Literature DB >> 35034219

Perceived social support and ambulatory blood pressure during daily life: a meta-analysis.

Bert N Uchino1, Brian R W Baucom2, Joshua Landvatter2, Robert G Kent de Grey2, Tracey Tacana2, Melissa Flores3, John M Ruiz3.   

Abstract

Perceived social support has been linked to lower rates of morbidity and mortality. However, more information is needed on the biological mechanisms potentially responsible for such links. The main aim of this paper was to conduct a meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and awake ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) which is linked to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The review identified 12 studies with a total of 3254 participants. The omnibus meta-analysis showed that higher perceived social support was not significantly related to lower ABP (Zr = -0.052, [ -0.11, 0.01]). In addition, there was evidence of significant bias across several indicators. Future research will be needed to explore the boundary conditions linking social support to ABP and its implications for theoretical models and intervention development.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory blood pressure; Meta-analysis; Social networks; Social support

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35034219      PMCID: PMC9283536          DOI: 10.1007/s10865-021-00273-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  55 in total

1.  Social support and ambulatory blood pressure: an examination of both receiving and giving.

Authors:  Rachel L Piferi; Kathleen A Lawler
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

3.  Hostility, social support, and ambulatory cardiovascular activity.

Authors:  E G Benotsch; A J Christensen; L McKelvey
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1997-04

Review 4.  Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease.

Authors:  S Cohen
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Psychosocial work characteristics and perceived control in relation to cardiovascular rewind at night.

Authors:  R Rau; A Georgiades; M Fredrikson; C Lemne; U de Faire
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2001-07

6.  Specific dimensions of perceived support and ambulatory blood pressure: which support functions appear most beneficial and for whom?

Authors:  Kimberly S Bowen; Wendy Birmingham; Bert N Uchino; McKenzie Carlisle; Timothy W Smith; Kathleen C Light
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Racial differences in the impact of social support on nocturnal blood pressure.

Authors:  Denise C Cooper; Michael G Ziegler; Richard A Nelesen; Joel E Dimsdale
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.312

8.  Workplace social support and ambulatory cardiovascular activity in New York City traffic agents.

Authors:  William A Karlin; Elizabeth Brondolo; Joseph Schwartz
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Social Support and Antibody Responses to Vaccination: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bert N Uchino; Joshua Landvatter; Katherine Zee; Niall Bolger
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-08-08

10.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.