferably taken from the antecubital fold or the popliteal fold. Nonlesional skin samples were taken from the volar arm if possible (online suppl. Table 1; for all online suppl. material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000520978) [26]. All swabs were collected using sterile cotton swabs soaked in sterile NaCl 0.9% and stored at −80°C until further processing.

DNA Isolation, qPCR, and Sequencing

Extensive description of the procedures have been published previously [26]. Microbiome analysis was performed on bacterial swabs from the nasal cavity, lesional and nonlesional skin with sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene using V4 hypervariable region on the Illumina MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). A genus table with raw read counts was generated for downstream analysis. Quantitative (q)PCR was performed on samples from the lesional and nonlesional skin to identify S. aureus and S. epidermidis. The bacterial DNA concentration was reported as log10-transformed femtogram per microliter (fg/μL) in this paper.

FLG Mutation Profiling

FLG mutations were determined on DNA isolated from blood samples. We used smMIP-NGS strategy to screen the entire FLG and to identify all mutations resulting in premature protein termination. Detailed information about the sample preparation and smMIP-NGS technique have been described previously [15, 19]. Previous use of this technique showed that more than one mutation may be present on the same allele, especially when this includes rare or new mutations. Therefore, patients in which we found two different mutations in FLG were not classified as compound heterozygous but as patients with more than one mutation. “FLG mutation status” was used throughout this paper to describe the dichotomous outcome as used in our statistical models: FLG wild-type patients (FLG+) versus FLG mutation carriers (FLG−, patients with one or more mutations in FLG).

Statistical Analysis

To determine differences in demographic data and disease severity between patients with and without a mutation in FLG, χ2, Fisher's exact test, or Mann-Whitney U tests were used when appropriate. Descriptive statistics were used to present the FLG mutations in our study population. For analysis of the microbiome, we used non-subsampled genus tables after filtering (Shannon diversity index was calculated on unfiltered data). Filtering was applied by selecting the genera representing 97.5% of all counts. Prior to ordination analysis, the filtered genus tables were square-root transformed with subsequent application of Wisconsin double standardization. To visualize the microbial composition for all 3 niches sampled (nose, lesional and nonlesional skin) and FLG status (FLG+ and FLG−), Bray-Curtis distance-based multidimensional scaling (MDS) was used. Permutational multivariable analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) correcting for repeated measurements was used to determine significant differences in microbial composition while accounting for FLG mutation status. We included the covariates “niche” and “mutation status” as interaction terms in this model. When appropriate, PERMANOVA coefficients were obtained to determine the genera that contributed to the significant differences [27]. Second, we performed a subset analysis for the skin samples and the niches individually (nose, lesional and nonlesional skin) to investigate the effect of FLG mutation status on the microbial composition within each niche. In-depth analysis was performed to assess the effect of FLG mutation status on S. aureus and S. epidermidis colonization rates using a χ2 test. Furthermore, the effect on S. aureus and S. epidermidis abundance in patients with positive bacterial swabs was analyzed with a linear mixed-effect model. This statistical model was also used in analyzing the effect of FLG status on the Shannon diversity index. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS (version 21) and R software (version 3.5.1). We used the packages “phyloseq” and “vegan” for microbiome analyses and accounted for repeated measurements using the “strata” argument [28]. R package “ggplot2” was used for visualization [29]. Linear mixed-effect models were performed using “lme” and “lme4” package [30]. A p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study Subjects and Sample Characteristics

A total of 77 patients were included in the study. Lesional and nonlesional skin swabs were available for 76 patients (99%) and analyzed using qPCR techniques. Sufficient amount of DNA to perform 16S rRNA sequencing was available in 63 (82%) patients for lesional skin, 55 (71%) patients for nonlesional skin, and 73 (95%) for the nose (online suppl. Fig. 1). Patient characteristics of missing data did not differ from the study group. Demographic data, comorbidities, medication use, and disease severity are noted in Table 1. The median severity score was 37.2 (17.6–52.6) in the FLG+ group, compared to 41.4 (26.4–60.6) in the FLG− group (p = 0.29).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Wild-type (n = 46)FLG mutation carriersa (n = 31)p valueb
Sex (female), n (%)20 (43.5)19 (61.3)0.13
Age, median (IQR)13.0 (11.0–15.0)12.0 (11.0–15.0)0.64
Age of AD onset <6 months, n (%)34 (80.4)28 (90.3)0.34
Asthmac, n (%)39 (84.8)26 (83.9)0.91
Rhinitisd, n (%)38 (82.6)29 (93.5)0.30
Food allergye, f, n (%)25 (54.3)26 (83.9)<0.01
SA-EASIg, median (IQR)37.2 (17.6–52.6)41.4 (26.4–60.6)h0.29
Topical corticosteroids previous 7 daysi, n (%)0.89
 None1 (2.2)1 (3.2)
 Moderate2 (4.3)2 (6.5)
 Potent40 (87.0)27 (87.1)
 Very potent3 (6.5)1 (3.2)
Systemic medication, n (%)1.00
 Prednisone2 (4.3)1 (3.2)
 Cyclosporine4 (8.7)3 (9.7)
 Oral antibiotics1 (3.2)

AD, atopic dermatitis; FLG, filaggrin gene; SA-EASI, Self-Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index; SD, standard deviation.

Including 23 patients who were heterozygous, 4 patients homozygous, and 4 patients with two different mutations.

p values were analyzed using χ2, Fisher's exact test, or Mann-Whitney U when appropriate.

Asthma was diagnosed based on spirometry reversibility testing and Methacholine Challenge Test.

Rhinitis was diagnosed based on assessment by a pediatrician.

Food allergy was defined as a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) or convincing clinical history (a reported type I allergic reaction with acute symptoms within 2 h after ingestion of the food) in combination with sensitization to the specific food allergen.

Missing n = 2 (both groups n = 1).

Range 0–96 (<17 mild; 18–46 moderate; >47 severe)1.

Missing n = 1.

UK potency system used.

Screening the Entire Filaggrin Gene Improves the Sensitivity of Mutation Detection

A total of 10 different mutations leading to a premature protein termination were found, of which c.5128G>T (p.(Gly1710*)) in repeat 4 and c.7211C>G (p.(Ser2404*)) in repeat 6 have not been described before (Fig. 1, online suppl. Table 2). Compared to the most common mutations in West-European populations (2282del4, R2447*, R501*, and S3247*), the prevalence of patients with an FLG mutation increased from 33% (25 of 77) to 40% (31 of 77) screening the entire encoding gene. This included 8 (26%) patients with more than one mutation.
Fig. 1

Prevalence of FLG mutations using smMIP sequencing. a Prevalence of patients carrying FLG mutations. 40% (n = 31) of the patients had a mutation in FLG. Within this group of mutation carriers, more than one mutation was detected in 8 (26%) patients. b Prevalence of the 10 different FLG mutations in our study population. Underlined mutations represent mutations which are most commonly detected in West-European populations.

The Microbial Composition in Children with AD

All sequences belonged to 844 genera, of which 81 genera remained after filtering. The genus Staphylococcus was predominant in both lesional and nonlesional skin samples, with a median relative abundance (RA) of 78% and 44%, respectively. This was followed by Streptococcus (median RA 3% and 4%) and Corynebacterium genera (median RA 2% and 5%) (online suppl. Fig. 2). Within the nose, the genera Corynebacterium (31%), Staphylococcus (11%), and Dolosigranulum genera (9%) were most prevalent (online suppl. Fig. 2). The differences in microbial composition between the three sampled niches were visualized and tested (online suppl. Fig. 3). All three niches harbored a significantly different microbiome (lesional skin vs. nonlesional skin, nose vs. lesional skin, nose vs. nonlesional skin: PERMANOVA R2 = 0.027, p < 0.01; R2 = 0.190, p < 0.01; and R2 = 0.139, p < 0.01, respectively).

The Overall Microbial Composition Is Affected by FLG Mutation Status

Community composition was visualized considering FLG mutation status in Figure 2 (skin samples only in online suppl. Fig. 4). The PERMANOVA analysis showed that both niche and FLG mutation status were significantly associated with the overall microbial composition (niche: R2 = 0.183, p < 0.01; FLG status: R2 = 0.006, p < 0.01; interaction “niche: FLG status”: R2 = 0.008, p = 0.47). The association between the microbiome and FLG mutation status was mainly driven by the Corynebacterium, which was less abundant in FLG mutation carriers (online suppl. Fig. 5a). Significant effects for niche and FLG mutation status were also observed in the subset analysis including only skin samples (niche: R2 = 0.027, p < 0.01; FLG status: R2 = 0.010, p < 0.01; interaction “niche: FLG status”: R2 = 0.005, p = 0.56; online suppl. Fig. 4). In this model, the Staphylococcus (less abundant in FLG−) and Acidovorax genera (more abundant in FLG−) mainly contributed to the effect for FLG mutation status (online suppl. Fig. 5b). Performing subset analysis to test the effect of FLG status within each niche separately (nose, lesional and nonlesional skin) did not yield any significant associations between FLG status and microbiome composition (nose PERMANOVA R2 = 0.014, p = 0.39; lesional skin PERMANOVA R2 = 0.013, p = 0.72; nonlesional skin PERMANOVA R2 = 0.0185, p = 0.42). Alpha diversity, indicated with Shannon diversity index, was significantly affected by niche (p = 0.01) but not by FLG status (p = 0.35, interaction “niche: FLG status” p = 0.85) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Bray-Curtis distance-based multidimensional scaling plot showing the microbiota for nose and skin in relation to FLG mutation status. For ordination analysis, genus tables were standardized using square-root transformation with subsequent application of Wisconsin double standardization. FLG status was significantly associated with the overall microbial composition using PERMANOVA analysis (niche: R2 = 0.183, p < 0.01; FLG status: R2 = 0.006, p < 0.01; interaction: R2 = 0.008, p = 0.47).

Fig. 3

Shannon diversity index in relation to FLG mutation status. Shannon diversity index represents the number of different genera (richness) and how even they are distributed (evenness). The boxes represent the twenty-fifth percentile, median, and seventy-fifth percentile. FLG status did not affect the microbial composition in all three niches as determined using a linear mixed-effect model (niche p = 0.01; FLG status p = 0.35; “niche: FLG status” p = 0.85).

Association between Staphylococcus Abundance and FLG Status

qPCR was performed to gain more information on the species S. aureus and S. epidermidis. In the total study population, 56 (72%) patients were positive for S. aureus on lesional skin, with similar proportions in FLG+ and FLG− patients (p = 0.10) (Table 2). Interestingly, on nonlesional skin, we found a higher proportion of patients colonized with S. aureus in the FLG+ group than in the FLG− group (57% for FLG+ vs. 32% in FLG− group; p = 0.04) (Table 2). The mixed model analysis showed that niche (lesional, nonlesional) was significantly associated with S. aureus load, but not with FLG mutation status (niche p < 0.01; FLG status p = 0.10; interaction “niche: FLG status” p = 0.81) (Fig. 4). S. epidermidis was detected on lesional skin in 70 (91%) participants and in 69 (90%) participants on nonlesional skin (Table 2). The S. epidermidis load was not affected by niche (p = 0.17), nor by FLG mutation status (p = 0.08) (Fig. 4).
Table 2

Colonization rates for S. aureus and S. epidermidis

Wild-type (n = 46)FLG mutation carriers (n = 31)P valuea
Positive for S. aureus
 Lesional skin37 (80.4)b19 (61.3)c0.10
 Nonlesional skin26 (56.5)c10 (32.3)c0.04
Positive for S. epidermidis
 Lesional skin43 (93.5)28 (90.3)b0.65
 Nonlesional skin43 (93.5)29 (93.5)b0.54

FLG, filaggrin gene.

p values were analyzed using χ2. Number of missings:

n = 1;

n = 2.

Fig. 4

Quantitative PCR results of the skin samples for S. aureus and S. epidermidis in relation to FLG mutation status. The results for S. aureus and S. epidermidis load are shown using log10 transformed data. The boxes represent the twenty-fifth percentile, median, and seventy-fifth percentile. S. aureus density was significantly associated with the sampled niche, but not with FLG status (niche p < 0.01; FLG status p = 0.10).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effect of FLG mutation status on the microbial composition in children with AD. In this cohort of children with difficult-to-treat AD, the prevalence of FLG mutations was 40% when screening the entire encoding gene, which is consistent with the prevalence of FLG mutations in AD groups. We demonstrated that the nose, lesional and nonlesional skin all harbored a significantly different microbiome. In addition, analyzing all samples together (and skin samples only), FLG status was of significant influence on the microbial composition, although the impact on the contribution was rather small. FLG mutations did not affect the Shannon diversity index or S. aureus load. Using subset analysis per niche, we were not able to confirm these results for the effect of FLG mutation status on the microbial composition. The prevalence of FLG mutations was increased with 7% using the smMIP-NGS strategy in comparison to including only the four most common mutations in the West-European population. It has been shown previously that only analyzing population-specific mutations gives an underrepresentation of FLG mutation prevalence in AD populations [15, 16, 17]. Since the C-terminus has a critical role in the processing from profilaggrin to filaggrin and thus the presence of filaggrin in the epidermis [16, 31], all mutations leading to a premature protein termination (and lack of this C-terminal) contribute to the disease burden in AD [16, 32]. This underlines the relevance of screening the entire coding region of the FLG, instead of focusing on population-specific mutations. Interestingly, the S3247* mutation, which is often described as a common European mutation variant, was not detected in our population. Possible explanations for the absence of S3247* is that mutation distribution can vary in every European country. Second, S3247* is described as a less common variant in comparison to R501* and 2282del4 [16]. A significant effect for FLG mutation status on the overall skin microbiome was found when analyzing all samples together (and analyzing lesional and nonlesional skin samples together), but not using subset analysis per individual niche. This might indicate that the effect for FLG mutation status was only minor (R2 of 0.006 and 0.010, respectively) and/or that the number of samples per niche in our study was too small, leading to insufficient power to properly detect significant differences. Only one previous publication, including a smaller number of adult AD patients with less severe disease, only screening for four mutations in FLG, investigated the association between FLG mutations and the microbiome [7]. They found a significant effect of FLG mutation status on the microbial composition on nonlesional skin (with Staphylococcus caprae being more prevalent in FLG−), but not on lesional skin or in the nose [7]. Combining these and our results, a role for FLG status on the microbial composition is suggested. Interestingly, looking into the Shannon diversity index, our results are in line with two previous publications including AD and ichthyosis vulgaris patients [7, 33], showing that Shannon diversity index was not affected by FLG status. The explanation could be that patients with and without a mutation in FLG are colonized by different genera and do not differ based on the number of genera (richness) or how even they are distributed (evenness). We found similar S. aureus colonization rates in FLG+ and FLG− patients on lesional skin, but significantly higher colonization rates on nonlesional skin for FLG+ patients. Literature on this association is conflicting. In vitro studies showed that the absence of filaggrin breakdown products, natural moisturizing factor (NMF), increases S. aureus corneocyte adhesion and growth rate [20, 34]. These findings were supported by clinical data in adult AD patients, with higher colonization rates on lesional skin and in the nose of patients with a mutation in FLG [21]. In contrast, other clinical studies did not show reduced filaggrin levels in patients colonized with S. aureus [23, 35, 36]. The differences in outcomes between clinical studies can be largely affected by disease severity in the studied AD population. In active AD skin, Th2 response is upregulated along with the production of cytokines interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, which are known to downregulate filaggrin expression independent of mutation status [11, 12]. Since our study included patients who were difficult to treat and included 74% with severe or very severe disease (based on SA-EASI score), it is possible that due to an upregulation of the immune system, filaggrin expression was suppressed irrespective of FLG mutation status and masked the effect for wild-type patients. A major strength of this study is the comprehensive sequencing of the entire encoding region of FLG, enabling to detect all mutations leading to premature protein termination. This technique enables to identify all patients who are at risk to develop a more severe and persistent disease course and are susceptible for the development of other atopic diseases (i.e., asthma and allergic sensitization). Furthermore, it could be useful to stratify patients in cohort studies. The following limitations need to be mentioned. First, since our cohort included children with difficult-to-treat AD, we did not discontinue concurrent medication. In addition, previous studies have shown that both age (Tanner stage) and disease severity can influence the composition of the microbiome [37, 38]. In this explorative study, we did not correct for these effects in our statistical analysis. However, the use of topical and systemic medication, age, and disease severity did not differ between patients with and without a mutation in FLG. Furthermore, excluding patients with systemic treatment from our statistical analysis did not yield different results (data not shown). Larger groups of patients with AD might be helpful in correcting for these effects. Second, heterozygous FLG mutations lead to 50% reduction in filaggrin expression as compared to a complete absence of filaggrin with bi-allelic mutations and might lead to different effects [11]. This gene-dosage effect was suggested in a previous study including ichthyosis vulgaris patients, with significant differences in the microbial composition between bi-allelic mutation carriers and wild-type patients, but not between bi-allelic and heterozygous mutation carriers [33]. Although our study included a small group of patients with more than one mutation in FLG (n = 8), we did not find different results for patients with one and more than one mutation in FLG (data not shown). Future studies should include a larger number of patients, investigating the gene-dosage effect on the microbiome in AD. In addition, by measuring FLG breakdown products we can determine the effect of the Th2 response in active AD. Lastly, as described previously [26], the impact of the inability to properly detect the Propionibacterium or to classify the Staphylococci at species level with the use of the V4 hypervariable region, was only minor due to the sampled body regions and the use of qPCR to detect S. aureus and S. epidermidis species [39]. In conclusion, sequencing the entire FLG for novel, family- and population-specific mutations, contributing to the disease burden in AD, leads to better patient stratification. Our results suggest that the presence of a mutation in FLG has only a small effect on the microbial composition. Our results indicate that the difference in the microbiome between FLG+ and FLG− patients is rather caused by the presence of distinct genera than differences in the alpha diversity. More research into the interaction of the microbiome with the skin barrier and immune system in large patient groups will lead to a better understanding of the etiology of AD and will help develop preventive and treatment strategies.

Key Message

Mutations in the filaggrin gene only have a small impact on the skin microbiome in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Statement of Ethics

This research was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands (reference 09-192/K). All patients and, if needed, their parents/guardians provided written informed consent.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

This study was supported by unrestricted grants from the European Allergy and Asthma Center Davos, the Merem Dutch Asthma Center Davos, the patient support group “Vereniging Nederland Davos,” and Micreos Human Health, the Netherlands.

Author Contributions

MMFvM, LMP, KBF, and SGMAP designed the study. SGMAP and KBF designed and supervised the collection of the data. FHJS supervised the DNA isolation, qPCR and sequencing. MvG supervised the FLG mutation analysis. MMFvM and TJvdB had full access to all of the data and performed the data analyses. MMFvM, LMP, KBF, and SGMAP interpreted the data. MMFvM wrote the manuscript, and all authors critically revised and commented on the manuscript. SGMAP supervised the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Supplementary data Click here for additional data file.
  31 in total

Review 1.  The role of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Michael R Williams; Richard L Gallo
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adults: European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/PRACTALL Consensus Report.

Authors:  Cezmi A Akdis; Mübeccel Akdis; Thomas Bieber; Carsten Bindslev-Jensen; Mark Boguniewicz; Philippe Eigenmann; Qutayba Hamid; Alexander Kapp; Donald Y M Leung; Jasna Lipozencic; Thomas A Luger; Antonella Muraro; Natalija Novak; Thomas A E Platts-Mills; Lanny Rosenwasser; Annika Scheynius; F Estelle R Simons; Jonathan Spergel; Kristiina Turjanmaa; Ulrich Wahn; Stefan Weidinger; Thomas Werfel; Torsten Zuberbier
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Reliable Next-Generation Sequencing of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Using Single Molecule Tags.

Authors:  Astrid Eijkelenboom; Eveline J Kamping; Annemiek W Kastner-van Raaij; Sandra J Hendriks-Cornelissen; Kornelia Neveling; Roland P Kuiper; Alexander Hoischen; Marcel R Nelen; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Bastiaan B J Tops
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Gram-positive anaerobe cocci are underrepresented in the microbiome of filaggrin-deficient human skin.

Authors:  Patrick L J M Zeeuwen; Thomas H A Ederveen; Danique A van der Krieken; Hanna Niehues; Jos Boekhorst; Sanja Kezic; Daniëlle A T Hanssen; Marisol E Otero; Ivonne M J J van Vlijmen-Willems; Diana Rodijk-Olthuis; Denise Falcone; Ellen H J van den Bogaard; Marijke Kamsteeg; Heleen D de Koning; Manon E J Zeeuwen-Franssen; Maurice A M van Steensel; Michiel Kleerebezem; Harro M Timmerman; Sacha A F T van Hijum; Joost Schalkwijk
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 5.  The role of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  R D Bjerre; J Bandier; L Skov; L Engstrand; J D Johansen
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  The influence of treatment in alpine and moderate maritime climate on the composition of the skin microbiome in patients with difficult to treat atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Minke M F van Mierlo; Joan E E Totté; Karin B Fieten; Tim J van den Broek; Frank H J Schuren; Luba M Pardo; Suzanne G M A Pasmans
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.018

7.  Staphylococcus aureus Induces Increased Serine Protease Activity in Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Michael R Williams; Teruaki Nakatsuji; James A Sanford; Alison F Vrbanac; Richard L Gallo
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Skin Barrier Function and Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Vestibulum Nasi and Fauces in Healthy Infants and Infants with Eczema: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Teresa Løvold Berents; Karin Cecilie Lødrup Carlsen; Petter Mowinckel; Håvard Ove Skjerven; Bente Kvenshagen; Leif Bjarte Rolfsjord; Maria Bradley; Agne Lieden; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; Peter Gaustad; Petter Gjersvik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Colin N A Palmer; Alan D Irvine; Ana Terron-Kwiatkowski; Yiwei Zhao; Haihui Liao; Simon P Lee; David R Goudie; Aileen Sandilands; Linda E Campbell; Frances J D Smith; Gráinne M O'Regan; Rosemarie M Watson; Jo E Cecil; Sherri J Bale; John G Compton; John J DiGiovanna; Philip Fleckman; Sue Lewis-Jones; Gehan Arseculeratne; Ann Sergeant; Colin S Munro; Brahim El Houate; Ken McElreavey; Liselotte B Halkjaer; Hans Bisgaard; Somnath Mukhopadhyay; W H Irwin McLean
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-19       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Staphylococcus aureus Exploits Epidermal Barrier Defects in Atopic Dermatitis to Trigger Cytokine Expression.

Authors:  Teruaki Nakatsuji; Tiffany H Chen; Aimee M Two; Kimberly A Chun; Saisindhu Narala; Raif S Geha; Tissa R Hata; Richard L Gallo
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 8.551

View more
  1 in total

1.  Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Abdominal Surgery for Neonates and Paediatrics: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.

Authors:  Sonia Bianchini; Erika Rigotti; Sara Monaco; Laura Nicoletti; Cinzia Auriti; Elio Castagnola; Giorgio Conti; Luisa Galli; Mario Giuffrè; Stefania La Grutta; Laura Lancella; Andrea Lo Vecchio; Giuseppe Maglietta; Nicola Petrosillo; Carlo Pietrasanta; Nicola Principi; Simonetta Tesoro; Elisabetta Venturini; Giorgio Piacentini; Mario Lima; Annamaria Staiano; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.