| Literature DB >> 35035609 |
Dan Liu1, Junwei Gao2, Tao You3, Shenghong Li2, Fengqin Cai2, Chonggang Pei4, Xianjun Zeng2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have focused on glaucoma-related neuronal degeneration in structural and spontaneous functional brain activity. However, there are limited studies regarding the differences in the topological organization of the functional brain network in patients with glaucoma. In this study, we aimed to assess both potential alterations and the network efficiency in the functional brain networks of patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35035609 PMCID: PMC8758296 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2731007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Brief description of network properties in this study.
| Global network properties. | |
| Clustering coefficient |
|
| The | |
| Characteristic path length |
|
| Normalized clustering coefficient |
|
| Normalized characteristic path length |
|
| Small-worldness |
|
| Global efficiency |
|
| Local efficiency | |
|
| |
| Regional network properties | |
| Normalized degree, Deg( | Normalized Deg( |
| Normalized node betweenness, NB( | Normalized NB( |
| Normalized local efficiency | Normalized |
| Normalized clustering coefficient |
|
Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with PACG and controls.
| PACG | HCs |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 54.21 ± 7.21 | 52.42 ± 7.80 | 0.337 |
| Sex (M/F) | 13/20 | 13/20 | 0.999 |
| Handedness | 33R | 33R | 0.999 |
| RNFL ( | 80.83 ± 17.69 | ||
| Vision | 0.46 ± 0.34 | ||
| V C/D | 0.68 ± 0.17 | ||
| IOP (mmHg) | 26.86 ± 9.44 |
RNFL: retina nerve fiber layer; RNFLT: retina nerve fiber layer thickness; V C/D: vertical cup to disc ratio; IOP: intraocular pressure; M: male; F: female; R: right.
Figure 1Changes in global network property measures as a function of network sparsity (from 0.1 to 0.6). The normalized clustering coefficient γ (a), normalized characteristic path length λ (b), small-world index σ (c), and global efficiency (d) of both the PACG and HC networks. Both networks follow a small-world organization.
Figure 2Between-group differences in global network measures as a function of small-world network sparsity (from 0.32 to 0.42). The 95% confidence intervals and between-group differences for the normalized clustering coefficient γ (a), normalized path length λ (b), small-world index σ (c), and global efficiency (d). Compared with the HC network, the global network normalized clustering coefficient and small-world index in the PACG network were slightly different across the small-world network sparsity range.
Figure 3Regional alterations in normalized clustering coefficiencies and normalized local efficiencies in functional brain networks at a minimum sparsity of 0.32. Statistical graphs of each node are presented on the left (a, b), and a three-dimensional view of the corresponding significant nodes are shown on the right (c, d). The significantly increased regional nodal parameters (normalized clustering coefficient and local efficiency) of patients with PACG are indicated by the red spheres, and significantly increased regional nodal parameters of the HC group are indicated by the blue spheres. The sphere sizes represent the significance values (p < 0.05, FDR correction); larger spheres indicate greater significance and smaller p values.
Figure 4Regional alterations in normalized node degree and normalized node betweenness in functional brain networks at the minimum sparsity of 0.32. Graphs of each node are presented on the left (a, b), and a three-dimensional view of the corresponding significant brain regions are shown on the right (c, d). The significantly increased regional nodal parameters (normalized node degree and normalized node betweenness) of the patients with PACG are indicated by the red spheres, and the significantly increased regional nodal parameters of the HC group are indicated by the blue spheres. The sphere size represents significance (p < 0.05); a larger sphere size indicates greater significance and a smaller p value.
Between-group comparisons of PACG vs. HCs in regional network properties at a minimum sparsity of 0.32.
| Normalized node betweenness | Normalized degree | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Regions |
| Regions |
|
| PACG > HCs | PACG > HCs | ||
| L. inferior frontal gyrus (opercular portion), IFGoperc.L | 0.040 | R. inferior frontal gyrus (opercular portion), IFGoperc.R | 0.042 |
| R. inferior frontal gyrus (opercular portion), IFGoperc.R | 0.024 | L. supplementary motor area, SMA.L | 0.013 |
| R. parahippocampal gyrus, PHG.R | 0.013 | R. supplementary motor area, SMA.R | 0.041 |
| L. supramarginal gyrus, SMG.L | 0.036 | R. parahippocampal gyrus, PHG.R | 0.012 |
| R. supramarginal gyrus, SMG.R | 0.003 | R. paracentral lobule, PCL.R | 0.002 |
| R. paracentral lobule, PCL.R | ≤0.001 | R. thalamus, THA.R | 0.044 |
| R. middle temporal gyrus, MTG.R | 0.025 | R. middle temporal gyrus, MTG.R | 0.047 |
| R. temporal pole:middle temporal gyrus, TPOmid.R | 0.040 | L. temporal pole:middle temporal gyrus, TPOmid.L | 0.018 |
| L. inferior temporal gyrus, ITG.L | 0.012 | R. temporal pole:middle temporal gyrus, TPOmid.R | 0.038 |
| PACG < HCs | PACG < HCs | ||
| L. dorsal lateral superior frontal gyrus, SFGdor. | 0.043 | L. calcarine, CAL.L | 0.007 |
| L. superior frontal gyrus (orbital portion), ORBsup.L | 0.049 | R. calcarine, CAL.R | 0.032 |
| L. middle frontal gyrus (orbital portion), ORBmid.L | 0.049 | L. cuneus, CUN.L | ≤0.001 |
| L. hippocampus, HIP.L | 0.009 | R. cuneus, CUN.R | 0.004 |
| L. cuneus, CUN.L | 0.004 | L. superior occipital gyrus, SOG.L | 0.040 |
| R. cuneus, CUN.R | ≤0.001 | R. inferior occipital gyrus, IOG.R | 0.042 |
| L. lingual gyrus, LING.L | 0.014 | ||
| L. superior occipital gyrus, SOG.L | 0.012 | ||
| L. inferior occipital gyrus, IOG.L | 0.047 | ||
| L. putamen, PUT.L | 0.007 | ||
| L. cerebellum 6, CRBL6.L | 0.026 | ||
| Vermis 6, Vermis6 | 0.015 | ||
L: left; R: right; PACG > HCs: increased regional network properties in PACG compared with HCs; PACG < HCs: decreased regional network properties in PACG compared with HCs.
Figure 5Correlation between altered regional values in patients with PACG and clinical parameters. The right superior parietal gyrus of the normalized clustering coefficient is correlated with the RNFL and V C/D (a), the right superior parietal gyrus normalized local efficiency is correlated with the RNFL and V C/D (b), and the left middle frontal gyrus (orbital portion) normalized node betweenness is correlated with the V C/D (c).