| Literature DB >> 35028031 |
Feng-Chou Cheng1,2, Ling-Hsia Wang3, Tzu-Chiang Lin4, Julia Yu-Fong Chang5,6,7, Chun-Pin Chiang5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Dentist manpower; Local practitioners; Oversupply and uneven distribution of dentists; Physicians
Year: 2021 PMID: 35028031 PMCID: PMC8739755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.07.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
The numbers of population, dentists, physicians, and local practitioners in each prefecture of Taiwan from Taisho 12 (1923) to Taisho 13 (1924).
| Prefecture | Population | Number of dentists | Number of dentists per 100,000 people | Population served by each dentist | Physicians | Number of physicians per 100,000 people | Population served by each physician | Local practi-tioners | Number of local practi-tioners per 100,000 people | Population served by each local practitioner | Physicians plus local practi-tioners | Number of physicians plus local practitioners per 100,000 people | Population served by each physician plus local practitioner | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public | Private | Total | |||||||||||||
| 1923 | |||||||||||||||
| Taipei | 796,269 | 28 | 3.52 | 28,438 | 98 | 154 | 252 | 31.65 | 3160 | 109 | 13.69 | 7305 | 361 | 45.34 | 2206 |
| Hsinchu | 590,713 | 5 | 0.85 | 118,143 | 7 | 73 | 80 | 13.54 | 7384 | 195 | 33.01 | 3029 | 275 | 46.55 | 2148 |
| Taichung | 838,026 | 15 | 1.79 | 55,868 | 16 | 164 | 180 | 21.48 | 4656 | 122 | 14.56 | 6869 | 302 | 36.04 | 2775 |
| Tainan | 1,005,083 | 22 | 2.19 | 45,689 | 33 | 188 | 221 | 21.99 | 4548 | 106 | 10.55 | 9482 | 327 | 32.53 | 3074 |
| Kaohsiung | 567,547 | 14 | 2.47 | 40,539 | 15 | 98 | 113 | 19.91 | 5023 | 51 | 8.99 | 11,128 | 164 | 28.90 | 3461 |
| Taitung | 41,459 | 2 | 4.82 | 20,730 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 36.18 | 2764 | 0 | 0 | – | 15 | 36.18 | 2764 |
| Hualien | 52,824 | 1 | 1.89 | 52,824 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 39.75 | 2515 | 0 | 0 | – | 21 | 39.75 | 2515 |
| Overall | 3,891,921 | 87 | 2.24 | 44,735 | 180 | 702 | 882 | 22.66 | 4413 | 583 | 14.98 | 6676 | 1465 | 37.64 | 2657 |
| Gini coefficient | – | 0.18 | – | – | 0.16 | – | – | 0.20 | – | – | 0.05 | – | – | ||
| 1924 | |||||||||||||||
| Taipei | 810,068 | 35 (4) | 4.32 | 23,145 | 112 | 129 | 241 | 29.75 | 3361 | 99 | 12.22 | 8183 | 340 | 41.97 | 2383 |
| (Taipei City) | (191,135) | (25) | (13.08) | (7645) | (68) | (76) | (144) | (75.34) | (1327) | (24) | (12.56) | (7964) | (168) | (87.90) | (1138) |
| Hsinchu | 597,579 | 4 | 0.67 | 149,395 | 45 | 45 | 90 | 15.06 | 6640 | 187 | 31.29 | 3196 | 277 | 46.35 | 2157 |
| Taichung | 855,153 | 12 | 1.40 | 71,263 | 45 | 151 | 196 | 22.92 | 4363 | 114 | 13.33 | 7501 | 310 | 36.25 | 2759 |
| Tainan | 1,019,813 | 24 (1) | 2.35 | 42,492 | 60 | 167 | 227 | 22.26 | 4493 | 103 | 10.10 | 9901 | 330 | 32.36 | 3090 |
| Kaohsiung | 577,971 | 20 | 3.46 | 28,899 | 40 | 95 | 135 | 23.36 | 4281 | 55 | 9.52 | 10,509 | 190 | 32.87 | 3042 |
| Taitung | 41,922 | 1 | 2.39 | 41,922 | 13 | 2 | 15 | 35.78 | 2795 | 0 | 0 | – | 15 | 35.78 | 2795 |
| Hualien | 54,200 | 1 | 1.85 | 54,200 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 42.44 | 2357 | 0 | 0 | – | 23 | 42.44 | 2357 |
| Overall | 3,956,706 | 97 (5) | 2.45 | 40,791 | 326 | 601 | 927 | 23.43 | 4268 | 558 | 14.10 | 7091 | 1485 | 37.53 | 2664 |
| Gini coefficient | – | 0.27 | – | – | 0.05 | – | – | 0.19 | – | – | <0.01 | – | – | ||
The official statistics distinguished dentists in private dental clinics and in hospitals in 1924. The total number of hospital dentists was 5 in 1924. Of these 5 dentists, there were 4 in Taipei Prefecture and one in Tainan Prefecture.
The numbers of population, dentists, physicians, and local practitioners in each region of Taiwan from Taisho 12 (1923) to Taisho 13 (1924).
| Regions of Taiwan | Population | Dentists | Physicians | Local practitioners | Physicians plus local practitioners | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| 1923 | ||||||||||
| Northern | 1,386,982 | 35.64% | 33 | 37.93% | 332 | 37.64% | 304 | 52.14% | 636 | 43.41% |
| Central | 838,026 | 21.53% | 15 | 17.24% | 180 | 20.41% | 122 | 20.93% | 302 | 20.61% |
| Southern | 1,572,630 | 40.41% | 36 | 41.38% | 334 | 37.87% | 157 | 26.93% | 491 | 33.52% |
| Eastern | 94,283 | 2.42% | 3 | 3.45% | 36 | 4.08% | 0 | 0 | 36 | 2.46% |
| Total | 3,891,921 | 100% | 87 | 100% | 882 | 100% | 583 | 100% | 1465 | 100% |
| 1924 | ||||||||||
| Northern | 1,407,647 | 35.58% | 39 | 40.21% | 331 | 35.71% | 286 | 51.25% | 617 | 41.55% |
| Central | 855,153 | 21.61% | 12 | 12.37% | 196 | 21.14% | 114 | 20.43% | 310 | 20.88% |
| Southern | 1,597,784 | 40.38% | 44 | 45.36% | 362 | 39.05% | 158 | 28.32% | 520 | 35.02% |
| Eastern | 96,122 | 2.43% | 2 | 2.06% | 38 | 4.10% | 0 | 0 | 38 | 2.56% |
| Total | 3,956,706 | 100% | 97 | 100% | 927 | 100% | 558 | 100% | 1485 | 100% |
Figure 1Correlation of dentist index and doctor index (physicians, local practitioners, and physicians plus local practitioners) in Taiwan in 1923 and 1924.
Upper (1923):
: The regression between dentist index and physician index (n = 7): y = 0.8494x + 13.209, R2 = 0.3826 (P = 0.14).
: The regression between dentist index and local practitioner index (n = 7): y = −0.5783x + 170.22, R2 = 0.0291 (P = 0.72).
: The regression between dentist index and physician plus local practitioner index (n = 7): y = −0.4913x + 149.85, R2 = 0.3969 (P = 0.13).
Lower (1924):
: The regression between dentist index and physician index (n = 7): y = 0.3292x + 57.326, R2 = 0.0675 (P = 0.57).
: The regression between dentist index and local practitioner index (n = 7): y = −1.1282x + 210.89, R2 = 0.102 (P = 0.49).
: The regression between dentist index and physician plus local practitioner index (n = 7): y = −0.2634x + 116.19, R2 = 0.153 (P = 0.39).
Figure 2Correlation of the numbers of dentists and doctors (physicians, local practitioners, and physicians plus local practitioners) in Taiwan in 1923 and 1924.
Upper (1923):
: The regression between the numbers of dentists and physicians (n = 7): y = 0.1064x – 0.9829, R2 = 0.9495 (P < 0.001).
: The regression between the numbers of dentists and local practitioners (n = 7): y = 0.0551x + 7.839, R2 = 0.1432 (P = 0.40)
: The regression between the numbers of dentists and physicians plus local practitioners (n = 7): y = 0.0588x + 0.1327, R2 = 0.6768 (P < 0.05).
Lower (1924):
: The regression between the numbers of dentists and physicians (n = 7): y = 0.1239x – 2.5559, R2 = 0.7892 (P < 0.01).
: The regression between the numbers of dentists and local practitioners (n = 7): y = 0.0528x + 9.6501, R2 = 0.0736 (P = 0.56)
: The regression between the numbers of dentists and physicians plus local practitioners (n = 7): y = 0.0664x – 0.223, R2 = 0.5152 (P = 0.07).