| Literature DB >> 35027610 |
Waqas Ashraf1, Umar Khan2, Amnah S Al-Johani3, Naveed Ahmed4, Syed Tauseef Mohyud-Din5, Ilyas Khan6, Mulugeta Andualem7.
Abstract
The dynamics of nanofluid by considering the role of imposed Lorentz forces, thermal radiations and velocity slip effects over a vertically convectively heated surface is a topic of huge interest. Therefore, the said study is conducted for Al2O3-H2O nanofluid. Mathematical modelling of the problem is done via nanofluid effective correlations comprising the influences of freezing temperature, molecular diameter and similarity transformations. The results for multiple parameters are plotted and provide comprehensive discussion. From the analysis, it is examined that Al2O3-H2O nanofluid motion drops by strengthening Lorentz forces. The temperature in the nanofluid (Al2O3-H2O) is improved by inducing viscous dissipation effects (Ec number), surface convection (Biot number) and thermal radiations (Rd). Moreover, the shear stresses at the surface decreased due to higher magnetic field effects and rises due to velocity slip. A significant rise in Local Nusselt number is observed due to thermal radiations and Biot effects. Finally, enhanced heat transport mechanism in Al2O3-H2O is examined than a conventional liquid. Therefore, nanofluids are better for industrial applications and the uses of conventional liquids are limited due to low thermal conductivity.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35027610 PMCID: PMC8758704 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04587-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The flow scenerio of Al2O3-H2O.
Thermophysical characteristics T = 310 K[19].
| Properties | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | 33 | – |
Figure 2against (a) M and (b) S.
Figure 3against (a) n and (b) c.
Figure 4against (a) M and (b) S.
Figure 5against (a) Ec and (b) Bi.
Figure 6against (a) Rd and (b) M.
Figure 7against (a) M and (b) S.
Figure 8against (a) S and (b) M.
Figure 9against (a) Rd and (b) Bi.
Figure 10Streamlines against (a) and (b)
Figure 11Streamlines against (a) M = 6 and (b) M = 8.
Ranges of the parameters for the velocity and temperature fields.
| Name of parameter | Range of variation | Name of parameter | Range of variation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1–2.0 | 0.1–1.1 | ||
| 0.1–2.0 | 0.1–1.6 | ||
| 0.1–2.0 | 0.1–1.1 | ||
| 0.1–1.2 | – | – |
Comparison of present study with previously reported studies.
| Khan et al.[ | Khan et al.[ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|