Mitchell Turner1, Alvaro Reyes2, Tim Rankin1,3, Danielle Bartlett1,4, Gabriel Trajano5, Tim Pulverenti1,6, Travis Cruickshank1,4,7. 1. School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University Perth, Australia. 2. Facultad de Ciencias de la Rehabilitacion, Universidad Andres Bello Vina del Mar, Chile. 3. Centre for Sleep Science, School of Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Western Australia Crawley, Perth, Australia. 4. Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University Perth, Australia. 5. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Brisbane, Australia. 6. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York Staten Island, NY, USA. 7. Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Sciences Perth, Western Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Torque steadiness can be impaired in people with Huntington's disease (HD) and worsen with disease advancement. However, existing studies have several methodological oversights. Studies have used absolute torque targets, which do not account for differences in maximal torque capacity between people. Furthermore, despite its known influence on torque steadiness, previous studies in HD have not controlled for visual feedback. This study evaluated torque variability at relative intensities with and without visual feedback between people with prodromal HD and healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty-four people with prodromal HD and twenty-seven age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited for this study. Torque variability was evaluated, with and without visual feedback, in the right plantar flexors at 10% and 30% of each participant's maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Measures of disease burden included the CAG age product, diagnostic confidence level and Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale - Total Motor Score. RESULTS: Significant differences in torque variability were observed, though not in overall MVIC, between people with prodromal HD and healthy controls. Significantly higher torque fluctuations were observed for both groups when visual feedback was removed. No associations were observed between torque variability and disease burden in people with prodromal HD. Torque variability measurements showed higher reliability in healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: People with prodromal HD exhibited greater torque variability than healthy controls. Torque variability worsened for both groups when visual feedback was removed. These findings support further investigation into the utilisation of torque variability measurements as markers of disease progression in people with prodromal HD. AJTR
BACKGROUND: Torque steadiness can be impaired in people with Huntington's disease (HD) and worsen with disease advancement. However, existing studies have several methodological oversights. Studies have used absolute torque targets, which do not account for differences in maximal torque capacity between people. Furthermore, despite its known influence on torque steadiness, previous studies in HD have not controlled for visual feedback. This study evaluated torque variability at relative intensities with and without visual feedback between people with prodromal HD and healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty-four people with prodromal HD and twenty-seven age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited for this study. Torque variability was evaluated, with and without visual feedback, in the right plantar flexors at 10% and 30% of each participant's maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Measures of disease burden included the CAG age product, diagnostic confidence level and Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale - Total Motor Score. RESULTS: Significant differences in torque variability were observed, though not in overall MVIC, between people with prodromal HD and healthy controls. Significantly higher torque fluctuations were observed for both groups when visual feedback was removed. No associations were observed between torque variability and disease burden in people with prodromal HD. Torque variability measurements showed higher reliability in healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: People with prodromal HD exhibited greater torque variability than healthy controls. Torque variability worsened for both groups when visual feedback was removed. These findings support further investigation into the utilisation of torque variability measurements as markers of disease progression in people with prodromal HD. AJTR
Authors: Ralf Reilmann; Stefan Bohlen; Thomas Klopstock; Andreas Bender; Adolf Weindl; Philipp Saemann; Dorothee P Auer; E Bernd Ringelstein; Herwig W Lange Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Juha-Pekka Kulmala; Marko T Korhonen; Luca Ruggiero; Sami Kuitunen; Harri Suominen; Ari Heinonen; Aki Mikkola; Janne Avela Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 4.379