Literature DB >> 35028686

Risk factors for the development of a parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Niu Niu1, Shizheng Du2, Dongliang Yang3, Liuliu Zhang4, Bainv Wu1, Xiaoxu Zhi4, Jun Li4, Dejing Xu4, Yinan Zhang5, Aifeng Meng6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common and serious complication in patients with enterostomy, but there is no current consensus for the risk factors for PSH from previous studies. Therefore, this study systematically analyzed the risk factors for PSH to provide a reference for prevention and treatment of this condition.
METHODS: Seven databases and 3 registers were systematically searched from database inception to January, 2021. Study quality was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Review Manager 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. The data that could not be combined quantitatively were only analyzed qualitatively.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies with 2031 patients were included. Higher BMI (OR, 1.29; 95% CI,1.02-1.63), older age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), female (OR, 2.55; 95% CI,1.39-4.67), lager aperture size (OR, 2.8; 95%CI, 1.78-4.42), transperitoneal stoma creation (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.33-4.35), and lager waist circumference (OR, 1.01; 95% CI,1.0-1.01) were significant risk factors for PSH. The laparoscopic approach was not a risk factor for PSH (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 0.83-5.27). Other risk factors, including the thickness of abdominal subcutaneous fat, no mesh, a stoma not through the middle of the rectus abdominis, atrophy of left lower medial part of rectus abdominis, α1(III) procollagen expression level, emergency surgery, no preoperative stoma site marking, end colostomy, smoking, diabetes, peristomal infection, severe abdominal distention, severe cough, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, operation time and hypertension, were significant on the multivariate analysis of each individual study.
CONCLUSIONS: The current available evidence showed that higher BMI, older age, female, larger aperture size, the creation of a transperitoneal stoma, and a larger waist circumference were independent risk factors for PSH. For factors without exact cutoff value, further explorations are needed in the future. In addition, reference to the limited number of studies in the pooled analysis, these factors still need to be interpreted carefully.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Parastomal hernia; Patients with enterostomy; Risk factors; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35028686     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04068-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  26 in total

1.  Risk factors for parastomal hernia: based on radiological definition.

Authors:  Sung Yeon Hong; Seung Yeop Oh; Jae Hee Lee; Do Yoon Kim; Kwang Wook Suh
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-12-26

Review 2.  European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.

Authors:  S A Antoniou; F Agresta; J M Garcia Alamino; D Berger; F Berrevoet; H-T Brandsma; K Bury; J Conze; D Cuccurullo; U A Dietz; R H Fortelny; C Frei-Lanter; B Hansson; F Helgstrand; A Hotouras; A Jänes; L F Kroese; J R Lambrecht; I Kyle-Leinhase; M López-Cano; L Maggiori; V Mandalà; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; M Prudhomme; T Rautio; N Smart; M Śmietański; M Szczepkowski; C Stabilini; F E Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Parastomal hernia: a growing problem with new solutions.

Authors:  Christopher T Aquina; James C Iannuzzi; Christian P Probst; Kristin N Kelly; Katia Noyes; Fergal J Fleming; John R T Monson
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  Risk factors for parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Keita Kojima; Takatoshi Nakamura; Takeo Sato; Yasumi Matsubara; Masanori Naito; Keishi Yamashita; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 5.  Parastomal hernia.

Authors:  P W G Carne; G M Robertson; F A Frizelle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy.

Authors:  Jan De Raet; Georges Delvaux; Patrick Haentjens; Yves Van Nieuwenhove
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Atrophic change of the abdominal rectus muscle significantly influences the onset of parastomal hernias beyond existing risk factors after end colostomy.

Authors:  K Nagayoshi; S Nagai; K Hisano; Y Mizuuchi; H Fujita; M Nakamura
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Yeun Ju Sohn; Sun Mi Moon; Ui Sup Shin; Sun Hee Jee
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-31

9.  Risk factors for parastomal hernia in Japanese patients with permanent colostomy.

Authors:  Kimihiko Funahashi; Takayuki Suzuki; Yasuo Nagashima; Satoshi Matsuda; Junichi Koike; Hiroyuki Shiokawa; Mitsunori Ushigome; Kenichiro Arai; Tomoaki Kaneko; Akiharu Kurihara; Hironori Kaneko
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Parastomal hernia - current knowledge and treatment.

Authors:  Roman Styliński; Adam Alzubedi; Sławomir Rudzki
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 1.195

View more
  1 in total

1.  Surgical treatment strategy for recurrent parastomal hernia: Experiences from 17 cases.

Authors:  Li Luan; Qiaonan Liu; Changjin Cui; Yugang Cheng; Guangyong Zhang; Bo Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.