Literature DB >> 35034032

Rural-Urban Differences in Diagnosed Cervical Artery Dissection in New York State.

Madeleine Dulany Hunter1, Erin R Kulick2, Eliza Miller1, Joshua Willey1, Amelia K Boehme1,3, Charles Branas3, Mitchell S V Elkind1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of stroke in young adults. Incidence estimates may be limited by under- or overdiagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate if CeAD diagnosis would be higher in urban centers compared to rural regions of New York State (NYS).
METHODS: For this ecological study, administrative codes were used to identify CeAD discharges in the NYS Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) from 2009 to 2014. Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes were taken from the US Department of Agriculture and included the classifications metropolitan, micropolitan, small town, and rural. Negative binomial models were used to calculate effect estimates and 95% confidence limits (eβ; 95% CL) for the association between RUCA classification and the number of dissections per ZIP code. Models were further adjusted by population.
RESULTS: Population information was obtained from the US Census Bureau on 1,797 NYS ZIP codes (70.7% of NYS ZIP codes), 826 of which had at least 1 CeAD-related discharge from 2009 to 2014. Nonrural ZIP codes were more likely to report more CeAD cases relative to rural areas even after adjusting for population (metropolitan effect = eβ 5.00; 95% CI: 3.75-6.66; micropolitan effect 3.02; 95% CI: 2.16-4.23; small town effect 2.34; 95% CI: 1.58-3.47).
CONCLUSIONS: CeAD diagnosis correlates with population density as defined by rural-urban status. Our results could be due to underdiagnosis in rural areas or overdiagnosis with increasing urbanicity.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical artery dissection; Epidemiology; Rural area; Urban area

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35034032      PMCID: PMC9256775          DOI: 10.1159/000521204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   3.104


  13 in total

1.  Association of cervical artery dissection with recent infection.

Authors:  A J Grau; T Brandt; F Buggle; E Orberk; J Mytilineos; E Werle; M Krause; R Winter; W Hacke
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1999-07

Review 2.  Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA.

Authors:  N Douthit; S Kiv; T Dwolatzky; S Biswas
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.427

3.  The scope and distribution of imaging services at critical access hospitals.

Authors:  Amir A Khaliq; Eugene Nsiah; Nadia H Bilal; Danny R Hughes; Richard Duszak
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Antiplatelet treatment compared with anticoagulation treatment for cervical artery dissection (CADISS): a randomised trial.

Authors:  Hugh S Markus; Elizabeth Hayter; Christopher Levi; Adina Feldman; Graham Venables; John Norris
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  Dissection of cervical arteries: Long-term follow-up study of 130 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Antonio Arauz; Leticia Hoyos; Carlos Espinoza; Carlos Cantú; Fernando Barinagarrementeria; Gustavo Román
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 2.762

6.  Influenza-Like Illness is Associated with Increased Short-Term Risk of Cervical Artery Dissection.

Authors:  Madeleine D Hunter; Yeseon P Moon; Eliza C Miller; Erin R Kulick; Amelia K Boehme; Mitchell Sv Elkind
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Ischemic stroke in young adults. Experience in 329 patients enrolled in the Iowa Registry of stroke in young adults.

Authors:  H P Adams; L J Kappelle; J Biller; D L Gordon; B B Love; F Gomez; M Heffner
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1995-05

8.  Differences and similarities between spontaneous dissections of the internal carotid artery and the vertebral artery.

Authors:  Michelle von Babo; Gian Marco De Marchis; Hakan Sarikaya; Christian Stapf; Fréderique Buffon; Urs Fischer; Mirjam R Heldner; Jan Gralla; Simon Jung; Barbara Goeggel Simonetti; Heinrich P Mattle; Ralf W Baumgartner; Marie-Germaine Bousser; Marcel Arnold
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Disparities in evaluation at certified primary stroke centers: reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke.

Authors:  Michael T Mullen; Suzanne Judd; Virginia J Howard; Scott E Kasner; Charles C Branas; Karen C Albright; J David Rhodes; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Infection and the risk of spontaneous cervical artery dissection: a case-control study.

Authors:  Benoît Guillon; Karine Berthet; Lamia Benslamia; Marion Bertrand; Marie-Germaine Bousser; Christophe Tzourio
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.