Literature DB >> 35037118

What is the appropriate skin cleaning method for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy patients? A randomized controlled trial.

Qingfen Zhang1, Ying Wang2, Shuang Yang1, Qian Wu1, Wanmin Qiang3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of various cleaning methods for skin with acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: A total of 168 NPC inpatients were randomized, while 152 patients completed the whole trial and the data were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into the non-washing group (Group 1), washing with water alone group (Group 2), and washing with water and soap group (Group 3). All three groups received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with other treatments. Follow-up from recruitment or the initial radiotherapy dose to 1 month after the final radiotherapy dose. CONSORT checklist was applied as the reporting guidelines for this study. The study evaluated a range of endpoints, including incidence, timing, severity of acute RD, and quality of life (QOL).
RESULTS: There were no allergic reactions or aggravating in both washing groups during the whole treatment. The incidence of acute RD was 100% in all three groups, while the incidence of severe RD (grades 2-3) differed among groups (Group 1 vs. Group 2 vs. Group 3: 51% vs. 23.5% vs. 18%; P = 0.001), washing moderately reduced severity compared with patients without washing. Washing also delayed the onset time of acute RD; the incidence of acute RD was significantly lower than non-washing during the first 20 fractions (P < 0.001). What is more, washing reduced the incidence of moist desquamation (25.5% vs. 5.9% vs. 6%; P = 0.003) and helped relieve itching (6.49 ± 2.09 vs. 4.90 ± 1.90 vs. 4.00 ± 1.58; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among groups with respect to pain or burning sensation. Washing improved QOL on physical (64.37 ± 4.08 vs. 67.41 ± 4.05 vs. 71.30 ± 4.87; P < 0.001), emotional (61.47 ± 4.75 vs. 65.75 ± 3.46 vs. 70.80 ± 3.27; P < 0.001), and social functional dimensions (62.64 ± 3.57 vs. 64.87 ± 3.88 vs. 68.04 ± 4.89; P < 0.001) at the end of radiotherapy, and the outcome was similar at 1 month after radiotherapy (P < 0.05). Washing with water and soap was the most effective way to reduce itching and improving QOL among the three groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Washing irradiated skin reduces the occurrence and severity of acute radiation dermatitis. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ChiCTR2000038231, date of registration 09.18.2020.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Nursing; Quality of life; Radiation dermatitis; Radiotherapy; Skin care

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35037118     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06835-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  20 in total

1.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute and late radiation reactions from the MASCC Skin Toxicity Study Group.

Authors:  Rebecca K S Wong; René-Jean Bensadoun; Christine B Boers-Doets; Jane Bryce; Alexandre Chan; Joel B Epstein; Beth Eaby-Sandy; Mario E Lacouture
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Maintaining skin integrity during radiation therapy.

Authors:  A Korinko; A Yurick
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.220

4.  What Can We Learn From Researching in an Overcrowded Research Area? Lessons Learned From the 50 Years of Research on Radiation Dermatitis.

Authors:  Raymond Javan Chan
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  The impact of skin washing with water and soap during breast irradiation: a randomized study.

Authors:  I Roy; A Fortin; M Larochelle
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

Authors:  J D Cox; J Stetz; T F Pajak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Advice on hair and scalp care during cranial radiotherapy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  C Westbury; F Hines; E Hawkes; S Ashley; M Brada
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2011.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Hongmei Zeng; Siwei Zhang; Jie He
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 9.  Use of deodorants during adjuvant breast radiotherapy: a survey of compliance with standard advice, impact on patients and a literature review on safety.

Authors:  P H Graham; J L Graham
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.735

10.  Mepilex Lite dressings for managing acute radiation dermatitis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Wen-Huan Zhong; Qiong-Fen Tang; Lian-Ying Hu; Hui-Xia Feng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.