Literature DB >> 35029838

Power Doppler artifacts in evaluating inflammatory arthritis of small joints: comparison with a superb microvascular imaging technique.

Goda Seskute1, Marija Montvydaite2, Irena Butrimiene2.   

Abstract

Conventional Doppler techniques provide clinical information about tissue vascularisation, but they have limitations in detecting low-velocity blood flow. The innovative Doppler technique called superb microvascular imaging provides visualization of microvascular flow never seen before with the ultrasound. The new tool suppresses the noise caused by motion artifacts with an innovative filter system without removing the weak signal arising from small vessel flow, hence it achieves a greater sensitivity than power Doppler. Explanation of motion artifact genesis reveals SMI imaging principles and helps to distinguish false-positive results. Due to the higher SMI sensitivity to flow, there are nuances in the interpretation of other artifacts as well as motion. The paper presents commonly encountered artifacts of power Doppler compared with a novel microvascular imaging technique focused on a small joints inflammation. The main attention is intent on the practical recommendations for ultrasound machine settings and evaluation of comparable images.
© 2022. Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact; Musculoskeletal ultrasound; Power Doppler; Superb microvascular imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35029838      PMCID: PMC9402880          DOI: 10.1007/s40477-021-00643-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN: 1876-7931


  17 in total

Review 1.  Doppler artifacts and pitfalls.

Authors:  Deborah J Rubens; Shweta Bhatt; Shannon Nedelka; Jeanne Cullinan
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Gain setting in power Doppler US.

Authors:  C Martinoli; L E Derchi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  The role of Doppler ultrasound in rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Francesco Porta; Goran Radunovic; Violeta Vlad; Mihaela C Micu; Rodina Nestorova; Tzvetanka Petranova; Annamaria Iagnocco
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  High-Frame-Rate Power Doppler Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Conventional Power Doppler in Detecting Rheumatic Vascularisation.

Authors:  Myrthe van der Ven; Jolanda J Luime; Levinia L van der Velden; Johan G Bosch; Johanna M W Hazes; Hendrik J Vos
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Optimizing Doppler and color flow US: application to hepatic sonography.

Authors:  Jonathan B Kruskal; Peggy A Newman; Laurie G Sammons; Robert A Kane
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Artifacts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Mihra S Taljanovic; David M Melville; Luke R Scalcione; Lana H Gimber; Eileen J Lorenz; Russell S Witte
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Power Doppler in musculoskeletal ultrasound: uses, pitfalls and principles to overcome its shortcomings.

Authors:  E Smith; C Azzopardi; S Thaker; R Botchu; H Gupta
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-07-18

8.  Superb Microvascular Imaging: Added Value and Novel Applications.

Authors:  Suheil Artul; William Nseir; Zaher Armaly; Michalle Soudack
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2017-12-28

Review 9.  Up-to-date Doppler techniques for breast tumor vascularity: superb microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Ah Young Park; Bo Kyoung Seo
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-08-19

10.  Microflow imaging: New Doppler technology to detect low-grade inflammation in patients with arthritis.

Authors:  A K P Lim; K Satchithananda; E A Dick; S Abraham; D O Cosgrove
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.