| Literature DB >> 35035926 |
Dina Mirsadeghi Darabi1, Peiman Ariaii1, Reza Safari2, Mohammad Ahmadi1.
Abstract
Mayonnaise is a semi-solid oil-in-water emulsion that in addition to eggs other stabilizers and thickeners are used as emulsifiers for better stability. Although eggs are an important ingredient in the production of mayonnaise, the health problems associated with the use of eggs is increasing due to their high cholesterol content. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of clover sprout protein hydrolysates (CSPH) to replace eggs for the production mayonnaise. First, CSPH was produced using alcalase and flavourzyme enzyme, and in order to find the best enzyme, the degree of hydrolysis (DH) and protein recovery (PR) were determined. Then four mayonnaise treatments included, T1: control (egg 9%), T2: egg 6%+ CSPH 3%, T3: egg 3%+ CSPH 6%, T4: egg 0%+ CSPH 9% was prepared and the stability, viscosity, physicochemical, textural, and sensory properties of mayonnaise was investigated. The samples containing CSPH showed that CSPH had high essential amino acids, CSPH from alcalase enzyme had higher amounts of protein, DH, PR, and increasing hydrolysis time had a positive effect on these parameters (p < .05); therefore, CSPH from alcalase enzyme was used for the production mayonnaise. The stability, viscosity, firmness, adhesion of texture, and pH increased with increasing CSPH, while the brightness, acidity, and sensory score of the samples decreased (p < .05). In general, T3 had an acceptable quality in terms of the studied characteristics, but sensory score in T4 could not be confirmed. Hence, by replacing eggs with CSPH up to 6%, mayonnaise with appropriate physicochemical and sensory properties can be produced. Therefore, the formulation egg 3%+ CSPH 6% is an appropriate choice to produce mayonnaise for consumers who are on a restricted diet to eat foods containing eggs.Entities:
Keywords: amino acid; commercial enzyme; mayonnaise; physicochemical properties; protease
Year: 2021 PMID: 35035926 PMCID: PMC8751449 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2665
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Formulations and ingredients of mayonnaise (g/100 g)
| Row | Compounds | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liquid oil | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 |
| 2 | Vinegar (11%) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 3 | Eggs | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
| 4 | Clover sprout protein | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 5 | Water | 12.35 | 12.35 | 12.35 | 12.35 |
| 6 | Sugar | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 7 | Salt | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 8 | Mustard | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 9 | Stabilizer | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
Degree of hydrolysis, protein content, and PR of clover sprout protein hydrolysates (CSPH)a
| Treatment | Degree of hydrolysis (%) | Protein content (%) | Protein recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcalase 10 min | 17.17 ± 0.73c | 61.21 ± 1.09c | 12.57 ± 0.22c |
| Alcalase 20 min | 26.06 ± 0.46b | 74.89 ± 0.96b | 15.38 ± 0.20b |
| Alcalase 30 min | 31.90 ± 0.79a | 91.24 ± 1.30a | 18.74 ± 0.27a |
| Flavourzyme 10 min | 8.24 ± 0.44e | 50.85 ± 1.23d | 10.44 ± 0.25d |
| Flavourzyme 20 min | 13.23 ± 0.16d | 63.14 ± 0.91c | 12.97 ± 0.18c |
| Flavourzyme 30 min | 17.98 ± 0.98c | 76.99 ± 1.05b | 16.84 ± 0.97b |
a,b,c,d: Values in same columns with different superscripts are significantly different at p < .05.
The amino acid composition of clover sprout protein hydrolysates (g 100 g‐1; 30 min)
| Amino acid(g 100 g−1) | Alcalase | Flavourzyme | FAO/WHO, 1990 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Histidine | 2.25 | 2.95 | |
| Isoleucine | 3.97 | 3.15 | 2.8 |
| Leucine | 7.78 | 7.12 | 6.6 |
| Lysine | 5.96 | 6.82 | 5.8 |
| Methionine | 0.45 | 0.32 | |
| Phenyl alanine | 5.45 | 4.55 | 6.3 |
| Tyrosine | 3.97 | 3.4 | 1.1 |
| Threonine | 6.55 | 7.35 | 3.4 |
| Arginine | 4.59 | 5.45 | |
| Valine | 5.52 | 5.09 | 3.5 |
| Aspartic acid | 18.99 | 17.58 | |
| Glycine | 4.68 | 5.13 | |
| Proline | 7.95 | 8.58 | |
| Serine | 4.99 | 5.78 | |
| Alanine | 5.85 | 5.39 | |
| Cystein | 0.35 | 0.59 | |
| Glutamic acid | 10.59 | 9.95 | |
| Total amino acid | 99.92 | 99.20 | |
| Essential amino acid/nonessential amino acid | 0.74 | 0.75 | |
| Essential amino acid/total amino acid | 42.55 | 43.15 | |
| HAA | 40.97 | 37.60 |
Essential amino acids
Total hydrophobic amino acids (alanine, valine, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, proline, methionine, and cysteine).
Proximate composition in different treatment of mayonnaisea
| Treatment | Moisture (%) | Protein (%) | Fat (%) | Ash (%) | Carbohydrate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 24.17 ± 0.73a | 2.02 ± 0.07d | 67.55 ± 0.86a | 0.82 ± 0.03a | 5.42 ± 0.04c |
| CSPH 1% | 23.89 ± 1.80a | 3.6 ± 0.13c | 65.87 ± 0.54b | 0.69 ± 0.04b | 5.95 ± 0.09b |
| CSPH 2% | 24.38 ± 0.61a | 4.3 ± 0.21b | 64.88 ± 0.71b | 0.64 ± 0.01b | 5.79 ± 0.08b |
| CSPH 3% | 24.19 ± 1.21a | 5.27 ± 0.17a | 63.58 ± 0.38c | 0.63 ± 0.02b | 6.31 ± 0.08a |
a,b,c,d: Values in same columns with different superscripts are significantly different at p < .05.
FIGURE 1Comparison of average of mayonnaise treatments in terms of color index L (a), a (b), and b (c)
FIGURE 2Comparison of mayonnaise treatments averages in terms of stiffness (a), adhesion (b), and viscosity (c)
FIGURE 3Comparison of mayonnaise treatments averages in terms of pH (a) and acidity (b)
FIGURE 4Comparison of mayonnaise treatments averages in terms of physical stability (a) and thermal stability (b)
FIGURE 5Comparison of mayonnaise treatments averages in terms of sensory score