Literature DB >> 35035254

?Description of a new species of the genus Neopseustis Meyrick, 1909 from China, with a new classification of the genus (Lepidoptera, Neopseustoidea, Neopseustidae).

Siyao Huang1, Yongxiang Hou1, Lijuan Zhu1, Yongqiang Xu2, Min Wang1, Xiaoling Fan1, Yang Long1, Wa Da2, Liusheng Chen3.   

Abstract

A new species of the genus Neopseustis Meyrick, 1909, Neopseustischentangensis S.Y. Huang & Chen sp. nov., which was confirmed by both morphological and molecular methods, is described from Xizang, China. This is currently the westernmost species in Asia of the primitive lepidopteran family Neopseustidae. The new species is externally reminiscent of N.moxiensis Chen & Owada, 2009; however, it can be easily distinguished from the latter by comparison of the male genitalia and is further distinguished by the large genetic distance in DNA barcodes (COI). The adult and genitalia of the new and similar species have been illustrated. Utilizing our new data, a new classification of the genus is provided, with its members subdivided into four species groups: the meyricki-group, the moxiensis-group, the bicornuta-group, and the chentangensis-group, which are supported by both molecular and morphological evidence. A checklist of the genus and a key to the species groups are also provided. Siyao Huang, Yongxiang Hou, Lijuan Zhu, Yongqiang Xu, Min Wang, Xiaoling Fan, Yang Long, Wa Da, Liusheng Chen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Himalaya; India; Neopseustina; Sichuan; Xizang; new species

Year:  2021        PMID: 35035254      PMCID: PMC8695565          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1078.75461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


?Introduction

The family is a small and archaic lepidopteran family known only by four genera and 14 species and with a peculiar disjunct distribution. Ten of these species are found in Southeast Asia, and the rest are found in South America (Davis 1975; Davis and Nielsen 1980; Davis and Nielsen 1985; Liao et al. 2021). Kristensen (1999) listed several probable autapomorphies for the family, mainly taken from the head, thorax, and abdomen, including the facial scales being restricted to paired lateral and usually swollen patches, the prominent apodemal plate invaginated from the upper base of the propecoxal bridge, the male sternum VII with medial spinose process, etc. Faucheux et al. (2006) studied the antennal flagellum sensilla of several neopseustid species and stated that one sensillum type, called “multiporous large sensillum basiconicum” in their work, is unknown in other lepidopterans except ; thus, the presence of such a sensillum constitutes an autapomorphy of the family. Recent molecular studies have brought new knowledge concerning the phylogenetic position of the family. Mutanen et al. (2010) and Regier et al. (2013) recovered the clade +, but with weak support. Kristensen et al. (2015) found that with the discovery of , the clade ++ (abbreviated as the AAeN clade in that work) was strongly supported, and was found to be sister to . The close relationship is supported by the sharing of a strong precoxal bridge between the prothoracic pleuron and sternum. Moreover, the AAeN clade was found to be sister to all the Heteroneura (Kristensen et al. 2015). Regier et al. (2015) also reported the grouping of and , and this clade was found to be supported by the presence of the smooth intercalary sclerotization and the alignment of antennal scale sockets in longitudinal rows in the antenna. Regier et al. (2015) also suggested that the former monotypic should include also the and , and that together they form the sister group to Heteroneura. Externally, adults are small to medium-sized moths with long antennae and semitransparent, thin-scaled wings, and they resemble some families in the order . Little is known about the biology of . Adults can be active during the day or night, flying above bushes or attracted to light traps (Liao et al. 2021; present study). As for the immature stages, Grehan (1991) suggested that the disjunct distribution of the plant family fitted well with that of the family , but no feeding had ever been recorded. Regier et al. (2015) reported an astonishing parasitoid immature stage on of Hering, 1925, but later the larvae of this Taiwanese species have been found to feed on , family (DearLep 2021), suggesting that the former record was based on an error. For other there is no information on immatures. To date, two genera and seven species have been recorded from mainland China, which are distributed in Henan, Sichuan, Guizhou, Hunan, Guangxi, and Guangdong provinces (Davis 1975; Chen et al. 2009; Liao et al. 2021). Xizang Autonomous Prefecture, also known as Tibet, is a biological hotspot region located in southwestern China and is well known for its various biotopes. Due to the diverse vegetation types found at different altitudes, this area is home to many families of , and new discoveries are frequently reported. are currently unknown for the Xizang fauna. During a survey conducted in May 2021, the first author unexpectedly captured a strange looking individual of this intriguing family from Chentang Town, Xigaze City, located in southern Xizang. After careful examination, this individual has been proven to be an unknown species, which is described herein. This is currently westernmost distribution record of the genus in Asia, and it is also the first record of the family in Xizang. Furthermore, we provide a new classification for the species in the genus , based both on molecular and morphological evidence.

?Materials and methods

?Morphological study.

Specimens examined were collected during daytime, using an insect net, or with a light trap at night and subsequently deposited in the collection of the South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou. Photographs of the adult and the habitat of the new species were taken using a Sony DSC-RX100 v. 1.00 camera. The abdomens were removed and macerated in 10% NaOH for about 2 min at about 95 °C for dissection of the genitalia. The genitalia were removed from the abdomen and mounted in glycerin for photographing. Photographs of the genitalia of the new species were taken under a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope, and those of other taxa were taken under a Zeiss SteReo Discovery V.12 digital microscope. Photographs of adults and genitalia were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS5 software. The terminology for adults and genitalia follows Davis (1975) and Liao et al. (2021).

?Molecular analysis.

Our molecular analysis comprised 19 samples, six of which are newly obtained COI sequences for DNA barcoding. Detailed information on these samples is provided in Table 1. Three COI sequences of three species of the genus Davis, 1975, two sequences of the monobasic genus Davis & Nielsen, 1980, and two sequences of one species of the genus were downloaded from BOLDSystem (www.boldsystems.org). Five sequences belonging to three species of the genus and a sequence of (Poujade, 1886), which was used as the outgroup in our phylogenetic analysis, were downloaded from NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The details of protocols for DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing have been provided in previous publications (Fan et al. 2016; Tang et al. 2017; Huang et al. 2019). The sequences were aligned using Clustal W (Thompson et al. 1997) implemented in MEGA v. 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016) with default parameters, and genetic distances were calculated using Kimura-2-parameter models implied by the same software. Maximum likelihood analyses were performed using IQ-tree v. 2.1.3 (Minh et al. 2020) with the branch support values evaluated by 1000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBS) replicates (Minh et al. 2013) on the web server (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at/). We considered the branch support strong when the UFBS was 95 or higher. Genetic distances were calculated using the Kimura-2-parameter models implied by the same software. All sequences were submitted to GenBank under the submission numbers OK148463 to OK148468. The specimens with voucher numbers CT1, BX1, YJ1, YJ2, MX1, and SZ1 were deposited in SCAU.
Table 1.

Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for COI sequences of the specimens and outgroup in this study. Newly obtained sequences are indicated by an asterisk (*).

TaxonLocalityDateVoucher NumberAccession Number
Neopseustischentangensis S.Y. Huang & Chen sp. nov.Xizang, ChinaV.2021CT1OK148463*
Neopseustisrectagnatha Liao, Chen & Huang, 2021Hunan, ChinaVIII.2020HAUHL039474 MW804623
Neopseustisrectagnatha Liao, Chen & Huang, 2021Hunan, ChinaVIII.2020HAUHL039473 MW804622
Neopseustisrectagnatha Liao, Chen & Huang, 2021Hunan, ChinaVI. 2020HAUHL040282 MW804609
Neopseustisarchiphenax Meyrick, 1928Henan, ChinaVII. 2002LNAUT030–14N/A
Neopseustisarchiphenax Meyrick, 1928Henan, ChinaVII. 2002LNAUT031–14N/A
Neopseustissinensis Davis, 1975Sichuan, ChinaVII. 2009BX1OK148464*
Neopseustissinensis Davis, 1975Sichuan, ChinaVII. 2009YJ1OK148465*
Neopseustismeyricki Hering, 1925Taiwan, ChinaN/ALS-06–0068 GU828566
Neopseustismoxiensis Chen & Owada, 2009Sichuan, ChinaVIII. 2004MX1OK148466*
Neopseustisfanjingshana Yang, 1988Hunan, ChinaVIII. 2019HAUHL041880 MW804624
Neopseustisfanjingshana Yang, 1988Hunan, ChinaVIII. 2008SZ1OK148467*
Neopseustisbicornuta Davis, 1975Sichuan, ChinaVII. 2009YJ2OK148468*
Apoplaniavaldiviana Davis & Nielsen, 1985Cautin, ChileXII. 1982LNAUT029–14N/A
Apoplaniapenai Davis & Nielsen, 1980Chiloe Island, ChileXII. 1981LNAUT022–14N/A
Apoplaniachilensis Davis, 1975Curico Las Tablas, ChileII. 1985LNAUT019–14N/A
Synemporaandesae Davis & Nielsen, 1980Sagrario Puerto, ArgentinaII. 1979LNAUT041–14N/A
Synemporaandesae Davis & Nielsen, 1980Aguas Calientes, ArgentinaII. 1979LNAUT042–14N/A
Endoclitadavidi (Poujade, 1886)Hunan, ChinaXI. 2015HN20170409020 KY928030
Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for COI sequences of the specimens and outgroup in this study. Newly obtained sequences are indicated by an asterisk (*).

?Taxonomy

Meyrick, 1909 7F4981CB-3C35-5EBB-886A-4111C099129E Meyrick, 1909: 436.

Type species.

Meyrick, 1909, by monotypy. [Type locality: Khasi Hills, Assam, India]. S.Y. Huang & Chen sp. nov. BE572CC1-D94C-559E-B1C3-649688E15502 http://zoobank.org/9E16636E-F0EE-4738-9DD9-4A6259EB96B6 Figures 1 , 3–10
Figures 1, 2.

Males of spp. 1 S.Y. Huang & Chen sp. nov., holotype, Chentang, Xizang, CT1 2, holotype, Moxi, Sichuan, MX1.

Figures 3–12.

Male genitalia of spp. 3–10 sp. nov., holotype, dissection number CT1 3 genitalia capsule in natural shape with anellus-juxta-parameres removed, dorsal view 4 same, in ventral view 5 genitalia capsule flattened with anellus-juxta-parameres removed 6 genitalia capsule in natural shape with anellus-juxta-parameres removed, in lateral view 7 anellus-juxta-parameres in natural shape, in dorsal view 8 same, in ventral view 9 same, in lateral view 10 anellus-juxta-parameres flattened, in ventral view 11, 12, holotype, dissection number MX1 11 anellus-juxta-parameres flattened, in ventral view 12 genitalia capsule flattened with anellus-juxta-parameres removed. J = Juxta; LPA = lateroposterior process of anellus; PE = parameres; TB = transverse bar. Scale bar: 1 mm (Figures 3–10).

Type material.

: male, altitude 2600 m, 23.V.2021, Chentang Town, Dingjie County, Xigaze City, Xizang Autonomous Prefecture, P.R. China, leg. Siyao Huang, voucher number and dissection number CT1 (SCAU).

Diagnosis.

Externally, resembles Chen & Owada, 2009 (Fig. 2, 11–12) from Moxi, western Sichuan, share a fuscous ground colour on both wings. However, the new species can be immediately distinguished from by the combination of the following characters: smaller size (length of forewing 8.7 mm vs 9 mm in holotype of ), narrower forewing (slightly broader in ), patches along forewing costa slenderer and darker (patches along forewing costa thicker and lighter in ), narrower hindwing and light fuscous ground colour (broader hindwing and light yellowish brown ground colour in ), and more uniform fringe in both wings (cilia clearly chequered, especially in hindwing in ). In the male genitalia, can be easily distinguished from by the shape of the latero-posterior process of anellus, which is long, robust, and L-shaped; the distal end is deeply bifurcated and forms two sharp processes bending anteriorly (in , the latero-posterior process of anellus is not L-shaped and bent anteriorly at the tip.). The tegumenal lobe is significantly slenderer after it is flattened (in the tegumenal lobe is much broader when it is flattened), the valvae lack the uncinate process apically, and long and thick processes ventrally (both processes present in ). The anterior arms of the vinculum are more slender (these arms are broader and shorter in ). From the other congeners, can be simply distinguished by the shape of its latero-posterior process of anellus mentioned above.

Description.

Adult: length of forewing 8.7 mm. Antennae brownish dorsally. Head, thorax, and abdomen uniformly brownish. Forewing nearly oval, apex slightly pointed. Forewing ground color pale yellowish fuscous, with four fuscous patches along costa to apex. Several irregular black or brownish transverse lines present in the median and submarginal zones. A row of brownish spots extending from apex to anal angle along termen. Fringe fuscous from apex to anal angle, slightly checkered with creamy white in dorsum. Hindwing oval, ground color uniformly light fuscous. Hindwing apex with light yellowish spot at the marginal zone. Fringe generally fuscous from apex to anal angle and slightly checkered with creamy white around anal angle. Males of spp. 1 S.Y. Huang & Chen sp. nov., holotype, Chentang, Xizang, CT1 2, holotype, Moxi, Sichuan, MX1. Male genitalia of spp. 3–10 sp. nov., holotype, dissection number CT1 3 genitalia capsule in natural shape with anellus-juxta-parameres removed, dorsal view 4 same, in ventral view 5 genitalia capsule flattened with anellus-juxta-parameres removed 6 genitalia capsule in natural shape with anellus-juxta-parameres removed, in lateral view 7 anellus-juxta-parameres in natural shape, in dorsal view 8 same, in ventral view 9 same, in lateral view 10 anellus-juxta-parameres flattened, in ventral view 11, 12, holotype, dissection number MX1 11 anellus-juxta-parameres flattened, in ventral view 12 genitalia capsule flattened with anellus-juxta-parameres removed. J = Juxta; LPA = lateroposterior process of anellus; PE = parameres; TB = transverse bar. Scale bar: 1 mm (Figures 3–10). Male genitalia: Uncus fused with tegumen, bifurcate basally and forming two short and distally rounded lobes. Gnathos strongly sclerotized thoroughly, consisting of a medially curved, short, and robust distal process and a large and thick base. Socii rounded, densely setose. Tegumenal lobe slightly curved outwards beyond the base and gradually narrowing towards its tip. Valvae totally fused with vinculum, broad and nearly trapezoid in natural shape. Vinculum broad posteriorly, abruptly narrowing anteriorly and forming long and slender arms. Lateroposterior process of anellus generally L-shaped, thick, and robust, with the tip deeply bifurcate and forming two sharp processes bending anteriorly. Two denticles present at the upper margin of dorsal process. Paired processes of anellus absent. Transverse bar in lateral view obtuse-triangular and slightly bending upwards near tip, while in dorsal and ventral views generally triangular with the lower angles shallowly bifurcate. Juxta in lateral view slightly curved outwards and nearly broad Y-shaped in dorsal and ventral views. Parameres short and setose-like, weakly sclerotized, situated between the two lateroposterior processes of anellus. Female. Unknown at present.

Bionomics.

The holotype of was spotted weakly flying above bushes during the daytime at an altitude about 2600 m. The collecting site (Fig. 13) is located at the edge of a forest along a road in a valley.
Figures 13, 14.

13 collecting site of in Chentang Town, Xizang 14 Distribution map of some spp. in Asia.

Distribution.

Currently only known from the type locality, Chentang Town (Fig. 14).

Etymology.

The specific epithet is derived from the type locality, Chentang Town.

Molecular analysis.

The Kimura-2-parameter distance of the genus , based on COI barcoding, is given in Table S1. The maximum interspecific divergence occurred between and , which was 11.7%, and the minimum interspecific divergence occurred between and , which was 1.5%. According to the table, is genetically distinct from its congeners, with the genetic divergence varying from 7.6 to 11.5%. Based on the ML tree (Fig. 15) constructed using the COI barcoding region, the genus was monophyletic (UFBS = 98), and subsequently diverged into four clades, with three of them receiving strong support (UFBS > 95). was found to be sister to all the remaining taxa in the current study.
Figure 15.

Phylogenetic tree of based on an analysis of the COI barcoding region, using the maximum likelihood method. The genus is divided into four groups with their corresponding anellus-juxta-parameres illustrated on the left side.

?Discussion

Although Davis (1975) and Liao et al. (2021) considered that the genus should be subdivided into two groups based on the morphology of male genitalia and molecular phylogenetic analysis, we consider that this genus may actually comprise of at least four groups, after utilizing more data from previously unsampled taxa. The first group, as already recognized by Davis (1975) and Liao et al. (2021), consists of Liao, Chen & G.H. Huang, 2021; Hering, 1925; Meyrick, 1928; and Davis, 1975, and is called the -group. The second group consists only of Chen & Owada, 2009, and is called the -group. The third group, consisting of Yang, 1988 and Davis, 1975, is called the -group and probably also includes the unsampled type species, Meyrick, 1909, based on the morphology of its anellus-juxta-parameres. The fourth group consists of only S.Y. Huang & Chen and is called the -group. Among these four groups, except for the -group which is unique in having well-developed parameres and a narrow, short, and forked lateroposterior process on the anellus, the , , and groups all share ill-developed parameres, but they can be distinguished from each other by the combination of features in the male genitalia. The -group is characterized by the latero-posterior process of the anellus covered by dense spinules from middle to distal end, in addition to the valvae which have an uncinate process apically and a long and thick process ventrally. The -group is characterized by the latero-posterior process of the anellus smooth from middle to distal end and the absence of ventral process in the valvae. The -group is characterized by latero-posterior process of anellus long, L-shaped with apex deeply bifurcating and bending anteriorly, and gnathos with a large and thick base. It is rather intriguing that although is similar externally only to in , among the whole genus, they have the greatest genetic divergence. Their male genitalia structures are also considerably different from each other, suggesting that the relationship between them is distant. We believe that their external similarity may probably due to their parallel evolution under similar environments. Unlike their relatively whitish congeners inhabiting the mid- and lower-elevation mountainous areas in India, mainland China, and Taiwan, these two species all inhabit high mountainous areas above 2500 m, and the similar cool climate in high elevation areas in western Sichuan and southern Xizang. This probably may have led to the evolution of their dark wing coloration which can help them absorb heat faster. This assumption is also supported by the studies of Wu et al. (2019), Trullas et al. (2007), and Pereboom and Biesmeijer (2003), who produced similar conclusions. 13 collecting site of in Chentang Town, Xizang 14 Distribution map of some spp. in Asia. Phylogenetic tree of based on an analysis of the COI barcoding region, using the maximum likelihood method. The genus is divided into four groups with their corresponding anellus-juxta-parameres illustrated on the left side. The former westernmost record of the genus is the type species , which is found in the Khasi Hills in India. The current record of this new species is situated about 520 km northwest of Khasi Hill, and thus is currently the westernmost record of the genus. The discovery of in Chentang, on the southern slope of the Himalayas in Xizang, suggests that the investigation of the microlepidopteran fauna is still inadequate in remote areas along the Himalaya. The collection site of the new species is very close to the border of China and Nepal, and are unknown in Nepal. It can be expected that this species or other new species will someday be discovered in Nepal or Bhutan. Moreover, are also expected in the southeastern part of Xizang, where no species are currently found. It is possible that the absence of this family there is only due to a lack of surveys, as poor transportation conditions in past decades makes this paradise of moths difficult to access.

?Checklist of the genus Meyrick, 1909

Meyrick, 1928 Distribution. Myanmar, China (Sichuan, Henan) Hering, 1925 Distribution. China (Taiwan) Liao, Chen & G.H. Huang, 2021 Distribution. China (Hunan, Guangxi, Guangdong) Davis, 1975 Distribution. China (Hunan, Sichuan) Chen & Owada, 2009 Distribution. China (Sichuan) Davis, 1975 Distribution. China (Sichuan) Meyrick, 1909 Distribution. India (Khasi Hills, Meghalaya) Yang, 1988 Distribution. China (Guizhou, Hunan) S.Y. Huang & Chen, sp. nov. Distribution. China (Xizang)
1Parameres well developed and narrow; lateroposterior process of anellus short, and forked Neopseustismeyricki -group
Parameres poorly developed 2
2Latero-posterior process of anellus long, L-shaped with apex deeply bifurcate, bending anteriorly Neopseustischentangensis -group
Latero-posterior process of anellus apex not bifurcate and pointed posteriorly 3
3Latero-posterior process of the anellus covered by dense spinules from middle to distal end; valvae with an uncinate process apically and a long and thick process ventrally Neopseustismoxiensis -group
Latero-posterior process of the anellus smooth from middle to distal end; valvae without a ventral process Neopseustisbicornuta-group
  11 in total

1.  Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butterflies.

Authors:  Marko Mutanen; Niklas Wahlberg; Lauri Kaila
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools.

Authors:  J D Thompson; T J Gibson; F Plewniak; F Jeanmougin; D G Higgins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Notes on the genus Neopseustis Meyrick with description of a new species from China (Lepidoptera: Neopseustidae).

Authors:  Cheng-Qing Liao; Liu-Sheng Chen; Guo-Hua Huang
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.091

5.  Thermal constraints for stingless bee foragers: the importance of body size and coloration.

Authors:  J J M Pereboom; J C Biesmeijer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Artificial intelligence reveals environmental constraints on colour diversity in insects.

Authors:  Shipher Wu; Chun-Min Chang; Guan-Shuo Mai; Dustin R Rubenstein; Chen-Ming Yang; Yu-Ting Huang; Hsu-Hong Lin; Li-Cheng Shih; Sheng-Wei Chen; Sheng-Feng Shen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era.

Authors:  Bui Quang Minh; Heiko A Schmidt; Olga Chernomor; Dominik Schrempf; Michael D Woodhams; Arndt von Haeseler; Robert Lanfear
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  A large-scale, higher-level, molecular phylogenetic study of the insect order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies).

Authors:  Jerome C Regier; Charles Mitter; Andreas Zwick; Adam L Bazinet; Michael P Cummings; Akito Y Kawahara; Jae-Cheon Sohn; Derrick J Zwickl; Soowon Cho; Donald R Davis; Joaquin Baixeras; John Brown; Cynthia Parr; Susan Weller; David C Lees; Kim T Mitter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Clarification of the Phylogenetic Framework of the Tribe Baorini (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae) Inferred from Multiple Gene Sequences.

Authors:  Xiaoling Fan; Hideyuki Chiba; Zhenfu Huang; Wen Fei; Min Wang; Szabolcs Sáfián
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Systematics of the genus Zinaida Evans, 1937 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Baorini).

Authors:  Jing Tang; Zhenfu Huang; Hideyuki Chiba; Yuke Han; Min Wang; Xiaoling Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.