Literature DB >> 35039170

Effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C on prognosis in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Fatma Yildirim1, Irem Karaman2, Meltem Şimşek3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35039170      PMCID: PMC8719926          DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2021.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)        ISSN: 0025-7753            Impact factor:   3.200


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, We read with great interest the study by Kavurgacı et al., which was published online-ahead-of-print in Medicina Clinica. In this retrospective study, 323 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were divided into two groups and the clinical features of patients who received high-dose vitamin C (VitC) were compared with those who did not. There was no difference in terms of length of hospital stay, re-admission rate, admission rate to the intensive care unit (ICU), and the need for advanced oxygen therapy between the groups that received and did not receive VitC, whereas the need for advanced medical treatment was higher in the group receiving VitC with no difference in terms of mortality. This is an important issue but there are some practical questions to be answered for a proper clinical extrapolation. Firstly, when the baseline characteristics of the groups that received and did not receive VitC were investigated, there seems no difference in terms of gender and comorbidities. In this study where clinical data was very insufficient, among the inflammatory parameters that was examined in the study, C-reactive protein levels were similar between two groups, whereas ferritin level was higher in the group given VitC (median 415.5 vs 271 ng/mL; p  = 0.029). There was no difference between the groups in terms of SpO2 (87.3 ± 8.7% vs 87.9 ± 8.3%; p  = 0.07), which was the only clinical data presented in the study. The information obtained from the study regarding the severity of the COVID-19 patients is limited. Considering that this study was retrospective, it is understood that the administration of VitC was done randomly. As emphasized in the introduction part of the study, no scoring was used for cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, VitC delivery criteria should be defined more clearly. In addition, the group which did not receive VitC was older (64.3 ± 14.5 vs 60.2 ± 13.7; p  = 0.009). The group receiving VitC had an increase in ferritin levels after treatment (415.5 vs 530.6 ng/ml; p  = 0.006). This results are in contrast to the possible expected positive results of VitC in COVID-19. Secondly; the need for advanced medical treatment was higher in the group that received VitC (24.2% vs 8.8%; p  < 0.001). The studies conducted with the use of VitC in COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia and hypoxic respiratory failure resulted in positive results with the VitC level varying between 6 g/day and 20 g/day. In the study of Kavurgacı et al., the level of 2 g/day given for 3 days seems to be at the supplement level and should be considered as below the treatment dose. COVID-19 can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), secondary infections, and sepsis. An intravenous treatment with high-dose VitC has shown beneficial effects on sepsis and septic shock. An intravenous infusion of VitC (50 mg/kg body weight) every 6 h for 96 h significantly decreased mortality and increased the number of ICU-free days in patients with sepsis and ARDS, compared to the control group. Although it was stated that all of the patients in Kavurgacı’s et al.’s study had severe acute respiratory syndrome, there was no data regarding the PaO2/FIO2 ratios of the patients, and the type of oxygen respiratory support treatments applied. It was reported that mortality rates were similar between groups that received and did not receive VitC (11.1% vs 14.1%; p  = 0.52). However, in this study, no data regarding the APACHE-II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) and SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score) scores of the patients were presented. In addition, in Kavurgacı’s et al. study only 7% of the patients were followed up in the ICU which may have affected the mortality assessment. In our recent study, we included the patients who were intubated in the ICU with the diagnosis of COVID-19 associated ARDS and who have ICU follow-up for at least 48 h. We accepted as high-dose VitC being equal to or above 200/mg/kg/day for at least 4 days. It was observed that high-dose VitC reduced mortality and prolonged life expectancy in this severe patient group. In the daily SOFA follow-up, daily improvement in the score was detected in our VitC group. Further prospective clinical trials need to confirm appropriate usage of VitC in COVID-19 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.
  4 in total

1.  Beneficial aspects of high dose intravenous vitamin C on patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in severe condition: a retrospective case series study.

Authors:  Bing Zhao; Yun Ling; Jian Li; Yibing Peng; Jun Huang; Yihui Wang; Hongping Qu; Yuan Gao; Yingchuan Li; Bijie Hu; Shuihua Lu; Hongzhou Lu; Wenhong Zhang; Enqiang Mao
Journal:  Ann Palliat Med       Date:  2020-11-17

2.  Effect of Vitamin C Infusion on Organ Failure and Biomarkers of Inflammation and Vascular Injury in Patients With Sepsis and Severe Acute Respiratory Failure: The CITRIS-ALI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alpha A Fowler; Jonathon D Truwit; R Duncan Hite; Peter E Morris; Christine DeWilde; Anna Priday; Bernard Fisher; Leroy R Thacker; Ramesh Natarajan; Donald F Brophy; Robin Sculthorpe; Rahul Nanchal; Aamer Syed; Jamie Sturgill; Greg S Martin; Jonathan Sevransky; Markos Kashiouris; Stella Hamman; Katherine F Egan; Andrei Hastings; Wendy Spencer; Shawnda Tench; Omar Mehkri; James Bindas; Abhijit Duggal; Jeanette Graf; Stephanie Zellner; Lynda Yanny; Catherine McPolin; Tonya Hollrith; David Kramer; Charles Ojielo; Tessa Damm; Evan Cassity; Aleksandra Wieliczko; Matthew Halquist
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Before-After Study.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Vikramjit Khangoora; Racquel Rivera; Michael H Hooper; John Catravas
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C on prognosis in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Authors:  Kavurgacı Suna; Uzel Şener Melahat; Yıldız Murat; Öztürk Ergür Figen; Öztürk Ayperi
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.200

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.