Literature DB >> 35029733

The central vein sign helps in differentiating multiple sclerosis from its mimickers: lessons from Fabry disease.

Mario Tranfa1, Mario Tortora1, Giuseppe Pontillo2,3, Valentina Iuzzolino4, Eleonora Riccio5, Simona Caccavallo6, Teodolinda Di Risi6,7, Serena Monti8, Roberta Lanzillo4, Vincenzo Brescia Morra4, Giuseppe Palma8, Maria Petracca4,9, Antonio Pisani6, Arturo Brunetti1, Sirio Cocozza1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although the use of specific MRI criteria has significantly increased the diagnostic accuracy of multiple sclerosis (MS), reaching a correct neuroradiological diagnosis remains a challenging task, and therefore the search for new imaging biomarkers is crucial. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of one of the emerging neuroradiological signs highly suggestive of MS, the central vein sign (CVS), using data from Fabry disease (FD) patients as an index of microvascular disorder that could mimic MS.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, MRI scans of 36 FD patients and 73 relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients were evaluated. Among the RRMS participants, 32 subjects with a disease duration inferior to 5 years (early MS) were also analyzed. For all subjects, a Fazekas score (FS) was recorded, excluding patients with FS = 0. Different neuroradiological signs, including CVS, were evaluated on FLAIR T2-weighted and spoiled gradient recalled echo sequences.
RESULTS: Among all the recorded neuroradiological signs, the most striking difference was found for the CVS, with a detectable prevalence of 78.1% (57/73) in RRMS and of 71.4% (25/32) in early MS patients, while this sign was absent in FD (0/36).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the high incidence of CVS in MS, also in the early phases of the disease, while it seems to be absent in conditions with a different etiology. These results corroborate the possible role of CVS as a useful neuroradiological sign highly suggestive of MS. KEY POINTS: • The search for new imaging biomarkers is crucial to achieve a correct neuroradiological diagnosis of MS. • The CVS shows an incidence superior to 70% in MS patients, even in the early phases of the disease, while it appears to be absent in FD. • These findings further corroborate the possible future central role of CVS in distinguishing between MS and its mimickers.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fabry disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35029733     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08487-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  59 in total

1.  Challenges in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: Misunderstanding and misapplication of the McDonald criteria.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Roman Pettigrew; Robert T Naismith; Salim Chahin; Stephen Krieger; Brian Weinshenker
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 2.  Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Impact of the 2017 McDonald criteria on clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Robert T Naismith; Anne H Cross
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and clinical presentation.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Gelfand
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2014

Review 4.  MRI mimics of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Esther Sánchez Aliaga; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2014

Review 5.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria.

Authors:  Alan J Thompson; Brenda L Banwell; Frederik Barkhof; William M Carroll; Timothy Coetzee; Giancarlo Comi; Jorge Correale; Franz Fazekas; Massimo Filippi; Mark S Freedman; Kazuo Fujihara; Steven L Galetta; Hans Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Ruth Ann Marrie; Aaron E Miller; David H Miller; Xavier Montalban; Ellen M Mowry; Per Soelberg Sorensen; Mar Tintoré; Anthony L Traboulsee; Maria Trojano; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Sandra Vukusic; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian G Weinshenker; Stephen C Reingold; Jeffrey A Cohen
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 44.182

6.  No MRI evidence of cortical lesions in neuromyelitis optica.

Authors:  Massimiliano Calabrese; Mi Sun Oh; Alice Favaretto; Francesca Rinaldi; Valentina Poretto; Sara Alessio; Byung-Chul Lee; Kyung-Ho Yu; Hyeo-Il Ma; Paola Perini; Paolo Gallo
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Patients with migraine do not have MRI-visible cortical lesions.

Authors:  Martina Absinta; Maria A Rocca; Bruno Colombo; Massimiliano Copetti; Donatella De Feo; Andrea Falini; Giancarlo Comi; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  How much do periventricular lesions assist in distinguishing migraine with aura from CIS?

Authors:  Caterina Lapucci; Laura Saitta; Giulia Bommarito; Maria Pia Sormani; Matteo Pardini; Laura Bonzano; Giovanni Luigi Mancardi; Claudio Gasperini; Antonio Giorgio; Matilde Inglese; Nicola De Stefano; Luca Roccatagliata
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Limited utility of current MRI criteria for distinguishing multiple sclerosis from common mimickers: primary and secondary CNS vasculitis, lupus and Sjogren's syndrome.

Authors:  Susan S Kim; David P Richman; Wesley O Johnson; John K Hald; Mark A Agius
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Lesion topographies in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: A reappraisal.

Authors:  Georgina Arrambide; Mar Tintore; Cristina Auger; Jordi Río; Joaquín Castilló; Angela Vidal-Jordana; Ingrid Galán; Carlos Nos; Manuel Comabella; Raquel Mitjana; Patricia Mulero; Andrea de Barros; Breogán Rodríguez-Acevedo; Luciana Midaglia; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Alex Rovira; Xavier Montalban
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.