| Literature DB >> 35038818 |
Dae Young Kim1,2, Seung Lyul Oh1,3, Jae-Young Lim1,3.
Abstract
Muscle aging ultimately leads to the deterioration of human physiological functioning, including declining muscle strength, loss of muscle mass, and decreased quality of life in advanced age. Eccentric exercise is a key intervention that has the potential to ameliorate this problem. Recent studies have focused on evidence-based exercise interventions to prevent declines in muscle strength and physical function in older adults. This paper reviewed relevant literature on the use of eccentric exercise to improve muscle and mobility function in older adults. We explained not only the changes in mobility that occur with aging but also the rationale for and positive effects of eccentric intervention in older adults. We also explored several proposed mechanisms for the intramuscular changes caused by eccentric muscle contraction and considered the safety and side effects accompanying eccentric training. We concluded by suggesting that eccentric exercise is an exercise modality that can potentially improve muscle strength and enhance mobility in older adults.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Exercise; Mobility; Muscles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35038818 PMCID: PMC8984170 DOI: 10.4235/agmr.21.0138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Geriatr Med Res ISSN: 2508-4798
Fig. 1.Flowchart of the methodology used in this review.
Studies comparing the effects of eccentric and concentric contractions to traditional and other resistance training on muscle mechanical function
| Study | Year | Participant characteristics | Device & modality | Intervention | Outcomes (p-value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim et al. | 2019 | ET (n=8), CT (n=8) | Eccentric ergometer, leg press | Volume: | Significant improvements in muscle strength, isokinetic and isometric power, and physical function (stair climb and gait speed, p<0.05). |
| Mean age: 73 y (range, 68–78 y) | - ET: 50% of estimated 1RM tested via eccentric device, two times (30 min) per week. | ||||
| - CT: 50% of estimated 1RM tested via the EN dynamic seated leg press, two times (30 min) per week. | |||||
| Duration: 8 weeks | |||||
| Mueller et al. | 2009 | ET (n=23), RT (n=23), CT (n=16) | Eccentric ergometer, leg press, leg curl | Volume: | Significant increase with ET in isometric leg extension (8.4%) and eccentric muscle coordination (-43%) (p<0.05) |
| Mean age: 80.6 y (range, 71–89 y) | - ET: initial load on the eccentric ergometer (females 30 W, males 50 W) | ||||
| - RT: 20-min training (leg press, knee extension, leg curl, hip extension) | |||||
| - CT: no exercise | |||||
| Duration: 12 weeks | |||||
| LaStayo et al. | 2017 | ET (n=68), CT (n=66) | Eccentric ergometer, leg press | Volume: | No group differences in the numbers surviving without a fall (p=0.565) or near-fall (p=0.678) |
| Mean age: 76.1 y (range, 65–93 y) | - ET: 60 min per session, three times per week | ||||
| - CT: 3 sets of 15 repetitions of a seated bilateral leg press, 60%–65% of 1RM | |||||
| Raj et al. | 2012 | ET (n=13), CT (n=12) | Isokinetic dynamometer | Volume: | Both ET and CT improved 1RM (Δ23%–35%, p<0.01), 6-m fast walk (Δ5%–7%, p<0.01), and concentric torque at 60 and 120°/sec (Δ6%–8%, p<0.05) |
| Mean age: 68 y | - ET (eccentric): 3 sets of 5 repetitions, 100% of 1RM | ||||
| - ET (concentric): 3 sets of 10 repetitions, 50% of 1RM | |||||
| - CT (eccentric): 2 sets of 10 repetitions, 75% of 1RM | |||||
| - CT (concentric): 2 sets of 10 repetitions, 75% of 1RM | |||||
| Duration: 16 weeks | |||||
| Sanudo et al. | 2019 | ET (n=18), CT (n=18) | YoYo leg-extensor flywheel ergometer, leg press | Volume: | Significant improvements in TUG and COPAP in ET compared with CT |
| Mean age: 65 y (range, 61–69 y) | - ET: 4 sets of 9 repetitions (2 repetitions at the beginning of each set to initiate the flywheel movement, 7 maximal bilateral repetitions accelerating the wheel in concentric action) | Mean power also increased in ET | |||
| Leszcszak et al. | 2013 | ET (n=10), high-velocity group (n=9) | Seated leg press and leg curl | Volume: | No group differences in the numbers surviving without a fall (p=0.565) or near-fall (p=0.678). |
| Mean age: 74.89 y (range, 65–89 y) | - Eccentric group: 3 sets of 8–12 repetitions at 75% of 1RM on each of the three machines (concentric phase, 1–2 sec; eccentric phase, 3–5 sec) | ||||
| - High-velocity group: 3 sets of 8–12 repetitions at 50% of 1RM on each machine (concentric phase, high velocity; eccentric phase, 2–3 sec) | |||||
| Chen et al. | 2017 | ET (n=13), CT (n=13) | Leg extension machine | Volume: 30–60 min per session (3 and 6 sets) | Functional physical fitness (30-second chair stand) and maximal concentric contraction strength of the knee extensors (eccentric>concentric). |
| - ET: 10%–100% or 1RM | |||||
| - CT: 50%–100% of 1RM | |||||
| Duration: 12 weeks | |||||
| Gluchowski et al. | 2017 | ET (n=11), EBT (eccentric-biased, n=11), CT (n=11) | Leg press | Volume: 4 sets of 10 repetitions, 70% of 1RM | No significant differences between groups in eccentric maximal strength, functional capacity assessments, body composition, and blood biomarkers. |
| Mean age: 67 y | - ET: only performed eccentric phase (2–1) | ||||
| - EBT: performed the concentric phase bilaterally (2–1–2 tempo) | |||||
| - CT: 2 sec to lift the load (concentric), 1-sec pause, then 2-sec lowering (eccentric) phase | |||||
| Duration: 8 weeks | |||||
| Dias et al. | 2015 | 26 healthy elderly women: ET (n=13), CT (n=13) | Leg press, knee extension machines | Volume: ET, concentric and eccentric phases performed using 1.5 and 4.5 sec, respectively. | Both ET and CT improved knee extension 1RM (24%–26%); TUG test (11–16%), 6-m walk test (9%–12%) (p<0.05) |
| Mean age: 67 y | CT, 1.5 sec for the concentric phase and 1.5 sec for the eccentric phase | ||||
| Duration: 12 weeks | |||||
| Katsura et al. | 2019 | ET (n=9), CT (n=8) | Chair and push squats | Volume: | Significant difference in muscle thickness (21.6% increase), MVC (38.3% increase); TUG (16.7% decrease) and balance (35.1% less movement) (p<0.05) |
| Mean age: 72 y (range, 65–84 y) | - ET: sitting down in a chair | ||||
| - CT: standing up from a chair (2–5 sets of 10–15 repetitions) | |||||
| Home-based training included; 2–3 sets of 10–15 repetitions each day at least 2 days a week | |||||
| Duration: 8 weeks |
ET, eccentric training; CT, concentric training; 1RM, one-repetition maximum; LST, low-intensity resistance training with slow movement and tonic force generation; LN, low-intensity normal speed; TUG, Times Up and Go; MVC, maximal voluntary contraction; COPAP, anterior-posterior center of pressure.
Fig. 2.Advantages of eccentric contraction in older adults. DOMS, delayed onset of muscle soreness.
Experimental studies of mechanical and biochemical effects of eccentric contraction
| Study | Year | Subject characteristics | Device & Modality | Intervention | Mechanisms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lomonosova et al. | 2014 | 56 male Wistar rats (3 months old) | Downhill treadmill | Downhill treadmill running: speed of 20 m/min on a -16° incline for 40 min | Exercise induced an up-regulation of nNOS mRNA expression level in soleus muscles when compared with muscles of control non-exercised rats. |
| One day before eccentric exercise testing by running at 5 m/min with a 2° uphill grade for 15 min | |||||
| Da Rocha et al. | 2017 | 8 week old male C57BL/6 mice | Uphill & downhill treadmill | Treadmill running: 5 days, 10 min/day at 3 m/min; rodents performed the incremental load test | In the soleus, the OTR/down group increased all analyzed proinflammatory cytokines, the OTR/up group only increased IL-6. |
| OTR (n=16), OTR/up (n=16), OTR/down (n=16), CT (n=16) | |||||
| Chavanelle et al. | 2014 | Male Wistar rats (n=18, age 3 months) | Uphill & downhill treadmill | Motor driven treadmill at various speed and inclines (+15%; 0%; -15%; -30%) | At the same mechanical intensity, the eccentric muscle contraction generated muscle force with lower oxygen cost compared to concentric contractions. |
| Rest for 3 min, run at 15 cm/sec, with increase of 5 cm/sec every 3 minutes | |||||
| Lavagnino et al. | 2014 | Sprague-Dawley rats (n=5, 1 month; n=5, 3 month; n=5, 12 month) | Cyclic exercise and tendon contraction | Individual rat tail tendon fascicles (RTTfs) from 5 rats from each age group were cyclically loaded to 2% strain at 0.17 Hz for 2 hours | The amount of initial tendon elongation after cyclic exercise was age-dependent, with older tendons having significantly less elongation than younger tendons. |
| Kim et al. | 2016 | Sprague-Dawley rats (young, 4 months; late middle-aged, 20 months) | Uphill & downhill treadmill | 21 m/min at +10° slope for uphill training; 16 m/min with a -16° slope for downhill training: 60 min/day, 5 days/week for 8 weeks | BMD levels more increased in the downhill training group relative to the uphill training group in late-middle-aged bone. |
| YC (n=7), LMC (n=7), LMD (n=8), LMU (n=7) | |||||
| West et al. | 2018 | Fischer 344 Brown Norway rats, male adult (10 months) and old (30 months) | Electrical stimulation | The muscles in the anterior compartment (tibialis anterior; extensor digitorum longus) undergo high-force lengthening contraction as a result of the stronger antagonist muscles in the posterior compartment | Protein synthesis response in old rats was associated with decreased IRS1 protein levels. |
| Hill et al. | 2017 | 10-week-old (n=40, young) and 78-week-old (n=40, aged) female CD-1 mice | Electrical stimulation | The muscle was activated by electrical stimulation. Each preparation was allowed to stabilize for 10 min before performing isometric contractions | The ability of older EDL to withstand better the damaging effects of a sustained bout of eccentric muscle activity compared with younger EDL. |
| McBride et al. | 1995 | Female, 6- and 32-month-old Fisher 344/Brown Norway rats | Electrical stimulation | Stimulation: 100 Hz | The aged muscles generated a greater percentage of their maximum tension at lower stimulus frequencies. |
| Trains provided for 2.5-sec maximum contractile force | |||||
| 4 sets of six repetitions with a 20-sec rest between repetitions and a 5-min rest between sets |
nNOS, neuronal nitric oxide synthase; IL, interleukin; OTR: overtrained by running without inclination; OTR/up or down: overtrained by uphill or downhill running; CT: sedentary mice; YC: young control; LMC: late middle-aged; LMD: late middle-aged downhill; LMU: late middle-aged uphill; BMD, bone mineral density; EDL, extensor digitorum longus muscle.