Literature DB >> 35041002

Comparing Partitioned Models to Mixture Models: Do Information Criteria Apply?

Stephen M Crotty1,2,3, Barbara R Holland4.   

Abstract

The use of information criteria to distinguish between phylogenetic models has become ubiquitous within the field. However, the variety and complexity of available models are much greater now than when these practices were established. The literature shows an increasing trajectory of healthy skepticism with regard to the use of information theory-based model selection within phylogenetics. We add to this by analyzing the specific case of comparison between partition and mixture models. We argue from a theoretical basis that information criteria are inherently more likely to favor partition models over mixture models, and we then demonstrate this through simulation. Based on our findings, we suggest that partition and mixture models are not suitable for information-theory based model comparison. [AIC, BIC; information criteria; maximum likelihood; mixture models; partitioned model; phylogenetics.].
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35041002      PMCID: PMC9558833          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syac003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   9.160


  29 in total

1.  A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process.

Authors:  Nicolas Lartillot; Hervé Philippe
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species.

Authors:  Yuchi Zheng; John J Wiens
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Modeling compositional heterogeneity.

Authors:  Peter G Foster
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  The importance of data partitioning and the utility of Bayes factors in Bayesian phylogenetics.

Authors:  Jeremy M Brown; Alan R Lemmon
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  The effects of partitioning on phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  David Kainer; Robert Lanfear
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Information Criteria for Comparing Partition Schemes.

Authors:  Tae-Kun Seo; Jeffrey L Thorne
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  On the Use of Information Criteria for Model Selection in Phylogenetics.

Authors:  Edward Susko; Andrew J Roger
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases.

Authors:  Matthew J Phillips; Frédéric Delsuc; David Penny
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies.

Authors:  Lam-Tung Nguyen; Heiko A Schmidt; Arndt von Haeseler; Bui Quang Minh
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds.

Authors:  Erich D Jarvis; Siavash Mirarab; Andre J Aberer; Bo Li; Peter Houde; Cai Li; Simon Y W Ho; Brant C Faircloth; Benoit Nabholz; Jason T Howard; Alexander Suh; Claudia C Weber; Rute R da Fonseca; Jianwen Li; Fang Zhang; Hui Li; Long Zhou; Nitish Narula; Liang Liu; Ganesh Ganapathy; Bastien Boussau; Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid; Volodymyr Zavidovych; Sankar Subramanian; Toni Gabaldón; Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Bhanu Rekepalli; Kasper Munch; Mikkel Schierup; Bent Lindow; Wesley C Warren; David Ray; Richard E Green; Michael W Bruford; Xiangjiang Zhan; Andrew Dixon; Shengbin Li; Ning Li; Yinhua Huang; Elizabeth P Derryberry; Mads Frost Bertelsen; Frederick H Sheldon; Robb T Brumfield; Claudio V Mello; Peter V Lovell; Morgan Wirthlin; Maria Paula Cruz Schneider; Francisco Prosdocimi; José Alfredo Samaniego; Amhed Missael Vargas Velazquez; Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez; Paula F Campos; Bent Petersen; Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten; An Pas; Tom Bailey; Paul Scofield; Michael Bunce; David M Lambert; Qi Zhou; Polina Perelman; Amy C Driskell; Beth Shapiro; Zijun Xiong; Yongli Zeng; Shiping Liu; Zhenyu Li; Binghang Liu; Kui Wu; Jin Xiao; Xiong Yinqi; Qiuemei Zheng; Yong Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Linnea Smeds; Frank E Rheindt; Michael Braun; Jon Fjeldsa; Ludovic Orlando; F Keith Barker; Knud Andreas Jønsson; Warren Johnson; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Stephen O'Brien; David Haussler; Oliver A Ryder; Carsten Rahbek; Eske Willerslev; Gary R Graves; Travis C Glenn; John McCormack; Dave Burt; Hans Ellegren; Per Alström; Scott V Edwards; Alexandros Stamatakis; David P Mindell; Joel Cracraft; Edward L Braun; Tandy Warnow; Wang Jun; M Thomas P Gilbert; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Neogastropod (Mollusca, Gastropoda) phylogeny: A step forward with mitogenomes.

Authors:  Thomas Lemarcis; Alexander E Fedosov; Yuri I Kantor; Jawad Abdelkrim; Paul Zaharias; Nicolas Puillandre
Journal:  Zool Scr       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.185

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.