| Literature DB >> 35029638 |
Flobert Ndah1, Hanna Valolahti2,3,4, Michelle Schollert2,3,5, Anders Michelsen2,3, Riikka Rinnan2,3, Minna Kivimäenpää1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Climate change is subjecting subarctic ecosystems to elevated temperature, increased nutrient availability and reduced light availability (due to increasing cloud cover). This may affect subarctic vegetation by altering the emissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) and leaf anatomy. We investigated the effects of increased nutrient availability on BVOC emissions and leaf anatomy of three subarctic dwarf shrub species, Empetrum hermaphroditum, Cassiope tetragona and Betula nana, and if increased nutrient availability modifies the responses to warming and shading.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Betula nanazzm321990 ; zzm321990 Cassiope tetragonazzm321990 ; zzm321990 Empetrum hermaphroditumzzm321990 ; Arctic; climate change; soil nutrients; temperature; terpenoid; tundra
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35029638 PMCID: PMC8944702 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcac004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Bot ISSN: 0305-7364 Impact factor: 4.357
Standardized emissions (µg g−1 h−1, mean ± s.e., n = 5–6) of isoprene, non-oxygenated monoterpenes, oxygenated monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, green leaf volatiles and benzenoids from E. hermaphroditum, C. tetragona and B. nana under long-term control (C), shading (S), warming (W), fertilization (F), fertilization + shading (FS) and fertilization + warming (FW) treatments. T = climate treatment, Fert = fertilization, T × Fert = climate treatment × fertilization
| Standardized emissions (µg g−1 h−1) |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | S | W | F | FS | FW | T | Fert | T × Fert | |
|
| |||||||||
| Non-oxygenated monoterpenes | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.574 | 0.834 | 0.979 |
| Sesquiterpenes | 5.5 ± 3.0 | 31.3 ± 19.2 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 14.5 ± 13.7 | 5.3 ± 4.4 | 4.1 ± 3.8 | 0.406 | 0.359 | 0.483 |
| Green leaf volatiles | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 1.4 ± 1.4 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.753 | 0.476 | 0.842 |
| Benzenoids | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 1.7 ± 1.7 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.337 | 0.984 | 0.931 |
|
| |||||||||
| Non-oxygenated monoterpenes | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 0.6 ± 0.6 | 19.4 ± 19.3 | 2.5 ± 1.1 | 2.9 ± 2.0 | 0.603 | 0.101 | 0.756 |
| Benzenoids | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 1.5 | 0.9 ± 0.9 | 5.0 ± 5.0 | 2.7 ± 1.5 | 2.2 ± 1.7 | 0.400 | 0.199 | 0.873 |
|
| |||||||||
| Isoprene | 2.1 ± 1.7 | 7.5 ± 5.8 | 7.3 ± 5.0 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 25.0 ± 25.0 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.485 | 0.137 | 0.769 |
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.927 | 0.686 | 0.478 |
| Sesquiterpenes | 2.6 ± 2.4 | 7.6 ± 6.8 | 11.6 ± 11.4 | 8.8 ± 8.1 | 9.8 ± 7.1 | 1.6 ± 1.4 | 0.703 | 0.863 | 0.711 |
| Green leaf volatiles | 45.8 ± 44.5 | 119.3 ± 117.0 | 56.4 ± 53.2 | 61.4 ± 58.8 | 16.3 ± 8.6 | 8.8 ± 6.4 | 0.913 | 0.823 | 0.832 |
| Benzenoids | 1.9 ± 1.9 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 1.5 ± 1.5 | 2.5 ± 2.5 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.328 | 0.581 | 0.506 |
P values are from LMM ANOVA. The standardized emissions (minimizing the effects of variations caused by sampling environmental conditions) were calculated according to Guenther , i.e. actual emission rates were standardized to 30 °C and that of isoprene to a PAR of 1000 µmol m−2 s−1.
Fig. 1.Standardized emissions (temperature of 30 °C, PAR of 1000 µmol m−2 s−1; Guenther ) (mean ± s.e., n = 5–6) of (A) isoprene and (B) oxygenated monoterpenes (oMT) from E. hermaphroditum under long-term control (C), shading (S), warming (W), fertilization (F), fertilization + shading (FS) and fertilization + warming (FW) treatments. Significant main effects of fertilization (Fert) and climate (T) treatments from mixed-model ANOVAs are indicated by * (P < 0.05) and + (P < 0.1). See main text for pairwise comparisons using the Bonferroni test.
Fig. 2.Standardized emissions (temperature of 30 °C, PAR of 1000 µmol m−2 s−1; Guenther ) (mean ± s.e., n = 5–6) of (A) isoprene, (B) oxygenated monoterpenes (oMT) and (C) sesquiterpenes (SQT) from C. tetragona under long-term control (C), shading (S), warming (W), fertilization (F), fertilization + shading (FS) and fertilization + warming (FW) treatments. Significant main effect of fertilization (Fert) from mixed models ANOVAs is indicated by + (P < 0.1).
Fig. 3.Standardized emission (temperature of 30 °C; Guenther ) (mean ± s.e., n = 5–6) of non-oxygenated monoterpenes from B. nana under long-term control (C), shading (S), warming (W), fertilization (F), fertilization + shading (FS) and fertilization + warming (FW) treatments. Significant main effect of fertilization (Fert) from mixed-model ANOVA is indicated by * (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4.PCA of the emissions of individual BVOCs from B. nana. (A) Mean scores (±s.e; n = 15–16) for fertilization and no fertilization treatments on PC1 and PC2 and (B) the corresponding loading plot. PC1 and PC2 explained 48 and 16 % of the variation, respectively. Significant main effect of fertilization is shown (PC2, LMM ANOVA, *P < 0.05). Abbreviations: cis-3-hex_acet. = cis-3-hexenyl acetate; aceto. = acetophenone.
Leaf anatomy variables of E. hermaphroditum under long-term control (C), shading (S), warming (W), fertilization (F), fertilization + shading (FS) and fertilization + warming (FW) treatments. T = climate treatment; Fert = fertilization; T x Fert = climate treatment x fertilization
| Leaf anatomy |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | S | W | F | FS | FW | T | Fert | T × Fert | |
|
| |||||||||
| Shape index | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 0.586 | 0.833 | 0.729 |
| Leaf thickness (µm) | 236.3 ± 11.9 | 231.0 ± 7.3 | 246.6 ± 18.0 | 229.5 ± 13.2 | 209.9 ± 10.7 | 218.9 ± 15.6 | 0.581 | 0.103 | 0.732 |
| Glandular trichome density on outer surface (no. per mm) | 6.1 ± 0.4 | 5.9 ± 0.9 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 6.4 ± 0.3 | 0.753 | 0.979 | 0.496 |
| Glandular trichome density on inner surface (no. per mm) | 3.1 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 0.808 | 0.145 | 0.182 |
| Glandular trichome condition | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 0.762 |
| 0.769 |
| Stomata density on inner surface (no. per mm) | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 0.713 | 0.135 | 0.947 |
| Outer epidermis thickness (µm) | 17.0 ± 0.7 | 18.0 ± 1.1 | 18.1 ± 1.4 | 15.9 ± 1.4 | 17.1 ± 1.1 | 14.7 ± 0.6 | 0.509 |
| 0.467 |
| Inner epidermis thickness (µm) | 10.9 ± 0.5 | 10.5 ± 0.2 | 11.0 ± 0.4 | 11.0 ± 0.8 | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 0.194 | 0.277 | 0.607 |
| Palisade parenchyma thickness (µm) | 85.4 ± 7.3 | 77.2 ± 8.2 | 83.6 ± 9.7 | 77.0 ± 4.9 | 69.0 ± 6.7 | 68.2 ± 5.1 | 0.547 |
| 0.858 |
| Spongy parenchyma thickness (µm) | 90.8 ± 4.9 | 89.6 ± 9.6 | 95.7 ± 8.4 | 90.6 ± 6.4 | 80.7 ± 5.9 | 90.9 ± 9.9 | 0.553 | 0.410 | 0.848 |
| Palisade/spongy parenchyma ratio | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.651 | 0.382 | 0.910 |
| Intercellular space, palisade (%) | 14.6 ± 2.3 | 18.3 ± 2.4 | 19.6 ± 3.8 | 21.2 ± 2.0 | 27.3 ± 1.6 | 21.8 ± 2.8 | 0.184 |
| 0.439 |
| Intercellular space, spongy (%) | 63.2 ± 2.7 | 62.5 ± 2.0 | 67.4 ± 2.9 | 66.5 ± 3.8 | 67.8 ± 2.9 | 67.6 ± 0.9 | 0.583 | 0.210 | 0.653 |
| Intercellular space total (%) | 38.2 ± 1.9 | 42.0 ± 1.3 | 43.7 ± 2.2 | 42.8 ± 2.9 | 48.2 ± 2.3 | 47.1 ± 0.4 |
|
| 0.788 |
P values from LMM ANOVA are shown, with P < 0.1 emboldened. See main text for pairwise comparisons by Bonferroni test.
Leaf anatomy variables of C. tetragona under long-term control (C), shading (S), warming (W), fertilization (F), fertilization + shading (FS) and fertilization + warming (FW) treatments. T = climate treatment; Fert = fertilization; T x Fert = climate treatment x fertilization
| Leaf anatomy |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | S | W | F | FS | FW | T | Fert | T × Fert | |
|
| |||||||||
| Leaf thickness (µm) | 196.7 ± 9.3 | 192.6 ± 13.2 | 182.8 ± 12.9 | 207.5 ± 10.6 | 189.8 ± 10.1 | 184.2 ± 16.3 | 0.319 | 0.702 | 0.836 |
| Glandular trichome density on inner surface (no. per mm) | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.989 |
| 0.401 |
| Glandular trichome density on surface against stem (no. per mm) | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 6.1 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 6.1 ± 0.7 |
|
|
|
| Spiky trichome density on surface (number per mm2) | 300.8 ± 28.7 | 202.6 ± 47.2 | 210.7 ± 44.6 | 201.9 ± 40.6 | 170.3 ± 47.1 | 221.7 ± 58.0 | 0.142 | 0.156 | 0.280 |
| Spiky trichome density on inner surface (no. per mm) | 5.0 ± 2.1 | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 11.1 ± 3.3 | 4.4 ± 1.6 | 4.5 ± 2.5 | 9.2 ± 3.6 |
| 0.324 | 0.855 |
| Spiky trichome density on surface against stem (no. per mm) | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.641 |
| 0.747 |
| Stomata density on inner surface (no. per mm) | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.2 |
|
| 0.918 |
| Outer epidermis thickness (µm) | 21.0 ± 1.1 | 21.5 ± 1.1 | 21.6 ± 1.1 | 21.8 ± 1.3 | 20.5 ± 0.7 | 18.6 ± 1.0 | 0.492 | 0.223 | 0.217 |
| Inner epidermis thickness (µm) | 10.8 ± 0.5 | 10.7 ± 0.3 | 10.7 ± 0.3 | 11.4 ± 0.3 | 12.1 ± 0.5 | 11.0 ± 0.4 | 0.368 |
| 0.411 |
| Palisade parenchyma thickness (µm) | 83.0 ± 5.5 | 82.9 ± 8.4 | 83.9 ± 10.6 | 87.8 ± 5.5 | 75.0 ± 6.6 | 78.5 ± 13.7 | 0.739 | 0.688 | 0.731 |
| Spongy parenchyma thickness (µm) | 85.4 ± 4.9 | 80.6 ± 4.7 | 70.5 ± 6.5 | 88.1 ± 7.6 | 85.4 ± 5.5 | 79.3 ± 3.6 | 0.127 | 0.206 | 0.807 |
| Palisade/spongy parenchyma ratio | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.477 | 0.254 | 0.548 |
| Intercellular space, palisade (%) | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.986 | 0.523 | 0.105 |
| Intercellular space, spongy (%) | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.0 |
| 0.705 | 0.368 |
| Intercellular space total (%) | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.548 | 0.399 | 0.851 |
P values from LMM ANOVA are shown, with P < 0.1 emboldened. See main text for pairwise comparisons by Bonferroni test.
Leaf anatomy variables of B. nana under long-term control (C), shading (S), warming (W), fertilization (F), fertilization + shading (FS) and fertilization + warming (FW) treatments. T = climate treatment; Fert = fertilization; T x Fert = climate treatment x fertilization
| Leaf anatomy |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | S | W | F | FS | FW | T | Fert | T × Fert | |
|
| |||||||||
| Leaf thickness (µm) | 210.8 ± 11.3 | 202.0 ± 14.1 | 215.2 ± 9.2 | 226.2 ± 8.4 | 222.3 ± 9.9 | 246.4 ± 9.7 | 0.210 |
| 0.742 |
| Glandular trichome density (no. per mm2) | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 4.5 ± 1.2 | 0.392 | 0.301 | 0.153 |
| Stomata density (no. per mm2) | 116.0 ± 5.7 | 96.7 ± 10.9 | 123.8 ± 12.4 | 115.4 ± 13.9 | 91.7 ± 10.7 | 124.9 ± 7.4 |
| 0.833 | 0.964 |
| Upper epidermis thickness (µm) | 26.4 ± 0.9 | 27.6 ± 1.3 | 22.9 ± 2.2 | 28.7 ± 1.5 | 29.4 ± 1.1 | 29.6 ± 0.8 | 0.260 |
| 0.160 |
| Lower epidermis thickness (µm) | 14.1 ± 0.7 | 15.8 ± 0.6 | 13.2 ± 1.1 | 15.4 ± 1.1 | 16.8 ± 1.1 | 16.3 ± 1.2 | 0.164 |
| 0.433 |
| Palisade parenchyma thickness (µm) | 67.5 ± 6.3 | 55.4 ± 11.6 | 67.4 ± 1.3 | 76.1 ± 8.4 | 61.7 ± 5.9 | 80.8 ± 6.6 |
| 0.109 | 0.872 |
| Spongy parenchyma thickness (µm) | 97.0 ± 4.9 | 103.6 ± 6.0 | 104.4 ± 7.7 | 104.4 ± 2.6 | 114.1 ± 7.9 | 123.4 ± 5.9 | 0.126 |
| 0.636 |
| Palisade/spongy parenchyma ratio | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| 0.783 | 0.926 |
| Intercellular space palisade (%) | 17.5 ± 2.1 | 28.8 ± 3.2 | 21.8 ± 2.5 | 21.3 ± 3.4 | 21.8 ± 1.3 | 19.2 ± 2.9 |
| 0.382 | 0.157 |
| Intercellular space, spongy (%) | 60.4 ± 2.7 | 75.0 ± 2.7 | 63.4 ± 4.4 | 68.5 ± 4.0 | 70.5 ± 2.4 | 74.5 ± 3.7 |
|
|
|
| Intercellular space, total (%) | 40.1 ± 2.4 | 57.2 ± 2.6 | 45.2 ± 3.8 | 50.0 ± 3.3 | 52.7 ± 2.8 | 49.8 ± 2.9 |
| 0.196 |
|
P values from LMM ANOVA are shown, with P < 0.1 emboldened. See main text for pairwise comparisons by Bonferroni test.