| Literature DB >> 35035426 |
Ling Li1, Lei Gao2, Yifan Zhao3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To discuss the effective mechanism of vitiligo treatment by compound glycyrrhizin combined with fractional laser and triamcinolone acetonide injection.Entities:
Keywords: Compound glycyrrhizin; Fractional laser; T lymphocyte subpopulation; Vitiligo
Year: 2022 PMID: 35035426 PMCID: PMC8713234 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.38.1.4412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Fig.1CD4 + T lymphocyte expression of combined group before treatment.
Fig.3CD4 + T lymphocyte expression of normal control group.
Comparison of T lymphocyte subpopulation expression level of combined group and medicine group before and after treatment (x̅ ±s).
| Group | n | CD3+(%) | CD4 +(%) | CD8 +(%) | CD4 +/CD8 + |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 19 | ||||
| Before treatment | 53.64±9.84 | 32.02±7.98 | 22.85±4.10 | 1.41±0.29 | |
| Treatment for 6 months | 55.96±8.97 | 33.12±7.39 | 21.94±2.64 | 1.51±0.27 | |
| p | 0.452 | 0.662 | 0.422 | 0.278 | |
| Medicine group | 23 | ||||
| Before treatment | 52.79±9.82 | 31.64±8.02 | 20.80±3.19 | 1.54±0.43 | |
| Treatment for 6 months | 53.68±9.53 | 34.77±8.71 | 20.63±2.51 | 1.70±0.42 | |
| p | 0.755 | 0.211 | 0.841 | 0.218 |
comparison of both groups before and after treatment, P>0.05.
Comparison of T lymphocyte subpopulation expression level of vitiligo patients and normal control group (x̅ ±s).
| Item | n | CD3+(%) | CD4 +(%) | CD8 +(%) | CD4 +/CD8 + |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitiligo patients | 42 | 53.17±9.72 | 31.81±7.91 | 21.72±3.73 | 1.48±0.38 |
| Control group | 23 | 57.33±10.11 | 36.90±9.22 | 20.43±2.76 | 1.82±0.47 |
| p | 0.115 | 0.031 | 0.117 | 0.004 |
CD4 + and CD4 +/CD8 + Comparison between vitiligo patients and normal control group, P<0.05.
Fig.4CD4 + lymphocyte expression in skin damage tissue of normal control group (×100).
Fig.6CD4 +T lymphocyte expression in skin damage tissue after combined treatment (×100).
CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocyte expression level of combined group and medicine group in the skin damage part before and after treatment (x̅ ±s).
| Group | n | CD4 + | CD8 + | CD4 +/CD8 + |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 11 | |||
| Before treatment | 11.97±6.09 | 8.75±4.84 | 1.57±0.61 | |
| Treatment for 6 months | 10.03±3.99 | 8.27±4.52 | 1.46±0.56 | |
| p | 0.131 | 0.676 | 0.452 | |
| Medicine group | 10 | |||
| Before treatment | 11.57±4.85 | 9.67±4.73 | 1.59±0.67 | |
| Treatment for 6 months | 9.27±5.18 | 8.70±4.56 | 1.41±0.90 | |
| p | 0.081 | 0.423 | 0.394 |
comparison of two vitiligo groups before and after treatment, P>0.05.
CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocyte expression level in the skin damage part of vitiligo patients and normal control group (x̅ ±s).
| Item | n | CD4 + | CD8 + | CD4 +/CD8 + |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitiligo patients | 21 | 11.78±5.49 | 8.73±4.67 | 1.58±0.64 |
| Control group | 11 | 8.30±4.98 | 5.49±3.33 | 2.00±0.65 |
| p | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
comparison of CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ between vitiligo patients and normal control group,P <0.05