| Literature DB >> 35027581 |
Dong In Kim1, Ji Won Lee1,2, Rak Hyun Jeong1,2, Jin-Hyo Boo3,4.
Abstract
Over the past number of years, the power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells has remained at 25.5%, reflecting a respectable result for the general incorporation of organometallic trihalide perovskite solar cells. However, perovskite solar cells still suffer from long-term stability issues. Perovskite decomposes upon exposure to moisture, thermal, and UV-A light. Studies related to this context have remained ongoing. Recently, research was mainly conducted on the stability of perovskite against non-radiative recombination. This study improved a critical instability in perovskite solar cells arising from non-radiative recombination and UV-A light using a passivation layer. The passivation layer comprised a polyaniline (PANI) polymer as an interfacial modifier inserted between the active layer and the electron transport layer. Accordingly, the UV-A light did not reach the active layer and confined the Pb2+ ions at PANI passivation layer. This study optimized the perovskite solar cells by controlling the concentration, thickness and drying conditions of the PANI passivation layer. As a result, the efficiency of the perovskite solar cell was achieved 15.1% and showed over 84% maintain in efficiency in the ambient air for one month using the 65 nm PANI passivation layer.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35027581 PMCID: PMC8758721 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04547-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Graphical images of the PANI passivation layer (PPL), based on the solvent used.
Figure 2(a) The UV–Vis transmittance of glass with the PPL. (b) X-ray diffraction of the perovskite layer with/without PPL.
Figure 3(a) The SEM image of the PPL (cross section image). (b) The thickness of the PPL and (c) the transmittance of the PPL according to its thickness.
Figure 4(a) The J–V curve and (b) the time-dependent evolution of efficiency (c) the J–V curve hysteresis of the perovskite solar cell with the PPL.
Photovoltaic performance parameters summarized J–V measurements with different PPL thickness.
| Sample | Jsc (mA/cm2) | Voc (V) | FF (%) | PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | 17.95 | 0.96 | 62.1 | 10.7 |
| 65 nm | 23.71 | 0.99 | 64.2 | 15.1 |
| 100 nm | 20.10 | 0.98 | 64.1 | 12.7 |
| 135 nm | 13.40 | 0.98 | 63.2 | 11.0 |
| 170 nm | 16.30 | 0.98 | 64.4 | 10.3 |
Figure 5(a) The circuit and (b) the fill factor curve of the solar cell and (c) the series resistance and (d) the shunt resistance of the perovskite solar cell with PPL.
Comparison of series and shunt resistances of perovskite solar cell with different PPL thickness.
| Base | 65 nm | 100 nm | 135 nm | 170 nm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rs (Ω) | 16.70 | 6.12 | 10.23 | 13.71 | 17.12 |
| Rsh (Ω) | 5157.43 | 9122.47 | 8247.47 | 7250.49 | 4952.32 |
Figure 6(a) The PL intensity and (b) the impedance of the perovskite solar cell with the PPL.
Scheme 1(a) Schematic diagram of carrier transfer processes in perovskite solar cells and (b) Energy band diagram of perovskite solar cells with PPL.
Efficiency comparison of the results of other group reported in ambient air process perovskite solar cell.
| YYYY.MM | PCE (%) | Cell area (cm2) | Device structure | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015.04 | 10.1 | 0.24 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag | [ |
| 2015.09 | 18.0 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/Ca/Al | [ | |
| 2015.09 | 9.4 | 0.092 | FTO/TiO2/Al2O3 + Perovskite/SWCNTs/PMMA/Ag | [ |
| 2016.10 | 12.0 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/C60/BCP/Ag | [ | |
| 2016.10 | 16.3 | 0.05 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/PDINO/Al | [ |
| 2017.01 | 18.1 | 0.1 | ITO/Poly-TPD/Perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | [ |
| 2017.02 | 15.6 | 0.126 | FTO/TiO2/Perovskite/ZrO2/Carbon | [ |
| 2018.01 | 18.7 | 4.85 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | [ |
| 2018.12 | 17.1 | 0.1 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | [ |
| This work | 15.1 | 0.16 | FTO/TiO2/Perovskite/Spiro-MeOTAD/Ag |