| Literature DB >> 35031029 |
Zulhamri Abdullah1, K Y S Putri2, Syed Hassan Raza3, S Bekti Istiyanto4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: THE CONTEXT AND PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Unhealthy food consumption has raised an alarming situation of obesity among Asian nations and posing serious threats to human health. Recent studies have acknowledged that organic food consumption has been contrariwise associated with obesity. The consumption of healthy food has received research attention in social marketing and several antecedents and consequences have been identified. However, to date, there is a void in literature that how social, individual, and marketing elements together tradeoff in predicting a healthy lifestyle. Thus, the current investigation unfolds the antecedents of healthy foods' adoption in Asia by integrating the brand signaling and theory of planned behavior.Entities:
Keywords: Consumer innovativeness; Environmental concern; Healthy lifestyle; Obesity; Purchase intention; Theory of planned behavior
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35031029 PMCID: PMC8759204 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12480-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Obesity in Asia, Source: World Population Review, 2020
Fig. 2Proposed Conceptual Framework
Items by Construct
| Constructs | Number of Items | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy foods’ purchase intention | 6 | Shin & Severt (2020); Yazdanpanah, & Forouzani (2015) |
| Health consciousness | 8 | Ali, et al. (2020); Smith & Paladino (2010) |
| Environmental concern | 6 | Lee (2008) |
| Consumer innovativeness | 6 | Zhang, et al. (2020) |
| Brand credibility identification | 5 | Spry et al. (2009) |
| Brand image identification | 5 | Cretu & Brodie (2009) |
| Healthy lifestyle | 6 | Güney & Giraldo (2019) |
Sample Descriptive Characteristics ( = 241)
| Profile | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 81 | 33.6 | |
| Female | 160 | 66.4 | |
| Malaysian | 202 | 83.8 | |
| International | 39 | 16.2 | |
| Malay | 110 | 45.6 | |
| Chinese | 51 | 21.2 | |
| Indian | 41 | 17.0 | |
| Others | 39 | 12.1 | |
| 19–29 | 100 | 41.5 | |
| 30–39 | 68 | 28.2 | |
| 40–49 | 48 | 19.9 | |
| 50–59 | 21 | 8.7 | |
| Above 60 | 2 | 0.8 | |
| Below 18 | 2 | 0.8 | |
| Single | 124 | 51.5 | |
| Married | 107 | 44.4 | |
| Divorce | 4 | 1.7 | |
| In a Relationship | 2 | 0.8 | |
| Widow | 4 | 1.7 | |
| PhD | 18 | 7.5 | |
| Master’s Degree | 40 | 16.6 | |
| MBA | 11 | 4.6 | |
| Bachelor’s degree | 102 | 42.3 | |
| Certificate or diploma | 65 | 27.0 | |
| Senior High School | 5 | 2.1 | |
| Below RM3,000 | 85 | 35.3 | |
| RM3001 - RM6,000 | 72 | 29.9 | |
| RM6,001 - RM9,000 | 32 | 13.3 | |
| RM9,001 - RM12,000 | 12 | 5.0 | |
| RM12,000 - RM15,000 | 5 | 2.1 | |
| RM15,001 and above | 6 | 2.5 | |
| None | 29 | 12.0 | |
Factor Loadings, Composite Reliability, and Average Variance Extracted
| Constructs | Items | Loadings | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand credibility identification | BC1 | 0.842 | 0.947 | 0.782 |
| BC2 | 0.913 | |||
| BC3 | 0.914 | |||
| BC4 | 0.885 | |||
| BC5 | 0.864 | |||
| Brand image identification | BI1 | 0.882 | 0.950 | 0.792 |
| BI2 | 0.883 | |||
| BI3 | 0.882 | |||
| BI4 | 0.886 | |||
| BI5 | 0.916 | |||
| Consumer innovativeness | CI1 | 0.836 | 0.926 | 0.677 |
| CI2 | 0.783 | |||
| CI3 | 0.856 | |||
| CI4 | 0.806 | |||
| CI5 | 0.814 | |||
| CI6 | 0.840 | |||
| Environmental concern | EC1 | 0.733 | 0.888 | 0.573 |
| EC2 | 0.862 | |||
| EC3 | 0.844 | |||
| EC4 | 0.787 | |||
| EC5 | 0.678 | |||
| EC6 | 0.606 | |||
| Health consciousness | HC1 | 0.703 | 0.897 | 0.521 |
| HC2 | 0.704 | |||
| HC3 | 0.714 | |||
| HC4 | 0.688 | |||
| HC5 | 0.761 | |||
| HC6 | 0.740 | |||
| HC7 | 0.674 | |||
| HC8 | 0.784 | |||
| Healthy foods’ purchase intention | HFPI1 | 0.843 | 0.919 | 0.656 |
| HFPI2 | 0.817 | |||
| HFPI3 | 0.855 | |||
| HFPI4 | 0.775 | |||
| HFPI5 | 0.765 | |||
| HFPI6 | 0.799 | |||
| Healthy lifestyle | HL1 | 0.689 | 0.840 | 0.513 |
| HL2 | 0.713 | |||
| HL3 | 0.713 | |||
| HL4 | 0.682 | |||
| HL6 | 0.779 |
Note: AVE = Average variance extracted CR = Composite reliability
Fig. 3Measurement Model
Discriminant Validity Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT)
| Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Brand image identification | ||||||
| 2 Brand credibility identification | 0.827 | |||||
| 3 Consumer innovativeness | 0.329 | 0.482 | ||||
| 4 Environmental concern | 0.328 | 0.382 | 0.292 | |||
| 5 Health consciousness | 0.371 | 0.425 | 0.443 | 0.611 | ||
| 6 Healthy foods’ purchase intention | 0.296 | 0.415 | 0.765 | 0.412 | 0.447 | |
| 7 Healthy lifestyle | 0.343 | 0.382 | 0.315 | 0.503 | 0.698 | 0.258 |
Fig. 4Structural Model Main Effect
Structural Model Assessment Direct Effect
| Relationships | Beta Values | Standard Deviation | T Statistic | P Values | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand image identification - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention | 0.005 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 0.941 | Not Support |
| Brand credibility identification - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention | 0.020 | 0.091 | 0.220 | 0.826 | Not Support |
| Consumer innovativeness - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention | 0.636 | 0.056 | 11.405 | 0.000** | Supported |
| Environmental concern - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention | 0.156 | 0.061 | 2.546 | 0.011* | Supported |
| Health consciousness - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention | 0.047 | 0.067 | 0.700 | 0.484 | Not Support |
| Healthy foods’ purchase intention - > Healthy lifestyle | 0.228 | 0.065 | 3.519 | 0.000** | Supported |
Structural Model Assessment Indirect (Mediating) Effect
| Beta Values | Standard Deviation | T Statistics | P Values | 97.5% | 97.5% | Decision | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand image identifications - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention - > Healthy lifestyle | 0.001 | 0.019 | 0.064 | 0.949 | 0.042 | 0.040 | Not Supported |
| Brand credibility identifications - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention - > Healthy lifestyle | 0.005 | 0.024 | 0.195 | 0.846 | 0.050 | 0.055 | Not Supported |
| Consumer innovativeness - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention - > Healthy lifestyle | 0.145 | 0.040 | 3.676 | 0.000** | 0.235 | 0.213 | Supported |
| Environmental concern - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention - > Healthy lifestyle | 0.036 | 0.021 | 1.660 | 0.097 | 0.091 | 0.082 | Not Supported |
| Health consciousness - > Healthy foods’ purchase intention - > Healthy lifestyle | 0.011 | 0.019 | 0.560 | 0.575 | 0.061 | 0.052 | Not Supported |
Note: **Significant at 0.01 (1-tailed), *Significant at 0.05 (1-tailed)
Effect Size
| Constructs | Healthy foods’ purchase intention | Healthy lifestyle |
|---|---|---|
| Brand image identification | 0.000 | |
| Brand credibility identification | 0.000 | |
| Consumer innovativeness | 0.629 | |
| Environmental concern | 0.037 | |
| Health consciousness | 0.003 | |
| Healthy foods’ purchase intention | 0.055 |