Literature DB >> 35035924

Evaluation of tolerance to artificial gastroenteric juice and fermentation characteristics of Lactobacillus strains isolated from human.

Chen Liu1,2,3, Fei Han1,2,3, Lin Cong1,2,3, Ting Sun1,2,3, Bilege Menghe1,2,3, Wenjun Liu1,2,3.   

Abstract

Fifty-seven strains of Lactobacillus were isolated from fecal samples of healthy young people in Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia using pure culture methods. Lactobacillus ruminis and Lactobacillus gasseri were the dominant Lactobacillus species isolated from the intestinal microflora, accounting for 54.4% and 14.0% of the total isolates, respectively. Isolated strains were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing, and their tolerance to gastric acid and bile salt, and fermentation characteristics were evaluated. The results of experiments in vitro showed that nine of the isolated strains of Lactobacillus grew well at pH 3.0. After 11 h of incubation in artificial digestive juices, the isolated L. plantarum and the control strain L. plantarum P8 still had high survival rates. Most of the isolates and control isolates have strong tolerance to bile salts. The evaluation of fermentation characteristics indicated that the ability of the intestinal Lactobacillus to ferment skimmed milk was lower than that of the reference L. plantarum P8. In the process of storage, the viable count of screened isolates of human origin in fermented milk decreased to some extent, but remained above 7.01 ± 0.22 log CFU/ml, showing good storage characteristics.
© 2021 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bile tolerance; fermentation characteristics; intestinal Lactobacillus; isolation and identification; resistance to artificial gastroenteric juices

Year:  2021        PMID: 35035924      PMCID: PMC8751432          DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Sci Nutr        ISSN: 2048-7177            Impact factor:   2.863


INTRODUCTION

The human intestinal microflora is composed of different microbes. To date, about 30 genera and more than 500 species and subspecies of bacteria have been isolated and identified; the vast majority of these are anaerobic bacteria (Min et al., 2004; Shang & Yu, 2012). There are more microbial cells within humans than there are human cells themselves, and 78.67% of those microbes are in the human gastrointestinal tract where they play a vital role in maintaining healthy homeostasis (Luckey, 1972). Intestinal microorganisms contribute to human health in the same way as an organ and so some scholars describe the metabolism of the microflora in the intestine as a hidden organ in the human body (Sekirov et al., 2010; Zhao & Shen, 2010). Human intestinal microflora was affected by many factors, such as geographical environment, eating habits, lifestyle, and age. Xinjiang, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia are the gathering places of nomads, following the ancient and traditional way of living. At the same time, these areas are located in the frontier and have a unique climate. With the growth and development of human body, the structure of human intestinal microflora is relatively stable, so we studied the intestinal microflora of young people in this area. The term “probiotic” refers to microorganisms that benefit the host when administered in appropriate quantities (Hotel, 2001; Hill et al., 2014; Roberfroid, 2000). The best probiotics are of human origin that is safe and does not harbor genes associated with antibiotic resistance, pathogenicity, or virulence factors (Yasmin et al., 2020). At the same time, they must be able to survive under intestinal conditions (e.g., acid pH, enzymes, and bile salts) (Wang et al., 2009). It must also be demonstrated that the activity, viability, growth, and efficacy of probiotics are maintained in technical treatments (Plaza‐Díaz et al. 2017, 2018). Probiotics include microorganisms, most of which are similar to the beneficial bacteria naturally produced in the human intestine. To date, probiotics have been used in the treatment of a variety of gastrointestinal diseases and have been widely studied; the most studied species are from the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, and also yeast (Wilkins & Sequoia, 2017). As one of the main probiotics, Lactobacillus species are also extremely important microflora in the intestine and their ability to survive in the gut environment is of great significance to host’s health. Lactobacillus species are important in intestinal homeostasis throughout the host's life. They can help correct imbalances in the intestinal microflora, thereby restoring and improving host’s health. Clinical studies have confirmed that probiotics are effective against gastrointestinal disorders, for example, irritable bowel syndrome (Zhang et al., 2016), Helicobacter pylori (Zheng et al., 2013), inflammatory bowel disease (Saez‐Lara et al., 2015), and diarrhea (McFarland, 2007); allergic diseases for example atopic dermatitis (Rather et al., 2016); in treating obesity (Sharafedtinov et al., 2013), insulin resistance syndrome (Rajkumar et al., 2014), type 2 diabetes and non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (Sáez‐Lara et al. 2016; Buss et al., 2014), and the side effects of cancer (Redman et al., 2014). Positive effects of probiotics on human health can also be achieved through immune regulation (Hevia et al., 2015). Lactobacillus is also commonly used in the production of fermented dairy products. In the food industry and dairy processing industry, it is used as a starter in the production of yogurt and cheese. In recent years, the use of lactic acid bacteria, particularly Lactobacillus species, has extended from food production into microecological preparations for use as health products. Lactobacillus has a very important role and economic value in our daily life. For this reason, there has been much research on the isolation, screening, metabolism, physiology, and genomics of intestinal Lactobacillus species. In this study, the pure culture method was used to isolate and identify the Lactobacillus from the intestinal tracts of healthy young people in Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang. Preliminary evaluations were made on the acid and bile salt resistance and fermentation characteristics of the intestinal isolates of Lactobacillus. The experimental results may provide basic data for the screening and the evaluation of probiotic Lactobacillus and provide theoretical guidance for the industrial production of Lactobacillus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection

Fecal samples were collected from healthy young people (average age 24 years) in Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and Tibet (n = 38) (Table 1). All samples were collected with the consent of the volunteers themselves. Each sample comprised of 5~10 g of human feces, which were picked up in a sterile sampling bottle, marked, and sealed with a sealing film, then quickly placed in an ice box and transferred into a car refrigerator for storage at −4℃. The samples were transported back to the laboratory for bacterial isolation within 2 h. Reference probiotic strains Lactobacillus plantarum P8 and Lactobacillus casei Zhang were provided by the Lactic Acid Bacteria Culture Collection (LABCC) of the Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering of the Ministry of Education of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University.
TABLE 1

The kind of samples and collected site in Mongolia, Tibetan, and XinJiang

SampleGenderRegionAge
FHS12MaleInner Mongolia21
FHS15MaleInner Mongolia33
FHS16FemaleInner Mongolia22
FHS2MaleInner Mongolia30
FHS4MaleInner Mongolia35
FHS7FemaleInner Mongolia21
FHS8FemaleInner Mongolia21
FXJ21FemaleXinjiang22
FXJ26FemaleXinjiang23
FXJ27FemaleXinjiang22
FXJ28FemaleXinjiang20
FXJ36FemaleXinjiang28
FXJ38FemaleXinjiang18
FXJ4MaleXinjiang21
FXJ40MaleXinjiang24
FXJ47MaleXinjiang21
FXJ5MaleXinjiang23
FXJ56MaleXinjiang26
FXJ6MaleXinjiang22
FXM13FemaleInner Mongolia30
FXM19MaleInner Mongolia29
FXM20FemaleInner Mongolia29
FXM22MaleInner Mongolia33
FXM23FemaleInner Mongolia30
FXZ15FemaleTibet27
FXZ16FemaleTibet24
FXZ24MaleTibet24
FXZ25MaleTibet24
FXZ30MaleTibet22
FXZ33FemaleTibet25
FXZ34FemaleTibet25
FXZ37FemaleTibet35
FXZ45FemaleTibet29
FXZ46MaleTibet24
FXZ49FemaleTibet22
FXZ5FemaleTibet28
FXZ52FemaleTibet23
FXZ53MaleTibet26
The kind of samples and collected site in Mongolia, Tibetan, and XinJiang

Isolation, purification, and preservation of Lactobacillus

Lactic acid bacteria were counted using the pouring culture method (Liu Hongxin et al., 2017). The stool sample (5 g) was diluted with normal saline (45 ml), and the appropriate concentration gradients (10–5, 10–6, and 10–7) were selected by the 10‐fold gradient dilution method (Yu et al., .2015). The diluent of 1 ml sample was absorbed and shaken in the unsolidified MRS solid medium, and 0.5% l‐cysteine and 0.05 mg/ml mupirocin (Qingdao Hope Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) (Ferraris et al., 2010) were added to modify MRS Agar (Oxoid). After the culture medium was thoroughly dried, the dishes were incubated at 37℃ in an anaerobic environment for 48 h (Jousimies‐Sommer & Summanen, 2002). At the same time, 100 μL of sample dilution with the same dilution multiple as living bacteria count was spread on MRS solid medium. After colony formation, single colonies with different morphological characteristics were randomly selected on the corresponding solid medium for 2–3 times of lineation purification (Gooch Jan, 2011), in order to screen out colonies with different morphology. The single colony was stained with Gram, and the cell morphology was observed under a microscope. The pure isolate identified as gram‐positive was cultured in modified MRS solid medium. After catalase test, the catalase‐positive bacteria were discarded. Finally, the gram‐positive and catalase‐negative isolates were tentatively designated as lactic acid bacteria (Daiwen., 1999). Those tentatively designated as Lactobacillus were cultured at 37℃ in an anaerobic environment for 18–24 h and prepared for DNA extraction (see below) and preservation. After centrifugation at 3500 × g for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded and replaced with about 5 ml normal saline into which the bacteria in the precipitate were resuspended. This was repeated three times in more saline to wash the bacterial cells which were finally resuspended using a Pap needle in a sterile protective solution containing: 10 g skimmed milk powder, 0.1 g sodium glutamate, 90 ml distilled water, all sterilized at 121℃ for 7 min. Some of the isolates were stored in a cryopreservation tube at −80℃, and the other part was freeze‐dried in an ampoule tube and cryopreserved in a refrigerator at −80℃.

Sequence analysis of 16S rRNA gene

For extraction of DNA from each tentatively identified Lactobacillus strain, 2 ml of cells in liquid culture medium was centrifuged for 1 min at 12000 rpm. The supernatant was discarded, and the bacterial precipitate was collected. The genomic DNA extracted using DNA extraction kit (Beijing Tiangen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) needs to be determined by a ND‐1000 micro‐ultraviolet spectrophotometer. Fifty microliters of purified DNA was diluted to 100 ng/ μL with a automatic thermal cycler (MJ Research PTC‐200; MJ Research Inc., Watertown, MA, USA) for 16S rRNA amplification and sequencing. The primers used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene were universal primers, the forward primer FA‐27F (5'‐GCAGAGTTCTCGGA GTCACGAAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG‐3') and the reverse primer RA‐1495R (5'‐AGCGGA TCACTTCACA CAGGACTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA‐3') (Sun et al., 2010). Each PCR reaction (50 μL) includes 1.5 μL (10 μmol/L) upstream and downstream primers, 2.0 μL genomic DNA, 5.0 μL 10 × buffer, 4 μL dNTP (2.5 mmol/L), 0.5 μL Taq DNA polymerase, and 35.5 μL distilled water. PCR amplification was performed under following conditions: pre‐denaturation at 94℃ for 5 min, 30 cycles (denaturation at 94℃, 58℃, annealing for 1 min, extension of 2 min at 72℃), and final extension at 72℃ for 10 min, and the product was kept at 4℃ to prevent degradation (Liu et al., 2020). After the amplification reaction, approximately 2 μL of the PCR amplification products was analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized on the gel imager (Beijing SAGE Creative Science Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). If there was a clear amplification band at 1500 bp and no trailing or diffusion phenomena, the PCR amplification was considered successful. Positive products were sent directly for sequencing by Majorbio Bio Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Sequences were compared using the SeqMan module of the DNA Star software (DNA‐STAR Company, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) (Altschul et al., 1997). A BLAST search (http://BLAST.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST.cgi) of the NCBI database was used to analyze the nucleic acid sequences of bacteria in relation to sequences in GenBank. When sequence similarity to GenBank sequences achieved 97%, they were considered to be the same genus; when sequence similarity reached 99%, they were determined to be the same species (Drancourt et al., 2000). Finally, MEGA software version 6.0 was used build the system evolution tree (Tamura et al., 2007; Yu et al., 2011).

Physiological and biochemical evaluation

In vitro growth curve

Cryopreserved isolate was inoculated into modified MRS liquid medium, incubated at 37℃ for 24 h, and then continuously cultured for three generations to activate them (Yasmin et al., 2020). Inoculum (4%) was inoculated into MRS liquid medium, and there was MRS liquid medium 4.5 ml into each test tube (15 × 100 mm). The experiment was divided into three groups, with 12 replicative test tubes in each group, which were cultured at 37℃ for 24 h. Samples (three parallel samples) were taken every 2 h and stored in a refrigerator at 4℃. After sampling, the MRS liquid medium was used as blank, the absorbance value of the sample was determined using a spectrophotometer under 620 nm, and the growth curve was drawn with culture time as abscissa and corresponding absorbance value as ordinate.

Tolerance to acid environments

Preparation of artificial gastric and intestinal fluids

Artificial gastric juice was prepared using 3.0 g/L pepsin dissolved in sterile phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS; China Beijing Chemical Base Science and Technology Co., Ltd.) that had been adjusted to pH 2.5 with 0.1 mol/L hydrochloric acid. The resulting artificial gastric fluid was then filtered through a 0.22‐μm filter membrane (China Hefei Biosharp Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) to sterilize it prior to use. Artificial intestinal fluid was prepared using 1.0 g/L trypsin (China Beijing Chemical Base Technology Co., Ltd.) and 1.8% bile salt (China Beijing Chemical Base Technology Co., Ltd.) dissolved in sterile PBS and adjusted to pH 8.0 with 0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide. The resulting artificial intestinal fluid was filtered through a 0.22‐μm filter membrane (China Hefei Biochemical Co., Ltd.) to sterilize it prior to use.

Tolerance to artificial digestive juices

Cryopreserved Isolated Lactobacillus strains were activated as described previously. Activated isolate was centrifuged (3800 × g) for 10 min and the supernatant removed. The bacterial pellets were collected and washed three times in PBS (8.0 g/L NaCl, 0.2 g/L KH2PO4, and 1.15 g/L Na2HPO4, pH 7.2). The bacteria were then resuspended in 5 ml of sterilized PBS. For each strain, 0.5 ml of bacterial suspension was added to 4.5 ml (pH 2.5) of artificial gastric fluid and then incubated at 37℃ under anaerobic conditions. Samples were taken at 0 h and 3 h, respectively, and plate viable bacteria were counted (Fernández et al., 2003). The artificial gastric juice cultured with pH 2.5 for 3 h was transferred into artificial intestinal juice (4.5 ml) by absorbing 0.5 ml, and then anaerobic culture was performed. The number of living bacteria was determined after 4 h and 8 h (Hosono, 1998). Finally, the survival rate was calculated using the plate counting method (Bao et al., 2010). Specifically, strain survival rate = [N1/N0] × 100%, where N0 is the number of live bacteria at 0 h [colony forming units (CFU/ml)] and N1 is the number of live bacteria in artificial gastric/intestinal fluids after 3 h or 11 h (CFU/ml).

Bile salt tolerance

Each of the cryopreserved Lactobacillus strains was activated as described previously. The activated Lactobacillus was inoculated in MRS‐sodium mercaptoacetate medium (MRS liquid medium added 0.2% sodium mercaptoacetate) without bovine bile salt and MRS‐sodium mercaptoacetate solution containing bile salt (3.0 g/L) according to 4% inoculum, and then cultured at 37℃ in constant temperature and anaerobic culture. The OD values of cultures were determined at 620 nm every 1 h by an UV‐vis spectrophotometer (Kyoto Shimadzu Company of Japan). When the OD value of cultures had increased by more than 0.3 U, the experiment was stopped, and the time required for each strain to achieve 0.3 U was recorded. The delay time (LT) was calculated as the difference between values with and without bile salts (Pochart et al., 1992). The tolerance of isolate to bile salt was judged according to the delay time of each strain.

Fermentation and storage characteristics

Skimmed milk (10% in distilled water plus 1% glucose) was sterilized and cooled to about 40 ~ 45℃. For each strain, 4.5 ml of skimmed milk in a test tube was inoculated with 0.5 ml of a 1.0 × 107 CFU/ml suspension of activated bacteria, shaken well, and incubated at 37℃ under anaerobic conditions. The pH and titrated acidity were measured every 3 h until the pH value reached 3.5. At the end of fermentation, the resulting fermented milk was stored at 4℃, and the number of viable bacteria, pH, and titratable acidity were determined after storage for 0, 7, 14, and 21 days, respectively. Titratable acidity of the fermented milk was determined according to the national standard method reference GB5413‐34–2010 (National Standard of the People's Republic of China, 2010).

Statistical analysis

Three parallel samples were made for the determination of each index of the test sample. The experimental data were statistically analyzed by the CORR program of SAS9.0 software, and the drawing was made by Origin7.0 software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Preliminary identification of Lactobacillus

Continuous culture of isolates in modified MRS solid medium for 48 h resulted in colonies that were white, transparent, with neat edges, smooth or dull surfaces, flattened, or protruding in the center. By Gram staining and other phenotypic tests, a total of 57 isolates were identified as Lactobacillus species. All isolates showed gram‐positive and catalase‐negative properties.

Molecular identification by 16S rRNA sequencing

The 57 isolates of Lactobacillus from human feces could be divided into 13 species by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Figure 1), specifically: L. ruminis (31 isolates), L. gasseri (8 isolates), L. casei, L. vaginalis, L. mucosae, L. brevis, L. helveticus, L. crispatus, L. acidophilu, L. reuteri, L. plantarum, L. fermentum, and L. rhamnosus. The species L. ruminus and L. gasseri were the dominant species of Lactobacillus in the human intestinal tract in this study. Specifically, L. ruminus accounted for 54.38% of the total number of isolated bacteria while L. gasseri accounted for 14.03%.
FIGURE 1

Phylogenetic tree of Lactobacillus isolates from the human intestine based on 16S rRNA

A total of 23 isolates of Lactobacillus were isolated from samples collected in Tibet; 15 of these were L. ruminus accounting for 65.21% of all bacteria from the fecal samples of young people in Tibet (Table 2). Of the remaining isolates from Tibet samples, three were L. gasseri and there were one each of L. helveticus, L. crispatus, L. plantarum, L. casei, and L. vaginalis. Thus, L. ruminus and L. gasseri were the dominant Lactobacillus species in the fecal samples of young people in Tibet. A total of 18 isolates of Lactobacillus from seven species were isolated from fecal samples collected in Xinjiang: L. ruminus (10 isolates), L. mucosae (3 isolates), and one strain each of L. gasseri, L. crispatus, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, and L. brevis. Thus, L. ruminus and L. mucosae were the dominant Lactobacillus species in the fecal samples of young people in Xinjiang. A total of 16 isolates of Lactobacillus from eight species were isolated from fecal samples collected in Inner Mongolia: L. ruminus (6 isolates), L. gasseri (4 isolates), and one strain each of L. helveticus, L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. reuteri, and L. crispatus. Thus, L. ruminus and L. gasseri were the dominant Lactobacillus species in the fecal samples of young people in Inner Mongolia.
TABLE 2

Number of Lactobacillus species isolated from human feces collected in different regions of China

SpeciesTibetXinjiangInner MongoliaTotal
L. ruminus 1510631
L. gasseri 3148
L. helveticus 1012
L. casei 1012
L. vaginalis 1001
L. mucosae 0303
L. rhamnosus 0101
L. brevis 0101
L. acidophilus 0011
L. reuteri 0011
L. fermentum 0011
L. crispatus 1113
L. plantarum 1102
Total23181657
Phylogenetic tree of Lactobacillus isolates from the human intestine based on 16S rRNA Number of Lactobacillus species isolated from human feces collected in different regions of China The dominant Lactobacillus species in the three regions were similar; L. ruminus was the predominant Lactobacillus in all three regions. Overall, L. ruminus and L. gasseri were the main Lactobacillus microflora in the intestinal tract of healthy young people in Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia. This was consistent with the results of studies of fecal samples from young French people (Heilig et al., 2002) and young European (Klaenhammer, 1995) who also found that Lactobacillus species in the human intestinal tract were mainly comprised of L. gasseri and L. reuteri. However, it was different from a study on the dominant Lactobacillus species in fecal samples from 20‐year‐old and 25‐year‐old Chinese people which found Lactobacillus curly and Lactobacillus saliva are common and dominant Lactobacillus in the intestinal tract of healthy Chinese young people, and the species and quantity of other Lactobacillus are also quite different from those of Europeans (Min et al., 2004). Many studies have found significant differences in diversity and abundance of Lactobacillus among individual and between regions (Liu Hongxin et al., 2017). The fact that the dominant Lactobacillus species from young people in Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia detected in this experiment was similar to that of Europeans may be because the diet of these three regions is similar to that of Europeans, that is, a lot of dairy products.

In vitro growth curve

We evaluated the growth of nine of the Lactobacillus (from seven species) isolated from fecal samples and two reference strains: L. plantarum P8 and L. casei Zhang. It can be seen from the Figure 2 that the growth curves of nine isolates of Lactobacillus isolated in MRS liquid medium were basically very similar to each other. They all grew slowly between 0 and 4 h, entered a stable growth period after 14 h which lasted until 24 h. In this experiment, growth characteristics were evaluated under aerobic conditions and so differences in growth were also affected by oxygen. Thus, in subsequent experiments we adjusted the culture time according to the growth curve.
FIGURE 2

Growth of different Lactobacillus isolates in MRS at 37℃

Growth of different Lactobacillus isolates in MRS at 37℃

Acid and bile tolerance

Preliminary analysis of acid tolerance (pH 2.0) and artificial gastric juice tolerance (pH 3.0) of 11 Lactobacillus can be seen in Table 2. All the tested Lactobacillus could grow well in the pH 3.0 environment, but were unable to survive in the pH 2.0 environment for very long. This is consistent with the results of Marteau (Marteau et al., 1997). After 3 h at pH 3.0 in artificial gastric juice, survival rates of the different isolates of Lactobacillus varied significantly from that of the two reference strains (p < .05) (Table 3). From the experimental results, it can be seen that the survival rate of the isolated L. plantarum IMAUFB042, IMAUFB063, and the control strain L. plantarum P8 in pH 3.0 gastric juice environment reached more than 90%, showing a strong tolerance to artificial gastric juice, which is consistent with the conclusion that part of Lactobacillus isolated from human body has good resistance to gastrointestinal fluid, which was found by Fernández, Boris, and Barbés (2003). In other studies, it was also found that L. plantarum had strong tolerance to artificial gastric juice with low pH value (Peng et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2004).
TABLE 3

Tolerance of Lactobacillus to artificial gastrointestinal juices (pH 3.0) and survival rates after 0 h and 3 h incubation (n = 3, x ± SD)

Isolate reference numberMean toleranceSurvival rate (%)
0 h3 h
L. acidophilus IMAUFB0589.13 ± 0.018.91 ± 0.0260.0 h
L. brevis IMAUFB0369.09 ± 0.028.95 ± 0.0171.1 f
L. casei IMAUFB0599.04 ± 0.018.79 ± 0.0358.1 i
L. casei IMAUFB0138.98 ± 0.038.85 ± 0.0173.9 e
L. casei Zhang8.97 ± 0.018.78 ± 0.0565.3 g
L. helveticus IMAUFB0019.16 ± 0.039.09 ± 0.0487.4 d
L. plantarum IMAUFB0428.31 ± 0.028.43 ± 0.06100 a
L. plantarum IMAUFB0638.99 ± 0.019.11 ± 0.05100 a
L. plantarum P88.80 ± 0.048.87 ± 0.0597.1 b
L. reuteri IMAUFB0609.13 ± 0.018.01 ± 0.067.5 j
L. fermentum IMAUFB0559.25 ± 0.039.22 ± 0.0194.4 c

Presented values are means of triplicate determinations; ± indicates standard deviation from the mean. Data in the same column followed by different lowercase letter are significantly different from each other (p < .05).

Tolerance of Lactobacillus to artificial gastrointestinal juices (pH 3.0) and survival rates after 0 h and 3 h incubation (n = 3, x ± SD) Presented values are means of triplicate determinations; ± indicates standard deviation from the mean. Data in the same column followed by different lowercase letter are significantly different from each other (p < .05). The 11 isolates of Lactobacillus that were digested at pH 3.0 in artificial gastric juice for 3 h were then inoculated into artificial intestinal juice at pH 8.0 and their survival rate was recorded after 4 h and 8 h (Figure 3). The number of Lactobacillus viable count changed slowly during 4 h and 8 h digestion in pH 8.0 artificial intestinal juice, but the tolerance of them is becoming different after 8 h digestion (p < .05). Among them, L. plantarum IMAUFB042, IMAUFB063, and the control strain L. plantarum P8 maintained a high survival rate of 80% after 8 h, but the survival rate of L. reuteri IMAUFB060 was very low after this period of time, and significantly lower than the other Lactobacillus (p < .05).
FIGURE 3

Survival rates of Lactobacillus isolates in artificial intestinal juice at pH 8.0

Survival rates of Lactobacillus isolates in artificial intestinal juice at pH 8.0 Bile concentration in the human intestinal tract generally fluctuates between 0.3% and 1.8%. Of the 11 Lactobacillus evaluated, 10 were tolerant to bile salts in the range of 0.3% ‐ 2.0% (Table 4). The highest bile salt concentration that L. helveticus IMAUFB001 could tolerate was 1.8%. Overall, some of the isolated strains of Lactobacillus we evaluated demonstrated high resistance to bile salts which was consistent with previous research showing that most intestinal bacteria have strong tolerance to bile salts (Gilliland & Walker, 1990). Tolerance in the reference strains L. casei Zhang and L. plantarum P8 to 1.8% bile salts was consistent with previous studies on these isolates (Wu et al., 2009; Ying et al., 2007). Another strain of the same species, L. plantarum MB3182, also has good tolerance to 2.0% bile salt (Missotten et al., 2008), confirming the conclusion that L. plantarum has good bile salt tolerance.
TABLE 4

Tolerance of Lactobacillus to different concentrations bile salts

Isolate reference numberBile salt concentration(%)
0.30.60.81.01.51.82.0
L. acidophilus IMAUFB058△A620nm 2.5931.9811.6151.4111.1530.6610.31
MRS plate
L. brevis IMAUFB036△A620nm 2.8341.8651.5411.2771.1930.8750.728
MRS plate
L. casei IMAUFB059△A620nm 1.4881.0680.7560.8160.7921.1280.975
MRS plate
L. casei IMAUFB013△A620nm 3.2171.8491.8371.5971.7111.6431.003
MRS plate
L. casei Zhang △A620nm 2.8421.7681.9360.820.9760.6360.544
MRS plate
L. helveticusIMAUFB001△A620nm 2.8141.2111.9140.9680.5730.424
MRS plate
L. plantarum IMAUFB042△A620nm 0.7380.3870.3690.3840.4260.5340.66
MRS plate
L. plantarum IMAUFB063△A620nm 1.1140.6370.5890.4660.4750.4840.61
MRS plate
L. plantarum P8△A620nm 3.1181.7781.6761.5021.2440.3380.38
MRS plate
L. reuteriIMAUFB060△A620nm 1.9131.7451.0011.4690.9650.8770.952
MRS plate
L. fermentum IMAUFB055△A620nm 1.240.8380.5830.9340.4050.3710.323
MRS plate

△A620nm is the change of absorbance value for each isolate within 12 h; + indicates colony growth, ‐indicates no colony growth.

Tolerance of Lactobacillus to different concentrations bile salts △A620nm is the change of absorbance value for each isolate within 12 h; + indicates colony growth, ‐indicates no colony growth. The delay time of each strain in response to bile salts was significantly different among isolates (p < .05), indicating significant differences in bile salt tolerance among isolate (Table 5). The delay time of the reference strain L. casei Zhang was 0.65 h, which was similar to the delay times of L. acidophilus IMAUFB058, L. brevis IMAUFB036, and L. casei IMAUFB059 which were 0.78 h, 0.87 h, and 0.91 h, respectively; the delay time of L. helveticus IMAUFB001, which had good tolerance to bile salts, was more than 5 h, which was significantly different from all the other isolates (p < .05). While Liong & Shah, 2005 showed that probiotics in general varied significantly in bile tolerance, the Lactobacillus, we evaluated strong tolerance to bile salt which is likely related to the long‐term maintenance of high bile salt concentration in the intestinal environment from which they originated.
TABLE 5

Comparison of growth rate and delay time of Lactobacillus at 3% bile salts concentration (n = 3, x ± SD)

Isolate reference numberOD620nm The time required to increase the number of units by 0.3 (h)
Mean time in medium containing 0.3% bile saltMean time in bile‐free mediumDelay
L.acidophilus IMAUFB0583.38 ± 0.232.60 ± 0.150.78 ± 0.08 ef
L. brevis IMAUFB0363.11 ± 0.212.24 ± 0.190.87 ± 0.02 def
L. casei IMAUFB0594.08 ± 0.233.17 ± 0.200.91 ± 0.03 de
L. casei IMAUFB0134.17 ± 0.113.15 ± 0.021.02 ± 0.09 bcd
L. casei Zhang3.70 ± 0.163.05 ± 0.170.65 ± 0.01f
L. helveticus IMAUFB0018.89 ± 0.343.32 ± 0.085.57 ± 0.26 a
L. plantarum IMAUFB0423.84 ± 0.112.86 ± 0.020.98 ± 0.09 bcd
L. plantarum IMAUFB0633.22 ± 0.212.08 ± 0.091.14 ± 0.13bc
L. plantarum P83.73 ± 0.242.55 ± 0.181.18 ± 0.06 b
L. reuteri IMAUFB0604.46 ± 0.133.33 ± 0.321.13 ± 0.19 bc
L. fermentum IMAUFB0552.96 ± 0.321.74 ± 0.390.95 ± 0.07 cde

Presented values are means of triplicate determinations; ± indicates standard deviation from the mean. Data in the same column followed by different lowercase letter are significantly different from each other (p < .05).

Comparison of growth rate and delay time of Lactobacillus at 3% bile salts concentration (n = 3, x ± SD) Presented values are means of triplicate determinations; ± indicates standard deviation from the mean. Data in the same column followed by different lowercase letter are significantly different from each other (p < .05). The pH value of each strain decreased with fermentation time; the decrease was slow in the first 3 h of fermentation, and then accelerated (Figure 4). Fermentation by most of the Lactobacillus was strong, reducing the pH to 4.5 within 22 h, while the ability of L. casei IMAUFB059 and IMAUFB013 to ferment skimmed milk was weak and the pH achieved during fermentation was not as low as for the other Lactobacillus. The pH of each strain changed slowly during storage because of growth, and therefore, acid production was suppressed at 4℃. While the pH of L. casei IMAUFB059 and IMAUFB013 did continue to decrease during storage, it was still higher than 4.5 after 21 days. Overall, acid production during fermentation was lower for Lactobacillus than for L. plantarum P8 and L. casei Zhang.
FIGURE 4

Changes of pH during fermentation (a) and storage (b) of yogurt by different Lactobacillus isolates

Changes of pH during fermentation (a) and storage (b) of yogurt by different Lactobacillus isolates During the fermentation of skimmed milk, the titration acidity of each strain increased significantly with the fermentation time. The changing trend of titration acidity between 0 and 3 h is slow, the titration acidity is lower, and the titration acidity increases rapidly between 3 and 18 h (Figure 5). At the end of fermentation, the TA values of the nine isolates of Lactobacillus were lower than those of the two reference strains, L. plantarum P8 and L. casei Zhang. The significant increase in acidity during fermentation by Lactobacillus is mainly due to the fact that Lactobacillus ferments lactose in skimmed milk into organic acids (mainly lactic acid); the continuous accumulation of organic acids leads to the continuous increase in acidity. The upward trend in titratable acidity during fermentation slowed during cold storage at 4℃. After 21 days of storage, the TA value of Lactobacillus was still higher than that of L. plantarum P8 and L. casei Zhang.
FIGURE 5

Changes in titratable acidity during fermentation (a) and storage (b) of yogurt by different Lactobacillus isolates

Changes in titratable acidity during fermentation (a) and storage (b) of yogurt by different Lactobacillus isolates After 21 days of storage, the number of living bacteria in the fermented milk had decreased by about 3 logarithmic units (Table 6). This is consistent with other studies that found the number of living bacteria of some probiotic decreased to a certain extent during low‐temperature storage of fermented milk (Kailasapathy, 2006; Shah, 2000). While the number of living bacteria in fermented milk produced by some isolates remained above 1.0 × 107 CFU/ml after 21 days of storage, the number of living bacteria of the reference strain, L. casei Zhang, after 21 days of storage was slightly higher than for the Lactobacillus isolated from human feces and also the other reference strain, L. plantarum P8. This indicates that the storage characteristics of L. casei Zhang‐fermented milk were better than for some of the Lactobacillus isolated from the intestinal tract.
TABLE 6

Change in viable counts of different Lactobacillus strains in yogurt after 21 d storage at 4℃ (n = 3, x ± SD)

Isolate reference number0 d7 d14 d21 d
L. acidophilus IMAUFB0589.29 ± 0.028.76 ± 0.037.89 ± 0.077.17 ± 0.02
L. brevis IMAUFB0369.19 ± 0.028.57 ± 0.18.14 ± 0.098.12 ± 0.08
L. casei IMAUFB0599.14 ± 0.048.94 ± 0.057.79 ± 0.037.05 ± 0.04
L. casei IMAUFB0139.23 ± 0.098.62 ± 0.067.19 ± 0.117.03 ± 0.1
L. casei Zhang9.08 ± 0.018.76 ± 0.038.63 ± 0.068.16 ± 0.04
L. helveticus IMAUFB0019.18 ± 0.028.54 ± 0.037.78 ± 0.197.76 ± 0.03
L. plantarum IMAUFB0429.31 ± 0.088.79 ± 0.068.63 ± 0.097.54 ± 0.06
L. plantarum IMAUFB0639.02 ± 0.148.1 ± 0.028.19 ± 0.067.05 ± 0.1
L. plantarum P89.37 ± 0.028.57 ± 0.048.08 ± 0.227.69 ± 0.07
L. reuteri IMAUFB0609.13 ± 0.038.41 ± 0.087.88 ± 0.057.11 ± 0.08
L. fermentum IMAUFB0559.28 ± 0.128.41 ± 0.138.14 ± 0.097.89 ± 0.07

Presented values are means of triplicate determinations; ± indicates standard deviation from the mean. Data in the same column followed by different lowercase letter are significantly different from each other (p < .05).

Change in viable counts of different Lactobacillus strains in yogurt after 21 d storage at 4℃ (n = 3, x ± SD) Presented values are means of triplicate determinations; ± indicates standard deviation from the mean. Data in the same column followed by different lowercase letter are significantly different from each other (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The fecal samples of healthy young individuals in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia were analyzed using the pure culture method and 16S rRNA gene homology analysis. Fifty‐seven isolates of Lactobacillus were identified and preserved. These species had a rich diversity, in which L. ruminus and L. gasseri were the predominant species. Nine of the Lactobacillus isolates and two reference strains of Lactobacillus had high survival rate in a pH 3.0 environment. L. plantarum and the reference strain L. plantarum P8 showed high tolerance in artificial gastrointestinal juice. Six of Lactobacillus and reference strains were tolerant to bile at a concentration of 2.0%. The fermentation of 11 isolates of Lactobacillus was slow, but they had good storage characteristics. This study is of practical significance; understanding the growth fermentation characteristics and tolerance of Lactobacillus isolates from the human intestinal tract may provide valuable isolate for use as probiotics.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Chen Liu: Methodology (equal); Resources (equal); Software (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (supporting). Fei Han: Resources (equal); Software (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (equal). LING CONG LIN: Resources (supporting); Validation (equal); Visualization (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Ting Sun: Investigation (supporting); Resources (supporting); Software (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Bilege Menghe: Resources (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Wunjun Liu: Resources (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal).

FUND PROJECT SUPPORT

The study was funded by National Key R&D Program (Project Code: 2018YFE0123500) Project Name: Study on the nutritional status of Mongolian population and the diversity of Lactobacillus in the intestinal tract—Bilege Menghe; Inner Mongolia Agricultural University Science and Technology Plan Project of School of Food Science and Engineering (Project Code: SPKJ202007)—Wenjun Liu; Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project (Project Code: 2021GG0080)—Wenjun Liu.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.
  37 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler's diarrhea.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 6.211

2.  Survival of lactic acid bacteria in a dynamic model of the stomach and small intestine: validation and the effects of bile.

Authors:  P Marteau; M Minekus; R Havenaar; J H Huis in't Veld
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Survival of bifidobacteria ingested via fermented milk during their passage through the human small intestine: an in vivo study using intestinal perfusion.

Authors:  P Pochart; P Marteau; Y Bouhnik; I Goderel; P Bourlioux; J C Rambaud
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Diversity of lactic acid bacteria associated with traditional fermented dairy products in Mongolia.

Authors:  J Yu; W H Wang; B L G Menghe; M T Jiri; H M Wang; W J Liu; Q H Bao; Q Lu; J C Zhang; F Wang; H Y Xu; T S Sun; H P Zhang
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypocholesterolemic effect in humans.

Authors:  S E Gilliland; D K Walker
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Fermentation characteristics and transit tolerance of probiotic Lactobacillus casei Zhang in soymilk and bovine milk during storage.

Authors:  J Wang; Z Guo; Q Zhang; L Yan; W Chen; X-M Liu; H-P Zhang
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Effect of probiotic (VSL#3) and omega-3 on lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, inflammatory markers, and gut colonization in overweight adults: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Hemalatha Rajkumar; Naseha Mahmood; Manoj Kumar; Sudarshan Reddy Varikuti; Hanumanth Reddy Challa; Shiva Prakash Myakala
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 8.  Immune-Mediated Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics and Synbiotics in Treating Pediatric Intestinal Diseases.

Authors:  Julio Plaza-Díaz; Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda; Mercedes Gil-Campos; Angel Gil
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Molecular Players Involved in the Interaction Between Beneficial Bacteria and the Immune System.

Authors:  Arancha Hevia; Susana Delgado; Borja Sánchez; Abelardo Margolles
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Effects of probiotic type, dose and treatment duration on irritable bowel syndrome diagnosed by Rome III criteria: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Lixiang Li; Chuanguo Guo; Dan Mu; Bingcheng Feng; Xiuli Zuo; Yanqing Li
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.