| Literature DB >> 35034981 |
Carolin L Dreher1, Manuel Schad2, Leslie J Robbins3, Kurt O Konhauser2, Andreas Kappler1, Prachi Joshi1.
Abstract
Banded Iron Formations (BIFs) are marine chemical sediments consisting of alternating iron (Fe)-rich and silica (Si)-rich bands which were deposited throughout much of the Precambrian era. BIFs represent important proxies for the geochemical composition of Precambrian seawater and provide evidence for early microbial life. Iron present in BIFs was likely precipitated in the form of Fe3+ (Fe(III)) minerals, such as ferrihydrite (Fe(OH)3), either through the metabolic activity of anoxygenic photoautotrophic Fe2+ (Fe(II))-oxidizing bacteria (photoferrotrophs), by microaerophilic bacteria, or by the oxidation of dissolved Fe(II) by O2 produced by early cyanobacteria. However, in addition to oxidized Fe-bearing minerals such as hematite (FeIII 2O3), (partially) reduced minerals such as magnetite (FeIIFeIII 2O4) and siderite (FeIICO3) are found in BIFs as well. The presence of reduced Fe in BIFs has been suggested to reflect the reduction of primary Fe(III) minerals by dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacteria, or by metamorphic (high pressure and temperature) reactions occurring in presence of buried organic matter. Here, we present the current understanding of the role of Fe-metabolizing bacteria in the deposition of BIFs, as well as competing hypotheses that favor an abiotic model for BIF deposition. We also discuss the potential abiotic and microbial reduction of Fe(III) in BIFs after deposition. Further, we review the availability of essential nutrients (e.g. P and Ni) and their implications on early Earth biogeochemistry. Overall, the combined results of various ancient seawater analogue experiments aimed at assessing microbial iron cycling pathways, coupled with the analysis of the BIF rock record, point towards a strong biotic influence during BIF genesis.Entities:
Keywords: Banded Iron Formations (BIF), iron redox processes; Microbial iron cycling; Nutrients
Year: 2021 PMID: 35034981 PMCID: PMC8724090 DOI: 10.1007/s12542-021-00598-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Palaontol Z ISSN: 0031-0220
Fig. 1Photographs of Banded Iron Formations (BIFs); a view of a mine at the southern ridge of the Tom Price BIFs, Western Australia (provided by Mark Barley); b BIF formation in Gamohaan Hill near Kuruman, Northern Cape Province, South Africa; (c) close-up of (b), showing centimeter-thick alternating wavy bands of iron-rich and silica-rich bands; (d) alternating millimeter-thick bands of a Hamersley Group BIF sample, Western Australia (provided by Jan-Peter Duda)
Fig. 2Overview of biotic and abiotic Banded Iron Formations (BIFs) deposition mechanisms. Precambrian seawater was anoxic, silica- and iron-rich. Silica and phosphate were transported following the weathering of rock formations, and Fe(II) and nickel were supplied by hydrothermal fluxes. 1. Abiotic photooxidation of Fe(II) by UV radiation, directly leading to abiotic formation of Fe(III); 2. Oxygen produced by cyanobacteria leading to abiotic oxidation of dissolved Fe(II) to form Fe(III) minerals; 3. Microaerophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria reducing oxygen produced by cyanobacteria for direct oxidation of Fe(II)(aq) to Fe(III) minerals; 4. Direct oxidation of dissolved Fe(II) by phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing (photoferrotrophic) bacteria and 5. partial reduction of deposited Fe(III) minerals to mixed-valence state Fe(II)Fe(III) minerals by dissimilatory iron(III)-reducing bacteria (DIRB)
Fig. 3a Molar P/Fe concentrations in iron formations (IF) from 4 Ga to today, replotted using data from Robbins et al. (2016) and Planavsky et al. (2010); BIF deposition between 3.8 to 1.85 Ga, Great Oxidation Event (GOE) between 2.45 to 2.32 Ga; no IF record during the Mesoproterozoic gap between ~ 1.6 and ~ 0.7 Ga. Distal hydrothermal sediments are included to extend the record into the Phanerozoic. For sample filtering criteria see Planavsky et al. (2010). (b) Possible scenarios depicting the relationship between P contents in IFs and seawater P concentrations; scenario (1): all dissolved P (in the form of phosphate) adsorbs to Fe(III) minerals, therefore, the IF P/Fe ratio displays sea water concentration; scenario (2): a wide range of ions adsorb to ferrihydrite, some P stays in solution, therefore, sea water concentration of P is higher than indicated based the P/Fe ratio in the IF record as the surface of the ferrihydrite is passivated by the adsorption of other ions and less reactive to P; X2+ = divalent cations; orange hexagons = ferrihydrite