The mature skeletons of hard corals, termed stony or scleractinian corals, are made of aragonite (CaCO3). During their formation, particles attaching to the skeleton's growing surface are calcium carbonate, transiently amorphous. Here we show that amorphous particles are observed frequently and reproducibly just outside the skeleton, where a calicoblastic cell layer envelops and deposits the forming skeleton. The observation of particles in these locations, therefore, is consistent with nucleation and growth of particles in intracellular vesicles. The observed extraskeletal particles range in size between 0.2 and 1.0 μm and contain more of the amorphous precursor phases than the skeleton surface or bulk, where they gradually crystallize to aragonite. This observation was repeated in three diverse genera of corals, Acropora sp., Stylophora pistillata─differently sensitive to ocean acidification (OA)─and Turbinaria peltata, demonstrating that intracellular particles are a major source of material during the additive manufacturing of coral skeletons. Thus, particles are formed away from seawater, in a presumed intracellular calcifying fluid (ICF) in closed vesicles and not, as previously assumed, in the extracellular calcifying fluid (ECF), which, unlike ICF, is partly open to seawater. After particle attachment, the growing skeleton surface remains exposed to ECF, and, remarkably, its crystallization rate varies significantly across genera. The skeleton surface layers containing amorphous pixels vary in thickness across genera: ∼2.1 μm in Acropora, 1.1 μm in Stylophora, and 0.9 μm in Turbinaria. Thus, the slow-crystallizing Acropora skeleton surface remains amorphous and soluble longer, including overnight, when the pH in the ECF drops. Increased skeleton surface solubility is consistent with Acropora's vulnerability to OA, whereas the Stylophora skeleton surface layer crystallizes faster, consistent with Stylophora's resilience to OA. Turbinaria, whose response to OA has not yet been tested, is expected to be even more resilient than Stylophora, based on the present data.
The mature skeletons of hard corals, termed stony or scleractinian corals, are made of aragonite (CaCO3). During their formation, particles attaching to the skeleton's growing surface are calcium carbonate, transiently amorphous. Here we show that amorphous particles are observed frequently and reproducibly just outside the skeleton, where a calicoblastic cell layer envelops and deposits the forming skeleton. The observation of particles in these locations, therefore, is consistent with nucleation and growth of particles in intracellular vesicles. The observed extraskeletal particles range in size between 0.2 and 1.0 μm and contain more of the amorphous precursor phases than the skeleton surface or bulk, where they gradually crystallize to aragonite. This observation was repeated in three diverse genera of corals, Acropora sp., Stylophora pistillata─differently sensitive to ocean acidification (OA)─and Turbinaria peltata, demonstrating that intracellular particles are a major source of material during the additive manufacturing of coral skeletons. Thus, particles are formed away from seawater, in a presumed intracellular calcifying fluid (ICF) in closed vesicles and not, as previously assumed, in the extracellular calcifying fluid (ECF), which, unlike ICF, is partly open to seawater. After particle attachment, the growing skeleton surface remains exposed to ECF, and, remarkably, its crystallization rate varies significantly across genera. The skeleton surface layers containing amorphous pixels vary in thickness across genera: ∼2.1 μm in Acropora, 1.1 μm in Stylophora, and 0.9 μm in Turbinaria. Thus, the slow-crystallizing Acropora skeleton surface remains amorphous and soluble longer, including overnight, when the pH in the ECF drops. Increased skeleton surface solubility is consistent with Acropora's vulnerability to OA, whereas the Stylophora skeleton surface layer crystallizes faster, consistent with Stylophora's resilience to OA. Turbinaria, whose response to OA has not yet been tested, is expected to be even more resilient than Stylophora, based on the present data.
All scleractinian or
stony corals form aragonite (CaCO3) skeletons, which provide
the scaffolding for entire coral reef
ecosystems. Will coral reefs survive ocean acidification (OA)? Current
models and projections include predictions that corals will continue
to calcify even when water chemistry in coral reefs switches from
net precipitation to net dissolution, which is expected to happen
in 2050.[1] Why this is the case, however,
is unclear. Importantly, different coral genera respond differently
to OA.[2]Stylophora pistillata, one of the most studied coral species, exhibits the greatest resilience
to OA.[2]S. pistillata was
shown to form its aragonite skeleton by attachment of amorphous precursor
particles, including hydrated and anhydrous amorphous calcium carbonate
(ACC-H2O and ACC).[3] Then, this
result was reproduced in five other genera and expanded to include
both particle attachment and ion attachment to achieve dense, space-filling
skeletons at the nano- and microscales.[4] Particles were assumed to nucleate and grow inside intracellular
vesicles, within the calicoblastic epithelium—that is,
the cell layer that deposits the coral skeleton and tightly envelops
the forming surface. These vesicles were presumed to be filled with
intracellular calcifying fluid (ICF), with closely biologically controlled
chemical composition, favoring particle formation. Once formed, intracellular
particles are presumed to be delivered, exocytosed, and attached to
the forming surface of the coral skeleton.[4] Between the calicoblastic epithelium and the coral skeleton
is a small amount, 1–2 μm thick,[5,6] of
liquid or gel termed extracellular calcifying fluid (ECF). The ECF
is known to acidify when seawater acidifies,[2] because the ECF is partly open to seawater.[7] In contrast, the ICF is intracellular; thus, it is expected to be
precisely controlled by cells and not at all open to seawater. (Embryonic
corals may differ.[6])To simulate
OA in aquaria, Venn et al.[2] bubbled CO2 in seawater and observed the effects on the
coral calcification rate, on pH in the ECF, and in the cytoplasm of
calicoblastic cells. With four different seawater pH values—8.1,
7.8, 7.4, and 7.2—and three different coral species—Stylophora pistillata, Pocillopora damicornis, and Acropora hyacinthus—they observed that
the daytime calcification rate decreased significantly for Pocillopora and Acropora but remained constant
for Stylophora. The ICF pH in intracellular vesicles
was not measured, but the intracellular pH in the cytoplasm of calicoblastic
cells decreased slightly and similarly (pH changed by ∼ –0.3
for all genera from control values ∼7.4), as did the ECF pH
measured during the day (∼ –0.5 for all genera
from control values ∼8.2). The parameter that changed most
dramatically and differently across genera was the ECF pH measured
at night: ∼ –0.4, ∼ –0.6,
and ∼ –0.7 change for Stylophora, Pocillopora, and Acropora, respectively.
The decrease of calcification and ECF night-time pH with OA for these
three corals is shown in Figure .
Figure 1
(a) Calcification rate and (b) night-time pH measured
in extracellular
calcifying fluid (ECF), between calicoblastic epithelium and
forming skeleton surface, as seawater pH decreases in simulated ocean
acidification (OA, pH 8.1 → 7.2) experiments in three coral
genera and species: Stylophora pistillata (Sp, light blue), Pocillopora damicornis (Pd, green), and Acropora hyacinthus (Ah, purple). These are selected, replotted data
from Venn et al., 2019.[2] (a) During the
day (open circles) the calcification rate is constant for Stylophora, but it decreases with OA for Pocillopora and Acropora. At night, calcification decreases
with OA for all genera, but especially for Acropora, which goes below zero (black solid line); thus, the skeleton formed
during the day dissolves at night. (b) The pH values in the ECF during
the day, when photosynthesis is active, decrease to 7.8 identically
for all three genera; thus, they are omitted here. Only night-time
pH values in the ECF are shown, as they vary dramatically across the
three genera. The solid lines are linear fits of the data; the 1:1
line (black dashed line) is where pHECF = pHseawater. Clearly, as the seawater pH decreases, the ECF night-time pH decreases,
but at slower rates for all genera compared to seawater. Stylophora ECF pH is the slowest, Pocillopora intermediate,
and Acropora the fastest, that is, closest to the
seawater pH decrease with OA.
(a) Calcification rate and (b) night-time pH measured
in extracellular
calcifying fluid (ECF), between calicoblastic epithelium and
forming skeleton surface, as seawater pH decreases in simulated ocean
acidification (OA, pH 8.1 → 7.2) experiments in three coral
genera and species: Stylophora pistillata (Sp, light blue), Pocillopora damicornis (Pd, green), and Acropora hyacinthus (Ah, purple). These are selected, replotted data
from Venn et al., 2019.[2] (a) During the
day (open circles) the calcification rate is constant for Stylophora, but it decreases with OA for Pocillopora and Acropora. At night, calcification decreases
with OA for all genera, but especially for Acropora, which goes below zero (black solid line); thus, the skeleton formed
during the day dissolves at night. (b) The pH values in the ECF during
the day, when photosynthesis is active, decrease to 7.8 identically
for all three genera; thus, they are omitted here. Only night-time
pH values in the ECF are shown, as they vary dramatically across the
three genera. The solid lines are linear fits of the data; the 1:1
line (black dashed line) is where pHECF = pHseawater. Clearly, as the seawater pH decreases, the ECF night-time pH decreases,
but at slower rates for all genera compared to seawater. Stylophora ECF pH is the slowest, Pocillopora intermediate,
and Acropora the fastest, that is, closest to the
seawater pH decrease with OA.The ECF night-time pH accompanies the observed decrease in night-time
calcification rate for the three genera, and best distinguishes them
from one another in their resilience to OA. Clearly, for all genera,
the ECF night-time pH is biologically controlled, as indicated by
the different slopes for the three genera, all of them above the 1:1
line in Figure b.
Is it possible that intracellular particle formation and ICF are less
or not at all affected by OA, but once the particles are exocytosed
and exposed to ECF they dissolve as the ECF pH decreases with OA?
This would explain the difference across genera observed at night
but not during the day.[2] Biomineralization
and respiration proceed day and night, whereas photosynthesis is only
active during the day. Thus, it is not surprising that biomineralization
conditions differ between day and night. Photosynthesis, done by the
coral polyp animal’s symbiont dinoflagellates, changes
the chemistry internal to the animal in two different ways: it removes
aqueous CO2 and therefore increases the pH in the surrounding
fluids. Furthermore, photosynthesis produces carbohydrates that feed
the coral polyp animal, thus providing metabolic energy, which the
animal can use to better control its internal chemistry, and specifically
the ECF day-time pH.If the nucleation and growth of nanoparticles
occurs in intracellular
vesicles, as hypothesized previously,[4] it
should be possible to observe particles in intracellular vesicles
in the calicoblastic cells in all coral genera—those
extremely sensitive to OA, such as Acropora, and
those resilient to OA, such as Stylophora. To test
this hypothesis, we searched for particles outside the forming skeleton
surface and strived to analyze the mineral phases present in such
particles, if they exist, in three diverse corals.Where the
particles nucleate and grow before they attach to the
forming skeleton surface, in the ECF or in the hypothesized but never
directly observed ICF, makes a significant difference. If they nucleate
and grow in the ECF, OA will be inescapably fatal for the most sensitive
corals, such as Acropora.If instead nucleation
and growth of particles occurs intracellularly,
even the most sensitive genera may have a chance at surviving OA.
As long as the pH of the oceans stays above the threshold of net dissolution,
the animals will still be able to form new skeletons, even if ECF
conditions prevent particle nucleation and growth.The supersaturation
with respect to aragonite iswhere the solubility
product is Ksp = 7.184, as obtained by
Sevilgen et al.[8] using the salinity values
in Mucci.[9] As shown by Cohen and Holcomb,[10] nucleation
of aragonite occurs at very high saturation states, Ωaragonite ≥ 20, whereas at lower supersaturation states, with 6 <
Ωaragonite < 19, crystal growth is favored over
nucleation.[10] For other carbonates, amorphous
and crystalline, similar supersaturation ranges are expected for nucleation
and growth. In the ECF, the supersaturation measured by Sevilgen et
al.[8] in Stylophora is
Ωaragonite = 12; thus, only crystal growth occurs,
and this must be growth by ion attachment. If nanoparticles are observed
in the tissue, they require that ICF conditions be appropriate for
nucleation; thus, the supersaturation in ICF must be greater than
in ECF, or else nucleation could not occur.[10] Such intracellular vesicles, and the ICF they contain, in which
particles nucleate and grow, have been observed in single cells of
sea urchin embryos, where they contained ICF with more than 1 M calcium![11]If such high-concentration and supersaturated
droplets of solution
exist intracellularly in corals, sea urchin embryos,[11] or adult regenerating sea urchin spines,[12] they must be confined by vesicles, with phospholipid membranes
that keep them well isolated from the cytoplasm. This is because the
calcium concentrations necessary for nucleation (mM–M) are
toxic for any eukaryotic cells, whose cytoplasm has orders of magnitude
lower concentrations (nM).[4]
Results and Discussion
Extraskeletal
Particles
Using photoemission electron
microscopy (PEEM), we analyzed species that are representative of
three different genera of corals: one extremely sensitive to OA, Acropora sp.; one resilient to OA, S. pistillata; and one with unknown response to OA, Turbinaria peltata. Mapping the spectral components at the surface of the fresh, forming
coral skeleton, we observed that all genera form calcium carbonate
particles just outside (<2 μm) the skeleton surface, indicated
by a yellow line, and just inside the surface (1–2 μm),
in the recently deposited skeleton (see Figures –4 and Figures S2–S4.
Figure 2
Acropora sp.: (a, b) polarized light microscopy
(PLM) images and (c) a component map with a black mask where the Ca
signal is undetectable and pixels colored according to the mineral
phase spectroscopically observed. In this and all other component
maps in this work, red pixels are ACC-H2O, green pixels
are ACC, and blue pixels are aragonite. The component spectra used
to obtain all component maps are shown in Figure S1. (d) Average PEEM image overlaid with the component map,
with both black mask and pure blue aragonite removed. (e, f) One region
of interest, boxed in panels c and d, magnified here to show the precise
locations of both intra- and extraskeletal amorphous pixels. Extraskeletal
particles are no farther than 2 μm outside the skeleton’s
surface (yellow line in panels d and f), are mostly amorphous, and
are assumed to be inside the calicoblastic epithelium. Intraskeletal
amorphous pixels in panel d extend several micrometers inside the
yellow line. See Figure S2 for more images
of this area.
Figure 4
Turbinaria peltata: (a) PLM
image, (b) Differential
Interference Contrast (DIC) image, (c) component map, and (d) average
PEEM image overlaid with the component map, as described in Figure . (e, f) The regions
boxed in panels c and d are magnified here to show amorphous particles
where calicoblastic cells are expected. Amorphous pixels also
appear along the edge of the skeleton. Extraskeletal particles are
mostly amorphous within the calicoblastic epithelium, <2
μm outside the yellow line in panels d and f. Intraskeletal
amorphous pixels in panel f extend <1 μm inside the yellow
line. See Figure S4 for more images of
this area.
Acropora sp.: (a, b) polarized light microscopy
(PLM) images and (c) a component map with a black mask where the Ca
signal is undetectable and pixels colored according to the mineral
phase spectroscopically observed. In this and all other component
maps in this work, red pixels are ACC-H2O, green pixels
are ACC, and blue pixels are aragonite. The component spectra used
to obtain all component maps are shown in Figure S1. (d) Average PEEM image overlaid with the component map,
with both black mask and pure blue aragonite removed. (e, f) One region
of interest, boxed in panels c and d, magnified here to show the precise
locations of both intra- and extraskeletal amorphous pixels. Extraskeletal
particles are no farther than 2 μm outside the skeleton’s
surface (yellow line in panels d and f), are mostly amorphous, and
are assumed to be inside the calicoblastic epithelium. Intraskeletal
amorphous pixels in panel d extend several micrometers inside the
yellow line. See Figure S2 for more images
of this area.Stylophora pistillata: (a)
PLM image, (b) DIC
image, (c) a component map, and (d) an average PEEM image overlaid
with the component map, as described in Figure . (e, f) The regions boxed in panels c and
d are magnified here to show amorphous particles where calicoblastic
cells are expected. This region shows several scars left by desmocytes,
the cells that bind the calicoblastic epithelium to the skeleton
and form 3-μm-deep V-shaped scars, indicated by white arrows
in panel d. Distinct particles are visible just outside the skeleton
surface (e.g., cyan arrowhead in panel d, and three particles in panel
f). These extraskeletal particles have both a greater percentage of
amorphous pixels and a greater concentration of amorphous phases per
pixel, compared to the skeleton surface or bulk (Tables S2 and S3). Extraskeletal
particles are mostly amorphous within the calicoblastic epithelium,
<2 μm outside the yellow line in panels d and f. Intraskeletal
amorphous pixels in panel d extend ∼1 μm inside the yellow
line. See Figure S3 for more images of
this area.Turbinaria peltata: (a) PLM
image, (b) Differential
Interference Contrast (DIC) image, (c) component map, and (d) average
PEEM image overlaid with the component map, as described in Figure . (e, f) The regions
boxed in panels c and d are magnified here to show amorphous particles
where calicoblastic cells are expected. Amorphous pixels also
appear along the edge of the skeleton. Extraskeletal particles are
mostly amorphous within the calicoblastic epithelium, <2
μm outside the yellow line in panels d and f. Intraskeletal
amorphous pixels in panel f extend <1 μm inside the yellow
line. See Figure S4 for more images of
this area.The extraskeletal particles observed
vary in size between 200 nm
and 1 μm, and spectromicroscopic analysis of their composition
reveals a mix of ACC-H2O, ACC, and aragonite. The density
of extraskeletal particles varies from area to area, ranging from
∼1 to 30 particles/μm3 in the probed volume,
which ranges from ∼1 to 7 μm3 for each area,
as shown in Table S1. The density of extraskeletal
particles was expected to be small, as previously observed and calculated
in regenerating sea urchin spines,[12] because
the probing depth of PEEM component mapping at the Ca L-edge is only
3 nm, as shown in refs (13 and 14); thus, even higher densities
for particles appear sparser in such
a thin slice.The location of extraskeletal calcium carbonate
particles is consistent
with them being intracellular, inside calicoblastic cells. These
particles must have formed where they were observed, and when the
tissue was fixed they were interrupted in their transfer to the forming
skeleton surface, where, in time, they would have crystallized. Several
observations, explained below, support this deduction.First,
the grayscale PEEM images at the Ca L-edge in Figures –4, panels
d, and all other areas in Figure S5 are
not good enough to identify cells or cell structures. However,
calicoblastic cells are well known to envelop the forming skeleton,
and all of it,[5] and are well preserved
by the fixation method used here and previously.[4] Thus, any Ca-rich extraskeletal nanoparticles observed
within a 2 μm distance can safely be interpreted as intracellular
to calicoblastic cells.[5] The distances
outside the skeleton surfaces (yellow lines in panels d and f) in Figures –4 and in four additional areas per genus are consistently
within ∼2 μm (Figure S5).
Representative single-pixel spectra for each mineral phase and each
coral skeleton in Figures –4 are shown in Figure S6.Second, given the supersaturation
of the ECF, Ωaragonite = 12 measured in Stylophora, nucleation of particles
in the ECF is extremely unlikely.[8,10]Third,
amorphous pixels, either ACC-H2O or ACC, are
observed in greater percentage in extraskeletal particles than intraskeletally,
even when comparing extraskeletal particles with only the skeleton
surface, as shown in Tables S2 and S3; thus, intracellular particles are distinct,
and not simply material dislodged from the skeleton during embedding
or polishing. Figures –4, panels e and f, show such extraskeletal
and intracellular particles and their amorphous phases just outside
the surface of the forming skeleton (yellow line). Intraskeletal amorphous
pixels are substantially less spatially dense than in extraskeletal
particles; thus, there is a distinct chemical difference between amorphous
phases inside or outside the skeleton.Fourth, if extraskeletal
particles were not present intracellularly
but were in the ECF, they would have been washed away when the corals
were fixed and then rinsed tens of times, so there must have been
something holding the particles in place—likely the calicoblastic
cells, as these are well known to envelop the forming skeleton.[5] It is possible that more particles were originally
present that were washed away during the tens of rinsing steps. No
conclusions were made based on lost particles.All extraskeletal
particles observed here could also be localized
within a network of organic fibrils[15] or
filopodia[6] that were recently observed,
using cryo-scanning electron microscopy, between cells and skeleton.[6] These occur between the skeleton growing surface
and calicoblastic cells or desmocytes, alike, and are attached
to the skeleton surface;[15] thus, even where
cells were detached from the skeleton during sample preparation, fibrils
could, in principle, remain attached. Since the fibrils are expected
to contain Ca-rich particles, it is possible that some or all the
extraskeletal particles observed here in all genera are within fibrils.
It is important to note that these fibrils are still part of calicoblastic
cells; thus, particles within fibrils should still be considered intracellular.
Particles in either cell bodies or fibrils protruding from cell bodies
are collectively referred to in this work as in-tissue or intracellular
extraskeletal particles.The Ca-rich biggest particle in Figure e,f is comparable
in size and position to
one of the vacuoles observed by Clode and Marshall in a desmocyte
(labeled V in their Figure 1),[15] although
this similarity must be further investigated to be confirmed.
Figure 3
Stylophora pistillata: (a)
PLM image, (b) DIC
image, (c) a component map, and (d) an average PEEM image overlaid
with the component map, as described in Figure . (e, f) The regions boxed in panels c and
d are magnified here to show amorphous particles where calicoblastic
cells are expected. This region shows several scars left by desmocytes,
the cells that bind the calicoblastic epithelium to the skeleton
and form 3-μm-deep V-shaped scars, indicated by white arrows
in panel d. Distinct particles are visible just outside the skeleton
surface (e.g., cyan arrowhead in panel d, and three particles in panel
f). These extraskeletal particles have both a greater percentage of
amorphous pixels and a greater concentration of amorphous phases per
pixel, compared to the skeleton surface or bulk (Tables S2 and S3). Extraskeletal
particles are mostly amorphous within the calicoblastic epithelium,
<2 μm outside the yellow line in panels d and f. Intraskeletal
amorphous pixels in panel d extend ∼1 μm inside the yellow
line. See Figure S3 for more images of
this area.
Extraskeletal amorphous particles, consistent with intracellular
vesicles, were also observed in regenerating sea urchin spines.[12]
Skeletal Surface Crystallization Rates Differ
across Genera
The most striking difference across genera
is the thickness of
the surface layer containing intraskeletal amorphous pixels, measured
from the yellow line at the surface of each skeleton. This thickness
is 2.1 μm in Acropora, 1.1 μm in Stylophora, and 0.9 μm in Turbinaria. The average measurements of these thicknesses are shown in Figure , and all the precise
data from 15 areas in three genera are presented in Table S4. The same trends are visible in Figures d, 3d, and 4d, where the pure aragonite blue pixels
were removed: intraskeletal amorphous pixels are farther from the
surface in Acropora, intermediate in Stylophora, and closer in Turbinaria. Thus, crystallization
rates differ across the three genera, as shown in Figure .
Figure 5
Amorphous, soluble thickness
decays with distance from the skeleton
surface. Comparison of the three genera analyzed here, for percentage
of amorphous pixels (either ACC-H2O or ACC) as a function
of distance from the surface, indicated by a yellow line in Figures –4. Each percentage is averaged over the five areas
analyzed per genus (Table S4), the averages
are displayed as circles, and the solid lines are logarithmic decays
(among others tested, a logarithmic decay provided better fits, with R > 0.98). The half-lengths (vertical lines) are the
distances
at which the amorphous pixels have decayed to 50% of the surface value
for that genus (horizontal lines). The half-lengths are 2.1 μm
for Acropora, 1.1 μm for Stylophora, and 0.9 μm for Turbinaria.
Amorphous, soluble thickness
decays with distance from the skeleton
surface. Comparison of the three genera analyzed here, for percentage
of amorphous pixels (either ACC-H2O or ACC) as a function
of distance from the surface, indicated by a yellow line in Figures –4. Each percentage is averaged over the five areas
analyzed per genus (Table S4), the averages
are displayed as circles, and the solid lines are logarithmic decays
(among others tested, a logarithmic decay provided better fits, with R > 0.98). The half-lengths (vertical lines) are the
distances
at which the amorphous pixels have decayed to 50% of the surface value
for that genus (horizontal lines). The half-lengths are 2.1 μm
for Acropora, 1.1 μm for Stylophora, and 0.9 μm for Turbinaria.There are also differences in the composition of these intraskeletal
surface bands: Acropora has the greatest density
of amorphous pixels, and its pixels are mostly ACC-H2O; Stylophora has intermediate amorphous density and mostly
ACC pixels; and finally Turbinaria has the lowest
density and fewest of both ACC-H2O and ACC pixels (Table S2).In all genera, almost all pixels
observed farther into the skeleton
than 1–2 μm were pure aragonite. (In Figure d, some lines of pixels were
not selected by the Magic Wand because they were non-pure aragonite—these
are topographic artifacts caused by scratches on the sample’s
imperfectly polished surface.)The density of amorphous pixels
was quantified in each genus by
measuring the percentage of amorphous pixels within 2 μm of
the skeleton surface. For Acropora, Stylophora, and Turbinaria, we found that approximately 24%,
15%, and 12% of the pixels contained amorphous phases. These values
were obtained from 15 areas analyzed. The precise values from each
area and genus are shown in Table S2. The
areas in Figures –4 have slightly different percentages of amorphous
pixels than the average, but they follow the same trend as the average,
with Acropora having the most amorphous and Turbinaria the most crystalline 2-μm-thick surface
layer (Table S2).We note that the
times for sample preparation and analysis varied
between 15 and 45 h post-mortem. All of these times are immensely
longer than the crystallization rate of ACC-H2O in laboratory
conditions, which takes less than 1 min, especially in contact with
water.[16] Therefore, the observed amorphous
phases are biologically stabilized, or they would not be observable
in these experiments. Amorphous-phase stabilizing molecules are well
known to exist in biominerals.[17−23]The increased amorphous content observed in the surface layer
of Acropora skeleton means that these amorphous phases
last
longer during the process of skeleton formation in Acropora. Thus, crystallization of amorphous phases is slow in Acropora, faster in Stylophora, and fastest in Turbinaria.This observation directly explains why different genera vary
in
sensitivity to OA, as shown in Figure . The forming surface in Acropora skeletons
crystallizes slowly from its amorphous precursors; thus, newly attached
ACC-H2O and ACC particles are exposed to the ECF for a
longer time.ACC and ACC-H2O are well known to be
more soluble than
crystalline aragonite in water;[24] thus,
they can dissolve in ECF, as occurs for Acropora at
night (Figure ). The
solubility product Ksp,ACC is ∼100×
larger than Ksp,arag in deionized water,[24] making ACC significantly more soluble than aragonite.
The solubility of ACC in ECF or even in seawater conditions is not
known, but it is certainly greater than that of aragonite in those
conditions as well. In contrast, the faster-crystallizing skeleton
surface in Stylophora exposes more insoluble aragonite
than soluble ACC to night-time ECF, thus reducing dissolution. While
this may not be the only factor contributing to OA resilience, these
data suggest that Turbinaria should be even more
resilient to OA than Stylophora, due to its fastest
crystallization rate observed here. We stress that this is the crystallization
rate from the amorphous precursors to crystalline aragonite, not the
calcification rate, which is known to be slower in Turbinaria than in Stylophora.[25,26] There are
at present no data on Turbinaria’s resilience
to OA.Notice that the calcification rate in Acropora is lower than in Stylophora, which is in turn lower
than in Pocillopora, as shown in Figure , for both day- and night-time
calcification. The synthesis rate of precursors is equal to the calcification
rate, independent of crystallization rate. Thus, the thickest amorphous
layer observed in Acropora cannot be caused by greater
production of amorphous precursor, because Acropora is the slowest calcifier. We also observe a lower density of extraskeletal
particles in Acropora than in both Turbinaria and Stylophora (Table S1), consistent with the lower calcification rate (Figure ).The origin of differing
crystallization rates is not explored in
this study. We speculate that either organic molecules or elemental
impurities stabilize amorphous phases for a longer time in Acropora. For instance, magnesium is known to stabilize
ACC in sea urchin spines,[16,27] and proteins are known
to do the same in sea urchin spicules.[17]
Conclusion
Here, analyzing fresh corals inside and
outside the surface of
the forming skeletons, we observed particles consistent with intracellular
localization, presumably inside calicoblastic cells.Intraskeletal
amorphous phases localized near the skeleton’s
surface contain, respectively, a lower or greater percentage of the
amorphous phases compared to the extraskeletal particles or the skeleton
bulk, which is almost completely crystalline aragonite. These spectroscopically
detectable localizations in space and phase transition trends are
consistent with previous models of coral skeleton biomineralization.[4,28,29] They are also consistent with
a time sequence in which extraskeletal amorphous nanoparticle nucleation
and growth in intracellular vesicles is followed by attachment to
the growing surface of the skeleton,[30,31] followed by
gradual crystallization of the amorphous phases into crystalline aragonite.The precise chemical environment (ICF) and cellular location in
which the particles nucleate remain unknown. We observe directly extraskeletal
particles, likely in intracellular vesicles within calicoblastic
cells forming the epithelium that envelops the growing skeleton surface.Once the particles are exocytosed into the ECF and attach to the
growing skeleton surface, they are exposed to increasingly lower pH
during OA. The partial control of ECF pH will slow down but not completely
counter the effect of OA on the ECF, which is partly open to seawater,[7] especially for sensitive corals such as Acropora, where with seawater pH 7.2, the ECF night-time
pH is as low as 7.4, as shown in Figure .The differential sensitivity of calcification
to OA, shown in Figure A, is elegantly explained
by faster or slower crystallization of the forming skeleton surface,
which makes it less or more soluble, and thus more or less resilient
to OA. We observed less-amorphous surfaces in resilient Stylophora than in vulnerable Acropora, and even less in Turbinaria, whose response to OA is unknown but is predicted,
on the basis of these data, to be even more resilient than Stylophora.
Methods
Samples
All corals were obtained live from Albany Aquarium,
Albany, CA, USA. First, 1-cm fragments of skeleton and tissue were
fixed to preserve the tissue and all its nanoparticle content, and
then they were dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol
as described by Sun et al. in 2020.[4] TheStylophora and Turbinaria samples were
then embedded into EpoFix (EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA), the Acropora sample was embedded in Solarez (Solarez, Vista, CA, USA) and UV-cured,
and all three were polished, coated with 1 nm Pt in the regions to
be analyzed, and 40 nm Pt elsewhere, as described in refs (32−35).The three coral samples were analyzed with component mapping
approximately 1–2 days after they were fixed. Precisely, the
analysis lasted 13–24 h post-mortem for Acropora (14.5–15 for the data in Figure ), 23–44.5 h post-mortem for Stylophora (44–44.5 for the data in Figure ), and 24.5–36 h post-mortem
for Turbinaria (25.5–26 for the data in Figure ).The post-mortem
times of the corals differ, but this does not invalidate
the deduced amorphous precursor crystallization rates. The rate of
crystallization for ACC in the lab is on the order of seconds;[16] thus, the post-mortem times used here are many
orders of magnitude larger, making differences between them insignificant.
Furthermore, the longest post-mortem sample, Stylophora, does not contain the fewest amorphous pixels, implying that these
phases are stabilized biologically[17−23] and last days post-mortem. Finally, all sample preparations greatly
reduce the exposure of the amorphous phases to water and air, both
of which induce ACC crystallization.[36]
Component Mapping
PEEM images, component maps, and
spectra shown in all figures were acquired using the photoemission
electron microscope (PEEM) at the Advanced Light Source on beamline
11.0.1.1. All data were acquired across the Ca L-edge. The intracellular
particles observed in calicoblastic cells vary in size between
200 nm and 1 μm, and spectromicroscopic analysis of their
composition reveals a mix of hydrated and anhydrous amorphous calcium
carbonate (ACC-H2O and ACC) and aragonite.PEEM images
were taken with 54, 24, or 56 nm pixel resolution for Figures , 3 or 4, respectively, and 3 nm probing depth.[13] Each stack of 121 PEEM images contained 106 pixels/image, and thus 106 complete Ca spectra.
All Ca stacks of images were acquired between 340 and 360 eV, with
0.1 eV energy steps between 345 and 355 eV where the Ca peaks are,
and 0.5 eV steps outside of this range. All Ca spectra were acquired
with circular polarization to minimize crystal orientation effects.Images were stacked to produce component maps, in which each pixel
spectrum is best-fitted to a linear combination of known “component
spectra”, using IGOR Pro Carbon 8 with open-source GG Macros,
available free of charge from ref (37). The “Cni7” component spectra
(Figure S1) are provided as Supporting Information.Figures d, 3d, and 4d were all made by
overlaying the component map from Figures c, 3c, and 4c on a PEEM average image in Adobe Photoshop and
then using the Magic Wand tool to remove both black (the Ca poor mask)
and pure blue (aragonite) from the component map, with a threshold
of 26, which is 10% of 255.The component maps in Figures –4 are “brightness
enhanced” [37] to improve visibility
of amorphous phases. Before brightness enhancement, the amounts of
RGB add up to 255 and are entirely quantitative. Brightness enhancement
is accomplished by making the color value of the largest percentage
component 255 and then scaling up the other two components proportionally.
For example, if a pixel has RGB amounts [25,25,205], thus, approximately
10% ACC-H2O, 10% ACC, and 80% aragonite, brightness enhancement
changes its RGB values to [31,31,255]. All operations using the Magic
Wand tool in Adobe Photoshop were performed on non-brightness-enhanced
pMaps of the component of interest.[37] In Figures –4, the epoxy black pixels and aragonite blue pixels
deleted from panels d and f were selected using the Magic Wand on
non-brightness-enhanced RGB maps, so they were quantitatively accurate.The black masks in Figures c, 3c, and 4c that cover the irrelevant parts of component maps are all produced
from a combination of three different masks termed “difference
mask”, “χ2 mask”, and “manual
mask”. The difference mask covers all pixels with a zero or
near-zero Ca concentration. It is produced in the GG Macros[37] by digital subtraction of two images, acquired
above and below the Ca L-edge at 352.6 and 344 eV energies, respectively.
More precisely, in order to eliminate noise, each image used in the
subtraction is the average of multiple images (five on-peak, nine
off-peak), acquired at and around the stated energies. The resulting
Ca concentration map is shown in Figure S7. The Ca concentration map is then thresholded so all pixels in the
image with zero or near-zero Ca concentration are masked off and displayed
as black. The threshold value is determined accurately by zooming
in on a skeleton edge region and adjusted numerically until all the
spectra at the skeleton edge with acceptable signal/noise ratio and
distinct and identifiable Ca spectral peaks are retained, and the
others are discarded. This numeric adjustment of the threshold is
repeated in several regions of skeleton edge to ensure that the difference
mask is consistently retaining good- and discarding bad-spectra pixels.
The χ2 mask is produced by first mapping all χ2 values obtained from the best fit during component analysis
of each pixel. Then, a threshold is applied to exclude all χ2 values above a numeric value, typically χ2 = 0.01. The resulting χ2 mask, therefore, makes
black all pixels where, for any reason, the fit was poor. Both masks,
difference and χ2, are then layered on top of one
another in Adobe Photoshop. The third “manual mask”
is produced by hand to discard (display in black) any spurious single
pixels that were not eliminated by the other two masks. The rare single
pixels observed are unrealistic, noisy spectra and are clearly Ca-poor
in the epoxy or tissue regions. Figure S7 shows PEEM single and average images, the Ca map, and the final
black mask over the component map and over the Ca map.The yellow
line, indicating the skeleton surface, was obtained
by outlining the black mask (resulting from overlapping difference,
χ2, and manual masks) from each component map, ignoring
particles outside the skeleton and anything masked inside the skeleton.
This was achieved by selecting the mask and outlining it with a yellow
line using the “Stroke” layer tool in Adobe Photoshop.
This line was obtained with 1-pixel resolution (24 nm in Stylophora; 54 and 56 nm in Acropora and Turbinaria) and used throughout all distance and thickness measurements with
1-pixel resolution, leaving no ambiguity about what is inside and
outside the skeleton. For visibility and display purposes only, in
panels d and f, the yellow line was made 3-pixels wide, expanding
outside the skeleton, not to overlap any parts of it. Figure S7 shows the yellow outline and the amorphous
pixels overlaid on an average image, as done in Figures –4.We
stress that the colored pixels from component maps (panels c
and e in all figures) and the grayscale average PEEM image (panels
d and f) were obtained from precisely the same Ca stack, not repeated
acquisitions. Thus, we made no assumptions on where the Ca signal
was high or low, where the tissue was, or where the skeleton was in
space. The yellow line position is based exclusively on where the
Ca signal is as high as in the mature skeleton. This is a conservative
choice that excludes many amorphous pixels, but it is a rigorous one.
Amorphous Pixel Counting
Quantitative measurements
of how amorphous the different skeletons surfaces are were performed
in Adobe Photoshop and are presented in Tables S2 and S4. To obtain the amorphous pixels vs depth data in Table S4 and Figure , first we used the black mask in each area,
and then the “Expand” selection tool to include the
outermost 4, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 μm of skeleton. Next,
the black mask was removed from the selection area, and finally the
selected band was placed over the ACC-H2O or ACC proportion
maps, that is, the grayscale images that show the proportion, between
0 and 1 or between 0 and 255, of ACC-H2O or ACC phase in
each pixel. Then, using the Magic Wand tool, we selected a pixel that
contained 100% of a given phase and varied the tolerance of the wand.
To select pixels with at least 10% amorphous phase, a tolerance of
230 was used, which is 90% of 255. Once selected, the number of pixels
was measured in “Windows” and “Histogram”
in Adobe Photoshop. For aragonite we used a threshold of 26, which
is 10% of 255. All pixel counts from all areas were logged in Microsoft
Excel, as presented in Table S4, at the
depth specified. Figure was obtained in Kaleidagraph 5.0 for Mac (Synergy Software), where
the data were fitted by a logarithmic decay with excellent correlation
coefficients: R = 0.999 for Acropora, R = 0.995 for Stylophora, and R = 0.984 for Turbinaria. Other decay functions
were tested, including exponential and parabolic, but the correlation
coefficients R were lower than for logarithmic decay;
hence, the latter was used for Figure .
Parallel Component Mapping by the Cnidarians
The Cni7
component spectra used for component mapping were optimized to eliminate
any spectral background contributions that are mistakenly interpreted
as different phases during component mapping. This undesirable effect
was recently discovered for this work, when we processed many stacks
of images in parallel, with a group of talented undergraduate students
we call “the Cnidarians”, 13 of whom are co-authors
of this work. Since October of 2020, the Cnidarians have been processing
component mapping spectromicroscopy of biominerals data, collected
over the past 10 years. The results of this meta-analysis, done in
parallel on the same data by different people, are then compared during
biweekly meetings, thus optimizing every choice. There are 5–10
different human choices to make to process component maps, and different
people make these choices differently; thus, direct comparison of
the results benefits from a diversity of people and greatly improves
the final data quality. One major problem was revealed by these comparisons:
the energy range used for component analysis (between 345 and 355
eV) greatly affected the outcome of component maps. When using previous
component spectra, such as 0608 in Gong et al.,[17] 0709 in DeVol et al.,[38] 0823
in Mass et al.,[3] or CY1 in Sun et al.,[4] uneven backgrounds of spectra at the edges of
the energy range (around 345 eV or around 355 eV) led to phase assignment
differences in component maps when the energy range selected for peak-fitting
differed from person to person. This undesirable mistake was eliminated
by improving the component spectra so they have identical spectral
backgrounds (2 arctan, 1 polynomial), as shown in Figure S1. Using the new “Cni7” component spectra
makes the final component map only dependent on real, spectroscopic
differences occurring at Ca peaks’ energy positions, not away
from Ca peaks, e.g., at 345 or 355 eV. Table S5 shows all the fit parameters for all component spectra.All
data presented in this manuscript have been analyzed by at least 5–10
people, multiple times each, using different component spectra. Once
we converged on using the Cni7 component spectra, 5 people analyzed
these data in parallel, making individual choices on multiple parameters,
e.g., threshold for difference mask and χ2 mask,
peak shift in energy acceptable interval, etc. The data presented
are the best fits to the data, because, even after small changes in
parameters, the results consistently provide the same locations for
amorphous phases in the skeleton and extraskeletal particles. The
precise percentage of each phase fluctuates slightly, by ∼10%.The component spectra, “Cni7”, were generated by
P.U.P.A.G. using spectra taken from several biominerals (Figure S1). Component spectra for ACC-H2O and ACC were generated from averaged spectra taken from single
pixels in sea urchin spines which previous analysis showed to be at
least 90% of the desired component. The same process was applied to
coral skeletons for the aragonite component spectra. For each component,
more than 1000 single-pixel spectra were aligned in energy and averaged,
and then we subtracted the backgrounds using a pre-edge linear fit
for each spectrum. We then peak-fitted each spectrum, using the background
(third-order polynomial and two arctangents) obtained for aragonite
for all spectra identically.
Authors: Gelsomina De Stasio; Bradley H Frazer; Benjamin Gilbert; Katherine L Richter; John W Valley Journal: Ultramicroscopy Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Ian C Olson; Rebecca A Metzler; Nobumichi Tamura; Martin Kunz; Christopher E Killian; Pupa U P A Gilbert Journal: J Struct Biol Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 2.867
Authors: A V Radha; Tori Z Forbes; Christopher E Killian; P U P A Gilbert; Alexandra Navrotsky Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anat Akiva-Tal; Shifi Kababya; Yael S Balazs; Lilah Glazer; Amir Berman; Amir Sagi; Asher Schmidt Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Johannes Ihli; Wai Ching Wong; Elizabeth H Noel; Yi-Yeoun Kim; Alexander N Kulak; Hugo K Christenson; Melinda J Duer; Fiona C Meldrum Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Pupa U P A Gilbert; Kristin D Bergmann; Nicholas Boekelheide; Sylvie Tambutté; Tali Mass; Frédéric Marin; Jess F Adkins; Jonathan Erez; Benjamin Gilbert; Vanessa Knutson; Marjorie Cantine; Javier Ortega Hernández; Andrew H Knoll Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 14.136