Literature DB >> 3502806

Prescriptive v. exploratory psychotherapy. Outcomes of the Sheffield Psychotherapy Project.

D A Shapiro1, J Firth.   

Abstract

Prior research suggests that psychotherapeutic techniques which differ in their contents are quite similar in their outcomes. Outcome data are reported from a study designed to maximise sensitivity to technique effects on outcome in a clinically realistic setting, and to permit detailed analysis of the relations between content, immediate impact, and outcome of therapy. Forty professional and managerial workers with depression or anxiety received eight sessions of Prescriptive (cognitive/behavioural) and eight sessions of Exploratory (relationship-oriented) therapy in a crossover design, with each client seeing the same therapist throughout. Outcome was assessed by standard interview and questionnaire methods. The results favoured Prescriptive therapy, although this difference was of moderate extent. The outcome was largely unaffected by the order in which the two methods were offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3502806     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.151.6.790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  3 in total

1.  Can psychotherapists function as their own controls? Meta-analysis of the crossed therapist design in comparative psychotherapy trials.

Authors:  Fredrik Falkenström; John C Markowitz; Hanske Jonker; Björn Philips; Rolf Holmqvist
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Source of stress in women junior house officers.

Authors:  J Firth-Cozens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-14

3.  Measuring outcome in counselling: a brief exploration of the issues.

Authors:  A J Hazzard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.386

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.