| Literature DB >> 35024498 |
Kathryn Braden1,2, Harrison J Stratton3, Daniela Salvemini1,2, Rajesh Khanna3,4.
Abstract
Treatment with anti-neoplastic agents can lead to the development of chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), which is long lasting and often refractory to treatment. This neuropathic pain develops along dermatomes innervated by peripheral nerves with cell bodies located in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). The voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7 is expressed at high levels in peripheral nerve tissues and has been implicated in the development of CIPN. Efforts to develop novel analgesics directly inhibiting NaV1.7 have been unsuccessful, and our group has pioneered an alternative approach based on indirect modulation of channel trafficking by the accessory protein collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2). We have recently reported a small molecule, compound 194, that inhibits CRMP2 SUMOylation by the E2 SUMO-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 (Cai et al. , Sci. Transl. Med. 2021 13(6 1 9):eabh1314). Compound 194 is a potent and selective inhibitor of NaV1.7 currents in DRG neurons and reverses mechanical allodynia in models of surgical, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain, including spared nerve injury and paclitaxelinduced peripheral neuropathy. Here we report that, in addition to its reported effects in rats, 194 also reduces mechanical allodynia in male CD-1 mice treated with platinumcomplex agent oxaliplatin. Importantly, treatment with 194 prevented the development of mechanical allodynia when co-administered with oxaliplatin. No effects were observed on the body weight of animals treated with oxaliplatin or 194 throughout the study period. These findings support the notion that 194 is a robust inhibitor of CIPN that reduces established neuropathic pain and prevents the emergence of neuropathic pain during treatment with multiple anti-neoplastic agents in both mice and rats.Entities:
Keywords: CIPN, chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy; CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats; CRMP2; CRMP2, collapsin response mediator protein 2; Chemotherapy; DRG, dorsal root ganglia; NaV1.7; NaV1.7, voltage-gated sodium channel family 1 isoform 7; Neuropathy; Oxaliplatin; PWT, paw withdrawal threshold; SNI, spared nerve injury; SUMO, smallubiquitin like modifier; SUMOylation; TTX, tetrodotoxin; TTX-R, tetrodotoxin-resistant; TTX-S, tetrodotoxin-sensitive; Ubc9, E2 SUMO-conjugating enzyme; t-CSM, tat-CRMP2 SUMOylation motif
Year: 2021 PMID: 35024498 PMCID: PMC8733339 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2021.100082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurobiol Pain ISSN: 2452-073X
Fig. 1194 reduces and prevents the development of mechanical allodynia in male CD-1 mice with oxaliplatin induced peripheral neuropathy. (A) Compound 194 discovery and validation. 194 was designed using the structure–activity relationships of compounds obtained from a virtual screen against a pocket encompassing the SUMOylation target on CRMP2 (PDB 2GSE (Stenmark et al., 2007)). 194 effectively blocks SUMOylation of CRMP2 by the E2 SUMO-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 (PDB 5D2M (Cappadocia et al., 2015)) to reduce cell-surface trafficking of NaV1.7 (PDB 6J8H (Shen et al., 2019)). This results in dramatically reduced sodium currents and amelioration of pain in animal models. Graphic generated with BioRender. (B) Experimental design for behavioral assessment of oral administration of 194 on reversal of oxaliplatin induced CIPN. Baseline paw withdrawal threshold (PWT, in grams) was established at Day 0, followed by induction of CIPN with administration of oxaliplatin between Day 0–4 and Day 10–14 as indicated by the blue box. Mechanical allodynia was evaluated by measuring PWTs at regular intervals as indicated in the timeline. On day 25, mice were orally administered 194 and paw withdrawal thresholds were tested over six hours as indicated. (C) Mice treated with Vehicle and 194 displayed stable PWTs over the experimental time course (gray). Those treated with oxaliplatin developed robust mechanical allodynia that peaked at Day 25 (blue). Treatment with 194 completely reversed the oxaliplatin induced mechanical allodynia to vehicle treated levels 3 h following oral administration. Data are mean ± SD; Two-Way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison *p < 0.05 vs D0; †p < 0.05 vs D25; Oxaliplatin + 194n = 4; Vehicle + 194n = 5. (D) Experimental outline of prevention experiments performed in male CD-1 mice. Baseline PWTs was first established at Day 0, followed by treatment with Vehicle + Vehicle, Oxaliplatin + Vehicle, or Oxaliplatin + 194. PWTs were then assessed at regular intervals as indicated. Blue boxes indicate periods of treatment with oxaliplatin. (E) Mice treated with Vehicle + Vehicle had stable PWTs across the experimental time course (gray). Treatment with Oxaliplatin + Vehicle demonstrated robust mechanical allodynia in male mice (pink). Treatment with Oxaliplatin + 194 prevented the development of mechanical allodynia in these mice (blue). (F) Evaluation of the body weight of mice across the experimental period revealed no significant differences between groups of animals. Data are mean ± SD; Two-Way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison †p < 0.05 vs Oxaliplatin + Vehicle; *p < 0.05 vs D0; Vehicle + Vehicle n = 4; Oxaliplatin n = 5 per group. Experimenters were blinded to the treatment conditions. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)