Heather Davila1,2, Weiwen Ng3, Odichinma Akosionu3, Mai See Thao4, Tricia Skarphol3, Beth A Virnig3, Roland J Thorpe5, Tetyana P Shippee3. 1. VA Iowa City Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 2. University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 3. School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 4. Anthropology, Global Religions, and Cultures, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA. 5. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite research documenting gender differences in numerous outcomes in later life, we know little about gender differences in quality of life (QoL) for nursing home (NH) residents. This study examines the relationship between gender and residents' QoL, including possible reasons for differences observed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a mixed-methods design including surveys with a random sample of Minnesota NH residents using a multidimensional measure of QoL (n = 9,852), resident clinical data, facility-level characteristics (n = 364), interviews with residents (n = 64), and participant observations. We used linear mixed models and thematic analysis of resident interviews and observations to examine possible gender-related differences in residents' QoL. RESULTS: After controlling for individual and facility characteristics, men reported lower overall QoL than women, including significantly lower ratings in several QoL domains. In interviews, men noted being less satisfied with activities than women, having fewer friends, and being less able to rely on family for support. Some women described the NH as a place of respite, but men more often described being dissatisfied with life in the NH and undesirable for long-term living. Our observations were consistent with interview findings but provide additional nuances, such as that some men organized their own social groups. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that men and women experience QoL differently in NHs, with men reporting lower QoL in several domains. Tailoring more activities for men and finding ways to strengthen relationships for men in NHs could help reduce the gender differences in QoL we observed. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America 2022.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite research documenting gender differences in numerous outcomes in later life, we know little about gender differences in quality of life (QoL) for nursing home (NH) residents. This study examines the relationship between gender and residents' QoL, including possible reasons for differences observed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a mixed-methods design including surveys with a random sample of Minnesota NH residents using a multidimensional measure of QoL (n = 9,852), resident clinical data, facility-level characteristics (n = 364), interviews with residents (n = 64), and participant observations. We used linear mixed models and thematic analysis of resident interviews and observations to examine possible gender-related differences in residents' QoL. RESULTS: After controlling for individual and facility characteristics, men reported lower overall QoL than women, including significantly lower ratings in several QoL domains. In interviews, men noted being less satisfied with activities than women, having fewer friends, and being less able to rely on family for support. Some women described the NH as a place of respite, but men more often described being dissatisfied with life in the NH and undesirable for long-term living. Our observations were consistent with interview findings but provide additional nuances, such as that some men organized their own social groups. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that men and women experience QoL differently in NHs, with men reporting lower QoL in several domains. Tailoring more activities for men and finding ways to strengthen relationships for men in NHs could help reduce the gender differences in QoL we observed. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America 2022.
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Sarah A McGraw; Leslie Curry; Alison Buckser; Kinda L King; Stanislav V Kasl; Ronald Andersen Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Howard B Degenholtz; Rosalie A Kane; Robert L Kane; Boris Bershadsky; Kristen C Kling Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: V Mor; K Branco; J Fleishman; C Hawes; C Phillips; J Morris; B Fries Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Obinna Francis Onunkwor; Sami Abdo Radman Al-Dubai; Philip Parikial George; John Arokiasamy; Hemetram Yadav; Ankur Barua; Hassana Ojonuba Shuaibu Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Barbara Resnick; Marie Boltz; Elizabeth Galik; Sarah Holmes; Steven Fix; Shijun Zhu Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 1.571