Literature DB >> 35029839

Risk Factors Associated with Suboptimal Tobramycin Levels in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Jacob P Counts1, Jessica L Elefritz1, Erica E Reed1, Marilly Palettas2, Connor Aossey3, Julia J Beatty4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal aminoglycoside dosing in critically ill patients represents a challenge for practitioners, especially in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). MICU patients exhibit altered pharmacokinetics due to pathophysiological changes the body undergoes in critical illness, leading to possible treatment failure. The literature surrounding optimal dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring strategies of aminoglycosides in MICU patients is scarce and conflicting. Additionally, only a few studies have investigated risk factors for suboptimal pharmacokinetic target obtainment. Currently, no definitive risk factors have been identified to predict suboptimal aminoglycoside target obtainment in MICU patients.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for suboptimal pharmacokinetic target obtainment in patients receiving tobramycin in the MICU.
METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients 18-89 years old who received at least one 7 mg/kg tobramycin dose in the MICU from January, 1 2015 to September, 30 2020. Patients also had to have at least two detectable drug levels obtained at least one half-life apart following the first tobramycin dose. The primary outcome was to determine the incidence of optimal pharmacokinetic target obtainment, defined as a tobramycin maximum concentration (Cmax) ≥ 10 mcg/ml, and to identify the risk factors for suboptimal (Cmax < 10 mcg/mL) pharmacokinetic target obtainment, in MICU patients. Secondary outcomes were compared between suboptimal and optimal target obtainment in patients with culture confirmed gram-negative infection susceptible to tobramycin. These secondary outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and vasopressor duration in those with shock.
RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were included in this retrospective study. For the primary outcome, 187 (81.3%) patients achieved optimal target obtainment. Through multivariate logistic regression, female sex and serum albumin < 2.5 g/dL were identified as independent risk factors for suboptimal target obtainment; [OR = 2.14; 95% CI (1.05-4.37), p = 0.037], [OR = 2.50; 95% CI (1.21-5.19), p = 0.014], respectively. Fifty-four (23%) patients had culture-confirmed gram-negative infections susceptible to tobramycin and were included in the subgroup analysis. Of these 54 patients, 11 (20.4%) did not achieve optimal target concentrations. In patients with culture-confirmed gram-negative infection, there was no difference between patients with optimal target obtainment and suboptimal target obtainment in ICU LOS, hospital LOS, all-cause mortality, or vasopressor duration in those with shock.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients receiving their first dose of tobramycin in the MICU, 81.3% obtained an optimal serum concentration. Female sex and serum albumin < 2.5 g/dL were identified as risk factors for suboptimal target obtainment; however, further research is warranted to assess the utility of using these two covariates as risk factors for more aggressive dosing in critically ill MICU patients.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35029839     DOI: 10.1007/s13318-021-00749-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  20 in total

Review 1.  Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Studies.

Authors:  Amélie Marsot; Romain Guilhaumou; Camille Riff; Olivier Blin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Variability in aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in critically ill surgical patients.

Authors:  J F Dasta; D K Armstrong
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Determinants of gentamicin concentrations in critically ill patients: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.

Authors:  Caspar J Hodiamont; Nicole P Juffermans; Catherine S C Bouman; Menno D de Jong; Ron A A Mathôt; Reinier M van Hest
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides in critically ill trauma patients on once-daily regimens.

Authors:  J F Barletta; S B Johnson; D E Nix; L C Nix; B L Erstad
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-11

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Suboptimal aminoglycoside dosing in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Rhonda S Rea; Blair Capitano; Robert Bies; Kristin L Bigos; Randall Smith; Howard Lee
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing: An update on current literature.

Authors:  Matthew S Stankowicz; Jad Ibrahim; Daniel L Brown
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.637

9.  The RIFLE and AKIN classifications for acute kidney injury: a critical and comprehensive review.

Authors:  José António Lopes; Sofia Jorge
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2012-01-01

10.  Improving peak concentrations of a single dose regime of gentamicin in patients with sepsis in the emergency department.

Authors:  Maarten Cobussen; Patricia M Stassen; Dirk Posthouwer; Frank H van Tiel; Paul H M Savelkoul; Thomas Havenith; Michiel B Haeseker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.