Literature DB >> 35041069

Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.

Samuel Daly1, Jacob T Hanson1, Vibha Mavanji2, Amy Gravely3, James Jean1, Alec Jonason1, Scott Lewis4,5, James Ashe4,5, John M Looft2, Robert A McGovern6,7.   

Abstract

Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 20 age-matched control subjects were fitted with inertial measurement units and underwent 10-20 pull tests of varying intensities performed by a trained clinician. Kinematic data were extracted for each pull test and aggregated. Patients participated in 103 sessions for a total of 1555 trials while controls participated in 20 sessions for a total of 299 trials. Patients were separated into groups by MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) pull test score. The center of mass velocity profile easily distinguished between patient groups such that score increases correlated with decreases in peak velocity and later peak velocity onset. All patients except those scored as "3" demonstrated an increase in step length and decrease in reaction time with increasing pull intensity. Groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship of step length to pull intensity (slope) and their overall step length or reaction time regardless of pull intensity (y-intercept). NPH patients scored as "normal" on the MDS-UPDRS scale were kinematically indistinguishable from age-matched control subjects during a standardized perturbation, but could be distinguished from controls by their response to a range of pull intensities. An instrumented, purposefully varied pull test produces kinematic metrics useful for distinguishing clinically meaningful differences within hydrocephalus patients as well as distinguishing these patients from healthy, control subjects.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrocephalus; Perturbation; Postural instability; Reaction time; Step response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35041069     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06292-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

Review 1.  Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?

Authors:  Fay B Horak
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: increased supplementary motor activity accounts for improvement after CSF drainage.

Authors:  Niklas Lenfeldt; Anne Larsson; Lars Nyberg; Micael Andersson; Richard Birgander; Anders Eklund; Jan Malm
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Trunk sway in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-Quantitative assessment in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tomas Bäcklund; Jennifer Frankel; Hanna Israelsson; Jan Malm; Nina Sundström
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Preparation for compensatory forward stepping in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Laurie A King; Rebecca J St George; Patricia Carlson-Kuhta; John G Nutt; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Postural function in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunt surgery: a controlled study using computerized dynamic posturography (EquiTest).

Authors:  F Lundin; T Ledin; C Wikkelsø; G Leijon
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 1.876

6.  Anticipatory postural adjustments prior to step initiation are hypometric in untreated Parkinson's disease: an accelerometer-based approach.

Authors:  M Mancini; C Zampieri; P Carlson-Kuhta; L Chiari; F B Horak
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 6.089

7.  Feasibility, Reliability, and Value of Remote Video-Based Trial Visits in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Christopher G Tarolli; Kelly Andrzejewski; Grace A Zimmerman; Michael Bull; Steven Goldenthal; Peggy Auinger; Michael O'Brien; E Ray Dorsey; Kevin Biglan; Tanya Simuni
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 8.  Objective biomarkers of balance and gait for Parkinson's disease using body-worn sensors.

Authors:  Fay B Horak; Martina Mancini
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 10.338

9.  Maintaining balance against force perturbations: impaired mechanisms unresponsive to levodopa in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Irene Di Giulio; Rebecca J St George; Eirini Kalliolia; Amy L Peters; Patricia Limousin; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  mHealth and wearable technology should replace motor diaries to track motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M Kelley Erb; Daniel R Karlin; Bryan K Ho; Kevin C Thomas; Federico Parisi; Gloria P Vergara-Diaz; Jean-Francois Daneault; Paul W Wacnik; Hao Zhang; Tairmae Kangarloo; Charmaine Demanuele; Chris R Brooks; Craig N Detheridge; Nina Shaafi Kabiri; Jaspreet S Bhangu; Paolo Bonato
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-01-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Postural instability in Parkinson's disease assessed with clinical "pull test" and standardized postural perturbations: effect of medication and body weight support.

Authors:  Chiahao Lu; Kenneth H Louie; Amber M Stutz; Colum D MacKinnon; Scott E Cooper
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 6.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.