Travel time prediction of urban public transportation based on detection of single routes.

Improving travel time prediction for public transit effectively enhances service reliability, optimizes travel structure, and alleviates traffic problems. Its greater time-variance and uncertainty make predictions for short travel times (≤35min) more subject to be influenced by random factors. It requires higher precision and is more complicated than long-term predictions. Effectively extracting and mining real-time, accurate, reliable, and low-cost multi-source data such as GPS, AFC, and IC can provide data support for travel time prediction. Kalman filter model has high accuracy in one-step prediction and can be used to calculate a large amount of data. This paper adopts the Kalman filter as a travel time prediction model for a single bus based on single-line detection: including the travel time prediction model of route (RTM) and the stop dwell time prediction model (DTM); the evaluation criteria and indexes of the models are given. The error analysis of the prediction results is carried out based on AVL data by case study. Results show that under the precondition of multi-source data, the public transportation prediction model can meet the accuracy requirement for travel time prediction and the prediction effect of the whole route is superior to that of the route segment between stops.

I. Introduction

Public transit travel time prediction is one effective measure for improving service reliability, optimizing travel structure, and alleviating traffic problems. Accurate real-time travel time information benefits include reducing passenger waiting time, relieving passenger anxiety, reasonably distributing travel time, improving convenience in taking or transferring busses, enriching public transit services types, enhancing public transit’s image and improving its desirability, and providing a rational basis for scheduling [1]. In contrast, conventional transit is a complex non-linear system with multiple parameters, creating a high degree of uncertainty. This complexity makes it challenging to predict travel times, especially when short-term travel times are more susceptible to random factors and uncertainties than long-term forecasts. Moreover, as travel time increases, so does the probability of unexpected accidents. The requirement for short-term travel time prediction precision (≤35min) is higher than for long-term, making its prediction also more complex.

Traditional travel time prediction methods based on statistical analysis or mathematical modeling are deficient in intelligence and have weak adaptability. Current methods depend on real-time detection of traffic conditions regardless of precision or accuracy. Some methods based on new mathematical tools, such as neural networks, have a good application effect for some specific problems but lack generalizability. Other knowledge discovery methods embody knowledge-based requirements but have not formed a methodology suitable for traffic data analysis. Therefore, in the big data environment, it is necessary to study travel time prediction technology to more fully meet the data requirements in the operation analysis process of urban public transit and improve its applicability.

This paper studies the travel time prediction of urban public transit based on the Kalman filter in a big data environment. Based on leading research and application in intelligent transit technologies, the theories and methods of current travel time prediction of public transit based on data mining are enriched and complemented. Additionally, a travel time prediction system of conventional transit under the influence of random factors is constructed, and a short-term (≤35min) travel time prediction model with strong applicability is built. These will work congruously to improve prediction’s real-time accuracy and adaptability and reduce costs associated with data acquisition. This paper provides a scientific theoretical basis and decision support for the practical work of using intelligent technology to improve the prediction accuracy of travel time. It holds practical application value for four stakeholder groups:

Travelers: As a general travel time prediction system of public transit, it can predict travel time information within a certain period. This improves an urban public transit system’s service levels and provides passengers with real-time travel time information through multiple channels to facilitate their travel choices.

Public transit operators: Accurate travel time prediction is the basis of dynamic scheduling. Using artificial intelligence to perceive and predict the system’s status continuously improves travel time predictions in real-time. Establishing a new generation of intelligent information service systems that bases predictions on big data analysis improves and enhances the intelligent service level of public transit. Innovative big data analysis applied to public transit realizes gains in the efficient operation and management of public transportation systems.

Public transit managers: Building a flexible and universal public transit travel time model based on data mining in the big data environment can provide public transit managers with decision-support information related to management planning.

Public transit policymakers: Strategic public policymakers and planners can use this approach for improving passenger satisfaction, optimizing scheduling schemes, increasing public transit system reliability, making public transit options more attractive, promoting reasonable travel plan creation, and relieving the pressure of urban traffic. These benefits will facilitate the strategic development of public transit.

II. Literature review

Prior researchers have developed methods to predict travel time [2-4]. This section is an overview of methods for predicting travel time published in the last five years. These methods can be divided into five categories: Global Positioning System (GPS) based, Neural Network based, Support Vector Machines (SVM) based, Particle Filtering (PF) based, and Kalman Filter (KF) based.

A. Global positioning system

GPS signal positioning is the most direct method for travel time prediction. Based on bus riders’ smartphone Wi-Fi information, Liu et al. [5] presented a model to track and predict the arrival time of a city bus. Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) and smartphone location can also predict bus arrival time. Farooq et al. [6] presented a prediction system relying on real-time AVL. While using technological solutions such as GPS and AVL, those methods could not use historical information and ignored space features.

Chen EH et al. [7] proposed a generic framework to analyze short-term passenger flow, considering passenger flow’s dynamic volatility and nonlinearity during special events. Four different generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models and the ARIMA model were used to model the mean and volatility of passenger flow based on the transit smart card data(Contains GPS information) from Nanjing, China. The proposed framework could effectively capture the mean and volatility of passenger flow and outperform the traditional methods in terms of accuracy and reliability. Zhang B et al. [8] focuses on identifying the distribution of regions with high travel intensity and the correlation between travel intensity and points of interest (POIs), based on the online car-hailing data collected in Chengdu, China(Contains GPS information). Zhang HL et al. [9] propose a spatial-temporal generative adversarial network (ST-GAN) to assign the generative factors of traffic flow to the feature vector in latent space and reconstructs the high-dimensional citywide traffic flow from the given elements. With the help of the disentangled representations, the decomposed feature vector in latent space discloses the relationship between underlying patterns and citywide traffic dynamics. Liu Y et al. [10] propose a novel travel mode recommendation system for multi-modal transportation. In the proposed model, the feature engineering focuses on the application scenario of the multi-modal transportation recommendation and is designed from multiple perspectives of users, travel modes, locations, and time.

B. Neural network

Neural networks’ non-linear modeling ability has made them more popular. Chen CH et al. [11] proposed an arrival time prediction method (ATPM) based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to predict the stop-to-stop travel time for motor carriers. Pang et al. [12] proposed to exploit the long-range dependencies among the multiple time steps for bus arrival prediction via a recurrent neural network. Zhang et al. [13] proposed a model based on MapReduce combining clustering with the neural network. Yang et al. [14] proposed a novel stacked autoencoder Levenberg-Marquardt model, a type of deep architecture of neural network approach that aimed to improve forecasting accuracy. Polson et al. [15] developed a deep learning model to predict traffic flows. Wu et al. [16] proposed a deep neural network (DNN) based traffic flow prediction model (DNN-BTF) to improve the prediction accuracy. Cristina et al. [17] tried five neural network models and identified the best performing deep learning model. Wichai et al. [18] proposed another DNN-based model. Zhang et al. [19] proposed an end-to-end multitask learning temporal convolutional neural network (MTL-TCNN) to predict the short-term passenger demand at a multi-zone level. In the same year, Zhang et al. [20] also proposed a deep learning-based multitask learning (MTL) model using Bayesian optimization to tune parameters of MTL to predict short-term traffic speed. Zheng et al. [21] proposed a feature selection-based approach to identify reasonable spatial-temporal traffic patterns related to the target link to improve online prediction performance. To resolve the problem that empirical methods cannot adequately capture various travel time distributions, Zhang et al. [22] proposed a deep learning-based Trip Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Network (T-InfoGAN). Liu Y et al. [23] analyze the passenger flow from scopes on macroscopic and microscopic levels. Decision-tree-based models are used in modeling and predicting passenger flow. Inspired by the feature engineering of decision-tree-based models, a modular convolutional neural network is designed, which contains automatic feature extraction block, feature importance block, fully-connected block, and data fusion block. However, these articles do not combine timely GPS data with the neural network model.

C. Support vector machine

SVM maps the input data into higher dimensional space with a specifically designed kernel such that the relationship between modified input data and the target variable is linear. Yang et al. [24] presented a prediction model of bus arrival time based on SVM with a genetic algorithm (GA-SVM). Peng et al. [25] proposed a forecasting method based on principal component analysis-genetic algorithm-support vector machine (PCA-GA-SVM) to improve arrival time prediction precision. Yao et al. [26] proposed a single-step prediction SVM model composed of spatial and temporal parameters. Moridpour et al. [27] suggested a Least Squares SVM (LS-SVM) method that expedited the training process by simplifying the quadratic programming problem using a linear regression technique. Lu LL et al. [28] propose a methodology for real-time freeway travel time estimation with data from sparse detectors, utilizing a self-organized mapping algorithm to cluster the sensors with similar traffic patterns. The data collected from the representative detectors within each cluster is then employed to estimate the travel time based on a support vector regression model.

And further, to better assist travelers in making trip decisions in under-connected environments and undersaturated signalized arterial environments, Lu LL et al. [29, 30] propose a lane-level travel time prediction model under a connected environment real-time prediction model for vehicle individuals on an undersaturated signalized arterial. Conventional models are suitable for estimating the travel time distributions of only a few road segments. In contrast, these two models fully capture travel time reliability metrics such as the buffer time index, skewness, and width of the travel time distributions for all road segments, these results will help traffic managers and engineers carry out effective traffic management and control to optimize the operation under-connected environments, and undersaturated signalized arterial environments.

D. Particle filtering

The PF technique has been widely applied to deal with historical GPS information and predict bus arrival time. Dhivyabharathi et al. [31] proposed a method to predict stream travel time using a particle filtering approach that considers the predicted stream travel time as the sum of the median of historical travel times, random variations in travel time over time, and a model evolution error. Dhivyabharathi et al. [32] developed a model based on particle filtering technique which was better than the existing method with MAPE values around 17% with the accuracy of +/- 2 minutes, wherein inputs were obtained using the K-NN (k-nearest neighbors) algorithm (the core of KNN is that a sample belongs to most categories of k samples adjacent to it). However, the particle filtering algorithm used in these two papers is only suitable for a non-linear stochastic system with the state-space model, but the time property of bus arrival prediction was not considered.

E. Kalman filtering

Kalman first proposed Kalman filtering in 1960. It takes the minimum mean square error as the best estimation criterion to seek a set of recursive estimation algorithms. Its basic idea is to use the state-space model of signal and noise, update the estimation of state variables by using the estimated value of the previous time and the observed value of the current time, and obtain the estimated value of the present time. It is suitable for real-time processing and computer operation. Kalman filters are ideal for conventional urban transit systems, a multi-parameter and time-varying complex giant system with a high degree of uncertainty and are non-linear. This filter can consider quantities that are partially or entirely neglected in other methods (such as the variance of the initial estimate of the state and the variance of the model error). It provides information about the quality of the estimation by providing, in addition to the best estimate, the variance of the estimation error.

KF has been widely applied to the prediction of travel time. Li et al. [33] considered KF combined with other methods and proposed a three-stage mixed model including K-means, real-time adjusted Kalman filter, and Markov historical transfer model. Huo JB et al. [34] propose a spatiotemporal extended Kalman filter (SEKF)short-term pedestrian density estimation and prediction method based on mobile phone data. A massive mobile phone dataset collected in Nanjing, China, is used in the case study. The estimated pedestrian density from Monday to Thursday is used for Friday’s prediction. KF model has the advantages of high prediction accuracy and a large amount of data processed by computer. At the same time, there still is room for improvement in model construction and data input in previous studies.

While the models described in this section can solve the bus-to-station prediction problem to some degree, the influence factors these models considered are one-sided. GPS over-emphasizes the current state of the bus, degrading the prediction accuracy as the predicted distance increases. The input used in the NN network is too one-sided and does not consider the comprehensive impact of time and space characteristics. SVM relies too much on kernel tricks to achieve predictions on a large scale. The PF only finds the time of the bus to the stop and ignores the spatial effect of the bus.

The system contains accurate mathematical noise statistics (noise mean and variance matrix), which is the essential requirement of the Kalman filtering method. However, in practical application, the mathematical model and/or noise statistics of the system are always unknown (the model or noise statistics of the system contain errors). In addition, there is often model uncertainty and/or interference uncertainty; that is, there is an unmodeled dynamic system, which will cause the filtering performance to deteriorate or even diverge. This paper tries to achieve as follows:

Build the model to match the actual situation;

Noise convergence is ensured based on multi-source data input;

The above two points ensure that the performance of the Kalman filter is good to overcome the shortcoming mentioned.

This paper applies models to the public transit network data of Madison, Wisconsin, USA. It combines the Kalman filter model with the AVL and IC card intelligent bus technologies, both currently widely used, to predict urban public transit travel time.

III. Methodology

A. Definitions

1) Research object

In conventional urban transit, the uncertainty of many external factors makes it challenging to execute vehicle and personnel scheduling and dispatching, leading to the low reliability of public transportation. Bus ridership is consistently at low levels due to lack of information about wait times, anxiety regarding the timeliness of the bus service, and failure to arrive at the destination at the expected time. These deficiencies inconvenience urban commuters who rely on mass public transit and hinder the resultant urban traffic structures that would lower energy consumption and pollution, raise efficiency, and yield more sustainable development. Given existing technical conditions, in-depth research on the prediction method of travel time of conventional transit is of great practical value.

2) Short-term travel time predictions

Short-term travel time predictions are influenced by random factors (road conditions, traffic conditions, time, climate, emergencies, vehicle conditions, drivers, passengers, intersection, and control mode [35-37]). Unexpected and accidental events occur less predictably, thus requiring greater precision than long-term prediction. In this paper, the short time travel prediction is the next step prediction of travel time, that is, at time T, a short-term prediction is made for the travel time of the following decision moment + Δ, where the prediction period is generally not more than 35 minutes.

Historical data is used to predict long-term travel time (35 minutes or more). However, travel time prediction (15 minutes or less) uses real-time data. Short-term travel time prediction (15 minutes ~ 35 minutes) uses historical and real-time data, where the recorded data is used to build and test models, and real-time information is used for online prediction and evaluation. The classification of travel time prediction is shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1

Differentiation of travel time.

From this analysis, this paper’s specific research focus is the short-term travel time prediction of the urban conventional transit with fixed routes and stops within the time range of 15min ~ 35min, where the system is equipped with at least advanced intelligent public transit technologies, including AVL, IC, and another real-time spatial positioning, monitoring, and transmission.

3) Definition of bus travel time

In this paper, public transit travel time consists of two parts: Route travel Time (RT) + stop Dwell Time (DWT). Transfer time is not included in the scope of this paper. Combined with the above discussion, this paper’s definition of the public transport travel time can be expanded to the short-time travel time (15min ~ 35min) with the regular bus as the carrier, namely the single bus travel time prediction based on single-line detection.

B. Data preprocessing

1) The data type

Relative to IC and dispatching information, route and stop information is relatively fixed and does not change often. It is usually obtained directly from bus companies or government passenger transport authorities. However, this information is often neither detailed nor accurate enough, especially the location of stops and other information. Discrepancies often arise in routes, requiring a supplementary survey of the routes and stops to determine their correct directions and locations.

The Madison bureau of the Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory provided the data analyzed herein (see S3 File, Figs 1 and 2). All data obtained for routes and stops are spatial data. This data was digitized and stored in a spatial database utilizing GIS technology for storage. The raw data required for data mining are:

Fig 2

Composition of bus travel time.

Static primary data of transit

■ Route data: route number, number of stops, stop location (latitude and longitude), etc.

■ Stop data: stop ID, stop site (latitude and longitude), the distance between adjacent stops, etc.

Dynamic primary data of transit

■ IC data: Service day, bus code, swiping time, latitude and longitude when swiping, ID of IC, route number, etc.

■ AVL data: Service day, bus code, pattern ID, actual arrival time, actual departure time, time point ID, stop ID, etc.

■ Bus dispatching data: bus code, pattern ID, departure time, arrival time, departure interval, etc.

2) Data preprocessing

In this paper, data preprocessing and analysis were carried out using Oracle and MATLAB software. Clustering was carried out on the IC data, and the travel time after clustering was divided into sections to obtain the arrival, departure, and stop dwell times of each stop. These steps are shown in S1 File. The dwell time of each stop was assessed to estimate each boarding stop. Finally, the essential travel time of stops after segmentation based on the actual stops was obtained as the input data of the travel time prediction model. These results are shown in S2 File, Table 1.

Table 1

Average absolute error and relative error of travel time prediction of the route segment.

Bus number	Morning peak(s)			Evening peak(s)			Flat peak(s)
	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	4
Absolute error (seconds)	11.78	11.20	11.60	14.11	13.54	15.98	11.67	13.12	12.32	11.56
Mean relative error (seconds)	12.0%	9.0%	10.0%	14.0%	13.0%	15.0%	12.0%	13.0%	12.0%	9.0%

AVL data was used to verify the validity of the IC data processing procedures. These steps are shown in S1 File. AVL data was also used both to estimate the parameters of the prediction model and evaluate the accuracy of the prediction model. AVL key stops (Timepoint) information was used to assess the accuracy of the segmented results: AVL key stop (Timepoint) data was used to adjust the parameters of the data processing procedures, allowing the absolute error to be minimized.

i. The basic assumptions

C. Prediction model

1) Model assumptions

A Transit Network consists of routes and stops. Routes are comprised of route segments and stops.

The whole route is simplified into two parts: stop and route segment (see Fig 2). The route segment is divided into two adjacent stops: the initial and terminal stops. The route segment may or may not contain intersections. The total travel time consists of two parts: route travel time (RT) + stop dwell time (DWT).

All vehicles are equipped with IC and AVL systems.

Intersection delays and road segment delays are reflected in RT. The time of arrival and departure stop, as well as stop delays, are reflected in DWT.

Due to the limitation of route and dispatch, drivers are not affected by their subjective will factors.

The vehicle type and performance are the same on the same route.

There will be no changes to road infrastructure or stops during the prediction period.

Assuming that the bus has two doors, one door for boarding and another for disembarking, the time taken by unit passengers to get on and off is the same, and the number of people determines the time to get on and off.

ii. Basic principle

The travel time prediction model based on single route detection comprises the route travel time prediction model (RTM), and the stop dwell time prediction model (DTM).

Route travel time is predicted by the route travel time prediction model (RTM). Each route segment’s historical travel time data is used as the input to the prediction model. The arrival time at the stop for each route segment is obtained from IC card data, and the updated travel time is used to predict the new travel time, then stored as historical data. The dwell time model (DTM) and passenger arrival rate prediction model (PARM) are based on IC records of getting on and off the bus at each stop (combined with historical and current data).

The chosen historical data input for this model is the travel time data of the same period for the previous three days and the previous period of the same day, and the model output is the travel time of the current period of the day.

2) Overall model

The single route travel time between stops is composed of two parts: road travel time (RT) + stop dwell time (DWT), which can be expressed by the arrival time of buses:

Where,

AT is the predicted time the bus n to arrives at the stop i +1;

DT is the time the bus n to leave the stop i;

RT is the travel time of bus n between stops i and i +1 predicted by the Kalman filtering algorithm.

The stop dwell time can be expressed as:

Where,

DWT is the time of bus n stay at stop i+1 to be predicted;

λ( is the passenger arrival rate at the stop i +1 predicted by the Kalman filtering algorithm;

H(i+1) is the headway of bus n in the stop i + 1, H(i+1) = ATn(i+1)−ATn-1(i+1).

ρ is consumed at the boarding time of the average passenger at the stop i +1, assumed to be 2.5 seconds per person.

The time when the bus leaves the stop can be expressed as:

Where,

DT is the predicted time for bus n to leave the stop i +1;

AT is the time of bus n arriving at stop i +1 predicted by Eq (1);

DWT is the time of bus n stay at stop i +1 predicted by Eq (2).

Meanwhile, according to Eqs (1), (2) and (3), the time of departure from the stop i +1 is:

In the equation, each parameter is the same as the above equation. The above equations can predict the arrival and departure times of bus n at stop i+1. In the equation, RT and λ are obtained from the Route Travel Time Prediction Model(RTM) and the Passenger Arrival Rate Prediction Model(PARM).

i. Route Travel Time Prediction Model (RTM)

The road travel time prediction model of period k+1 of a single route between adjacent stops can be expressed in Eqs (5) ~ (8):

Where,

g (k+1) is the gain of the Kalman filter in the period k +1;

a (k+1) is the loop gain in the period k +1;

e (k) is the filter error in period k, which is calculated in the previous cycle;

e (k+1) is the filter error of period k +1, which is used for the calculation of the following process;

RT(k+1) is the travel time of bus n between stops i and i +1 predicted by Kalman filtering algorithm in period k +1;

art (k) is the travel time of bus n between stop i and i +1 in period k;

art1 (k+1) is the travel time of bus n between stops i and i +1 during period k+1 on the previous day;

art2 (k+1) is the travel time of bus n between stops i and i +1 during period k+1 on the previous two days;

art3 (k+1) is the travel time of bus n between stops i and i +1 during period k+1 on the previous three days;

VAR(data) is the variance of the prediction;

VAR(data) is the variance of the travel time "art1 (k+1), art2 (k+1), art3 (k+1)" between stops i and i +1 for the previous three days, which can be expressed by the travel time " art1 (k+1), art2 (k+1), art3 (k+1)"of the previous three days:

The variance of the random variable can be expressed as:

The equation expresses the relevant variables:

VAR(data) is determined by the prediction result of the filter model and the observation value in the future, which cannot be obtained because the prediction result is unknown, and the future trip has not yet happened, ideally, under the condition of good prediction state, VAR(data) = VAR(data), the introduction of new variables: VAR(local) is used to indicate the VAR(data), VAR(data) and can be represented as:

Filter gain (Eq (5) and filter error (Eq (7)) can be reduced to Eqs (17) and (18):

From what has been discussed above, the prediction model of route travel time for a single route between stops based on the Kalman filter mainly consists of Eqs (6), (8), (17) and (18). The four essential equations can predict the route travel time of bus n on the whole route by rolling(these results are shown in S2 File, Table 2).

Table 2

Absolute and relative errors of the total travel time prediction of the whole route.

Bus number	Morning peak(s)			Evening peak(s)			Flat peak(s)
	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	4
Absolute error (minutes)	1.23	1.98	2.11	0.98	2.23	0.78	1.43	0.17	0.83	1.76
The relative error	2.3%	0.4%	3.0%	4.0%	6.0%	4.0%	3.0%	2.2%	7.0%	4.0%

ii. Stop Dwell Time prediction Model (DTM)

(1) Stop Dwell Time Prediction Model

Stop dwell time refers to the bus’s time at a stop due to events. According to the vehicle arrival process, stop dwell time includes passenger service time, acceleration and deceleration time, opening and closing door time, and additional delay time caused by queuing at the stop. Most passenger service time is when passengers require to board and disembark the bus. Acceleration and deceleration times, opening and closing door times are the same for the same type of bus on the same route. Additional delays caused by queuing occur at stops with multiple routes, and there are second dwell at longer stops. However, direct observation finds that when there is a queue at the stop, buses can often use the queuing time to complete the loading and unloading service. The time lost in queuing is considered negligible due to its small size.

Therefore, this paper only considers the difference in service time of passengers on and off the bus. The dwell time of the bus at the stop i+1 is mainly determined by the number of passengers arriving in a unit time (expressed by Eq (2)). The equation shows that H (i +1) can be obtained directly from the IC data. The only predictive value in this equation is the passenger arrival rate λ(.

(2) Passenger Arrival Rate prediction Model (PARM)

λ is the number of passengers arriving per unit of time. The historical arrival rate λ per stop can be obtained through IC data mining technology. In this paper, the Kalman filtering method is still used to predict the passenger arrival rate of stop i +1. The prediction model construction follows, VAR(local) can be expressed as follows:

There are:

The Kalman gain g (k + 1) and the loop gain a (k + 1), λ((k+1) prediction model:

Where,

g (k+1) is the gain of the Kalman filter in the period k +1;

a (k+1) is the loop gain in the period k +1;

e (k) is the filter error of period k, which is calculated from the previous cycle;

e (k+1) is the filter error of period k +1, which is used for the calculation of the following process;

par (k) is the passenger arrival rate between stops i and i +1 during the period k;

par1 (k+1) is the passenger arrival rate at stop i+1 during period k +1 in the previous day;

par2 (k+1) is the passenger arrival rate at stop i+1 during period k +1 in the previous two days;

par3 (k+1) is the passenger arrival rate at stop i+1 during period k +1 in the previous three days.

VAR(local) is the variance of the passenger arrival rate of " par1 (k+1), par2 (k+1), par3 (k+1) " during period k+1 between stops i and i +1 in the previous three days.

The Passenger Arrival Rate prediction Model (PARM) based on the Kalman filter is mainly composed of Eqs (25), (26), (27), and (28). Based on the above four essential equations, the passenger arrival rate of bus n in the period i +1 can be predicted by rolling to obtain the dwell time of each stop (these results are shown in S2 File, Table 3).

Table 3

The mean absolute error of predictive travel time of route 2 # (entire route).

Route	Mean Absolute Error (MAE, S)
	Prediction of arrival time	Prediction of departure time
#2	59.24	46.41

3) Prediction process. In conclusion, the travel time prediction model constructed above can predict the travel time of the whole route.

Step 1: Overall prediction

Determine the target route predicted and its initial and terminal stops: determine the initial forecast period k +1, assume stop i as the initial stop, and predict the time of bus n arriving at stop i +n;

Prepare the basic data required for prediction;

i = 0;

i = i+1;

Executing Stop Dwell time prediction Module (DTM): to predict the dwell time of bus n at stop i, DWT;

Executing Route Travel time prediction Module (RTM): to predict the route travel time of bus n between stop i and i+1 during the k+1 period, RT(k+1);

Sum, DT = AT+DWT, AT = DT = RT;

Determine if i +1 = n, then end the operation; otherwise, return to Step (4) and continue the procedure until the end of the prediction.

After the repeated cyclic operation, the arrival time of bus n AT at stop i +n during period k+m can be obtained by stop, one by one (as shown in Fig 3).

Fig 3

Steps of travel time prediction between stops.

Step 2–1: Built-in module (Stop Dwell Time Prediction Module (DTM))

Initialize e (k) = 0, assuming stop i is the initial stop;

The historical data of passenger arrival rate between stop i and i +1 for these four days (during period k +1 in the previous three days, during period k in the same day) can be obtained through the IC card system: par3 (k+1), par2 (k+1), par1 (k+1), par(k);

The passenger arrival rate of stop i +1 in period k +1 can be predicted according to the Eqs (25), (26), (27), and (28);

The headway of the corresponding stop in period k+1 of the predicted day can be obtained through the bus IC data;

According to Eq (2), the dwell time of stop i +1 in period k+1 can be predicted.

Step 2–2: Built-in module (Route Travel Time Prediction Module (DTM))

Initialize e (k) = 0, assuming stop i is the initial stop, and the AVL system can obtain its departure time, and it is set as DT;

The historical data of travel time between stop i and i +1 for these four days (during period k +1 in the previous three days, during period k in the same day) can be obtained through the IC card system: art3 (k+1), art2 (k+1), art1 (k+1), art(k);

According to Eqs (6), (8), (17), and (18), the route travel time of bus n between stop i and i +1 in period k+1 can be predicted RT(k+1).

The prediction process is shown in Fig 4.

Fig 4

Travel time prediction process based on single route detection.

IV. Case study

A. Data preprocessing

1) Circuit information

This example selects route 2 in Madison, Wisconsin, located in the Madison metropolitan area. The chosen route is the section between N Frances Street in the east and N Midvale Blvd in the west and traverses the city’s center. The route goes through different road types and thus can comprehensively reflect the operational characteristics of buses under other road conditions (shown in S3 File, Figs 3 and 4).

2) Data information

The IC card and AV data of four days on October 1, 2, 3, and 4, 2019 were selected as the primary data of the example, and the historical data of period k+1 on October 1, 2, and 3 and period k on October 4 were used to predict the data of period k+1 on October 4. Among them, 4,157 sets of travel time data (IC data) were used as the model’s input data, and 2,124 sets of AVL data were used as the validation data of the model.

B. Preliminary results

According to the characteristics of urban roads, in this paper, the day was divided into three time periods, with morning and evening peaks as the boundary:

■ Period 1: 7:00–9:00, morning peak;

■ Period 2: 17:00–19:00, evening peak;

■ Period 3: another period, flat peak.

Given these three periods, this paper will first analyze the change laws between these three periods and then analyze the change rule within each period.

1) Route segment between stops

The average absolute error and relative error of the travel time prediction of the ten shifts were calculated. Table 1 shows the results.

Table 2 shows that the average absolute error of the travel time prediction between stops is concentrated between 11~16 seconds, and the average absolute error of the evening peak is slightly higher than that of the other two periods. The average relative error is higher than the whole route, concentrated in the range of 9% to 15%.

2) Whole route

The travel time of the whole route is the total time taken by the bus between the initial and terminal stop (prediction results are shown in S2 File, Table 4). Table 2 shows the calculations of the absolute error and relative error of the total travel time prediction of the route of 10 shifts between 128 stops in the entire day.

Table 4

Prediction error of travel time between stops.

Route Segment	The Evaluation Index	Kalman Filter	The Neural Network
Route segment 1	MRE	0.0681	0.0750
	RSRE	0.0730	0.0849
	MARE	0.1155	0.1431
Route segment 2	MRE	0.0276	0.0632
	RSRE	0.0355	0.0740
	MARE	0.0760	0.1303
Route segment 3	MRE	0.0750	0.1638
	RSRE	0.0918	0.3494
	MARE	0.2240	0.0661
Route segment 4	MRE	0.0859	0.1076
	RSRE	0.1076	0.1431
	MARE	0.2290	0.1214
Route segment 5	MRE	0.0434	0.1115
	RSRE	0.0543	0.2290
	MARE	0.1204	0.1194
Route segment 6	MRE	0.0424	0.1392
	RSRE	0.0444	0.1303
	MARE	0.0967	0.2280

Table 2 shows that the absolute error of the total travel time prediction for the ten shifts is within 2.25 minutes, with the maximum absolute error of 2.23 minutes and the minimum absolute error of only 0.17 minutes. The maximum relative error is 7%, and the minimum relative error is only 0.4%. At the same time, the absolute and relative errors of the morning, evening, and flat peaks are not significantly different, indicating that the prediction model can respond to the change of traffic conditions over time and can make an accurate prediction of travel time during peak hours.

In summary, the relative error of the model is within 15%, and the absolute error is concentrated in about 11~16 seconds when the route travel time between stops is taken as the prediction object. The relative error of the model is within 7%, and the absolute error is concentrated in 0~2.5 minutes when the whole route is taken as the prediction object. The forecast method proposed in this paper can accurately predict the travel time of buses, and the prediction effect of the whole route is better than that of the route segment between stops.

C. Evaluation

Travel time predictions for 235 groups of 128 sections between stops of route 2# were carried out throughout the day from 6:00 to 18:00. The following three forms were evaluated respectively in route segment between stops, whole route, and comparison with another prediction method.

i. Route segment 1 (CAMPUS & BABCOCK[ID#0809] W JOHNSON & CHARTER [ID#0581])

Fig 5 shows the predicted travel time for route segment 1 using this process (Campus & Babcock [ID#0809] W Johnson & Charter [ID#0581]).

Fig 5

Predicted result of travel time (route segment 1).

ii. Route segment 2 (W JOHNSON & CHARTER [ID#0581] W JOHNSON & MILLS [ID#0741])

Fig 6 shows the predicted travel time for route segment 2(W Johnson & Charter [ID #0581] W Johnson & Mills [ID #0741]).

Fig 6

Predicted result of travel time (route segment 2).

iii. Route segment 3 (W JOHNSON & MILLS [ID#0741] W JOHNSON & N PARK [ID#0435])

Fig 7 shows the predicted travel time for route segment 3 (W Johnson & Mills [ID #0741] W Johnson & N Park [ID #0435]).

Fig 7

Predicted result of travel time (route segment 3).

iv. Route segment 4 (W JOHNSON & PAKE [ID#0435] W JOHNSON & FRANCES [ID#0941])

Fig 8 shows the predicted result travel time for route segment 3 (W Johnson & Pake [ID #0435] W Johnson & Frances [ID #0941]).

Fig 8

Predicted result of travel time (route segment 4).

The critical stop data (time points) across route 2# was taken for analysis and evaluation. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of the whole route was evaluated. Table 3 displays these results:

3) Comparison with other prediction models

Since neural network models can guarantee real-time prediction and adequately control multiple influencing factors in public transit systems, previous researchers primarily used neural network models to predict travel time. Comparing and analyzing the current model’s prediction results against neural networks, a travel time prediction method based on a neural network model was introduced. The two forecasting methods’ Mean Relative Error (MRE), Root Squared Relative Error (RSRE), and Maximum Relative Error (MARE), were calculated. From the evaluation results, the MRE were all less than 20%, indicating that this model is a good prediction model. The calculation results are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 demonstrates that the Kalman filtering algorithm is more accurate and stable than the neural network, with less fluctuation and minor errors.

IV. Conclusions

The travel time prediction of public transit is one of the effective measures to improve service reliability and travel structure, alleviate traffic problems. The Kalman filter model has high precision in one-step-ahead prediction and uses computer software to calculate massive data. Under the background of the urban intelligent public transit system and big data, this paper focuses on an urban conventional transit system. The Kalman filter-based travel time prediction technology of an urban public transit system with various random traffic factors was studied based on AVL and IC data.

Prediction model: The overall prediction model (including prediction steps and processes) was constructed: 1) Road travel Time prediction Model (RTM); 2) stop Dwell time prediction Model (DTM) and Passenger Arrival Rate prediction Model (PARM).

Model evaluation: The model’s evaluation criteria and indices are given; The travel time of route #2 in Madison was selected for prediction, and the error analysis of the prediction results was carried out in combination with AVL data. The results show that the model can meet the accuracy requirements of the travel time prediction, and the prediction effect of the whole route is superior to that of the route segment between stops.

In this paper, the travel time considered only a single bus in a journey, which is the basis of passenger-oriented travel time predictions. The prediction model should be expanded to be more consistent with the actual application scenario of a conventional large-scale composite transit network. Due to the data’s particularity and the demand’s diversity and complexity, future research should focus on these points:

Data mining: In practical applications, massive multi-source data is needed. Meticulous data collection, processing, and analysis are conducive to improving the accuracy of prediction results. Therefore, the construction and management of databases need further research. Data mining is an iterative process in which mining results are constantly applied to practice, the effect is tested, and the mining algorithm is improved. Further research is needed on the actual application effect, user evaluation, and improvement direction of data mining algorithm in the intelligent public transit system to promote the perfection and improvement of the prediction model.

Prediction model of travel time: This paper only studies the travel time prediction method based on the Kalman filter. In future research, other commonly used prediction methods such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and comprehensive modeling can be combined to improve prediction accuracy.

Levels of travel time prediction: In this paper, the travel time focuses on a single bus in a journey, which is the basis of traveler-oriented travel time predictions. In contrast, a trip consists of the sum of one or more bus journeys. Based on several routes for multiple buses, travel time prediction problems involving line selection and transfer will need to consider the transit system’s network capacity. For a large-scale network, the complexity will increase sharply with stops and routes. Therefore, making the method scalable to large networks should be studied.

Promotion and application: Extensive cooperation and investment of enterprises and research institutes would benefit the use of the models described here. Special attention to the characteristics of those local enterprises, allowing measures to be adjusted to local conditions will ease the application and promotion of this technology. Properly promoted and applied, these models will contribute to developing and using intelligent public transit systems to meet the needs of passengers, operators, managers, and policymakers.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

2 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-18697

Travel Time Prediction of Urban Public Transportation Based on Detection of Single Routes

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zhang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 16 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jian Wang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide further details in your methods section of the source of the dataset, how it was collected, and how it can be accessed by other researchers seeking to reproduce your study

3. We note that Figure 3 in your submission contain satellite images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 3 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

4. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Please note that one reviewer reject this paper and two reviewers suggest minor revision. I would like to make a decision of major revision. Please carefully revise the manuscript and provide the responses to the reviewers. Further, the manuscript contains many grammar mistakes and typos. A professional English editing is suggested.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This article develops a Kalman filter-based travel time prediction of urban public transportation model.

The reviewer has the following comments:

1) Please remove all comments and be professional!

2) In Section II, there is a syntax error in ‘This literature review presents an overview of methods for predicting travel time published in the last 5 years is presented’.

3) The flow in Section II would confuse readers a lot. Why not move ‘Section II.B Kalman filtering’ after the other four sub-sections, as this paper chooses Kalman filtering as the optimal algorithm? Present the pros and cons of SVM, GPS, PF, and NN, and then articulate the advantage of Kalman filter over others.

4) The research gaps are still unclear. Sections I & II states the reason why this paper choose Kalman filter as the tool for travel time prediction, but none of current research gaps has been presented.

5) The potential contributions and renovations of this paper are still unclear by the end of Section II. Please add potential contributions and renovations at the end of Section II.

6) The statement at the end of Section III.A.1), ‘Given existing technical conditions, in-depth research on the prediction method of travel time of conventional transit (especially conventional transit under mixed traffic conditions) is of great theoretical significance and application value’, is inconvincible, as this paper never mentions anything related to mixed traffic before or existing technical conditions.

7) What is ‘random factor’ in Section III. A. 2). Please add definitions to terms before you use them.

8) The flow of this paper is very very hard to follow. There is no connection between sub-sections and even paragraphs.

9) The writing of this paper is very unfriendly to readers.

10) Recommend authors to well re-organize the structure of this paper, improve the academic writing, and rephrase the whole paper before submission.

Reviewer #2: This paper combines the Kalman filter model with the AVL and IC card intelligent bus technologies to predict the travel time of urban public transport. It is an interesting work. However there are some key problems need to be addressed:

1. The part of Literature review lacks research contributions and the motivation of choosing Kalman filter model.

2. The detailed parameters and processes of neural network travel time prediction model should be explained, since current comparisons are insufficient.

3. Some data (such as bus code, pattern ID, departure time, et al.) has been detected with multiple devices (i.e., IC, AVL, and Bus dispatching). The authors should demonstrate the fusion process of these data.

4. The parts of Abstract and Conclusions should add the methodology and results with real engineering of the research.

5. Some minor writing mistake “Kilman” should be “Kalman”, “△” should be “Δ”, not triangle, et al.

Reviewer #3: Based on Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) and IC data, this paper proposed a variety of random traffic factors, constructed transit travel time prediction model and carried out comparative analysis on the actual results. The topic is interesting and the study is timely. However, there are still some concerns to be addressed before publication.

1) The motivation of this study is not very clear, and the contributions of the proposed method should be highlighted.

2) The research background and significance were not clearly described. The research background should include an analysis of some current policies. Research significance should address the outcomes of this paper and point out improvements to be achieved in certain areas and judge the value of these research outcomes. It will be very important for the readers to judge whether the paper is useful for them to make a plan or obtain some suggestions.

3) A good review introduces the research status and the shortages of the current related studies, and find out how to solve the problem which has not been solved based on comprehensive literature review. The author introduced the relevant studies and conducted a summary; however, it is not sufficient for the readers to realize why the author choose the proposed method and what its innovations are. Please combine the logicality of the literature systematically to let the readers know why you choose this method.

4) The paper also lacks some latest relevant literature, so it is suggested to supplement them.

5) In Case Study Section, the author writes“The IC card and AV data of four days on October 1, 2, 3, and 4, 2019 were selected as the basic data of the example”; however, the reason why the author choose this period was not given. Authors can consider adding a paragraph to the discussion and introduce why they choose this period. Is the data extracted randomly?

6) In the Conclusions part, it is suggested to add limitations of the proposed model and to show future directions.

7) The English language throughout the paper should be polished carefully.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Chao Sun

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

23 Aug 2021

Response to Reviewers

Reviewer #1:

This article develops a Kalman filter-based travel time prediction of the urban public transportation model. The reviewer has the following comments:

1. Please remove all comments and be professional!

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, which will make me more careful and professional in writing academic papers in the future. I apologize for my carelessness, unprofessionalism, and comments that should be deleted at the previous stage. I have revised all the formats and kept them standard before submitting them to you for review again.

2. In Section II, there is a syntax error in 'This literature review presents an overview of methods for predicting travel time published in the last five years is presented'.

Response: Thank you very much for your professionalism and carefulness in pointing out the spelling mistakes in the paper. All the mistakes have been corrected before submitting them to you for review again.

3. The flow in Section II would confuse readers a lot. Why not move 'Section II.B Kalman filtering' after the other four sub-sections, as this paper chooses Kalman filtering as the optimal algorithm? Present the pros and cons of SVM, GPS, PF, and NN, and then articulate the advantage of the Kalman filter over others.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, which enables me to consider the structure of the whole paper more logically and clearly in future writing. I have adjusted the structure of the literature review. Indeed, the literature review on Kalman filtering is put at the end, which is more logical and clearer to readers.

4. The research gaps are still unclear. Sections I & II state why this paper chooses Kalman filter as the tool for travel time prediction, but none of the current research gaps have been presented.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, the motivation and significance of selecting the Kalman filter as a travel time prediction tool have been added in Sections I & II.

5. The potential contributions and renovations of this paper are still unclear by the end of Section II. Please add potential contributions and renovations at the end of Section II.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions. In Section II, the significance and contribution of selecting the Kalman filter as a travel time prediction tool are added, and the renovations of this method are expounded.

6. The statement at the end of Section III.A.1), 'Given existing technical conditions, in-depth research on the prediction method of travel time of conventional transit (especially conventional transit under mixed traffic conditions) is of great theoretical significance and application value', is inconvincible, as this paper never mentions anything related to mixed traffic before or existing technical conditions.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions. Considering this paper's research scope and content, this part is reworded to ensure the logical integrity of the whole paper structure. The following paper will elaborate on the travel time prediction of urban public transport under mixed traffic conditions.

7. What is 'random factor' in Section III. A. 2). Please add definitions to terms before you use them.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions.

A. Random factors include Road conditions (length, capacity, number of lanes, slope, grade, presence of bus lanes, type of median, and presence of crossings and the number of pedestrian crossing, roadside parking, fixed obstacles such as railway, intersection, control mode, etc.), traffic conditions, time, climate, traffic emergencies, vehicle conditions, drivers, passengers, etc.

B. Considering this paper's research scope and content, this part is reworded to ensure the logical integrity of the whole paper structure. Only a few random factors are briefly listed, and how detailed random factors affect travel time prediction will be illustrated in future studies.

8. The flow of this paper is very, very hard to follow. There is no connection between sub-sections and even paragraphs.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions. I rearranged the order of each part and the wording of some contents to ensure the whole paper's clear and complete logical structure.

9. The writing of this paper is very unfriendly to readers.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions. In addition to my own readjustment of the logical structure and wording of the text, I also asked professionals to help me polish the paper to ensure its readability.

10. Recommend authors to re-organize this paper's structure, improve the academic writing, and rephrase the whole paper before submission.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, which helps me to pay more attention to my future academic paper writing. In addition to my own readjustment of the logical structure and wording of the text, I also asked professionals to help me polish the paper to ensure its readability.

Reviewer #2:

This paper combines the Kalman filter model with the AVL and IC card intelligent bus technologies to predict urban public transport travel time. It is an interesting work. However, some fundamental problems need to be addressed:

1. The part of the Literature review lacks research contributions and the motivation of choosing the Kalman filter model.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. The content is modified in the introduction, highlighting the motivation and contribution of selecting the Kalman filter as a travel time prediction tool.

2. The detailed parameters and processes of the neural network travel time prediction model should be explained since current comparisons are insufficient.

Response: The detailed parameters and process of the neural network travel time prediction model are not the focus of this paper. The comparison results between the neural network prediction model and the Kalman filter prediction model are described as evaluation parts. More explicit content will be illustrated in the following research content in the future.

3. Some data (such as bus code, pattern ID, departure time, et al.) has been detected with multiple devices (i.e., IC, AVL, and Bus dispatching). The authors should demonstrate the fusion process of these data.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions.

A. In this paper, Madison's transit network data was provided by Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory (these Figs are shown in S3, Figs 1 and 2). All data obtained for routes and stops are spatial data. This data was digitized and stored in a spatial database utilizing GIS technology for storage.

B. The fusion process of multi-source data has a detailed process in the Supporting Files. Since data processing is not the focus of this paper, this part of the content will not be added to this paper.

4. The parts of Abstract and Conclusions should add the methodology and results with real engineering of the research.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. The abstract and the conclusion are rewritten, and the methodology used in the paper and the research results of practical engineering significance are added.

5. Some minor writing mistakes "Kilman" should be "Kalman", "△" should be "Δ", not a triangle, et al.

Response: Thank you very much for your professionalism and carefulness in pointing out the spelling mistakes in the paper. All the mistakes have been corrected before submitting them to you for review again.

Reviewer #3:

Based on Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) and IC data, this paper proposed various random traffic factors, constructed a transit travel time prediction model, and conducted a comparative analysis of the actual results. The topic is interesting, and the study is timely. However, there are still some concerns to be addressed before publication.

1. The motivation of this study is not very clear, and the contributions of the proposed method should be highlighted.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. The content is modified in the introduction, highlighting the motivation and contribution of selecting the Kalman filter as a travel time prediction tool.

2. The research background and significance were not clearly described. The research background should include an analysis of some current policies. Research significance should address the outcomes of this paper and point out improvements to be achieved in certain areas and judge the value of these research outcomes. It will be essential for the readers to judge whether the paper helps make a plan or obtain some suggestions.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, the background and significance of selecting the Kalman filter as a travel time prediction tool are expounded in Sections I & II.

3. A good review introduces the research status and the shortages of the current related studies and finds out how to solve the problem which has not been solved based on a comprehensive literature review. The author introduced the relevant studies and concluded; however, it is not sufficient for the readers to realize why the author chose the proposed method and its innovations. Please combine the logicality of the literature systematically to let the readers know why you choose this method.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, the motivation and innovations of selecting the Kalman filter as a travel time prediction tool have been added in Sections I & II. The status of this research work is further clarified by comparing the advantages and disadvantages with other technologies.

4. The paper also lacks some latest relevant literature, so it is suggested to supplement them.

Response: Thanks to the suggestions, the reference part has been modified again, a few latest pieces of literature has been added, which makes up for the shortcomings of the review.

5. In Case Study Section, the author writes, "The IC card and AV data of four days on October 1, 2, 3, and 4, 2019 were selected as the basic data of the example"; however, the reason why the author chooses this period was not given. Authors can consider adding a paragraph to the discussion and introduce why they choose this period. Is the data extracted randomly?

Response: Thank you very much for your suggestions.

A. In this paper, Madison's transit network data was provided by Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory (these Figs are shown in S3, Figs 1 and 2). All data obtained for routes and stops are spatial data. This data was digitized and stored in a spatial database utilizing GIS technology for storage.

B. The more recent data, the more convincing, but in 2020 and 2021, due to the impact of COVID-19, the public transport of Madison did not completely regular operation, so the data is not representative. Considering the stability of the urban public transport network and the climate characteristics of Madison, the data of October 1, 2, 3, and 4, 2019 was finally selected (the data of workdays are more representative). Different years of data did not affect the effectiveness of the travel time prediction model.

6. In the Conclusions part, it is suggested to add the proposed model's limitations and show future directions.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions. The limitations of this model have been mentioned, and future research and application directions have been added

7. The English language throughout the paper should be polished carefully.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, which helps me to pay more attention to my future academic paper writing. In addition to my own readjustment of the logical structure and wording of the text, I also asked professionals to help me polish the paper to ensure its readability.

Submitted filename: 2 Response to Academic Editor.docx

Click here for additional data file.

22 Nov 2021

PONE-D-21-18697R1Travel Time Prediction of Urban Public Transportation Based on Detection of Single RoutesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zhang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 06 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jian Wang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

So far, I received the recommentations from three reviewers. Two recommended acceptance at the current form and one recommended major revision. After a careful check of this paper, I feel this paper has merits. Thereby, I made a decision of "minor revision". The authors should carefully address the comments from the third reviewer. Further, I found several typos in the abstract. The language of this paper should be improved. The authors are also encouraged to cite the following latest related studies.

Lu, L., He, Z., Wang, J.*, Chen, J., Wang, W. (2021). Estimation of lane-level travel time distributions under a connected environment. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems.

J. Huo, X. Fu, Z. Liu and Q. Zhang, Short-Term Estimation and Prediction of Pedestrian Density in Urban Hot Spots Based on Mobile Phone Data, in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3096274.

Lu, L., Wang, J.*, Wu, Y., Chen, X. and Chan, C.Y., (2021). Real-time prediction model for vehicle individual travel time on an undersaturated signalized arterial. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

E. Chen, Z. Ye, C. Wang and M. Xu, Subway Passenger Flow Prediction for Special Events Using Smart Card Data, in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1109-1120, March 2020, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2902405.

Lu, L., Wang, J., He, Z.*, Chan, C. Real-time estimation of freeway travel time with recurrent congestion based on sparse detector data, IET Intelligent Transport Systems.

Y. Liu, C. Lyu, X. Liu and Z. Liu, Automatic Feature Engineering for Bus Passenger Flow Prediction Based on Modular Convolutional Neural Network, in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2349-2358, April 2021, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3004254.

Yang L A , Cheng L A , Zl A , et al. Exploring a large-scale multi-modal transportation recommendation system[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 126.

H. Zhang, Y. Wu, H. Tan, H. Dong, F. Ding and B. Ran, Understanding and Modeling Urban Mobility Dynamics via Disentangled Representation Learning, in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3030259.

Zhang B , Chen S , Ma Y , et al. Analysis on spatiotemporal urban mobility based on online car-hailing data[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 82:102568.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The reviewer still has the following comments:

1) In the abstract, there is a syntax error in ‘Its greater time-variance and uncertainty make predictions for short travel times (≤35min) more subject to influence by random factors’. The ‘to influence’ should be ‘to be influenced’.

2) Syntax error. ‘It requires higher precision than makes long-term predictions and is more complicated.’

3) Syntax error. ‘The Kalman filter model has a higher precision in one-step-ahead prediction and can significantly automate massive data calculations to improve prediction accuracy.’

4) The writing of the abstract is hard for readers to understand the background and motivation of this study.

5) Syntax error. ‘it is essential to study the technology of travel time prediction to more fully meet the data characteristics of urban public transit and improve its applicability.’

6) The flow in Section II confuses readers a lot. In Section II. B, ‘While the models described in this section can solve the bus-to-station prediction problem to some degree, the influence factors these models considered are one-sided. SVM relies too much on kernel tricks to achieve predictions on a large scale. GPS overemphasizes the current state of the bus, degrading the prediction accuracy as the predicted distance increases. The PF considers only the time of the bus to the stop and ignores the spatial effect of the bus. The input used in the NN network is too one-sided and does not consider the comprehensive effect of time and space characteristics.’

Why does the summary of the four models occurs before the description of the SVM and PF? Please move to Section II.E.

7) Section II describes the advantage of the Kalman Filter over other four models in the travel time prediction. However, the research gaps and motivations on choosing the Kalman Filter to solve the problem in this study is still unclear. Please add more description about limitations of existing studies in travel time prediction with the Kalman Filter.

8) The research background, academic research gaps, motivations, potential real-world contributions, and renovations of this paper are still unclear by the end of Section II. Please well state the background, research gaps, motivations, and contributions in the Section I&II.

9) The English language and flow through this paper still need to be well organized.

Reviewer #2: All the comments are worked out by the authors. And this edition of manuscript is appropriate for publishing.

Reviewer #3: In this revised version of the manuscript authors have taken into account all the points in my previous comments. Therefore, in my opinion, this new version of the manuscript can be accepted for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Chao Sun

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

10 Dec 2021

Response to Reviewers

Reviewer #1:

The reviewer still has the following comments:

1. In the abstract, there is a syntax error in 'Its greater time-variance and uncertainty make predictions for short travel times (≤35min) more subject to influence by random factors'. The 'to influence' should be 'to be influenced'.

Response: Thank you very much for your professionalism and carefulness in pointing out the spelling mistakes in the paper. All the errors have been corrected before submitting them to you for review again.

2. Syntax error. 'It requires higher precision than makes long-term predictions and is more complicated.'

Response: Thank you very much for your professionalism and carefulness in pointing out the spelling mistakes in the paper. All the errors have been corrected before submitting them to you for review again.

3. Syntax error. 'The Kalman filter model has a higher precision in one-step-ahead prediction and can significantly automate massive data calculations to improve prediction accuracy.'

Response: Thank you very much for your professionalism and carefulness in pointing out the spelling mistakes in the paper. All the errors have been corrected before submitting them to you for review again.

4. The writing of the abstract is hard for readers to understand the background and motivation of this study.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions. I rewrote and adjusted that Section to ensure it was clear and complete.

5. Syntax error. 'it is essential to study the technology of travel time prediction to more fully meet the data characteristics of urban public transit and improve its applicability.'

Response: Thank you very much for your professionalism and carefulness in pointing out the spelling mistakes in the paper. All the errors have been corrected before submitting them to you for review again.

6. The flow in Section II confuses readers a lot. In Section II. B, 'While the models described in this Section can solve the bus-to-station prediction problem to some degree, the influence factors these models considered are one-sided. SVM relies too much on kernel tricks to achieve predictions on a large scale. GPS overemphasizes the current state of the bus, degrading the prediction accuracy as the predicted distance increases. The PF considers only the time of the bus to the stop and ignores the spatial effect of the bus. The input used in the NN network is too one-sided and does not consider the comprehensive effect of time and space characteristics.'

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. This content has been revised to ensure the integrity and clarity of this part of the content.

7. Why does the summary of the four models occur before describing the SVM and PF? Would you please move to Section II.E?

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. This content has been revised to ensure the integrity and clarity of this part of the content.

8. Section II describes the advantage of the Kalman Filter over the other four models in the travel time prediction. However, the research gaps and motivations on choosing the Kalman Filter to solve the problem in this study are still unclear. Would you please add more description about the limitations of existing studies in travel time prediction with the Kalman Filter?

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. The content of more description about limitations of existing studies in travel time prediction with the Kalman Filter has been revised

9. The research background, academic research gaps, motivations, potential real-world contributions, and renovations of this paper are still unclear by the end of Section II. Would you please state the background, research gaps, motivations, and contributions in Section I&II?

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. The content of background, research gaps, motivations, and contributions have been revised in the Section I&II

10. The English language and flow through this paper still need to be well organized.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions. In addition to my own readjustment of the logical structure and wording of the text, I also asked professionals to help me polish the paper to ensure its readability.

Reviewer #2:

The authors work out all the comments. And this edition of the manuscript is appropriate for publishing.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, which enables me to consider the structure of the whole paper more logically and clearly in future writing. Thank you very much for your reply and affirmation, which gives me the confidence to continue writing academic papers in the future. At the same time, based on the editor's advice, I adjusted the contents of the literature part and made the latest adjustments in grammar and diction.

Reviewer #3:

In this revised version of the manuscript, the author has considered all the points in my previous comments. Therefore, in my opinion, this new version of the manuscript can be accepted for publication.

Response: Thank you very much for your criticism and suggestions, which enables me to consider the structure of the whole paper more logically and clearly in future writing. Thank you very much for your reply and affirmation, which gives me the confidence to continue writing academic papers in the future. At the same time, based on the editor's advice, I adjusted the contents of the literature part and made the latest adjustments in grammar and diction.

Submitted filename: 1 Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

28 Dec 2021

Travel Time Prediction of Urban Public Transportation Based on Detection of Single Routes

PONE-D-21-18697R2

Dear Dr. Zhang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jian Wang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The latest manuscript has worked out all points in my previous comments. The reviewer still has the last comment:

1) In the second paragraph of Section I, please add references to support all statements about the research motivation. “Traditional travel time prediction methods based on statistical analysis or mathematical modeling are deficient in intelligence and have weak adaptability … it is necessary to study travel time prediction technology to more fully meet the data requirements in the operation analysis process of urban public transit and improve its applicability.”

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

5 Jan 2022

PONE-D-21-18697R2

Travel Time Prediction of Urban Public transportation Based on Detection of Single   Routes

Dear Dr. Zhang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jian Wang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE