Literature DB >> 35039840

Visceral obesity with and without metabolic syndrome: incidence and clinical impact in esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with curative intent.

Jessie A Elliott1, Noel E Donlon1, Peter Beddy2, Claire L Donohoe1, Suzanne L Doyle1,3, Sinead King1, Narayanasamy Ravi1, John V Reynolds1.   

Abstract

Visceral obesity (VO) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); however, their impact on operative and oncological outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of VO and MetS among patients with EAC, and to assess their independent impact on operative and oncological outcomes. A total of 454 consecutive patients undergoing treatment with curative intent were studied. Total, subcutaneous, visceral fat area (VFA), and lean body mass (LBM) were measured by computed tomography pretreatment, with VO defined as VFA >163.8cm2 for men and 80.1cm2 for women. MetS was defined per the ATPIII definition. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were utilized to determine independent predictors of oncologic and operative outcomes. A total of 227 patients (50.0%) had VO. A total of 134 (30%) overall had MetS, 44% in the VO cohort. VO was associated with Barrett's esophagus (P = 0.002) and lower cT (P = 0.006) and cN stage (P = 0.011), and improved disease-specific (P = 0.021) and overall survival (P = 0.012). No survival benefit existed for patients with VO who also had MetS. For operative complications, neither VO nor MetS increased the severity of complications, or mortality. However, VO was significantly (P = 0.035) associated with anastomotic leak and pneumonia (P = 0.037). MetS alone did not increase complication risk. VO increases specific major operative complications with no increase in mortality. VO improved survival, mainly relating to earlier stage disease; however, co-existent MetS abrogated this benefit. These seemingly paradoxical outcomes highlight manageable and potentially targetable perioperative challenges in the context of an overall favorable oncologic vista.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenocarcinoma; body composition; computed tomography; esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; metabolic syndrome; neoadjuvant therapy; nutrition; survival; visceral fat

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35039840     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   2.822


  3 in total

Review 1.  Anti-reflux versus conventional self-expanding metal stents in the palliation of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  João Guilherme Ribeiro Jordão Sasso; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Igor Mendonça Proença; Epifânio Silvino do Monte Junior; Igor Braga Ribeiro; Sergio A Sánchez-Luna; Spencer Cheng; Alexandre Moraes Bestetti; Angelo So Taa Kum; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-10-17

2.  Incidence and Impact of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus Treated with Curative Intent.

Authors:  John V Reynolds; Noel E Donlon; Jessie A Elliott; Brendan Moran; Hugo Temperley; Tim S Nugent; Maria Davern; Sinead King; Melissa Conroy; Joanne Lysaght; Narayanasamy Ravi; Carmel Ryan; Stephen Finn; Suzanne Norris; Clare L Donohoe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Role of Obesity, Physical Exercise, Adipose Tissue-Skeletal Muscle Crosstalk and Molecular Advances in Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jan Bilski; Monika Pinkas; Dagmara Wojcik-Grzybek; Marcin Magierowski; Edyta Korbut; Agnieszka Mazur-Bialy; Gracjana Krzysiek-Maczka; Slawomir Kwiecien; Katarzyna Magierowska; Tomasz Brzozowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.