| Literature DB >> 35034909 |
Anna Ogonowska-Slodownik1, Ana Angélica R de Lima2, Luciana Cordeiro3, Natalia Morgulec-Adamowicz1, María Alonso-Fraile4, Javier Güeita-Rodríguez5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aquatic exercise is among the most common physical activity modalities performed by people with disabilities.Entities:
Keywords: Hydrotherapy; muscular dystrophy; myopathy; neuromuscular diseases; scoping review
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35034909 PMCID: PMC9028638 DOI: 10.3233/JND-210749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuromuscul Dis
Terms Describing Neuromuscular Diseases
| Structure affected | Disease (MeSH terms) |
| CNS | Primary lateral sclerosis |
| Upper motor neuron and / or lower motor neuron diseases | Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis |
| Progressive bulbar pals* | |
| Progressive muscular atrophy* | |
| Spinal muscular atrophy* | |
| Poliomyelitis | |
| Post-poliomyelitis Syndrome | |
| PNS | Neurophathy* |
| Neuropathies | Polyneuropathy* |
| Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease | |
| Guillain-Barre Syndrome | |
| Dejerine-Sottas Disease | |
| Disease, refsum | |
| Krabbe Disease | |
| Neuromuscular junction | Myasthenia Gravis |
| Myasthenic Syndrome | |
| Botulism | |
| Myopathy | Muscular Dystrophy* |
| Myotonic Dystrophy* | |
| Myopathy* |
CNS – central nervous system; MeSH – Medical Subject Headings; PNS – peripheral nervous system.
Fig.1Flow Diagram of Identified Publications.
Measurements Under General Outcome Categories
| Functional performance | Physiological domain | Psychosocial domain | Aquatic skills |
| • | • | • | • |
| • | • | • | • |
| • | • | • | |
| • | • | • | |
| • | • | • | |
| • | • | • | |
| • | • | • | |
| • | • | • | |
| • | • | • | |
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • | ||
| • | • |
Study Characteristics – Research on Myopathy
| Reference | Study aim | Sample | Intervention program | Exercise parameters | Water temperature | Measuring instrument and outcome | Study design |
| Adams &Chandler (1974) [ | NR | MD; Type: NR | AT (extended breath-holding, blowing water games, bobbing) + positive pressure therapy (breathing and increasing chest wall method) | Phase 1: AT (30 min, 3 days/week for 4 months) + positive pressure therapy (1 day/week for 4 months) | NR | Pre/post phase: Phase 1 VC: Case 1: ↑8%; Case 2: ↑3%; Case 3: ↑4% Phase 2 VC: Case 1: ↑14%; Case 2: no change; Case 3: ↑11% Phase 3 VC: Case 1: ↑13%; Case 2: ↑7%; Case 3: ↑3% | Case study |
| Phase 2: AT (30 min, 3 days/week, duration NR) + positive pressure therapy (2 days/week, duration NR) | |||||||
| Phase 3: AT (20 min, 4 days/week for 5 weeks) + positive pressure therapy (NR) | |||||||
| Atamturk &Atamturk (2018) [ | To investigate the impact of activity on physical and psychological health | DMD | AT (warm-up, breathing exercises, water adaptation activities, stretching, gross motor movements, cooldown) | 45 min, 2 days/week for 8 weeks | NR | Post intervention | Case study |
| – Parents semi-structured interview: | |||||||
| ↑ socialization and quality of life | |||||||
| slept better, got calmer and more confident | |||||||
| Caromano et al. (1998) [ | To study the effects of physiological aspects of immersion | DMD | AT (general active exercises, walking and breathing exercises) | 40 min, 1 session | 30–32°C | Pre (land, water) and post intervention (land): | Cross-sectional |
| – HR: ↓7.3 bpm (water), no change (post on land) | |||||||
| – MEP: ↑7.40 cmH2O (water); ↓6.80 cmH2O (post on land) | |||||||
| – MIP: ↓8 cmH2O (water); ↑3.80 cmH2O (post on land) | |||||||
| – O2 Sat: ↓2.7% (water); ↑ 1.8% (post on land) | |||||||
| – Oral temperature: no change | |||||||
| DiBiasio et al. (2015) [ | To describe the effects and viability of an individualized AT | LGMD | AT (walking, supine flutter kick, jumping in place in 5 feet of water, semi-prone breast stroke with a noodle, modified backstroke, active stretching, static standing, tall kneeling, and running with a floating barbell, cool down) | 45 min, 2 days/week for 32 weeks | 28–30°C | Pre (6–8 weeks before intervention) and post intervention | Case study |
| – BMI: ↑4.10 kg/cm | |||||||
| – Dynamometry: ↑ right knee flexion and extension | |||||||
| – FVC: no change | |||||||
| – Maximum ventilation volume: | |||||||
| ↑ 8% | |||||||
| – Passive ROM: ↑ hip flexion/ extension, right knee extension, shoulder flexion; ↓ dorsiflexion and left knee extension | |||||||
| -PEDI: ↑ mobility and social function; ↓ self-care and mobility | |||||||
| – Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents: ↑ all areas except physical appearance | |||||||
| – Swimming skills: ↑ | |||||||
| – Time spent in target HR zone: | |||||||
| ↑15% | |||||||
| Fachardo et al. (2004) [ | To verify if the AT is capable to delay the progression of the pathology | DMD | AT (stretching, strengthening of the upper limbs and lower, balance, trunk control, breathing exercises, cool down) | 40 min, 3 days/week for two phases of 7 weeks | 30–32°C | Pre/post phase | Case study |
| – Evaluation of activities functional disorders: | |||||||
| Phase 1: ↓2 pts; Phase 2: ↓1 pts | |||||||
| Ferreira et al. (2015) [ | To compare the motor function on land and in the water over a 2-year period | DMD | AT (water adaptation, balance in sitting and standing position, exercises for trunk, upper and lower limbs, rotations of Halliwick Method, gait training, backstroke, cool down) + PT (stretching, joint mobilizations, active and assisted exercises, balance, standing with orthoses, walking) | AT (40 min, 1 day/week for 2 years) + PT (50 min, 2 days/week for 2 years) | 34°C | Pre/post for each 6 months | Quasi-experimental |
| – Aquatic skills evaluation (Likert scale): ↑2.65 pts | |||||||
| – EK: ↑0.96 pts | |||||||
| – Vignos Scale: ↑0.65 | |||||||
| Hind et al. (2017) [ | To assess the clinical effectiveness of AT in maintaining physical function | DMD | EG: AT (stretching, upper and lower limbs exercises, balance, trunk control) + self-administered PT (stretching, strengthening using gravity as the resistance) CG: Self-administered PT (stretching, strengthening using gravity as the resistance) | EG: AT (30 min, 2 days/week for 6 months) + Self-administered PT (4 days/week for 6 months) CG: Self-administered PT (6 days/week for 6 months) | 34–36°C | Pre/post intervention | RCT |
| – 6MWT: EG ↓22 m; CG: ↓105 m | |||||||
| – Activity limitations measure: EG: ↓3.50 pts; CG: ↓11.67 pts | |||||||
| – Carer quality of life questionnaire: EG: ↑10.67 pts; CG:↑18.83 pts | |||||||
| – Child Health Utility 9D Index— health state utility: EG:↑0.10 pts; CG: ↑0.03 pts | |||||||
| – FVC: EG: ↓7%; CG: NR | |||||||
| – North Star Ambulatory Assessment: EG: ↓2.75 pts; CG: ↓5 pts | |||||||
| Honório et al. (2013) [ | To determine whether AT is beneficial in terms of functional mobility | DMD | AT (functional mobilisation) | 45 min, 1–2 days/week for 89 weeks | NR | Five evaluations (periods NR) | Case study |
| – BMI: AT: ↓2.07 kg/m2; no PA: | |||||||
| AT: | ↑1.91(1,27)kg/m2 | ||||||
| No PA: | – EK: AT:↑8pts; no PA: ↑8.83 (2.78) pts | ||||||
| 9–11 years | – FM: AT: ↑4.22%; no PA: ↑4.29 (2.29)% | ||||||
| Israel (2018) [ | To evaluate an intervention for aquatic motor skills learning in patients with LGMD | LGMD | AT (body rotations, swimming, gait) | 30 min, 1 day/week for 15 weeks | 33–34°C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| – Aquatic Functional Assessment Scale: | |||||||
| Case 1:33 years Case 2:32 years | Acclimation phase: Case 1: ↑1.8 pts; Case 2:↑1.0 pts | ||||||
| Mastering of the liquid medium phase: Case 1: ↑1.5 pts; Case 2: ↑2.8 pts | |||||||
| Specific therapeutic exercises phase: Case 1: ↑0.5 pts; Case 2: ↑1,7 pts | |||||||
| Global body conditioning phase: Case 1: ↑2.0 pts; Case 2: ↑2.5 pts | |||||||
| Nunes et al. (2008) [ | To measure changes on stress in a child under AT | DMD | AT (Halliwick method, Bad Ragaz and hydro kinesiotherapy) | 45 min, 2 days/week for 10 sessions | 33–34°C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| – Child Stress Symptoms Inventory: | |||||||
| 10 years | ↓42 pts | ||||||
| Ramos et al. (2008) [ | To evaluate the respiratory muscle force and peak flow in patients with DMD exposed to non-invasive ventilation and AT | DMD | EG: AT (passive stretching, passive and active-free mobilizations of knees, hips and shoulders) + non-invasive ventilation | EG: 30 min, 2 days/week for 20 sessions CG: 30 min, 2 days/week for 20 sessions | NR | Pre/post 10th session and post intervention | Quasi-experimental |
| CG: AT (passive stretching, passive and active-free mobilizations of knees, hips and shoulders) | |||||||
| – MEP: EG: ↓1.4 cmH20; CG: ↑10.7 cmH20 – MIP: EG:↓1.4 cmH20; CG:↑1.3 cmH20 | |||||||
| 17,6 (1,2) years | – Peak expiratory flow: EG: no change; CG: ↑33,4 L/min | ||||||
| CG: | |||||||
| 13,5 (0,5) years | |||||||
| Sales et al. (2004) [ | To verify the effects of breathing exercises | DMD | AT (body segment movements, breathing exercises, diving, relaxation) | 30 min, 1 day/week for 6 months | 34°C | Six measurements (one per month) | Case study |
| – Respiratory frequency: ↓3 rpm/min | |||||||
| 6 years | – Thoracic cirtometry: ↑1.5 cm in thoracic perimeter during inspiration | ||||||
| – VC: no change | |||||||
| Sanders &Torres (2010) [ | To analyze the effect of aquatic exercise on pain, fitness, and independence for ADL | MD Type: NR | AT (walking, jogging, rocking, kicking, jumping, and scissors) | NR | NR | 2nd month of intervention | Case study |
| ↓ back pain | |||||||
| 35 years | 4th month of intervention | ||||||
| ↓ back pain ↑ arms and legs strength | |||||||
| 8th month of intervention | |||||||
| water walking distance: 80 steps, | |||||||
| 1st year of intervention | |||||||
| ↓ back pain, ↑ flexibility of hips and knees, HR rest: 66 bpm, ↑ independence in ADL | |||||||
| 5-year follow up | |||||||
| ↑ body fat, ↑ resting HR, ↓ mobility and strength, pain: no change | |||||||
| Santos et al. (2016) [ | To verify the AT interference in velocity and energy expenditure during seated commuting on a flat surface, and functional reach | MD Type: Congenital | AT (trunk mobilization, abdominal muscle activation, seated displacement training) | 35 min, 2 days/week for 12 weeks | 33°C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| – Energy expenditure index adapted for sitting position: ↓252,31 bpm | |||||||
| 6 years | – Functional Reach Test: ↑16 cm | ||||||
| – EMG in immersion:↑activation of bilateral rectum abdominal and bilateral lumbar square | |||||||
| – MFM: ↑4.,29% | |||||||
| – Sitting displacement time (2.0 meters): ↓19 s | |||||||
| Silva et al. (2012) [ | To verify the impact of AT on non-ambulatory children | DMD | AT (passive mobilization, exercises to upper and lower limbs and trunk flexibility; active exercises for the upper and lower limbs; respiratory exercises; training of the function placing a wheelchair inside the pool) | 60 min, 10 sessions | 32°C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| – EK: no change | |||||||
| 12 years | – Flow Volume: ↓8% | ||||||
| – FVC: no change | |||||||
| – MEP: no change | |||||||
| – MIP: ↑11% | |||||||
| – Minute Volume: ↓16% | |||||||
| – O2Sat: ↑3% | |||||||
| – Peak cough flow: ↓21% | |||||||
| – Respiratory Frequency: ↓29% | |||||||
| Voos et al. (2020) [ | To describe the evolution of timed immersion expiration in patients with MD in one-year follow-up | DMD | AT (targeted trunk, upper and lower limbs control, breathing exercises, throwing, catching a ball, stretching, joint mobilization) + PT (passive stretching, exercises to recruit trunk, lower and upper limbs muscles, transferring from prone, supine, sitting, kneeling, half-kneeling, standing and dynamic balance, gait) | AT (60 min, 2 days/week for 1 year) + PT (60 min, 2 days/week for 1 year) | NR | Pre/post intervention | Quasi-experimental |
| – FVC: DMD:↓5%; LGMD: ↓5% | |||||||
| 16 (6.2) years | – MFM: DMD:↓2pts; LGMD: ↓2 pts | ||||||
| LGMD | – Peak expiratory flow: | ||||||
| DMD:↓10 mL; LGMD: ↓30 mL | |||||||
| 28 (7.2) years | – Timed immersion mouth expiration: | ||||||
| DMD:↑1s; LGMD: ↑2 s | |||||||
| – Timed immersion nose expiration: | |||||||
| DMD:↑1s; LGMD: ↑5 s |
↑ – increase of the parameter; ↓ – decrease of the parameter; 6MWT – 6-Minute Walk Test; ADL – activities of daily living; AT – aquatic therapy; BMI – Body Mass Index; bmp – beats per minute; CG – control group; DMD – Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy; EG – experimental group; EK – Egen Classification Scale; EMG – electromyography; F – female; FM – fat mass; FVC – forced vital capacity; HR – heart rate; LGMD – Limb-girdle Muscular Dystrophy; M – male; MD – muscular dystrophy; MEP – Maximum Expiratory Pressure; MFM – Motor Function Measure; MIP – Maximum Inspiratory Pressure; NR – not reported; O2 Sat – oxygen saturation; PA – physical activity; Peak VO2 – peak oxygen consumption; PEDI – Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory; PT – physiotherapy; RCT – randomized clinical trial; ROM – range of motion; VC – vital capacity.
Study Characteristics – Research on Other NMDs
| Reference | Study aim | Sample | Intervention program | Exercise parameters | Water temperature | Measuring instrument and outcome | Study design |
| Central Nervous System upper motor neuron and / or lower motor neuron disease | |||||||
| Albarello &Fiorina (2012) [ | To verify the efficacy of AT in a PPS individual | PPS | AT (walk, relaxation, stretching, active movements for abdominal, lower and upper limbs exercises, scapular waist mobilization) | 60 min, 3 days/week for 20 sessions | 33.5– 34°C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| – Fatigue severity scale: ↓10 pts | |||||||
| 55 years (F) | – SF36: ↑23,2 pts | ||||||
| – VAS – Pain scale (during activity): ↓5 pts | |||||||
| – VAS – Pain scale (after rest): ↓3 pts | |||||||
| Cunha et al. (1996) [ | To evaluate the potential benefits of AT as a supplementary rehabilitation method | SMA | AT (hydrotherapy and Halliwick method) + PT (kinesiotherapy, respiratory exercises and stretching) | AT (30 min for type II and 45 min for type III, 2 days/week, 2 years) + PT (1 day/week, 2 years) | 30°C | Pre/post intervention | Quasi-experimental |
| – Barthel Ladder: type II: ↑93%; type III: ↑100% | |||||||
| – Degrees of deformities: ↑ in hips, knees and feet in all participants | |||||||
| – Development of scoliosis: more pronounced in type II than type III | |||||||
| – MMT (only in type III): no change or ↑ in all participants | |||||||
| – Motor activities: type II – 5 participants acquire sitting, 4 acquire standing, 4 lost walking; type III – 1 participant acquire rolling, 1 acquire sitting, 3 acquire standing, 2 acquire walking | |||||||
| Johnson (1988) [ | To describe solution to the lack of options for persons disabled by a chronic degenerative disease | ALS | AT (Water Exercise and Therapeutic Swim – WETSwim program – exercises for strength and flexibility, overall conditioning, recreation, and socialization) | 45 min, 1 day/week for NR period | 30° C | – Quality of life ↑ | Case study |
| n = 1 (M) | – Performance ↑ | ||||||
| 62 years | – Swimming skills ↑ | ||||||
| Martinez et al. (2015) [ | To analyze the effect of the Halliwick method on physical fitness | PPS n = 1 (F) 35 years | AT (10 min warm-up; 70 min hydrokinesiotherapy program using Halliwick method – mental adjustment, release, vertical rotation, lateral rotation, combined rotation, flotation, balance, weathering turbulence, basic movement and fundamental movements; 10 min cool down) | 90 min, 5 days/week for 4 months | NR | Pre/post intervention ( | Case study |
| – Senior Fitness Test: | |||||||
| Arm curl test: right arm ↑361.5 | |||||||
| Back scratch test: right shoulder ↑100 | |||||||
| Medeiros et al. (2018) [ | To investigate the effects of a AT on biochemical parameters, quality of life and functional physical capacity | PPS n = 2 (F) 53 years AT: n = 1 No PA: n = 1 57 years | AT (swimming program) | 60 min, 2 days/week for 21 sessions | 27°±1C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| – Beck Anxiety Inventory: AT: ↓42%; no PA: ↑13% | |||||||
| – BMI: AT:↓7%; no PA: ↑9% | |||||||
| – FM: AT: ↓5%; no PA: ↑10% | |||||||
| – Flexibility test: AT: ↑23%; no PA: no change | |||||||
| – Hip circumference: AT: ↓3%; no PA: ↑5% | |||||||
| – Muscle strength: AT: ↑10%; no PA: no change | |||||||
| – SF36: | |||||||
| Role limitations due to mental health: AT: ↑11%; no PA: no change | |||||||
| General health: AT: ↑13%; no PA: no change | |||||||
| – Waist circumference: AT: ↓4%; no PA: ↑1% | |||||||
| Salem et al. (2010) [ | To describe an AT emphasizing functional movement to evaluate changes in motor function during land-based activities | SMA | AT (breathing exercises, flexibility, walking activities, exercised for last 5 min with the water between the mid-thigh level and the mid-leg level to allow transition of the activities to the land) | 45 min, 2 days/week, 14 weeks | 33°C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| Type: III | – Gait speed: ↑0.25m | ||||||
| n = 1 (F) | – Gross Motor Function Measure-88: ↑11% | ||||||
| 3 years | – MMT: ↑ lower limb muscles (exception of the right hamstring and bilateral dorsiflexor strength which remained the same) | ||||||
| – Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2nd Edition: ↑8 pts | |||||||
| – Single-limb support time:↑4.5% of the gait cycle | |||||||
| – Stride length: ↑14cm | |||||||
| – Stride time: ↓0.21s | |||||||
| Silva et al. (2010) [ | To describe the effects of the AT in wheelchair patients with PPS, in view of trunk balance, pain, and consequent improvement of the activities of daily life | PPS | AT (active exercises focused on forward, lateral and back trunk muscles, stretching, relaxation) | 45 min, 2 days/week for 24 weeks | 33°C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| n = 2 (F) Case 1:44 years (F) Case 2:49 years (F) | – Barthel Index: Case 1: ↑27.7%; Case 2: no change | ||||||
| – BBS: Case 1: ↑21.5%; Case 2: ↑5.4% | |||||||
| – MMT: Case 1: ↑ strength of trunk extensors; Case 2: ↑ strength of trunk extensors and rotators | |||||||
| – VAS – pain scale: Case 1: ↓100%; Case 2: ↓38.6% | |||||||
| Willen et al. (2001) [ | To evaluate the specific effects of general dynamic water exercise in individuals with PPS | PPS n = 28 EG: 7(M), 8(F) Mean: 51 years CG: 8(M), 5(F) Mean: 49 years | AT (aquatic exercises during standing, walking, bicycling, stretching) | 40 min, 2 days/week, 8 months | +33°C | Pre/post intervention | Quasi-experimental |
| – 30-meter walking – no change | |||||||
| – BBS – no change | |||||||
| – Muscle strength (dynamometer) – no change | |||||||
| – Peak VO2: EG: ↓ 1.2±4.0 mL/kg/min; CG: ↑1.0±3.4 mL/kg/min | |||||||
| – Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly: EG: ↓4; CG: ↓12 | |||||||
| – VAS – pain: EG: ↓15 pts; CG: ↑4 pts | |||||||
| Peripheral Nervous System Neuropathies | |||||||
| Leite et al. (2010) [ | To analyze the effects of AT associated to kinesiotherapy on land | ChMTD n = 1 (F) 49 years | AT (muscle strengthening, waist dissociation, balance exercises, jogging) + kinesiotherapy on land (activity circuit, squat on the parallel bars, kneeling to standing) | 60 min, 2 days/week for 21 sessions | 32– 34°C | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| – 6MWT: ↑15.50 m | |||||||
| – BBS: ↑6% | |||||||
| – Gait speed: ↑0.11 s | |||||||
| – SF36: | |||||||
| Physical function: ↑53.84% | |||||||
| Role limitations due to physical health:↑50% | |||||||
| Role limitations due to mental health: ↑4.16% | |||||||
| Energy/fatigue: no change | |||||||
| Emotional well-being: no change | |||||||
| Social functioning: no change | |||||||
| Pain: no change | |||||||
| General health: ↑12.19% | |||||||
| – TUG: ↑0.11 s | |||||||
| – Up and down stairs:↓0.06s; ↓0.14 s | |||||||
| Mayer et al. (2020) [ | To describe the effects of land-based and AT | Miller Fisher syndrome n = 1 (M) 57 years | AT (postural control, righting reactions, body awareness, gait training, lower extremity, general endurance, strength exercises) + PT (balance training, transfers and gait training, stability during standing) | AT (60 min, 2 days/week for 7 weeks) + PT (60 min, 2 days/week for 7 weeks) | NR | Pre/post intervention | Case study |
| – 6MWT:↑47.9 m | |||||||
| – 10MWT: Self-Selected velocity ↑0.05 m/s; Fast Velocity ↑ 0.21 m/s | |||||||
| – BBS: no change | |||||||
| – SF36: | |||||||
| Physical function: ↑5% | |||||||
| Role limitations due to physical health: ↑25% | |||||||
| Role limitations due to mental health: ↑100% | |||||||
| Energy/fatigue ↑5% | |||||||
| Emotional well-being: ↑40% | |||||||
| Social functioning ↑12.5% | |||||||
| Pain: no change | |||||||
| General health ↓10% | |||||||
| – TUG: ↓26.81 s | |||||||
| Zivi et al. (2017) [ | To compare the effects of AT in the context of a land-based rehabilitative program and the land-based rehabilitation alone on balance and gait | Peripheral neuropathy n = 40 EG: 11(M),10(F) 66.3 (13.0) years CG: 8(M), 11(F) 71.8 (7.7) years | EG: 1. AT (relaxation and breath control; balance and posture control exercises; gait exercises) + 2. conventional one-to-one training with a physical therapist + 3. devices training with the supervision of a physical therapist (treadmill, cycloergometer, cyclette, stabilometric platform) + 4. Occupational Therapy CG: 1. conventional one-to-one training with a physical therapist + 2. devices training with the supervision of a physical therapist (treadmill, cycloergometer, cyclette, stabilometric platform)+3. Occupational Therapy | 4 weeks EG: 1.60 min, 3 days/week + 2.60 min., 2 days/week +3.60 min, 6 days/week +4. 60 min, 5 days/week CG: 1. 60 min, 5 days/week +2.60 min, 6 days/week +3.60 min, 5 days/week | 32°C | Pre/post intervention (delta) | RCT |
| – BBS: EG: ↑11.1±4.9; CG: ↑11.4±6.9 | |||||||
| – Conley Scale: EG: ↓1.5±1.5; CG: ↓0.9±1.4 – Dynamic Gait Index: EG: ↑5.8±2.1; CG: ↑3.9±3.2 – Functional Ambulation Classification: EG: ↑0.9±0.6; CG: ↑1.4±0.7 | |||||||
| – Functional Independence Measure: EG: ↑25.8±8.2; CG: ↑ 26.1±11.5 | |||||||
| – Medical Research Council Scale score | |||||||
| Hip flexors: EG: ↑0.5±0.5; CG: ↑0.9±0.5 | |||||||
| Hip extensors: EG: ↑0.8±0.4; CG: ↑0.8±0.5 | |||||||
| Ankle flexors EG: ↑0.7±0.7; CG: ↑0.9±0.7 | |||||||
| Ankle extensors EG: ↑0.6±0.7; CG: ↑0.9±0.8 | |||||||
| – Neuropathic Pain Scale: EG: ↓0.7±0.7; CG: ↓0.5±1.8 | |||||||
| – Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale: EG: ↓0.2±1.2; CG: ↓0.8±0.9 | |||||||
| Mixed NMD | |||||||
| Huguet-Rodríguez et al. (2020) [ | To evaluate respiratory changes and functional outcomes in children with NMD attending an AT program | DMD (n = 2), congenital myopathy (n = 1), non-hereditary neuromuscular disease (n = 1), Steinert muscular dystrophy (n = 1), SMA (n = 4) ChMTD (n = 2) | AT (balance control, proprioception, double tasking, coordination, dissociation of shoulder and pelvic girdles, flexibility, maintenance of range of motion) | 45– 60 min, 1 day/week for 10 weeks | NR | Pre/post intervention | Quasi-experimental |
| 6M/5F 8.36 (4.4) years | |||||||
| – Forced expiratory volume in one second: ↑0.12 L | |||||||
| – Inspired volume: significant ↑ in children > 11 years | |||||||
| – O2Sat: ↑ in children > 11 years* | |||||||
| – PEDI: care: ↑3.37 pts; mobility: ↑3 pts; social: ↑1.45 pts | |||||||
| – Pediatric quality of life inventory: | |||||||
| Disease: ↑0.99 pts; communication: ↑4.17 pts; family: ↑2.86 pts | |||||||
| – Strength of the respiratory muscles: | |||||||
| MEP ↑4.7 pts; MIP ↓8.7 pts | |||||||
| – Volume of inhaled air: ↑18 pts | |||||||
| – Water Orientation Test Alyn 1: ↑3.37 pts | |||||||
↑ – increase of the parameter; ↓ – decrease of the parameter; 6MWT – 6-Minute Walk Test; 10MWT – 10 Meter Walk Test; ALS – Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; AT – aquatic therapy; BBS- Berg Balance Scale; BMI – Body Mass Index; CG – control group; ChMTD – Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease; DMD – Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy; EG – experimental group; F – female; FM – fat mass; M – male; MEP – Maximum Expiratory Pressure; MIP – Maximum Inspiratory Pressure; MMT- Manual Muscular Test; NMD – Neuromuscular Disorders; NR – not reported; PA – physical activity; Peak VO2 – peak oxygen consumption; PEDI – Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory; PPS – Post-polio syndrome; PT – physiotherapy; RCT – randomized clinical trial; SF-36 – Short Form (36) Health Survey; SMA – Spinal Muscular Atrophy; TUG – Timed Up & Go Test; VAS – Visual Analog Scale.