Literature DB >> 350271

Nonspecific interactions of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with native and denatured DNA: differences in the binding behavior of core and holoenzyme.

P L deHaseth, T M Lohman, R R Burgess, M T Record.   

Abstract

We have investigated the nonspecific interactions of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase core and holoenzyme with double-stranded (ds) and single-stranded (ss) DNA. Binding constants for these interactions as functions of such solution variables as monovalent and/or divalent cation concentration, temperature, or pH were determined by the method of deHaseth et a. [deHaseth, P.L., Gross, C.A., Burgess, R.R. and Record, M.T. (1977), Biochemistry 16, 4777--4783] from analysis of the elution of the proteins from small columns containing immobilized DNA. This technique, although as yet empirical, has been demonstrated to yield accurate binding constants fot the nonspecific interation of lac repressor with ds DNA. We find that observed binding constants (Kobsd) are extraordinarily sensitive functions of the monovalent cation concentration for the interactions of both core and holoenzyme with ds DNA. In the absence of divalent cations, the derivatives --(d log Kobsd/d log [Na+]) are 11 +/- 2 for the holo--ds DNA interaction and 21 +/- 3 for the core--ds DNA interaction. Consequently, approximately 11 and 21 low-molecular-weight ions are released, iin the thermodynamic sense, in the formation of the holo--ds and core--ds complexes, respectively (Record, M.T., Jr., Lohman, T.M., and deHaseth, P.L. (1976), J. Mol. Biol. 107, 145--158; Record, M.T., Jr., Anderson, C.F., and Lohman, T.M. (1978), Q. Rev. Biophys., in press). Ion release is a thermodynamic driving force for these nonspecific interactions and causes the stability of the complexes to increase very substantially with a reduction in monovalent ion concnetration. Possible molecular models which account for the different salt sensitivities of the holo--ds and core--ds complexes are discussed. Effects of the competitive ligand Mg2+ on these interactions are also examined. Substantial ion release (approximately 18 monovalent ions) also accompanies the interaction of either holo or core polymerase with ss DNA. Over the range of ion concentrations investigated the holo--ss interaction is substantially stronger than the core--ss interaction; furthermore, we conclude that the interactions of polymerase with ss DNA are, in general, stronger than the nonspecific interations of the enzyme with ds DNA. It is likely that the nonspecific interactions of RNA polymerase with DNA have physiological relevance. Not only is it plausible to assume that the same regions of the protein are involved in both specific and nonspecific interactions, but in addition nonspecific interactions of RNA polymerase and DNA may play role in determining the availability of this protein, in both the thermodynamic and the kinetic sense, for promoter binding and RNA chain initiation [von Hippel. P.H., Revzin, A., Gross, C.A., and Wang, A.C. (1974), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 71, 4808--4812]. Consequently, the strong dependences of the nonspecific interactions of RNA polymerase on ionic conditions suggest the possibility of a modulating role of ion concentrations in the control of transcription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 350271     DOI: 10.1021/bi00602a006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  38 in total

1.  Ionic interactions between PRNA and P protein in Bacillus subtilis RNase P characterized using a magnetocapture-based assay.

Authors:  Jeremy J Day-Storms; S Niranjanakumari; Carol A Fierke
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Insights into transcriptional regulation and sigma competition from an equilibrium model of RNA polymerase binding to DNA.

Authors:  Irina L Grigorova; Naum J Phleger; Vivek K Mutalik; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Monitoring RNA transcription in real time by using surface plasmon resonance.

Authors:  Sandra J Greive; Steven E Weitzel; Jim P Goodarzi; Lisa J Main; Zvi Pasman; Peter H von Hippel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  RNA polymerase approaches its promoter without long-range sliding along DNA.

Authors:  Larry J Friedman; Jeffrey P Mumm; Jeff Gelles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Binding of the unorthodox transcription activator, Crl, to the components of the transcription machinery.

Authors:  Patrick England; Lars F Westblade; Gouzel Karimova; Véronique Robbe-Saule; Françoise Norel; Annie Kolb
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: the comings and goings of RNA polymerase.

Authors:  P L deHaseth; M L Zupancic; M T Record
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Sigma factors from E. coli, B. subtilis, phage SP01, and phage T4 are homologous proteins.

Authors:  M Gribskov; R R Burgess
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-08-26       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Metalloregulator CueR biases RNA polymerase's kinetic sampling of dead-end or open complex to repress or activate transcription.

Authors:  Danya J Martell; Chandra P Joshi; Ahmed Gaballa; Ace George Santiago; Tai-Yen Chen; Won Jung; John D Helmann; Peng Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Growth-rate-dependent partitioning of RNA polymerases in bacteria.

Authors:  Stefan Klumpp; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Identification of a nucleic acid-binding region within the largest subunit of Drosophila melanogaster RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  R E Kontermann; M Kobor; E K Bautz
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.