| Literature DB >> 35029877 |
Jimilihan Simayi1, Maimaitiming Nuermaimaiti2, Ainiwaer Wumaier1, Nawaz Khan1, Maierdan Yusufu1, Muhadaisi Nuer1, Nulibiya Maihemuti1, Kaysar Adurusul1, Wenting Zhou1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This study investigates the active components and mechanism of Shufeng Jiedu Capsules (SFJDC) against novel coronavirus through network pharmacology and molecular docking.The TCMSP, TCMID, and BATMAN-TCM databases were used to retrieve the components of SFJDC. The active components were screened by ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) parameters, and identified by Pubchem, Chemical Book, and ChemDraw softwares. The molecular docking ligands were constructed. SARS Coronavirus-2 Major Protease (SARS-CoV-2-Mpro) and angiotension converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) were used as molecular docking receptors. AutoDock software was used for molecular docking. Cytoscape 3.7.1 software was used to generate an herbs-active components-targets network. Gene Ontology gene function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes signal pathway analysis were performed by DAVID data.A total of 1244 components were identified from SFJDC, and 210 active components were obtained. Among them, 97 active components were used as docking ligands to dock with SARS-CoV-2-Mpro and ACE2. There were 48 components with good binding activity to SARS-CoV-2-Mpro. Ten active components (including 7-Acetoxy-2-methylisoflavone, Kaempferol, Quercetin, Baicalein, Glabrene, Glucobrassicin, Isoglycyrol, Wogonin, Petunidin, and Luteolin) combined with SARS-CoV-2-Mpro and ACE2 simultaneously. Among them, Kaempferol, Wogonin, and Baicalein showed higher binding activity. The herbs-active components-targets network contained 7 herbs, 10 active components, and 225 targets. The 225 target targets were involved in 653 biological processes of Gene Ontology analysis and 130 signal pathways (false discovery rate ≤ 0.01) of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis.The active components of SFJDC (such as Kaempferol, Wogonin, and Baicalein) may combine with ACE2 and act on multiple signaling pathways and targets to exert therapeutic effect on novel coronavirus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35029877 PMCID: PMC8735807 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
The number of components each herb of SFJDC.
| No. | Herb | TCMSP | TCMID | BATMAN-TCM | Total |
| H1 | Polygonum cuspidatum (Chinese name Huzhang) | 62 | 74 | 0 | 104 |
| H2 | Forsythia suspensa (Chinese name Lianqiao) | 150 | 90 | 47 | 156 |
| H3 | Isatis tinctoria L. (Chinese name Banlangen) | 169 | 0 | 33 | 185 |
| H4 | Bupleurum chinense DC. (Chinese name Chaihu) | 349 | 132 | 0 | 376 |
| H5 | Patrinia Scabiosaefolia Fisch (Chinese name Baijiangcao) | 52 | 0 | 0 | 52 |
| H6 | Verbena officinalis L. (Chinese name Mabiancao) | 58 | 18 | 0 | 66 |
| H7 | Phragmites communis (Chinese name Lugen) | 31 | 0 | 0 | 31 |
| H8 | Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch (Chinese name Gancao) | 282 | 172 | 125 | 274 |
Active components from SFJDC screened by ADME.
| No. | Components | OB (%) | DL | Herb |
| MOL000358 | Beta-sitosterol | 36.91 | 0.75 | H1, H5, H6, H3, H2 |
| MOL000449 | Stigmasterol | 43.83 | 0.76 | H4, H5, H6, H7, H3 |
| MOL000098 | Quercetin | 46.43 | 0.28 | H1, H4, H5, H6, H2, H8 |
| MOL000422 | Kaempferol | 41.88 | 0.24 | H4, H5, H6, H2, H8 |
| MOL000006 | Luteolin | 36.16 | 0.25 | H1, H5, H6, H2 |
| MOL000359 | Sitosterol | 36.91 | 0.75 | H5, H3, H8 |
| MOL001790 | Linarin | 39.84 | 0.71 | H5, H3, H8 |
| MOL001689 | Acacetin | 34.97 | 0.24 | H5, H3 |
| MOL000354 | Isorhamnetin | 49.6 | 0.31 | H4, H8 |
| MOL001697 | Sinoacutine | 63.39 | 0.53 | H5, H3 |
| MOL001792 | Liquiritigenin | 32.76 | 0.18 | H3, H8 |
| MOL002322 | Isovitexin | 31.29 | 0.72 | H5, H3 |
| MOL000211 | Mairin | 55.38 | 0.78 | H2, H8 |
| MOL004856 | Gancaonin A | 51.08 | 0.4 | H8 |
| MOL002844 | Pinocembrin | 64.72 | 0.18 | H8 |
| MOL000392 | Formononetin | 69.67 | 0.21 | H8 |
| MOL004917 | Glycyroside | 37.25 | 0.79 | H8 |
| MOL002311 | Glycyrol | 90.78 | 0.67 | H8 |
| MOL002565 | Medicarpin | 49.22 | 0.34 | H8 |
| MOL001803 | Sinensetin | 50.56 | 0.45 | H3 |
| MOL001750 | Glucobrassicin | 66.02 | 0.48 | H3 |
| MOL001756 | Quindoline | 33.17 | 0.22 | H3 |
| MOL002881 | Diosmetin | 31.14 | 0.27 | H6 |
| MOL005229 | Artemetin | 49.55 | 0.48 | H6 |
| MOL003330 | (–)-Phillygenin | 95.04 | 0.57 | H2 |
| MOL003347 | Hyperforin | 44.03 | 0.6 | H2 |
| MOL003348 | Adhyperforin | 44.03 | 0.61 | H2 |
| MOL000173 | Wogonin | 30.68 | 0.23 | H2 |
| MOL002776 | Baicalin | 40.12 | 0.75 | H4 |
| MOL004991 | 7-Acetoxy-2-methylisoflavone | 38.92 | 0.26 | H8 |
Molecular docking of active components in SFJDC.
| Binding energy (kcal mol−1) | |||
| Active components | Molecular formula | SARS-CoV-2-Mpro | ACE2 |
| 7-Acetoxy-2-methylisoflavone | C18H14O4 | –6.3 | –4.1 |
| Kaempferol | C15H10O6 | –5.7 | –4.3 |
| Quercetin | C15H10O7 | –4.9 | –3.8 |
| Baicalein | C15H10O5 | –5.7 | –4.3 |
| Glabrene | C20H18O4 | –5.2 | –4.1 |
| Glucobrassicin | C16H19N2O9S2 | –4.9 | –4.0 |
| Isoglycyrol | C21H18O6 | –4.9 | –4.0 |
| Wogonin | C16H12O5 | –5.9 | –4.3 |
| Petunidin | C16H13O7+ | –5.0 | –4.0 |
| Luteolin | C15H10O6 | –5.6 | –3.9 |
| Remdesivir | C27H35N6O8P | –4.9 | – |
| Lopinavir | C37H48N4S5 | –4.7 | – |
| Ritonavir | C37H48N6O5S2 | –3.9 | – |
Figure 1Molecular docking diagram of SARS-CoV-2-Mpro and ACE2 with 10 active compounds. ACE2 = angiotension converting enzyme 2, SARS-CoV-2-Mpro = SARS Coronavirus-2 Major Protease.
Figure 2Herbal-active component-action target network. The network consists of 242 nodes (7 herbs, 10 active components, and 225 active targets) and 385 edges. The edges between HB (yellow octagon), C (red quadrilateral), and T (green circle) represent interactions. A degree of node (Degree) represents the number of nodes that directly interact with the node in the protein interaction network. The size of the node is proportional to the degree. The greater the degree of a node, the more biological functions it participates in, and the stronger its biological significance.
Figure 3GO and KEGG analysis of the targets of SFJDC active components. FDR (false discovery rate, ≤ 0.01). The smaller the FDR, the smaller the enrichment analysis, the higher the degree of enrichment. GO = Gene Ontology, KEGG = Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, SFJDC = Shufeng Jiedu Capsules.