| Literature DB >> 35024422 |
Young Sun Joo1, Jisun Kim2, Jungae Lee3, Ick-Joong Chung4.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Exposure to fine particulate matter has adverse effects on mental health outcomes. However, no empirical study has yet been conducted on mechanisms of how and why exposure to fine particulate matter can affect mental health outcomes, especially focusing on children. In addition, children living in poverty may be more vulnerable to fine particulate matter.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; Family poverty; Fine particulate matter; Mental health; Physical activity
Year: 2021 PMID: 35024422 PMCID: PMC8732086 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SSM Popul Health ISSN: 2352-8273
Fig. 1Analytic model.
Fig. 2Spatial distribution of the sample neighborhood.
Summary statistics for all variables.
| Variables | M/% | SD | Min | Max | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| Fine particulate matter (㎍/㎥) | 129.98 | 28.03 | 78 | 218 | 79 |
| Standardized fine particulate matter | 0 | 1 | −1.84 | 3.02 | 79 |
| | |||||
| Child's depressive symptoms | 1.91 | 0.62 | 1 | 4 | 4704 |
| Standardized depressive symptoms | 0 | 1 | −1.50 | 3.33 | 4704 |
| | |||||
| Physical activity (minutes) | 29.23 | 45.38 | 0 | 600 | 4607 |
| Standardized physical activity | 0 | 1 | −0.64 | 12.68 | 4607 |
| | |||||
| Family poverty | 14% | 4546 | |||
| | |||||
| Children | |||||
| Girl | 53% | 4704 | |||
| Age | 4704 | ||||
| Elementary school child | 27% | ||||
| Middle school child | 32% | ||||
| High school child | 41% | ||||
| Self-reported grades at school | 5.99 | 2.15 | 1 | 10 | 4582 |
| Primary caregiver | |||||
| Types of primary caregiver | 4704 | ||||
| Mother | 83% | ||||
| Father | 16% | ||||
| Others | 1% | ||||
| Age | 45.49 | 4.66 | 23 | 79 | 4416 |
| Married | 87% | 4704 | |||
| Number of family members | 4.14 | 0.92 | 2 | 15 | 4703 |
| Graduated college | 58% | 4646 | |||
| Homeowner | 67% | 4677 | |||
| Urbanicity | 4704 | ||||
| Live in urban area | 48% | ||||
| Live in suburban area | 37% | ||||
| Live in rural area | 15% | ||||
| Neighborhood poverty rate | 3.66 | 0.68 | 2.10 | 4.65 | 79 |
Fig. 3Distribution of depressive symptoms, physical activity, and fine particulate matter.
Unconditional mean model.
| Outcomes | Fixed Effect | Random Effect | ICC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Neighborhood-level | Children-level | |||||
| Coef. | SE | SD | Variance Component | SD | Variance Component | ||
| Physical activity | 0.006 | 0.022 | 0.161 | 0.026* | 0.986 | 0.977* | 0.026 |
| Depressive symptoms | −0.004 | 0.030 | 0.255 | 0.065* | 0.972 | 0.944* | 0.064 |
Mediation effect of physical activity (N = 4161).
| Predictors | Direct effect | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical activity | Depressive symptoms | |||||||
| Unstandardized | Standardized | Unstandardized | Standardized | |||||
| b | [95% CI] | β | b | [95% CI] | β | |||
| Fine particulate matter (10 μg/m3) | −0.05 | ** | [-0.09, −0.02] | −0.07 | 0.00 | [-0.01, 0.01] | 0.01 | |
| Physical activity (30 min) | - | - | −0.01 | ** | [-0.02, −0.01] | −0.05 | ||
| Girl | −0.45 | *** | [-0.58, −0.31] | −0.20 | 0.21 | *** | [0.18, 0.25] | 0.34 |
| (Elementary school child = 0) | ||||||||
| Middle school child | −0.41 | *** | [-0.61, −0.22] | −0.19 | 0.18 | *** | [0.13, 0.23] | 0.30 |
| High school child | −0.74 | *** | [-0.94, −0.54] | −0.33 | 0.24 | *** | [0.18, 0.29] | 0.38 |
| Self-reported grades at school | −0.04 | * | [-0.07, −0.01] | −0.04 | −0.06 | *** | [-0.07, −0.05] | −0.21 |
| (Mother is a primary caregiver = 0) | ||||||||
| Father is a primary caregiver | 0.04 | [-0.14, 0.23] | 0.02 | −0.02 | [-0.07, 0.03] | −0.03 | ||
| Other person is a primary caregiver | −0.82 | [-0.12, 1.77] | 0.37 | 0.00 | [-0.25, 0.26] | 0.00 | ||
| Primary caregiver's age | 0.01 | [-0.01, 0.03] | 0.02 | 0.01 | ** | [0.00, 0.01] | 0.05 | |
| Primary caregiver is married | −0.08 | [-0.29, 0.13] | −0.04 | −0.03 | [-0.09, 0.02] | −0.06 | ||
| Number of family member | 0.01 | [-0.06, 0.09] | 0.01 | −0.01 | [-0.03, 0.01] | −0.01 | ||
| Primary caregiver has a college degree | −0.10 | [-0.24, 0.03] | −0.05 | 0.02 | [-0.02, 0.05] | 0.02 | ||
| Primary caregiver is a homeowner | −0.10 | [-0.25, 0.04] | −0.05 | −0.03 | [-0.06, 0.01] | −0.04 | ||
| (Live in urban area = 0) | ||||||||
| Live in suburban area | 0.25 | * | [0.04, 0.46] | 0.11 | 0.04 | [-0.01, 0.09] | 0.06 | |
| Live in rural area | 0.04 | [-0.21, 0.28] | 0.02 | 0.05 | [-0.01, 0.11] | 0.08 | ||
| Neighborhood poverty rate | −0.01 | [-0.23, 0.03] | −0.03 | −0.03 | [-0.06, 0.00] | −0.03 | ||
| ICC | 0.017 | 0.015 | ||||||
*p < .05; **p < .01, ***p < .001.
Fig. 4Direct, indirect, and total effects (N = 4161).
Decomposition of direct, indirect, and total effects (N = 4161).
| Model path | Direct | Indirect | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | [95% CI] | β | [95% CI] | β | [95% CI] | ||
| Fine particulate → Physical activity → Depressive symptoms | 0.003 | [-0.01, 0.01] | 0.001 | * | [0.00, 0.00] | 0.004 | [-0.01, 0.01] |
*p < .05.
Moderation effect of family poverty.
| Predictors | Physical activity | Depressive symptoms | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unstandardized | Standardized | Unstandardized | Standardized | |||||
| b | [95% CI] | β | b | [95% CI] | β | |||
| Fine particulate matter | −0.05 | ** | [-0.08, −0.01] | −0.06 | 0.00 | [-0.01, 0.01] | 0.02 | |
| Poverty | 0.36 | [-0.52, 1.24] | 0.01 | 0.09 | [-0.15, 0.33] | 0.04 | ||
| Fine particulate | −0.03 | [-0.09, 0.04] | −0.03 | −0.00 | [-0.02, 0.01] | −0.02 | ||
| Physical activity | - | - | −0.02 | ** | [-0.02, −0.01] | −0.05 | ||
| Physical activity | - | - | −0.01 | [-0.02, 0.02] | −0.00 | |||
| Girl | −0.46 | *** | [-0.60, −0.33] | −0.21 | 0.21 | *** | [0.17, 0.24] | 0.33 |
| (Elementary school child = 0) | ||||||||
| Middle school child | −0.39 | *** | [-0.58, −0.21] | −0.18 | 0.19 | *** | [0.14, 0.24] | 0.31 |
| High school child | −0.71 | *** | [-0.90, −0.51] | −0.32 | 0.24 | *** | [0.19, 0.29] | 0.39 |
| Self-reported grades at school | −0.04 | * | [-0.07, −0.00] | −0.03 | −0.06 | *** | [-0.07, −0.05] | −0.21 |
| (Mother is a primary caregiver = 0) | ||||||||
| Father is a primary caregiver | 0.07 | [-0.12, 0.25] | 0.03 | −0.01 | [-0.06, 0.04] | −0.02 | ||
| Other person is a primary caregiver | 0.74 | [-0.22, 1.70] | 0.33 | −0.03 | [-0.29, 0.23] | −0.05 | ||
| Primary caregiver's age | 0.01 | [-0.01, 0.03] | 0.02 | 0.01 | * | [0.00, 0.01] | 0.04 | |
| Primary caregiver is married | −0.08 | [-0.30, 0.14] | −0.04 | −0.01 | [-0.07, 0.05] | −0.02 | ||
| Number of family member | 0.01 | [-0.07, 0.09] | 0.00 | −0.01 | [-0.03, 0.01] | −0.02 | ||
| Primary caregiver has a college degree | −0.08 | [-0.22, 0.06] | −0.04 | 0.02 | [-0.02, 0.05] | 0.03 | ||
| Primary caregiver is a homeowner | −0.10 | [-0.24, 0.05] | −0.04 | −0.02 | [-0.06, 0.02] | −0.04 | ||
| (Live in urban area = 0) | ||||||||
| Live in suburban area | 0.20 | [-0.00, 0.40] | 0.09 | 0.04 | [-0.02, 0.09] | 0.06 | ||
| Live in rural area | 0.04 | [-0.20, 0.27] | 0.02 | 0.05 | [-0.01, 0.12] | 0.08 | ||
| Neighborhood poverty rate | −0.10 | [-0.23, 0.03] | −0.03 | −0.02 | [-0.06, 0.01] | −0.02 | ||
| ICC | 0.015 | 0.018 | ||||||
*p < .05; **p < .01, ***p < .001.