| Literature DB >> 35035921 |
Quoc-Duy Nguyen1, Thanh-Thuy Dang1, Thi-Van-Linh Nguyen1, Thi-Thuy-Dung Nguyen1, Nhu-Ngoc Nguyen1.
Abstract
Anthocyanins are important phytochemical compounds in nature that are of interest not only for their health benefits such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-carcinogenic properties, but also for their role in imparting attractive and characteristic color to food products. In this study, anthocyanins from hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) calyces were microencapsulated by spray-drying technique using maltodextrin as the carrier. The experiment was carried out in the full factorial design with two factors, namely inlet temperature (150, 160, and 170°C) and anthocyanin to maltodextrin mass ratio (1:50, 1:60, 1:70, 1:80, 1:90, and 1:100) with the aim of investigating the effect of spray drying conditions on phenolic content, anthocyanin, antioxidant activity, and color of spray-dried hibiscus powder. The results showed that increasing the carrier ratio significantly reduced the antioxidant content and their activities in the powder. However, the high level of carriers exhibited a protective effect in encapsulating anthocyanin compounds into the maltodextrin matrix, which was demonstrated by high encapsulation efficiency (>85%) observed in the samples prepared at a ratio of 1:100. It should be highlighted that although high temperature (170°C) reduced total anthocyanin concentration, it actually enhanced total phenolic content. In addition, the moisture content of the powder declined with increasing carrier ratio and inlet temperature, and it was found to be in the range of 5.57%-10.19% in the powder. With solubility greater than 93.71%, the total phenolic and total anthocyanin content of spray-dried hibiscus powder were 31.5-41.9 (mg gallic acid equivalent/g of dry powder) and 6.08-10.47 (mg cyanidin-3-glucoside/g of dry powder), respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Roselle anthocyanins; antioxidant activities; encapsulation efficiency; phenolic content; spray drying
Year: 2021 PMID: 35035921 PMCID: PMC8751440 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
FIGURE 1Effects of inlet temperature (°C) and ratio (w/w) of anthocyanin (ACN) to maltodextrin (MD) on total phenolic content (TPC, mg GAE/g DW) of spray‐dried roselle powder. Note: Different letters within each method indicate that the mean values were significantly different at 95% confidence level
FIGURE 2Effects of inlet temperature (°C) and ratio (w/w) of anthocyanin (ACN) to maltodextrin (MD) on total anthocyanin (TAC, mg C3G/g DW), surface anthocyanin (SAC, mg C3G/g DW) contents and encapsulation efficiency (EE, %) of spray‐dried roselle powder at (a) 150°C, (b) 160°C, and (c) 170°C. Note: Different letters within each method indicate that the mean values were significantly different at 95% confidence level
FIGURE 3Effects of inlet temperature (°C) and ratio (w/w) of anthocyanin (ACN) to maltodextrin (MD) on antioxidant activities (mg TE/g DW) of spray‐dried roselle powder: (a) DPPH radical scavenging activity, (b) ABTS cation radical reduction ability, (c) ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and (d) cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC). Note: Different letters within each method indicate that the mean values were significantly different at 95% confidence level
Effects of inlet temperature (°C) and ratio (w/w) of anthocyanin (ACN) to maltodextrin (MD) on some physical properties of spray‐dried roselle powder
| ACN:MD ratio (w/w) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:50 | 1:60 | 1:70 | 1:80 | 1:90 | 1:100 | ||
| L* | 150°C | 45.07 (0.50)a | 45.36 (0.83)a | 47.71 (0.23)b | 51.17 (0.41)c | 53.27 (0.47)d | 52.6 (0.67)cd |
| 160°C | 47.04 (0.18)a | 50.55 (0.37)b | 51.40 (0.79)bc | 52.57 (0.45)cd | 53.11 (0.34)d | 54.77 (0.46)e | |
| 170°C | 50.15 (1.2)a | 51.46 (1.02)ab | 51.84 (0.62)abc | 52.32 (0.54)bc | 54.37 (0.33)d | 53.78 (0.17)cd | |
| a* | 150°C | 25.79 (0.38)a | 26.50 (0.62)ac | 27.97 (0.29)bd | 27.75 (0.16)bd | 27.58 (0.26)bc | 28.90 (0.62)d |
| 160°C | 26.82 (0.85)ab | 27.96 (0.04)bc | 26.23 (0.67)a | 28.68 (0.18)c | 28.66 (0.18)c | 27.20 (0.23)ab | |
| 170°C | 24.53 (0.39)a | 26.50 (0.40)b | 26.30 (0.26)b | 27.20 (0.25)bc | 27.80 (0.51)c | 27.57 (0.12)c | |
| b* | 150°C | 8.49 (0.12)a | 8.34 (0.08)ab | 8.33 (0.06)ab | 8.19 (0.19)abc | 8.10 (0.15)bc | 7.89 (0.01)c |
| 160°C | 8.40 (0.09)a | 8.38 (0.18)a | 8.08 (0.19)ab | 7.9 (0.06)b | 8.34 (0.04)a | 7.86 (0.11)b | |
| 170°C | 7.66 (0.30)a | 8.20 (0.15)b | 8.11 (0.05)ab | 8.23 (0.11)b | 8.49 (0.20)bc | 8.91 (0.06)c | |
| C* | 150°C | 27.15 (0.4)a | 27.78 (0.60)ac | 29.19 (0.26)bd | 28.93 (0.20)bcd | 28.74 (0.30)bc | 29.96 (0.59)d |
| 160°C | 28.11 (0.82)ab | 29.19 (0.03)bc | 27.45 (0.67)a | 29.75 (0.17)c | 29.85 (0.17)c | 28.31 (0.20)ab | |
| 170°C | 25.7 (0.46)a | 27.74 (0.35)b | 27.53 (0.25)b | 28.42 (0.26)bc | 29.07 (0.48)c | 28.97 (0.12)c | |
| h | 150°C | 18.22 (0.13)a | 17.48 (0.38)b | 16.59 (0.25)c | 16.44 (0.29)c | 16.37 (0.14)c | 15.27 (0.32)d |
| 160°C | 17.4 (0.5)a | 16.69 (0.36)ab | 17.11 (0.33)a | 15.41 (0.13)c | 16.22 (0.13)bc | 16.13 (0.33)bc | |
| 170°C | 17.34 (0.39)ab | 17.21 (0.51)ab | 17.14 (0.21)ab | 16.83 (0.22)a | 16.98 (0.53)ab | 17.91 (0.15)b | |
| W (%) | 150°C | 10.19 (0.26)a | 9.8 (0.08)b | 9.71 (0.26)cd | 8.93 (0.06)d | 7.69 (0.23)e | 7.66 (0.39)e |
| 160°C | 9.43 (0.11)a | 8.22 (0.05)b | 8.79 (0.29)ab | 6.93 (0.20)c | 5.67 (0.11)d | 5.71 (0.13)d | |
| 170°C | 8.51 (0.35)a | 7.36 (0.11)b | 7.52 (0.24)b | 6.02 (0.07)c | 5.69 (0.24)c | 5.57 (0.01)c | |
| S (%) | 150°C | 96.52 (0.89)a | 94.29 (2.80)a | 96.03 (2.09)a | 97.50 (2.17)a | 97.41 (1.29)a | 96.70 (2.69)a |
| 160°C | 97.13 (1.75)a | 97.85 (1.54)a | 95.92 (0.67)a | 96.23 (2.23)a | 95.95 (2.29)a | 97.22 (1.48)a | |
| 170°C | 93.71 (3.1)a | 96.05 (2.56)a | 97.68 (1.54)a | 97.54 (2.57)a | 96.83 (2.95)a | 94.91 (1.98)a | |
Results were expressed as mean (deviation), and in the same column, the different letter symbols indicate that the mean values were significantly different (p < .05).
Abbreviations: S, solubility (%); W, moisture content (%).
Pearson correlation coefficients between the contents of phenolics (TPC), anthocyanins (TAC) with antioxidant activities (DPPH free radical scavenging activity, ABTS cation radical scavenging capacity, ferric reducing antioxidant power—FRAP, and cupric reducing antioxidant capacity—CUPRAC) and color indicators (L*, a*, b*, C*, and h°) of spray‐dried roselle powder
| TPC | TAC | DPPH | ABTS | FRAP | CUPRAC | L* | A* | b* | C* | h° | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPC | 1 | ||||||||||
| TAC | 0.918** | 1 | |||||||||
| DPPH | 0.843** | 0.856** | 1 | ||||||||
| ABTS | 0.718** | 0.703** | 0.875** | 1 | |||||||
| FRAP | 0.864** | 0.775** | 0.924** | 0.812** | 1 | ||||||
| CUPRAC | 0.879** | 0.884** | 0.970** | 0.872** | 0.936** | 1 | |||||
| L* | −0.696** | −0.584* | −0.777** | −0.852** | −0.869** | −0.819** | 1 | ||||
| a* | −0.758** | −0.753** | −0.620** | −0.543* | −0.589* | −0.586* | 0.429 | 1 | |||
| b* | 0.064 | −0.134 | −0.189 | −0.080 | 0.055 | −0.040 | −0.189 | 0.164 | 1 | ||
| C* | −0.741** | −0.0752** | −0.625** | −0.540* | −0.575* | −0.580* | 0.407 | 0.997** | 0.238 | 1 | |
| h° | 0.686** | 0.540* | 0.397 | 0.412 | 0.543* | 0.473* | −0.506* | −0.722** | 0.563* | −0.668** | 1 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2‐tailed).
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2‐tailed).