Literature DB >> 35027482

[89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 PET Correlates with Response to Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic Melanoma B-targeted Therapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer.

Supum Lee1, Alessandra Cavaliere1, Jean-Dominique Gallezot1, Tibor Keler2, Sharon K Michelhaugh3, Erika Belitzky1, Michael Liu1, Tim Mulnix1, Stephen E Maher4, Alfred L M Bothwell4,5, Fangyong Li6, Manali Phadke6, Sandeep Mittal3,7, Bernadette Marquez-Nostra1.   

Abstract

There is a need for prognostic markers to select patients most likely to benefit from antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapy. We quantified the relationship between pretreatment PET imaging of glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma B (gpNMB) with 89Zr-labeled anti-gpNMB antibody ([89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011) and response to ADC therapy (CDX-011) in triple-negative breast cancer. First, we compared different PET imaging metrics and found that standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor-to-heart SUV ratios were sufficient to delineate differences in radiotracer uptake in the tumor of four different cell- and patient-derived tumor models and achieved high standardized effect sizes. These tumor models with varying levels of gpNMB expression were imaged with [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 followed by treatment with a single bolus injection of CDX-011. The percent change in tumor volume relative to baseline (% CTV) was then correlated with SUVmean of [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 uptake in the tumor. All gpNMB-positive tumor models responded to CDX-011 over 6 weeks of treatment, except one patient-derived tumor regrew after 4 weeks of treatment. As expected, the gpNMB-negative tumor increased in volume by 130 ± 59% at endpoint. The magnitude of pretreatment SUV had the strongest inverse correlation with the % CTV at 2-4 weeks after treatment with CDX-011 (Spearman ρ = -0.8). However, pretreatment PET imaging with [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 did not inform on which tumor types will regrow over time. Other methods will be needed to predict resistance to treatment. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35027482      PMCID: PMC8898259          DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.009


  31 in total

1.  Imaging activated T cells predicts response to cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Israt S Alam; Aaron T Mayer; Idit Sagiv-Barfi; Kezheng Wang; Ophir Vermesh; Debra K Czerwinski; Emily M Johnson; Michelle L James; Ronald Levy; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Puregmaa Khongorzul; Cai Jia Ling; Farhan Ullah Khan; Awais Ullah Ihsan; Juan Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 3.  Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for cancer therapy: Strategies, challenges, and successes.

Authors:  Meghdad Abdollahpour-Alitappeh; Majid Lotfinia; Tohid Gharibi; Jalal Mardaneh; Behrouz Farhadihosseinabadi; Pegah Larki; Babak Faghfourian; Koushan Sineh Sepehr; Kazem Abbaszadeh-Goudarzi; Ghasem Abbaszadeh-Goudarzi; Behrooz Johari; Mohammad Reza Zali; Nader Bagheri
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Evaluation of [89Zr]trastuzumab-PET/CT in differentiating HER2-positive from HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Farrokh Dehdashti; Ningying Wu; Ron Bose; Michael J Naughton; Cynthia X Ma; Bernadette V Marquez-Nostra; Philipp Diebolder; Cedric Mpoy; Buck E Rogers; Suzanne E Lapi; Richard Laforest; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  ImmunoPET with Anti-Mesothelin Antibody in Patients with Pancreatic and Ovarian Cancer before Anti-Mesothelin Antibody-Drug Conjugate Treatment.

Authors:  Laetitia E Lamberts; Catharina W Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; Eva J ter Weele; Frederike Bensch; Michiel M Smeenk; Johannes Voortman; Otto S Hoekstra; Simon P Williams; Bernard M Fine; Daniel Maslyar; Johan R de Jong; Jourik A Gietema; Carolien P Schröder; Alphons H H Bongaerts; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Henk M W Verheul; Sandra M Sanabria Bohorquez; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Elisabeth G E de Vries
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Antibody-drug conjugates: recent advances in conjugation and linker chemistries.

Authors:  Kyoji Tsuchikama; Zhiqiang An
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 14.870

7.  Preclinical PET imaging of glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma B in triple negative breast cancer: feasibility of an antibody-based companion diagnostic agent.

Authors:  Bernadette V Marquez-Nostra; Supum Lee; Richard Laforest; Laura Vitale; Xingyu Nie; Krzysztof Hyrc; Tibor Keler; Thomas Hawthorne; Jeremy Hoog; Shunqiang Li; Farrokh Dehdashti; Cynthia X Ma; Suzanne E Lapi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-01

Review 8.  Novel antibody-drug conjugates for triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Aiko Nagayama; Neelima Vidula; Leif Ellisen; Aditya Bardia
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Development of [89Zr]ZrDFO-amivantamab bispecific to EGFR and c-MET for PET imaging of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Cavaliere; Suxia Sun; Supum Lee; Jacob Bodner; Ziqi Li; Yiyun Huang; Sheri L Moores; Bernadette Marquez-Nostra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Application of Immuno-PET in Antibody-Drug Conjugate Development.

Authors:  Kendra S Carmon; Ali Azhdarinia
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.