Yingzhe Yuan1,2, Kali S Thomas3,4, Courtney H Van Houtven5,6, Megan E Price1, Steven D Pizer1,2, Austin B Frakt1,2,7, Melissa M Garrido1,2. 1. Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center (PEPReC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 4. Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports for Vulnerable Veterans, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 5. Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 6. Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 7. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rural residents face more barriers to healthcare access, including challenges in receiving home- and community-based long-term services, compared to urban residents. Self-directed services provide flexibility and choice in care options and may be particularly well suited to help older adults with multiple chronic conditions and functional limitations who reside in rural areas remain independent and live in the community. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study to understand whether differences in health outcomes between Veteran-Directed Care (VDC), a self-directed Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-paid care program, and other VHA-paid home- and community-based personal care services vary in rural/urban location. The sample included 37,395 veterans receiving VHA-paid home- and community-based long-term care services in FY17. Our primary outcomes were changes in monthly incidence of VHA or VHA-paid community acute care admissions, nursing home admissions, and emergency department (ED) visits. We used fixed effects logistic regression models on unmatched and coarsened exact matched cohorts, stratified by rural/urban location. RESULTS: Both urban and rural VDC recipients were significantly less likely to be admitted to VHA-paid nursing homes, compared to those receiving other VHA-paid personal care services (rural: incremental effect = -0.22, [-0.30, -0.14]; urban: incremental effect = -0.14, [-0.20, -0.07]). Rural, but not urban, VDC enrollees had significantly fewer VHA-paid acute care admissions and ED visits, relative to recipients of other VHA-paid personal care services (acute care, rural: incremental effect = -0.07, 95% CI = [-0.14, -0.01], urban: incremental effect = -0.01, [-0.06, 0.03]; ED, rural: incremental effect = -0.08, [-0.14, -0.02], urban: incremental effect = 0.01, [-0.03, 0.05]). CONCLUSIONS: VDC recipients had fewer incidents of potentially avoidable VHA-paid health care use, compared to similar veterans receiving other VHA-paid personal care services. These differences were more pronounced among rural VDC recipients than urban VDC recipients.
BACKGROUND: Rural residents face more barriers to healthcare access, including challenges in receiving home- and community-based long-term services, compared to urban residents. Self-directed services provide flexibility and choice in care options and may be particularly well suited to help older adults with multiple chronic conditions and functional limitations who reside in rural areas remain independent and live in the community. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study to understand whether differences in health outcomes between Veteran-Directed Care (VDC), a self-directed Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-paid care program, and other VHA-paid home- and community-based personal care services vary in rural/urban location. The sample included 37,395 veterans receiving VHA-paid home- and community-based long-term care services in FY17. Our primary outcomes were changes in monthly incidence of VHA or VHA-paid community acute care admissions, nursing home admissions, and emergency department (ED) visits. We used fixed effects logistic regression models on unmatched and coarsened exact matched cohorts, stratified by rural/urban location. RESULTS: Both urban and rural VDC recipients were significantly less likely to be admitted to VHA-paid nursing homes, compared to those receiving other VHA-paid personal care services (rural: incremental effect = -0.22, [-0.30, -0.14]; urban: incremental effect = -0.14, [-0.20, -0.07]). Rural, but not urban, VDC enrollees had significantly fewer VHA-paid acute care admissions and ED visits, relative to recipients of other VHA-paid personal care services (acute care, rural: incremental effect = -0.07, 95% CI = [-0.14, -0.01], urban: incremental effect = -0.01, [-0.06, 0.03]; ED, rural: incremental effect = -0.08, [-0.14, -0.02], urban: incremental effect = 0.01, [-0.03, 0.05]). CONCLUSIONS: VDC recipients had fewer incidents of potentially avoidable VHA-paid health care use, compared to similar veterans receiving other VHA-paid personal care services. These differences were more pronounced among rural VDC recipients than urban VDC recipients.
Authors: R Turner Goins; Kimberly A Williams; Mary W Carter; Melinda Spencer; Tatiana Solovieva Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2005 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Alecia S Clary; Kathleen R Perry; Merle Edwards-Orr; Edward J Miech; Courtney VanHoutven; James L Rudolph; Kali S Thomas; Nina Sperber Journal: J Gerontol Soc Work Date: 2020-11-09
Authors: Momotazur Rahman; Elizabeth M White; Caroline Mills; Kali S Thomas; Eric Jutkowitz Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Mark Sciegaj; Kevin J Mahoney; Abby J Schwartz; Lori Simon-Rusinowitz; Isaac Selkow; Dawn M Loughlin Journal: J Disabil Policy Stud Date: 2014-11-11