Literature DB >> 35028949

Bayesian hierarchical finite mixture of regression for histopathological imaging-based cancer data analysis.

Yunju Im1, Yuan Huang1, Jian Huang2, Shuangge Ma1.   

Abstract

Cancer is heterogeneous, and for seemingly similar cancer patients, the associations between an outcome/phenotype and covariates can be different. To describe such differences, finite mixture of regression (FMR) and other modeling techniques have been developed. "Classic" FMR analysis has usually been based on clinical, demographic, and molecular variables. More recently, histopathological imaging data-which is a byproduct of biopsy and enjoys broader data availability and higher cost-effectiveness-has been increasingly used in cancer modeling, although it is noted that its application to cancer FMR analysis still remains limited. In this article, we further advance cancer FMR analysis based on histopathological imaging data. Significantly advancing from the existing analyses under heterogeneity and homogeneity, our goal is to simultaneously use two types of histopathological imaging features, which are extracted based on domain-specific biomedical knowledge and using automated signal processing software, respectively. A significant modeling/methodological advancement is that, to reflect the "increased resolution" of the second type of imaging features over the first type, we impose a hierarchy in the mixture structures. An effective and flexible Bayesian approach is proposed. Simulation shows its competitiveness over several alternatives. The TCGA lung cancer data is analyzed, and interesting heterogeneous structures different from using the alternatives are found. Overall, this study provides a new venue for FMR analysis for cancer and other complex diseases.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; cancer; finite mixture of regression; hierarchy; histopathological imaging data

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35028949      PMCID: PMC8881390          DOI: 10.1002/sim.9309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

Review 1.  Review of free software tools for image analysis of fluorescence cell micrographs.

Authors:  V Wiesmann; D Franz; C Held; C Münzenmayer; R Palmisano; T Wittenberg
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Mixture models with a prior on the number of components.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Miller; Matthew T Harrison
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Hierarchical cancer heterogeneity analysis based on histopathological imaging features.

Authors:  Mingyang Ren; Qingzhao Zhang; Sanguo Zhang; Tingyan Zhong; Jian Huang; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Histopathological imaging-based cancer heterogeneity analysis via penalized fusion with model averaging.

Authors:  Baihua He; Tingyan Zhong; Jian Huang; Yanyan Liu; Qingzhao Zhang; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 1.701

5.  ConvPath: A software tool for lung adenocarcinoma digital pathological image analysis aided by a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Shidan Wang; Tao Wang; Lin Yang; Donghan M Yang; Junya Fujimoto; Faliu Yi; Xin Luo; Yikun Yang; Bo Yao; ShinYi Lin; Cesar Moran; Neda Kalhor; Annikka Weissferdt; John Minna; Yang Xie; Ignacio I Wistuba; Yousheng Mao; Guanghua Xiao
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 8.143

6.  Integrative analysis of histopathological images and chromatin accessibility data for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Siwen Xu; Zixiao Lu; Wei Shao; Christina Y Yu; Jill L Reiter; Qianjin Feng; Weixing Feng; Kun Huang; Yunlong Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes.

Authors:  Anne E Carpenter; Thouis R Jones; Michael R Lamprecht; Colin Clarke; In Han Kang; Ola Friman; David A Guertin; Joo Han Chang; Robert A Lindquist; Jason Moffat; Polina Golland; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features.

Authors:  Kun-Hsing Yu; Ce Zhang; Gerald J Berry; Russ B Altman; Christopher Ré; Daniel L Rubin; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Integrative analysis of imaging and transcriptomic data of the immune landscape associated with tumor metabolism in lung adenocarcinoma: Clinical and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Hongyoon Choi; Kwon Joong Na
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Histopathological imaging features- versus molecular measurements-based cancer prognosis modeling.

Authors:  Sanguo Zhang; Yu Fan; Tingyan Zhong; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.