Dear Editor,As researchers, we always welcome a constructive discussion, but we have to underline that intentions of our previous letter may have been misunderstood.In our first article [1], we warned the bariatric community about the risks of detrimental effects of lockdown on short-term weight loss. Afterwards, several articles on the same topic were published [2-5]. In the light of the outcomes of these papers, we updated our study with 1-year results.In our letter [6], we have enlisted the abovementioned articles [2-5] stressing similarities and differences.Indeed, the statement “Despite these studies have provided larger samples, they have also included individuals who were submitted to surgery long before the full lockdown” was not specifically referring to one paper [5].However, once again, we agree with our colleagues: Implementation of telemedicine could be useful to overcome geographical problems and/or to improve healthcare for minorities.Nevertheless, specific protocols that can provide a safe access to hospitals for critical patients, such as bariatrics, during the current and future pandemics are still mandatory [7].
Authors: Imad El Moussaoui; Julie Navez; Kamal El Moussaoui; Marie Barea-Fernandez; Anne Schaeken; Jean Closset Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Eva Conceição; Marta de Lourdes; Sofia Ramalho; Sílvia Félix; Ana Pinto-Bastos; Ana Rita Vaz Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Giuseppe Navarra; Iman Komaei; Giuseppe Currò; Luigi Angrisani; Rosario Bellini; Maria Rosaria Cerbone; Nicola Di Lorenzo; Maurizio De Luca; Mirto Foletto; Paolo Gentileschi; Mario Musella; Monica Nannipieri; Luigi Piazza; Stefano Olmi; Vincenzo Pilone; Marco Raffaelli; Giuliano Sarro; Antonio Vitiello; Marco Antonio Zappa; Diego Foschi Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2020-06-08