| Literature DB >> 35040958 |
F B P Wooding1, A J Forhead1, S Wilsher2, W R Allen2, R M Roberts3, J A Green3, J F Beckers4, N Melo Sousa4, G Charpigny5.
Abstract
Mature granulated trophoblast binucleate cells (BNC) have been found in all ruminant placentas examined histologically so far. BNC are normally fairly evenly distributed throughout the fetal villus and all their granules contain a similar variety of hormones and pregnancy associated glycoproteins (PAGs). Only the Giraffe is reported to show a different BNC protein expression, this paper is designed to investigate that. Gold labelled Lectin histochemistry and protein immunocytochemistry were used on deplasticised 1 μm sections of a wide variety of ruminant placentomes with a wide range of antibodies and lectins. In the Giraffe placentomes, even though the lectin histochemistry shows an even distribution of BNC throughout the trophoblast of the placental villi, the protein expression in the BNC granules is limited to the BNC either in the apex or the base of the villi. Placental lactogens and Prolactin (PRL) are present only in basally situated BNC: PAGs only in the apical BNC. PRL is only found in the Giraffe BNC which react with many fewer of the wide range of antibodies used here to investigate the uniformity of protein expression in ruminant BNC. The possible relevance of these differences to ruminant function and evolution is considered to provide a further example of the versatility of the BNC system. © Crown copyright 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Giraffe granule protein asymmetry; Ruminant placenta; Trophoblast binucleate cell
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35040958 PMCID: PMC9305501 DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioab247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Reprod ISSN: 0006-3363 Impact factor: 4.161
Antibodies and Lectins used
| Abbreviations | Antibody | Antibody origins | |
|---|---|---|---|
| “ancient”PAGs | |||
| RA | Anti native bovine-PAGs | Wooding et al 2005 [ | |
| RD | Anti-boPAG 2 | ||
| BJ | Anti-boPAG 2 | Beckers et al 1994 [ | R438 |
| “new”PAGs | |||
| RB | Anti native bo-PAGs | Wooding et al 2005 [ | |
| RC | Anti –ovinePAG 1 | ||
| RU | |||
| FPIR | Anti bo PAG 1 | Touzard et al 2013 [ | |
| BG | Anti-bo PAG 1 | Zoli et al 1991 [ | R726 |
| Buffalo PAGs | |||
| BK | Anti-wbPAGs | Barbato et al 2013 [ | R858 |
| BM | Anti-wbPAGs (different N terminal sequence) | R859 | |
| Goat PAGs | |||
| BB | Anti-capPAG55 + 59 kDa | Garbayo et al 1998 [ | R708 |
| BE | Anti-capPAG55 + 62 kDa | R706 | |
| Ovine PAG | Anti-ovPAG57 | El-Amiri et al 2004 [ | R780 |
| BN | Anti-bovine PAG 1 | Zoli et al 1991 [ | |
| Placental Lactogens | |||
| Friesen oPL | Anti ovinePL | Chan et al 1978 [ | |
| BF | Anti- bovine PL | Alvarez-Oxiley et al 2007 [ | |
| PROLACTIN | Anti humanPRL | NIH | |
| SBU3 | Monoclonal ab, Homologous to ovine PAG | Gogolin-Ewens et al,1987 [ | |
| LECTINS | Vector Laboratories, | Peterboro, UK | |
| DSA | |||
| DBA | |||
| ePHA | |||
| lPHA | |||
*For the differences between “ancient” and “new” PAGs see [14], the Touzard et al reference and Wallace et al [7].
Assessment of the immunoreactivity of non giraffoid Ruminant BNC
| ANTIBODY | COW | EWE | BISON | Tragulus | Springbok | Impala | Red deer | Chinese water deer | Wildebeest | White tail | Wapiti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “ancient”PAGs | |||||||||||
| RA | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | + | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | |
| RD | +++ | +++ | + | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ||||
| BJ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | + | +++ | |||||
| “new”PAGs | |||||||||||
| RB | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| RC | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| RU | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| FPIR | +++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | |||||
| BC | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | + | +++ | +++ | ||
| BO | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | |||
| Buffalo PAGs | |||||||||||
| BK | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | + | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| BM | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |||
| Goat PAGs | |||||||||||
| BB | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| BE | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| Ovine PAG | |||||||||||
| BN | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | + | +++ | +++ | |
| SBU3 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | |||
| Placental Lactogens | |||||||||||
| Friesen bPL | +++ | ++ | +++ | − | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
| BF | ++ | ++ | +++ | − | − | + | ++ | + | +++ | + | +++ |
| PROLACTIN | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| SBU3 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | |||
| LECTINS | |||||||||||
| DSA | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | |||||||
| DBA | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |||||
| ePHA | +++ | ||||||||||
| lPHA | +++ |
Scale used: —, no reactivity, +, ++, +++ indicate increasing levels of reactivity. Empty oblong: assessment not done
Quantitation of the number of immunoreactive BNC per mm2 in four non giraffoid Ruminants
| VILLUS COUNT AREA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| SPECIES | ANTIBODY OR | FETAL END 0 -50% n = 5 | MATERNAL END 50 – 100% n = 5 |
| COW( | BB | 80 ± 12 | 85 ± 11 |
| BC | 90 ± 6 | 95 ± 9 | |
| BF | 90 ± 12 | 85 ± 10 | |
| BG | 88 ± 10 | 85 ± 15 | |
| BK | 88 ± 15 | 80 ± 10 | |
|
|
|
| |
| EWE ( | RA | 68 ± 9 | 65 ± 10 |
| RB | 36 ± 8 | 40 ± 11 | |
| ovinePL | 28 ± 10 | 30 ± 8 | |
| bovinePL | 30 ± 8 | 32 ± 10 | |
| TRAGULUS spp | RU | 48 ± 14 | 50 ± 10 |
|
|
|
| |
| PRONGHORN ( | 97 ± 12 | 84 ± 15 | |
| RU | 78 ± 11 | 69 ± 12 | |
|
|
|
|
No significant differences were detected between fetal and maternal end counts
Figure 1Pronghorn and Tragulus; placentomal semiserial sections showing similar localisations and even distributions of BNCs throughout the sections using PAG antibody or lectin localisations. Maternal villus, mv. Arrows indicate different levels of the same BNCs on the pairs of sections. Arrowheads identify the fetal basal chorionic layer on the Pronghorn. Scale bar = 250 μm. Tragulus; Scale bar = 80 μm.
The immunoreactivity of the BNC in the Giraffoid clade
| GIRAFFE | OKAPI | PRONGHORN | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANTIBODY | Different Placentomes | Different animal | Different Placentomes | Different animal | |||
| “ancient”PAGs | G1A | G1B | G2 | P1 | P1G | P6 | |
| RA | (+) | (+) | (+) | +++ | ++++ | ++ | ++ |
| RD | − | − | − | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
| BJ | − | +Mend | +Mend | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
| “new”PAGs | |||||||
| RB | − | − | − | + | + | ++ | ++ |
| RC | − | +Mend | − | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| RU | ++Mend only | +++M end | ++Mend | + | + | + | + |
| FPIR | − | − | − | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| BC | − | − | − | − | +++ | ++ | ++ |
| BO | − | − | − | ++ | + | +++ | |
| Buffalo PAGs | − | ||||||
| BK | − | +Mend | − | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| BM | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Goat PAGs | |||||||
| BB | ++Mend | ++Mend | − | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| BE | ++Mend | ++Mend | +++Mend | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ |
| Ovine PAG | |||||||
| BN | ++Mend | ++Mend | ++Mend | − | ++ | + | +++ |
| SBU3 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Placental Lactogens | |||||||
| Friesen bPL | ++Fend | ++Fend | +++Fend | − | − | − | − |
| BF | ++Fend | ++Fend | ++Fend | + | − | − | − |
| PROLACTIN | ++Fend | ++Fend | ++Fend | − | − | − | − |
| LECTINS | |||||||
| DSA | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | |
| DBA | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| ePHA | ++ | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | ||
| lPHA | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |||
Scale used: —, no reactivity, (+) sporadic/occasional: +, ++, +++ indicate increasing levels of reactivity. Empty oblong: assessment not done.
M/F ends: Maternal or Fetal ends of the Fetal villus
Quantitative estimates of the number of immunoreactive BNC cells per mm2 in Giraffe
| Antibody or | Villus count position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 – 25% | 25% -50% | 50% -75% | 75%- 100% | ||
| Animal | Fetal end | Maternal end | |||
| Giraffe A |
| 61 ± 13 | 60 ± 11 | 63 ± 12 | 62 ± 14 |
| bovinePL | 27 ± 6 | 1 ± 2 | 1 ± 1 | 0 | |
| PRL | 29 ± 6 | 1 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | 0 | |
| BF | 67 ± 2 | 27 ± 8 | 11 ± 2 | 5 ± 2 | |
| BE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 ± 16 | |
| RU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 ± 9 | |
| Giraffe B |
| 56 ± 9 | 58 ± 11 | 55 ± 11 | 56 ± 12 |
| bovinePL | 28 ± 1 | 3 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | |
| ovinePL | 14 ± 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| PRL | 24 ± 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| BF | 53 ± 4 | 29 ± 9 | 24 ± 9 | 21 ± 6 | |
| BE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 ± 6 | |
| RU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 ± 5 | |
| BB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 ± 5 | |
| BJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 ± 7 | |
| BN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 ± 5 | |
No significant differences were detected between fetal and maternal end counts of the Lectins
Figure 2Giraffe placentomal fetal villus chorionic ends. Lactogen antibodies are present at the bases of the fetal chorionic villi (eg, at arrows); no BNCs can be identified using PAG antibody; BNCs are localised throughout the villi the using lectin. Arrows indicate different levels of probably the same BNCs on the sections using the lactogen antibody or lectin localisation. Scale bar =50 μm.
Figure 3Giraffe placentomal fetal villus caruncular ends. PAG antibodies are present at the apices of the fetal chorionic villi (eg, at arrows); no BNCs can be identified using lactogen antibody; BNCs are localised throughout the villi using lectin. Arrows indicate BNCs in very similar positions using the PAG antibody or lectin localisation. Scale bar =50 μm.