Anup Krishnan1, Karuna Datta2, Deep Sharma3, S Das Sharma4, Uma Mahajan5, Sunil Jhajharia6, Manoj Yadav7. 1. Senior Registrar & OC Tps, Military Hospital Dehradun, India. 2. Professor, Dept of Sports Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India. 3. Professor & Head, Dept of Sports Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India. 4. Commanding Officer, 436 Field Hospital, C/O 56 APO, India. 5. Consultant (Biostatistician), Army Sports Institute, Pune 411036, India. 6. Senior Resident, Dept of Sports Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India. 7. MO (Sports Medicine), Army Sports Institute, Pune 411036, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indian sportspersons have reported several antidoping rule violations with several cases suggesting inadvertent use of prohibited substances. This study was designed to evaluate the anti-doping knowledge, attitudes and practices amongst elite Indian sportsmen to suggest future interventions. METHODS: This study conducted at a Sports institute used an anonymized questionnaire to survey 181 male (18-35 years old) elite young athletes' attitudes toward performance-enhancing substances and anti-doping rules. RESULTS: Athlete awareness regarding antidoping agencies and antidoping rule violations was poor. 40% or less reported receiving antidoping updates. All reported improvement in antidoping knowledge and attitude changes after attending updates. Health is more important than sporting performance for 80% or more. Very low percentage reported consumption of banned substances amongst themselves and team mates. One-third of these athletes reported not having being tested for banned substances. Athletes who have attended antidoping sessions exhibit significantly higher knowledge levels and a significantly higher 80% reported consulting their Team doctor before any therapeutic drug use as compared with non-attendees. CONCLUSION: Indian elite athletes report low awareness about anti-doping rules and prohibited substances with low proportion of athletes reporting doping and being tested for doping. Grass root level education, supplement regulation, trained athlete support personnel and accessible reference material seems to be the way forward.
BACKGROUND: Indian sportspersons have reported several antidoping rule violations with several cases suggesting inadvertent use of prohibited substances. This study was designed to evaluate the anti-doping knowledge, attitudes and practices amongst elite Indian sportsmen to suggest future interventions. METHODS: This study conducted at a Sports institute used an anonymized questionnaire to survey 181 male (18-35 years old) elite young athletes' attitudes toward performance-enhancing substances and anti-doping rules. RESULTS: Athlete awareness regarding antidoping agencies and antidoping rule violations was poor. 40% or less reported receiving antidoping updates. All reported improvement in antidoping knowledge and attitude changes after attending updates. Health is more important than sporting performance for 80% or more. Very low percentage reported consumption of banned substances amongst themselves and team mates. One-third of these athletes reported not having being tested for banned substances. Athletes who have attended antidoping sessions exhibit significantly higher knowledge levels and a significantly higher 80% reported consulting their Team doctor before any therapeutic drug use as compared with non-attendees. CONCLUSION: Indian elite athletes report low awareness about anti-doping rules and prohibited substances with low proportion of athletes reporting doping and being tested for doping. Grass root level education, supplement regulation, trained athlete support personnel and accessible reference material seems to be the way forward.