Qian Zhao1, Cheng Zhang1, Changsong Qi1, Jing Yang1, Yang Chen1, Sai Ge1, Lin Shen1, Jing Gao2, Jian Li1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing 100142, China. 2. National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential correlation between KIT secondary mutations and Imatinib-resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has been hinted, yet their specific linkage and underlying mechanisms remained unelucidated, also the development of substitute strategies dealing with this resistance was urgently needed. METHODS: In this study, we explored the distribution of the most prevalent forms of KIT mutation in Chinese GIST patients, after that, we established cell lines that was overexpressed with mutant KIT, and by performing RNA sequencing, immunoblotting and cell viability, we analyzed their functional and mechanistic relevance with Imatinib-resistance in GIST cell lines. Additionally, we evaluated the tumor inhibition efficacy of four regimens in Imatinib-resistant GIST cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. RESULTS: We found that KIT exon 13-V654A and exon 17-N822K were the most common secondary mutations in GIST with primary exon 11 mutations. These two secondary mutations induced Imatinib resistance by activating PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, while PI3K-Akt inhibition rescued the resistance. By assessing the feasibility of other four tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs, Sunitinib/Regorafenib/Avapritinib/Ripretinib) against Imatinib-resistant GIST, we found that Sunitinib was more suitable for KIT exon 13 secondary mutations, the rest were more effective for KIT exon 17 secondary mutations, while all four TKIs displayed efficacy for KIT exon 9 mutations, emphasizing their clinical applications against Imatinib resistance. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the mechanism by which KIT secondary mutations on exon 13/17 cause Imatinib resistance to GIST, and validated that several novel TKIs were valuable therapeutic options against Imatinib-resistance for both secondary- and primary-KIT mutations. AJTR
BACKGROUND: The potential correlation between KIT secondary mutations and Imatinib-resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has been hinted, yet their specific linkage and underlying mechanisms remained unelucidated, also the development of substitute strategies dealing with this resistance was urgently needed. METHODS: In this study, we explored the distribution of the most prevalent forms of KIT mutation in Chinese GIST patients, after that, we established cell lines that was overexpressed with mutant KIT, and by performing RNA sequencing, immunoblotting and cell viability, we analyzed their functional and mechanistic relevance with Imatinib-resistance in GIST cell lines. Additionally, we evaluated the tumor inhibition efficacy of four regimens in Imatinib-resistant GIST cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. RESULTS: We found that KIT exon 13-V654A and exon 17-N822K were the most common secondary mutations in GIST with primary exon 11 mutations. These two secondary mutations induced Imatinib resistance by activating PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, while PI3K-Akt inhibition rescued the resistance. By assessing the feasibility of other four tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs, Sunitinib/Regorafenib/Avapritinib/Ripretinib) against Imatinib-resistant GIST, we found that Sunitinib was more suitable for KIT exon 13 secondary mutations, the rest were more effective for KIT exon 17 secondary mutations, while all four TKIs displayed efficacy for KIT exon 9 mutations, emphasizing their clinical applications against Imatinib resistance. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the mechanism by which KIT secondary mutations on exon 13/17 cause Imatinib resistance to GIST, and validated that several novel TKIs were valuable therapeutic options against Imatinib-resistance for both secondary- and primary-KIT mutations. AJTR
Authors: Erica K Evans; Alexandra K Gardino; Joseph L Kim; Brian L Hodous; Adam Shutes; Alison Davis; Xing Julia Zhu; Oleg Schmidt-Kittler; Doug Wilson; Kevin Wilson; Lucian DiPietro; Yulian Zhang; Natasja Brooijmans; Timothy P LaBranche; Agnieszka Wozniak; Yemarshet K Gebreyohannes; Patrick Schöffski; Michael C Heinrich; Daniel J DeAngelo; Stephen Miller; Beni Wolf; Nancy Kohl; Timothy Guzi; Nicholas Lydon; Andy Boral; Christoph Lengauer Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: S Hirota; K Isozaki; Y Moriyama; K Hashimoto; T Nishida; S Ishiguro; K Kawano; M Hanada; A Kurata; M Takeda; G Muhammad Tunio; Y Matsuzawa; Y Kanakura; Y Shinomura; Y Kitamura Journal: Science Date: 1998-01-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Yemarshet K Gebreyohannes; Agnieszka Wozniak; Madalina-Elena Zhai; Jasmien Wellens; Jasmien Cornillie; Ulla Vanleeuw; Erica Evans; Alexandra K Gardino; Christoph Lengauer; Maria Debiec-Rychter; Raf Sciot; Patrick Schöffski Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Heikki Joensuu; Mikael Eriksson; Kirsten Sundby Hall; Annette Reichardt; Jörg T Hartmann; Daniel Pink; Giuliano Ramadori; Peter Hohenberger; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; Marcus Schlemmer; Sebastian Bauer; Eva Wardelmann; Bengt Nilsson; Harri Sihto; Petri Bono; Raija Kallio; Jouni Junnila; Thor Alvegård; Peter Reichardt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544